Abstract
After a brief introduction of the term epistemology, the chapter presents an historical overview of most influential epistemological positions, pointing out especially those aspects that have proved to be relevant to psychology or which could be relevant to its future development. Positivism seems to be an indispensable starting point given its dominance in the first half of the twentieth century, even though it first appeared as a scientific program in the mid nineteenth century, in philosophy of Comte. As a new version of positivism named logical positivism or logical empiricism (Vienna Circle) provoked quite different critiques over decades (Popper, Quine, Husserl, Critical Theory, hermeneutics, feminist theories, communitarian epistemology), it follows a section dealing with critiques of positivist claims of certainty, of induction as a preferred mode of generating knowledge, of the unity of sciences, of atomistic representational model of knowledge, and of individualistic subject of knowing. Additionally it is referred to another, humanistic epistemic culture shaped in Renaissance under the influence of revival of the ancient Greek and Latin cultural legacy, which however remained less influential in shaping further developments. In spite of that, at the turn of the twentieth century, there were philosophers and psychologists (Dilthey, Wundt) who argued for a necessity to distinguish natural and human sciences and, correspondingly, to acknowledge that social and human sciences require specific modes of knowing (understanding) oriented toward grasping meaning of human experience and symbolic products objectified in human historical and sociocultural worlds. Summarizing implications of different epistemological positions for psychology, it is stated that epistemology of psychology is characterized, on the one hand, by a substantial influence of positivism and its natural-science model of knowledge, and on the other hand, by challenges posed by psychology’s subject matter to positivism. In conclusion, it is argued for a holistic, historically based and culturally shaped relational model of knowledge capable to integrate value dimension as an indispensable feature of human experience and human activity. In this way psychology and consequently teaching psychology can do justice to their subject matter – experience and activity of human beings as historical, social, and cultural beings living in a man-made world.
Gordana Jovanović is independent academic
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aristotle (2006). On the soul. (J. A. Smith, Trans.). Digireads.com. https://ia802609.us.archive.org/17/items/aristotledeanima005947mbp/aristotledeanima005947mbp.pdf. (Original work written 350B.C).
Baergen, R. (2006). Historical dictionary of epistemology. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. San Franciso, CA: Chandler Publishing Company.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
Cassirer, E. (1975). The philosophy of symbolic forms. Language. (R. Mannheim, Trans.).Yale University Press. (Original work appeared 1923).
Comte, A. (1865). A general view of positivism. (J. H. Bridges, Trans.). Trübner and Co. https://ia800908.us.archive.org/20/items/ageneralviewpos00comtgoog/ageneralviewpos00comtgoog.pdf
Croce, B. (1913). The philosophy of Giambattista Vico. (R. Collingwood, Trans.). The Macmilla Company. (Original work published 1911).
Danziger, K. (1999). Natural kinds, human kinds and historicity. In W. Maiers et al. (Eds.), Challenges to theoretical psychology (pp. 24–32). Captus Press.
Denzin, N. & Lincoln, I. (Eds.) (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5) SAGE. Los Angeles, CA
Descartes, R. (1971a). Discourse on the method. In Descartes philosophical writings (E. Anscombe & P. T. Geach, Eds. and Trans). (pp. 5–58). Bobb-Merrill Educational Publishing. (Original work published 1637).
Descartes, R. (1971b). Meditations on first philosophy. In Descartes philosophical writings (E. Anscombe & P. T. Geach, Eds. and Trans). (pp 59–124). Bobb-Merrill Educational Publishing. (Original work published 1641).
Dilthey, W. (1974). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie. In: W. Dilthey: Die gestige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosoiphie des Lebens (Gesammelte Schriften, B. 5) (pp. 139–240). Teubner. (First edition published 1894).
Dilthey, W. (1988). Introduction to the human sciences: An attempt to lay a foundation for the study of society and history. (R. Betanzos, Trans.). Harvester Wheatsheaf. (Original work published 1883).
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2006). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1960).
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interest (J. Shapiro, Trans.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1968).
Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and praxis. (J. Viertel, Trans.). Beacon Press.
Hacking, I. (1994). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 351–383). Clarendon Press.
Hankins, J. (Ed.). (2007). The Cambridge companion to Renaissance philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Haraway, D. (1988, Autumn). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from woman’s lives. Cornel University Press.
Horkheimer, M. (1937/2002). Traditional and critical theory. In Critical theory. Selected essays (pp. 188–244). (M. O’Connell et al., Trans.). Continuum.
Hume, D. (1998). In T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.), An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1748).
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936).
Jovanović, G. (2010). Historizing epistemology in psychology. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral, 44, 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9132-9
Jovanović, G. (2011). Toward a social history of qualitative research. History of the Human Sciences, 24(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111399334
Jovanović, G. (2019a). Cultural psychology as a human science. In G. Jovanović, L. Allolio-Näcke, & C. Ratner (Eds.), The challenges of cultural psychology. Historical legacies and future responsibilities (pp. 15–36). Routledge.
