Skip to main content

Flexible Work Initiatives, Employee Workplace Well-Being, and Organizational Performance

A Review of Intervention Studies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook on Management and Employment Practices

Part of the book series: Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences ((HDBSOHS,volume 3))

Abstract

This chapter presents a review of intervention studies that examine the simultaneous impact of flexible work initiatives on both employee workplace well-being and organizational performance. We specifically focus on flexible work initiatives that change where (physical boundaries) and/or when (temporal boundaries) employees work (Thompson RJ et al, J Occup Organ Psychol 88:726–749, 2015). Examples include teleworking (spatial flexibility), compressed workweeks (temporal flexibility), and flexible work elements of new ways of working (time-spatial flexibility). We exclude initiatives that focus on contractual flexibility such as contract type and part-time work (cf. Joyce K et al, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD008009, 2010). As flexible work practices are often part of a more comprehensive set of human resource management (HRM) practices, we make use of the broader HRM literature to better understand the effects of flexible work practices on well-being and performance. In particular, we draw from three competing perspectives – the optimistic, pessimistic, and skeptical perspective (Peccei R, Human resource management and the search for the happy workplace. Inaugural address. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), Rotterdam, 2004) – which consider whether human resource practices result in mutual gains for the organization and the employee or whether conflicting outcomes occur (Guest D, Hum Resour Manag J 27:22–38, 2017; Peccei R, Human resource management and the search for the happy workplace. Inaugural address. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), Rotterdam, 2004; Van De Voorde K et al, Int J Manag Rev 14:391–407, 2012). Inspired by these approaches, our central review question is: “What type of organizational and employee gains, if any, are attained and what type of organizational and employee losses, if any, are incurred through the implementation of flexible work initiatives?” We discuss the key benefits and problems associated with flexible work initiatives in relation to organizational performance and well-being at work and the role the nature of flexible work initiatives plays in this relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie De Ruiter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

De Ruiter, M., Peters, P. (2022). Flexible Work Initiatives, Employee Workplace Well-Being, and Organizational Performance. In: Brough, P., Gardiner, E., Daniels, K. (eds) Handbook on Management and Employment Practices. Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29010-8_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics