Skip to main content

Epistemology of Psychology

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 1588 Accesses

Abstract

After a brief introduction of the term epistemology, the chapter presents an historical overview of most influential epistemological positions, pointing out especially those aspects that have proved to be relevant to psychology or which could be relevant to its future development. Positivism seems to be an indispensable starting point given its dominance in the first half of the twentieth century, even though it first appeared as a scientific program in the mid nineteenth century, in philosophy of Comte. As a new version of positivism named logical positivism or logical empiricism (Vienna Circle) provoked quite different critiques over decades (Popper, Quine, Husserl, Critical Theory, hermeneutics, feminist theories, communitarian epistemology), it follows a section dealing with critiques of positivist claims of certainty, of induction as a preferred mode of generating knowledge, of the unity of sciences, of atomistic representational model of knowledge, and of individualistic subject of knowing. Additionally it is referred to another, humanistic epistemic culture shaped in Renaissance under the influence of revival of the ancient Greek and Latin cultural legacy, which however remained less influential in shaping further developments. In spite of that, at the turn of the twentieth century, there were philosophers and psychologists (Dilthey, Wundt) who argued for a necessity to distinguish natural and human sciences and, correspondingly, to acknowledge that social and human sciences require specific modes of knowing (understanding) oriented toward grasping meaning of human experience and symbolic products objectified in human historical and sociocultural worlds. Summarizing implications of different epistemological positions for psychology, it is stated that epistemology of psychology is characterized, on the one hand, by a substantial influence of positivism and its natural-science model of knowledge, and on the other hand, by challenges posed by psychology’s subject matter to positivism. In conclusion, it is argued for a holistic, historically based and culturally shaped relational model of knowledge capable to integrate value dimension as an indispensable feature of human experience and human activity. In this way psychology and consequently teaching psychology can do justice to their subject matter – experience and activity of human beings as historical, social, and cultural beings living in a man-made world.

Gordana Jovanović is independent academic

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle (2006). On the soul. (J. A. Smith, Trans.). Digireads.com. https://ia802609.us.archive.org/17/items/aristotledeanima005947mbp/aristotledeanima005947mbp.pdf. (Original work written 350B.C).

  • Baergen, R. (2006). Historical dictionary of epistemology. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. San Franciso, CA: Chandler Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1975). The philosophy of symbolic forms. Language. (R. Mannheim, Trans.).Yale University Press. (Original work appeared 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1865). A general view of positivism. (J. H. Bridges, Trans.). Trübner and Co. https://ia800908.us.archive.org/20/items/ageneralviewpos00comtgoog/ageneralviewpos00comtgoog.pdf

  • Croce, B. (1913). The philosophy of Giambattista Vico. (R. Collingwood, Trans.). The Macmilla Company. (Original work published 1911).

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1999). Natural kinds, human kinds and historicity. In W. Maiers et al. (Eds.), Challenges to theoretical psychology (pp. 24–32). Captus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. & Lincoln, I. (Eds.) (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5) SAGE. Los Angeles, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1971a). Discourse on the method. In Descartes philosophical writings (E. Anscombe & P. T. Geach, Eds. and Trans). (pp. 5–58). Bobb-Merrill Educational Publishing. (Original work published 1637).

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1971b). Meditations on first philosophy. In Descartes philosophical writings (E. Anscombe & P. T. Geach, Eds. and Trans). (pp 59–124). Bobb-Merrill Educational Publishing. (Original work published 1641).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1974). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie. In: W. Dilthey: Die gestige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosoiphie des Lebens (Gesammelte Schriften, B. 5) (pp. 139–240). Teubner. (First edition published 1894).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1988). Introduction to the human sciences: An attempt to lay a foundation for the study of society and history. (R. Betanzos, Trans.). Harvester Wheatsheaf. (Original work published 1883).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (2006). Truth and method. (J. Weinsheimer & D. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interest (J. Shapiro, Trans.). Beacon Press. (Original work published 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and praxis. (J. Viertel, Trans.). Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1994). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 351–383). Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, J. (Ed.). (2007). The Cambridge companion to Renaissance philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988, Autumn). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from woman’s lives. Cornel University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. (1937/2002). Traditional and critical theory. In Critical theory. Selected essays (pp. 188–244). (M. O’Connell et al., Trans.). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1998). In T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.), An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1748).

