Abstract
The article examines the relationship between lean production and Industrie 4.0 focusing on the question of autonomy in the work process. In contrast to the claim made by official Industrie 4.0 concepts that the autonomy of the employees would increase, the authors see in the current implementation projects a tendency toward greater standardization and control of work. This is in continuity with concepts of lean production, but neglects the participation-oriented elements of lean production such as teamwork and shop-floor-based improvement activities. Our argument is developed by analyzing practical examples from three relevant fields (digital assistance systems, data-based process management, modular assembly). The conclusions of this chapter also discuss the extent to which the concept of individual autonomy is suitable for the assessment of Industrie 4.0 concepts, given the high levels of interdependence already achieved in production processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Acatech. (2015). Smart Maintenance für Smart Factories. Munich/Berlin.
Acatech & Forschungsunion. (2013). Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0. Berlin: Forschungsunion.
Adler, P. S. (2007). The Future of Critical Management Studies: A Paleo-Marxist Critique of Labour Process Theory. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1313–1345.
Audi. (2018). Fertigungsinseln statt Fließband. Retrieved from https://blog.audi.de/modulare-montage-bei-audi/. Accessed last 5 July 2018.
Bainbridge, L. (1983). “Ironies of Automation.” Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man–Machine Systems. Automatica, 19(6), 775–779.
Baumann, H. (2013). Order Picking Supported by Mobile Computing. Dissertation. Bremen.
Buer, S. V., Strandhagen, J. O., & Chan, F. T. (2018). The Link Between Industrie 4.0 and Lean Manufacturing: Mapping Current Research and Establishing a Research Agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 1–17.
Daimler. (2018). Arena2036. Retrieved from https://www.arena2036.de/de/. Last accessed 5 June 2018.
Dohse, K., Jürgens, U., & Malsch, T. (1984). Vom „Fordismus“ zum „Toyotismus“? Die Organisation der industriellen Arbeit in der japanischen Automobilindustrie. Leviathan, 12(4), 448–477.
Dombrowski, U., Richter, T., & Krenkel, P. (2017). Interdependencies of Industrie 4.0 & Lean Production Systems: A Use Cases Analysis. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1061–1068.
Evers, M., Krzywdzinski, M., & Pfeiffer, S. (2018). Designing Wearables for Use in the Workplace: The Role of Solution Developers. WZB Discussion Paper SP III 2018-301. Berlin.
Fucini, J., & Fucini, S. (1990). Working for the Japanese: Inside Mazda’s American Auto Plant. New York: Free Press.
Fujimoto, T. (1999). The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota. New York: Oxford University Press.
Graham, L. (1995). Subaru-Isuzu: Worker Response in a Nonunion Japanese Transplant. In B. Steve (Pub.), Lean Work: Empowerment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry (pp. 199–206). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Gronau, N. (2014). Enterprise Resource Planning. München: Oldenbourg.
Günther, G., Benisch, M., Dankl, A., & Isopp, J. (2015). Roadmap der Instandhaltung 4.0. Salzburg.
Günthner, W., Blomeyer, N., Reif, R., & Schedlbauer, M. (2009). Pick-by-vision: Augmented Reality unterstützte Kommissionierung. Garching.
Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2018). Arbeit 4.0: Pfadabhängigkeit statt Disruption. Soziologisches Arbeitspapier 52/2018. Dortmund.
Holweg, M. (2007). The Genealogy of Lean Production. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 420–437.
Ihara, R. (2007). Toyota’s Assembly Line: A View from the Factory Floor. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.
Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance. (1996). Autonomous Maintenance for Operators. Portland.
Jürgens, U. (2017). Lean Production/Toyotismus. In H. Hirsch-Kreinsen & H. Minssen (Eds.), Lexikon der Arbeits- und Industriesoziologie (pp. 204–207). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Jürgens, U., & Krzywdzinski, M. (2016). New Worlds of Work: Varieties of Work in Car Factories in the BRIC Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kagermann, H. (2014). Chancen von Industrie 4.0 nutzen. In T. Bauernhansl, M. Hompel, & B. Vogel-Heuser (Eds.), Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik (pp. 603–614). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Krafcik, J. (1988). Triumph of the Lean Production System. Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 41–52.
Kuhlmann, M., Splett, B., & Wiegrefe, S. (2018). Montagearbeit 4.0? Eine Fallstudie zu Arbeitswirkungen und Gestaltungsperspektiven digitaler Werkerführung. WSI-Mitteilungen, 71(3), 182–188.
Liker, J. K., & Hoseus, M. (2008). Toyota Culture: The Heart and Soul of the Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mättig, B., Jost, J., & Kirks, T. (2018). Erweiterte Horizonte – Ein technischer Blick in die Zukunft der Arbeit. In S. Wischmann & E. A. Hartmann (Eds.), Zukunft der Arbeit – Eine praxisnahe Betrachtung (pp. 63–72). Berlin: Springer Vieweg.
