Abstract
Sustainable development of the natural resources that support our current standards of living is arguably one the biggest challenges of the Anthropocene. Institutions and policies alone however cannot guarantee that the right decisions are made. In this chapter, we argue that sound decisions must overcome the ethical dilemmas that experts face when encapsulating hypotheses of the real-world into numerical models. Using groundwater as an example, we show how the so-called complicity ethic may unfold during the process of designing management and policy interventions, and subsequently recommend eight guiding principles (a charter) that can be followed to reduce the likelihood that this complicity ethic takes place. We then introduce The Collaborative Pathway—a mediated modelling activity that synergistically blends the eight guiding principles of our ethics charter into a practical decision-making process. This approach is designed to foster community engagement, to improve the way sectoral risks and trade-offs are evaluated, and to help stakeholders understand what might drive a particular sector towards best- and worst-case outcomes. If done right and with the right tools and strategies, The Collaborative Pathway can become a useful framework to encode ethics, resilience, and sustainability in our decisions relating to the development and protection of any common-pool resource that maintains our humanity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal B (2000) Conceptualizing environmental collective action: why gender matters. Camb J Econ 24:283–310
Anderson MP, Woessner WW, Hunt RJ (2015) Applied groundwater modelling: simulation of flow and advective transport. Academic Press, San Diego
Barnosky AD, Hadly EA, Bascompte J, Berlow EL et al (2012) Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature 486:52–58
Basurto X, Gelcich S, Ostrom E (2013) The social-ecological systems framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries. Glob Environ Change 23:1366–1380
Bots PWG, van Daalen E (2008) Participatory model construction and model use in natural resource management: a framework for reflection. Syst Pract Action Res 21:389–407
Burris S, Drahos P, Shearing C (2005) Nodal governance. Aust J Legal Philos 30:30–58
Castilla JC, Manríquez P, Alvarado J, Rosson A et al (1998) Artisanal Caletas as units of production and co-managers of benthic invertebrates in Chile. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 125:407–413
Castilla JC (2012) Conservation and social-ecological systems in the 21st century of the anthropocen era. Contrib Sci 8(1):11–21
Castilla-Rho JC, Mariethoz G, Rojas R, Andersen MS, Kelly BF (2015) An agent-based platform for simulating complex human–aquifer interactions in managed groundwater systems. Environ Model Softw 73:305–323
Castilla-Rho JC (2017) Groundwater modelling with stakeholders: finding the complexity that matters. Groundwater 55:620–625
Castilla-Rho JC, Rojas R, Andersen MS, Holley C, Mariethoz G (2017) Social tipping points in global groundwater management. Nat Hum Behav 1:640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0181-7
Cohen AJ (2008) Negotiation, meet new governance: interests, skills, and selves. Law Soc Inq 33:501–562
Cosens B, Lance G, Chaffin B (2014) The adaptive water governance project: assessing law, resilience and governance in regional socio-ecological water systems facing a changing climate. Idaho Law Rev 1:1–27
Crutzen P, Stoermer EF (2000) The anthropocene. IGBP Glob Change Newsl 41:12–14
Dalin C, Wada Y, Thomas K, Puma MJ (2017) Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543:700–704
de Burca G, Keohane RO, Sabel C (2013) New modes of pluralist global governance. NY Univ J Int Law Politics 45:723–786
Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912
Deleuze G, Guattari F (1987) A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Dorf MC, Sabel CF (1998) A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Rev 98:267–473
Drahos P (2017) Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. Australian National University Press, Canberrra
Étienne M (2013) Companion modelling: a participatory approach to support sustainable development. Springer, Dordrecht
Epstein JM, Axtell R (1996) Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. Brookings Institution Press, Washington
Garmestani A, Allen CR, Cabezas H (2008) Panarchy, adaptive management and governance: policy options for building resilience. Nebr Law Rev 87:1036–1054
Garmestani A, Allen CR, Arnold C, Gunderson L (2014) Introduction. In: Garmestani AS, Allen C (eds) Social-ecological resilience and law. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 1–14
Gelcich S, Hughes TP, Olsson P, Folke C et al (2010) Navigating transformations in governance of Chilean marine coastal resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:16794–16799
Gleeson T, Wada Y, Bierkens MF, van Beek LPH (2012) Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 488:197–200
Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248
Holley C (2017) Environmental regulation and governance. In: Drahos Peter (ed) Regulatory theory: foundations and applications. Australian National University Press, Canberrra, pp 741–758
Holley C, Gunningham N, Shearing C (2012) The new environmental governance. Earthscan Publishing, Abingdon