Jovanović, G. (2019b). The repression of cultural psychology in the history of psychology. In G. Jovanović, L. Allolio-Näcke, & C. Ratner (Eds.), The challenges of cultural psychology. Historical legacies and future responsibilities (pp. 169–185). Routledge.
Jovanović, G. (2019c). Wundt’s forgotten legacy and epistemological foundations of critical psychology. In K. Murakami, J. Cresswell, T. Kono, & T. Zitoun (Eds.), The ethos of theorizing (pp. 96–105). Captus University Press.
Jovanović, G. (2021). How psychology repressed its founding father Wilhelm Wundt. Human Arenas, 4, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00186-2
Koyre, A. (1971). Introduction. In Descartes philosophical writings (E. Anscombe & P. T. Geach, Eds. and Trans). (pp. vii–xliv). Bobb-Merrill Educational Publishing.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Kusch, M. (2002). Knowledge by agreement: The program of communitarian epistemology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Montaigne, M. (1923). Essays (C. Cotton, Trans,; W.R. Hazlitt, Ed.) Navarre Society. (Original work published 1580-1588). https://ia802902.us.archive.org/3/items/essaysofmontaign0001unse_p9k9/essaysofmontaign0001unse_p9k9.pdf
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). In C. Harshorn & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. (E. Cuckworth, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
Piaget, J. (1972a). Psychology and epistemology. Towards a theory of knowledge. Penguin.
Piaget, J. (1972b). Epistémologie des sciences de l’homme. Gallimard.
Plato. (1955). Phaedo. (R. S. Bluck, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work written between 387 and 376 B.C.)
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press.
Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181906
Quine, W. V. (1957). The scope and language of science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 8, 1–17. Northwestern University Press.
Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. Penguin.
Steinmetz, G. (Ed.) (2005). The politics of method in the human sciences. Positivism and its epistemological others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. In Zalta, E (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/
Toulmin, S. (1992). Kosmopolis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Valsiner, J. (2014a). Needed for cultural psychology: Methodology in a new key. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515941
Valsiner, J. (2014b). An invitation to cultural psychology. Sage.
Vico, G. (1990). On the study of methods of our time (E. Gianturco, Trans.). Cornel University Press. (Original work published 1709).
Vico, G. (1984). The new science (T. Bergin & M. Fisch, Trans). Cornel University Press. (Original work published 1725, third edition. 1744).
Watson, J. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177. https://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Watson/views.htm
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wundt, W. (1876). Über den Einfluß der Philosophie auf die Erfahrungswissenschaften. Akademische Antrittsrede. W. Engelmann.
Wundt, W. (1897). Outlines of psychology. (C. H. Judd, Trans.). Williams & Norgate, Stechert.
Wundt, W. (1900–1920). Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. (10 Vol.). Enke.
Wundt, W. (1913). Die Psychologie im Kampf ums Dasein. Kröner.
Wundt, W. (1921). Logik der Geisteswissenschaften. Vierte umgearbeitete Auflage. Enke.
Further reading
Adriana Kaulino, Teresa Matus (2021) Theoretical proposal for the relationship between epistemology and ethics in psychology. T&P, 31(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211002267
David Borges Florsheim, Lívia Mathias Simão (2021) Towards rethinking the primacy of foundationalism: Epistemology, dialogue, and ethics in psychopathology. T&P, 31(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320976918
Fairweather, A., & Zagzebski, L. (2001). Virtue epistemology. Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, A. (1985). The relation between epistemology and psychology. Synthese, 64(1), 29–68.
Grimm, S. (2016). How understanding people differs from understanding the natural world. Philosophical Issues. A Supplement to Nous, 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12068
Grimm, S., Baumberger, C., & Ammon, S. (Eds.) (2017). Explaining understanding. New York, NY: Routledge.
Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance. Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resuistant imaginations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Peiwei Li (2021) Knowing as being: Psychology, limits to knowledge, and an ethics of solidarity. T&P, 31(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320978703
Pita King, Darrin Hodgetts, Danilo Silva Guimarães (2021) Towards rethinking the primacy of epistemology in psychology: Introduction to the special section. Theory and Psychology, 31(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211003161
Theory and Psychology (2021, Vol 31 (2). Special section towards rethinking the primacy of epistemology in psychology.
Tore Dag Bøe (2021) Ethical realism before social constructionism. T&P, 31(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211004756
Veronica Hopner, James H. Liu (2021) Relational ethics and epistemology: The case for complementary first principles in psychology. T&P, 31(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320974103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Jovanović, G. (2023). Epistemology of Psychology. In: Zumbach, J., Bernstein, D.A., Narciss, S., Marsico, G. (eds) International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28745-0_54
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28745-0_54
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28744-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28745-0
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education