Abstract
In times of shifting media, communication shifts as well. With these changes, today we observe a fundamental change in trust attribution away from formerly established systems. Institutions and the classic media have been sources of trust for a long time but recipients nowadays would rather trust their family, friends, and even strangers with Rachel Botsman having shaped the term “Distributed Trust” to refer to this phenomenon. If it is no longer institutions people trust in, they trust individuals which bears the danger of arbitrariness as these individuals are not backed and monitored by any institutional tradition, reputation, or control. This becomes even more critical as (social) media paves the way for a tremendous amount of individuals to position themselves quickly and effortlessly on numerous channels 24/7. Whilst being exposed to this kind of sensory overload, people do not only have to consider whom to trust and whom not to multiple times a day, they furthermore have to decide at once. What does it take to assign or deny trust though? This article is concerned with the how exactly trust and communication are intertwined: Is it the voice itself which demands for trust or rather the content? If so, how does that content have to be structured to evoke trust? How is trust transported linguistically? And what role does the listener hold? As the established question is multi-layered, it is crucial to first define trust and the character traits that form it. Hereinafter—and only focusing on spoken language—paraverbal, nonverbal as well as content-related features leading to a development of trust on the listener’s side are compiled and described to answer the question “How can communication be utilized to build trust?”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Speech and Communication will be used as synonyms throughout this article as communication contains speech in its verbal and nonverbal form.
- 2.
This figure does not display the recipient of a given message despite their great importance because it is, for now, only concerned with building trust on the speaker’s side.
- 3.
Note: speaking rate is language-dependent, values may therefore change in comparison; the here listed numbers are representative for German.
- 4.
The study was conducted in a clinical environment with patient’s parents in the PICU. Findings can nonetheless be seen as being generally valid even outside this setting as the communicative behaviour resembles crisis communication and is therefore an exemplary extreme case of building trust by means of communication.
References
Adler RF, Iacobelli F, Gutstein Y (2015) Are you convinced? A Wizard of Oz study to test emotional vs. rational persuasion strategies in dialogues. Comput Hum Behav 57(April 2016):75–81
Bakir V, Barlow DM (2007) The age of suspicion. In: Bakir V, Barlow DM (eds) Communication in the age of suspicion. Trust and the media. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 3–8
Beattie G, Ellis AW (2017) The psychology of language and communication. Routledge, London
Berger T, Engel C, Meuret S, Fuchs M (2014) Alters- und geschlechtsspezifische Normwerte für Sprechstimmprofile in der Allgemeinbevölkerung: Erste Ergebnisse aus der Leipziger LIFE- Adult-Studie, 31. Wissenschaftliche Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie (DGPP) zusammen mit dem 5. Pädakustiker-Symposium der Akademie für Hörgeräte-Akustik. Viewed 21 Mar 2018, from http://www.egms.de/static/en/meetings/dgpp2014/14dgpp24.shtml
Botsman R (2018) Q&A: Rachel Botsman on the third trust revolution. Digit Bus Lawyer 20(2):10–11
Braet AC (1992) Ethos, pathos and logos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: a re-examination. Argumentation 6(3):307–320
Burgoon J, Birk T, Pfau M (1990) Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Hum Commun Res 17(1):140–169
Carbone T (1975) Stylistic variables as related to source credibility: a content analysis approach. Speech Monogr 42(1975):99–106
Comadena ME, Hunt SK, Simonds CJ (2007) The effects of teacher clarity, nonverbal immediacy, and caring on student motivation, affective and cognitive learning. Commun Res Rep 24(3):241–248
DeLemos D, Chen M, Romer A, Brydon K, Kastner K (2010) Building trust through communication in the intensive care unit: HICCC*. Pediatr Crit Care Med 11(3):378–384
Franke U (2016) Logopädisches Handlexikon. UTB, Stuttgart
Gebhard C (2012) Sprechtempo im Sprachvergleich: Eine Untersuchung phonologischer und kultureller Aspekte anhand von Nachrichtensendungen. Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Hamilton MA, Hunter JE, Burgoon M (1990) An empirical test of an axiomatic model of the relationship between language intensity and persuasion. J Lang Soc Psychol 9(1990):235–255
Hammer SS, Teufel-Dietrich A (2017) Stimmtherapie mit Erwachsenen: Was Stimmtherapeuten wissen sollten. Springer, Berlin
Hurwitz SD, Miron MS, Johnson BT (1992) Source credibility and the language of expert testimony. J Appl Soc Psychol 22(1992):1909–1939
Jackob N, Roessing T, Petersen T (2011) The effects of verbal and nonverbal elements in persuasive communication: findings from two multi-method experiments. Communications 36(2011):245–271
Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435(2005):673–676
Mika S (1981) Some determinants of source credibility. Pol Psychol Bull 12(1981):79–86
Montrey J (2005) An investigation of the effects of speakers’ vocal characteristics on ratings of confidence and persuasion. Ph.D. thesis, University of Central Florida
Ostermeier H (1967) Effects of type and frequency of reference upon perceived source credibility and attitude change. Speech Monogr 34(1967):137–144
Peters J, Hoetjes M (2017) The effect of gesture on persuasive speech. Proc Interspeech 2017:659–663
Pompino-Marschall B (2009) Einführung in die Phonetik. De Gruyter, Berlin
Reinsch NL Jr (1974) Figurative language and source credibility: a preliminary investigation and reconceptualization. Hum Commun Res 1(1974):75–80
Renn O, Levine D (1991) Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson RE, Stallen PJ (eds) Communicating risks to the public. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 175–217
Rompf SA (2015) Trust and rationality. An integrative framework for trust research. Springer, Wiesbaden
Rosenberg A, Hirschberg J (2005) Acoustic/prosodic and lexical correlates of charismatic speech. INTERSPEECH-2005, pp 513–516
Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad Manage Rev 23(3):393–404
Seltzer LJ, Ziegler TE, Pollak SD (2010) Social vocalizations can release oxytocin in humans. Proc R Soc B 277:2661–2666
Seltzer LJ, Prososki AR, Ziegler TE, Pollak SD (2012) Instant messages vs. speech: hormones and why we still need to hear each other. Evol Hum Behav 33(1):42–45
Shim HS, Park S, Chatterjee M, Scherer S, Sagae K, Morency L-P (2015) Acoustic and paraverbal indicators of persuasiveness in social multimedia. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP), pp 2239–2243
Vygotsky LS (1994) Extracts from thought and language and mind in society. In: Stierer B, Maybin J (eds) Language, literacy, and learning in educational practice: a reader. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp 45–58
Whorf B (1940) Science and linguistics. Technol Rev 42(6):229–231, 247–248, 207–219
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meck, AM. (2019). Communication and Trust: A Linguistic Analysis. In: Osburg, T., Heinecke, S. (eds) Media Trust in a Digital World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30774-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30774-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30773-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30774-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)