Holley C, Sofronova E (2017) New environmental governance: adaptation, resilience and law. In: Hutter B (ed) Risk, resilience, inequality and environmental law. Edward Elgar Publsihing, London, pp 129–146
Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 16:46
Johnson N (2012) Simply complexity. Oneworld Publications, London
Karkkainen B, Fung A, Sabel C (2000) After backyard environmentalism: toward a performance-based regime of environmental regulation. Am Behav Sci 44:690–709
Krueger T, Page T, Hubacek K, Smtih L, Hiscock K (2012) The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling. Environ Model Softw 36:4–18
Kutz C (2007) Complicity: ethics and law for a collective world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lloyd WF (1833) Two lectures on the checks to population: delivered before the University of Oxford, in Michaelmas Term 1832. Oxford University Press, Oxford (cited in: Murota T, Takeshita K (eds) (2013) Local commons and democratic environmental governance. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, p 5)
McCay B, Acheson JA (1987) The culture and ecology of communal resources. University of Arizona Press, Tucson
Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2:175–220
Nourse V, Shaffer G (2014) Empiricism, experimentalism, and conditional theory. South Methodist Univ Law Rev 67:101–142
Ostrom E (1965) Public entrepreneurship: a case study in groundwater basin management. University of California, Los Angeles. Thesis. Available via http://hdl.handle.net/10535/3581. Accessed 5 July 2018
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ostrom E (2009) A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. The World Bank, vol 5095. Policy Research Working Paper, pp 1–54
Ostrom E, Janssen MA, Anderies JM (2007) Going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1004:15176–15178
Ostrom E, Dietz T, Doisak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (2002) The drama of the commons. National Academy Press, Washington
Peeters LJM (2017) Assumption hunting in groundwater modelling: find assumptions before they find you. Groundwater 55:665–669
Reeves HW, Zellner ML (2010) Linking MODFLOW with an agent-based land-use model to support decision making. Groundwater 48:649–660
Ruddiman WF (2013) The anthropocene. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 41(1):24
Sabel C, Fung A, Karkkainen B (1999) Beyond backyard environmentalism: how communities are quietly refashioning environmental regulation. Boston Rev 1–17
Sabel CF, Zeitlin J (2011) Experimentalist governance. In: Levi-Faur D (ed) The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford Publishing, Oxford, pp 169–183
Scheuerman WE (2004) Democratic experimentalism or capitalist synchronization? Critical reflections on directly-deliberative polyarchy. Can J Law Jurisprud 17:101
Scheffer M (2009) Critical transitions in nature and society, vol 16. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Suga Y (2013) The tragedy of the conceptual expansion of the commons. In: Murota Takeshi, Tekeshita Ken (eds) Local commons and democratic environmental governance. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 3–18
Taylor RG, Scalon B, Doll P, Rodel M et al (2013) Ground water and climate change. Nat Clim Change 3:322–329
Thaler R, Sunstein C (2009) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin Books, London
Van den Belt M (2004) Mediated modelling: a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington
Voss CI (2011a) Editor’s message: groundwater modelling fantasies—part 1, adrift in the details. Hydrogeol J 19:1281–1284
Voss CI (2011b) Editor’s message: Groundwater modelling fantasies—part 2, down to earth. Hydrogeol J 19:1455–1458
Wada Y, van Beek LPH, van Kempe CM, Reckman JWTM et al (2010) Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys Res Lett 37:L20402. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL04457137.20
Westermann O, Ashby J, Pretty J (2005) Gender and social capital: the importance of gender differences for the maturity and effectiveness of natural resource management groups. World Dev 33:1783–1799
Acknowledgements
J. C. Castilla-Rho acknowledges Peter Dupen from WaterNSW for his original ideas and interest in this work. Cameron Holley acknowledges financial support under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Project funding scheme (project numbers DP170100281 DP190101584). J. C. Castilla acknowledges financial support from “Cátedra Arauco in Environmental Ethic” and Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas and the Centro Interdisciplinario de Cambio Global, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
Conflict of Interests
We declare to have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Castilla-Rho, J.C., Holley, C., Castilla, J.C. (2020). Groundwater as a Common Pool Resource: Modelling, Management and the Complicity Ethic in a Non-collective World. In: Valera, L., Castilla, J. (eds) Global Changes. Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29443-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29443-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29442-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29443-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)