Meier, K. J. (2017). Lean QRM 4.0 – Das Beste aus Lean Production, QRM und Industrie 4.0 vereint in einem gemeinsamen Managementansatz. In R. Koether & K. J. Meier (Eds.), Lean Production für die variantenreiche Einzelfertigung (pp. 119–135). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
Meyer, A., Zander, S., Knapper, R., & Setzer, T. (2018). Decision Support Pipelines – Durchgängige Datenverarbeitungsinfrastrukturen für die Entscheidungen von morgen. In S. Wischmann & E. A. Hartmann (Eds.), Zukunft der Arbeit – Eine praxisnahe Betrachtung (pp. 207–209). Berlin: Springer Vieweg.
Moore, P., & Robinson, A. (2016). The Quantified Self: What Counts in the Neoliberal Workplace. New Media & Society, 18(11), 774–792.
Mormann, H. (2016). Das Projekt SAP: Zur Organisationssoziologie betriebswirtschaftlicher Standardsoftware. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Nachtwey, O., & Staab, P. (2016). Die Avantgarde des digitalen Kapitalismus. Mittelweg 36, 24(6), 59–84.
Nyhuis, P., Hübner, M., Quirico, M., Schäfers, P., & Schmidt, M. (2017). Veränderung in der Produktionsplanung und -steuerung. In G. Reinhart (Ed.), Handbuch Industrie 4.0 (pp. 31–50). Munich: Carl Hanser.
Pfeiffer, S. (2003). SAP R/3 & Co. Integrierte Betriebswirtschaftliche Systeme als stille Helferlein des Lego-Kapitalismus. FIfF-Kommunikation, Mitteilungsblatt des Forum InformatikerInnen für Frieden und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung (FIfF) e.V., 20(3), 9–13.
Plattform Industrie 4.0. (2018). Flexible Montage in der Fahrzeugproduktion. Retrieved from https://www.plattform-i40.de/I40/Redaktion/DE/Anwendungsbeispiele/137-wandelbare-r8-manufaktur/beitrag-wandelbare-r8-manufaktur.html. Last accessed 5 June 2018.
Rawlinson, K. (2013, February 13). Tesco Accused of Using Electronic Armbands to Monitor Its Staff. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/tesco-accused-of-using-electronic-armbands-to-monitor-its-staff-8493952.html. Last accessed 12 July 2018.
Reinhart, G., Bengler, K., Dollinger, C., Intra, C., Lock, C., Popova-Dlogosch, S., … Vernim, S. (2017). Der Mensch in der Produktion von Morgen. In G. Reinhart (Ed.), Handbuch Industrie 4.0 (pp. 51–88). Munich: Carl Hanser.
Rüttimann, B. G., & Stöckli, M. T. (2016). Lean and Industry 4.0—Twins, Partners, or Contenders? A Due Clarification Regarding the Supposed Clash of Two Production Systems. Journal of Service Science and Management, 9, 485–500.
Sandberg, A. (Publ.). (1995). Enriching Production: Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla Plant as an Alternative to Lean Production. Aldershot: Avebury.
Schlick, J., Stephan, P., Loskyll, M., & Lappe, D. (2014). Industrie 4.0 in der praktischen Anwendung. In T. Bauernhansl, M. Hompel, & B. Vogel-Heuser (Eds.), Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik (pp. 57–84). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Shimokawa, K., & Fujimoto, T. (2009). The Birth of Lean: Conversations with Taiichi Ohno, Eiji Toyoda, and Other Figures Who Shaped Toyota Management. Cambridge: Lean Enterprise Institute.
Shirose, K. (1996). TPM—Total Productive Maintenance: New Implementation Program in Fabrication and Assembly Industries. Tokyo: Japan Institute of Plant Maintenance.
Springer, R. (1999). Rückkehr zum Taylorismus? Arbeitspolitik in der Automobilindustrie am Scheideweg. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
Steegmüller, D., & Zürn, M. (2017). Wandlungsfähige Produktionssysteme für den Automobilbau der Zukunft. In G. Reinhart (Ed.), Handbuch Industrie 4.0 (pp. 27–44). Munich: Carl Hanser.
Stewart, P., Richardson, M., Danford, A., Murphy, K., Richardson, T., & Wass, V. (2009). We Sell Our Time No More: Workers’ Struggles Against Lean Production in the British Car Industry. London: Pluto Press.
Sugimori, Y., Kusunoki, K., Cho, F., & Uchikawa, P. (1977). Toyota Production System and Kanban System, Materialisation of Just-in-Time and Respect-for-Human System. International Journal of Production Research, 15, 553–564.
Weyer, J. (1997). Die Risiken der Automationsarbeit. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 26(4), 239–257.
Weyer, J. (2007). Autonomie und Kontrolle. Arbeit in hybriden Systemen am Beispiel der Luftfahrt. Technikfolgenabschätzung − Theorie und Praxis, 16(2), 35–42.
Williams, K., Haslam, C., & Williams, J. (1992). Ford Versus ‘Fordism’: The Beginning of Mass Production. Work, Employment & Society, 6(4), 517–555.
Wilson, H. J. (2013, September). Wearables in the Workplace. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2013/09/wearables-in-the-workplace. Last accessed 12 July 2018.
Wireman, T. (1991). Total Productive Maintenance—An American Approach. New York: Industrial Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butollo, F., Jürgens, U., Krzywdzinski, M. (2019). From Lean Production to Industrie 4.0: More Autonomy for Employees?. In: Meyer, U., Schaupp, S., Seibt, D. (eds) Digitalization in Industry. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28257-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28258-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)