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanović, G. (2010). Historizing epistemology in psychology. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral, 44, 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9132-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanović, G. (2011). Toward a social history of qualitative research. History of the Human Sciences, 24(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111399334

  • Jovanović, G. (2019a). Cultural psychology as a human science. In G. Jovanović, L. Allolio-Näcke, & C. Ratner (Eds.), The challenges of cultural psychology. Historical legacies and future responsibilities (pp. 15–36). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanović, G. (2019b). The repression of cultural psychology in the history of psychology. In G. Jovanović, L. Allolio-Näcke, & C. Ratner (Eds.), The challenges of cultural psychology. Historical legacies and future responsibilities (pp. 169–185). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanović, G. (2019c). Wundt’s forgotten legacy and epistemological foundations of critical psychology. In K. Murakami, J. Cresswell, T. Kono, & T. Zitoun (Eds.), The ethos of theorizing (pp. 96–105). Captus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanović, G. (2021). How psychology repressed its founding father Wilhelm Wundt. Human Arenas, 4, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00186-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyre, A. (1971). Introduction. In Descartes philosophical writings (E. Anscombe & P. T. Geach, Eds. and Trans). (pp. vii–xliv). Bobb-Merrill Educational Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusch, M. (2002). Knowledge by agreement: The program of communitarian epistemology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Montaigne, M. (1923). Essays (C. Cotton, Trans,; W.R. Hazlitt, Ed.) Navarre Society. (Original work published 1580-1588). https://ia802902.us.archive.org/3/items/essaysofmontaign0001unse_p9k9/essaysofmontaign0001unse_p9k9.pdf

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). In C. Harshorn & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. (E. Cuckworth, Trans.). Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972a). Psychology and epistemology. Towards a theory of knowledge. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1972b). Epistémologie des sciences de l’homme. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1955). Phaedo. (R. S. Bluck, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work written between 387 and 376 B.C.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2181906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. (1957). The scope and language of science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 8, 1–17. Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, G. (Ed.) (2005). The politics of method in the human sciences. Positivism and its epistemological others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. In Zalta, E (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/

  • Toulmin, S. (1992). Kosmopolis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014a). Needed for cultural psychology: Methodology in a new key. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13515941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014b). An invitation to cultural psychology. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vico, G. (1990). On the study of methods of our time (E. Gianturco, Trans.). Cornel University Press. (Original work published 1709).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vico, G. (1984). The new science (T. Bergin & M. Fisch, Trans). Cornel University Press. (Original work published 1725, third edition. 1744).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177. https://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Watson/views.htm

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1876). Über den Einfluß der Philosophie auf die Erfahrungswissenschaften. Akademische Antrittsrede. W. Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1897). Outlines of psychology. (C. H. Judd, Trans.). Williams & Norgate, Stechert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1900–1920). Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. (10 Vol.). Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1913). Die Psychologie im Kampf ums Dasein. Kröner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1921). Logik der Geisteswissenschaften. Vierte umgearbeitete Auflage. Enke.

    Google Scholar 

Further reading

  • Adriana Kaulino, Teresa Matus (2021) Theoretical proposal for the relationship between epistemology and ethics in psychology. T&P, 31(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211002267

  • David Borges Florsheim, Lívia Mathias Simão (2021) Towards rethinking the primacy of foundationalism: Epistemology, dialogue, and ethics in psychopathology. T&P, 31(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320976918

  • Fairweather, A., & Zagzebski, L. (2001). Virtue epistemology. Essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1985). The relation between epistemology and psychology. Synthese, 64(1), 29–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, S. (2016). How understanding people differs from understanding the natural world. Philosophical Issues. A Supplement to Nous, 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12068

  • Grimm, S., Baumberger, C., & Ammon, S. (Eds.) (2017). Explaining understanding. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, J. (2013). The epistemology of resistance. Gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resuistant imaginations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiwei Li (2021) Knowing as being: Psychology, limits to knowledge, and an ethics of solidarity. T&P, 31(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320978703

  • Pita King, Darrin Hodgetts, Danilo Silva Guimarães (2021) Towards rethinking the primacy of epistemology in psychology: Introduction to the special section. Theory and Psychology, 31(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211003161

  • Theory and Psychology (2021, Vol 31 (2). Special section towards rethinking the primacy of epistemology in psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tore Dag Bøe (2021) Ethical realism before social constructionism. T&P, 31(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211004756

  • Veronica Hopner, James H. Liu (2021) Relational ethics and epistemology: The case for complementary first principles in psychology. T&P, 31(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320974103

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordana Jovanović .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Jovanović, G. (2023). Epistemology of Psychology. In: Zumbach, J., Bernstein, D.A., Narciss, S., Marsico, G. (eds) International Handbook of Psychology Learning and Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28745-0_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics