Abstract
It is often asserted that neoliberalism is on the wane, with mainstream political parties and international agencies who had once so vociferously embraced it now appearing to break with consensus. Through an analysis of political rhetoric, public policies and social attitudes in the UK, this chapter seeks to determine whether neoliberalism is currently being diluted. Assuming that the strength of neoliberalism can be measured by the strength of corporate power, it suggests that the project, although on shaky ground, has shown itself to be eminently capable of evolving and adapting to changing circumstances to ensure its survival, no matter what the political hue of the government in power. Just as neoliberalism is itself a process, constantly being made and remade through the dialectical tension between theory and practice, its overthrow may ultimately be a long-term process requiring a favourable local and global, political and cultural, conjuncture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Although, as we suggest below, we should not necessarily equate a rejection of free markets with a rejection of neoliberalism per se.
- 2.
Historically, neoliberal thought crystalised in the 1930s and 1940s as a research programme into the institutional conditions necessary to ensure the stability, efficiency and fairness of capitalism. This meant identifying the permanent legal and constitutional rules as well as the temporary governmental interventions most conducive to controlling inflation, enhancing competition and mitigating inequality. The third objective was quickly abandoned in the 1950s, since early neoliberals felt that the welfare states implemented by developed countries in the aftermath of the Second World War had widely overshot the comparatively modest social measures they had initially countenanced. The other two objectives, however, have remained the central pillars of neoliberal economic thinking and policy worldwide. In the field of competition policy, the second key objective, neoliberal thinkers originally favoured state intervention to curb market power but subsequently reversed this earlier position on the grounds that state intervention would actually entrench market power. The reason is that government regulators would be ‘captured’ (i.e. corrupted) by the dominant players within the industries they were supposed to oversee, thereby leaving market leaders free to consolidate their power. From this and other theoretical developments (e.g. Friedrich Hayek’s ‘dynamic’ alternative to the static model of perfect competition), neoliberals concluded that competition was actually at its most efficient when the market was left to its own devices, undisturbed by government interference. At the risk of oversimplification, one can argue that neoliberals issued a blank cheque for corporations to act as they please.
References
Aalbers, M. B. (2013). Neoliberalism Is Dead: Long Live Neoliberalism! International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1083–1090.
Arvato Bertelsmann. (2017). UK Outsourcing Index: Full Year 2017. https://www.arvato.com/uk/insights/outsourcing-index/2017-full-year-review.html. Consulted 26 February 2018.
Ayers, A. J., & Saad-Filho, A. (2015). Democracy Against Neoliberalism: Paradoxes, Limitations, Transcendence. Critical Sociology, 41(4–5), 597–618.
Beckett, A. (2017, August 4). How Britain Fell Out of Love with the Free Market. The Guardian.
Behr, R. (2018, January 23). Even at Davos, Capitalism’s Critics Are Now Centre Stage. The Guardian.
Bell, E. (2015). Soft Power and Freedom Under the Coalition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Berry, C. (2014). Austerity, Ageing and the Financialisation of Pensions Policy in the UK. British Politics, 11(1), 2–25.
Berry, C. (2017). The Declining Salience of “Saving” in British Politics. SPERI British Political Economy Brief No. 28. http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Brief-28-The-declining-salience-of-saving-in-British-Politics.pdf. Consulted 26 February 2018.
Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). After Neoliberalization? Globalizations, 7(3), 327–345.
Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (2012). The Alchemy of Austerity. Critical Social Policy, 32, 299–319.
Comaroff, J. (2011). The End of Neoliberalism? What Is Left of the Left. The Annals of the American Academy, 637, 141–147.
Conservative Party. (2017). Forward Together: Our Plan for a Stronger Britain and a Prosperous Future—The Conservative and Unionist Party Manifesto. https://www.conservatives.com/manifesto. Consulted 26 February 2018.
Cribb, J., Hood, A., Joyce, R., & Keiller, A. N. (2017). Living Standards, Poverty and Inequality in the UK: 2017. Institute for Fiscal Studies. https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/9539. Consulted 27 February 2018.
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Crouch, C. (2017). Can Neoliberalism be Saved from Itself? Social Europe Edition. https://www.socialeurope.eu/book/can-neoliberalism-saved. Consulted 26 February 2018.
Crouch, C., della Porta, D., & Streeck, W. (2016). Democracy in Neoliberalism? Anthropological Theory, 16(4), 497–512.
Curtice, J. (2017). Role of Government: What Do We Want Government to Do? British Social Attitudes Survey 34. http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-34/key-findings/context.aspx. Consulted 5 March 2018.
Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2009). La nouvelle raison du monde: essai sur la société néolibérale. Paris: La Découverte/Poche.
Davis, D. (2018, February 20). Foundations of the Future Economic Partnership, Speech in Vienna. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/david-davis-foundations-of-the-future-economic-partnership-speech. Consulted 26 February 2018.
Edelman. (2018). Trust Barometer 2018—UK Findings. https://www.edelman.co.uk/magazine/posts/edelman-trust-barometer-2018/. Consulted 5 March 2018.
Elliott, M., & Kanagasooriam, J. (2017). Public Opinion in the Post-Brexit Era: Economic Attitudes in Modern Britain. London: Legatum Institute.
Ellis, D., & Whyte, D. (2016). Redefining Corruption: Public Attitudes to the Relationship Between Government and Business: Briefing 15. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.
Farha, L. (2017). Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing as a Component of the Right to an Adequate Standard of Living, and on the Right to Non-Discrimination in this Context (Report A/HRC/34/51). United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/34/51. Consulted 26 February 2018.
Farnsworth, K. (2013). Public Policies for Private Corporations: The British Corporate Welfare State. Renewal, 24(4), 51–65.
Finlayson, A. (2009). Financialisation, Financial Literacy and Asset-Based Welfare. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11(3), 400–421.
Froud, J., Johal, S., & Moran, M. (2017). Outsourcing the State: New Sources of Elite Power. Theory, Culture and Society, 34(5–6), 77–101.
Gamble, A. (2009). The Spectre at the Feast: Capitalist Crisis and the Politics of Recession. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hall, S., & O’Shea, A. (2013). Common-Sense Neoliberalism. Soundings, 55, 9–25.
Harcourt, B. (2012). The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
HM Government. (2018). A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/673203/25-year-environment-plan.pdf. Consulted 26 February 2018.
House of Commons. (2017). Household Debt: Statistics and Impact on the Economy (Briefing Paper 7584). https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7584#fullreport. Consulted 26 February 2018.
House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee. (2018, February 7). PIP and ESA Assessments: Seventh Report of Session 2017–19, HC 829. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmworpen/829/829.pdf. Consulted 26 February 2018.
Jacques, M. (2016, August 21). The Death of Neoliberalism and the Crisis in Western Politics. The Observer.
Johnson, P. (2017). Institute for Fiscal Studies Autumn Statement Analysis 2017. https://www.ifs.org.uk/tools_and_resources/budget/520. Consulted 5 March 2018.
Krugman, P. (2015, April 29). The Austerity Delusion. The Guardian.
Labour Party. (2017a). For the Many, Not the Few: The Labour Party Manifesto 2017. https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/labour-manifesto-2017.pdf. Consulted 26 February 2018.
Labour Party. (2017b). Alternative Models of Ownership. https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Alternative-Models-of-Ownership.pdf. Consulted 5 March 2018.
Labour Party. (2017c). Labour’s Tax Transparency and Enforcement Programme. http://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Tax-transparency-programme.pdf. Consulted 5 March 2018.
Massey, D., & Rustin, M. (2013a). Whose Economy: Reframing the Debate. In Stuart Hall, Doreen Massey, and Michael Rustin (Eds.), After Neoliberalism? The Kilburn Manifesto. https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/soundings/kilburn-manifesto. Consulted 26 February 2018.
Massey, D., & Rustin, M. (2013b). Displacing Neoliberalism. In Stuart Hall, Doreen Massey, and Michael Rustin (Eds.), After Neoliberalism? The Kilburn Manifesto. https://www.lwbooks.co.uk/soundings/kilburn-manifesto. Consulted 26 February 2018.
May, T. (2018, March 5). Speech on Making Housing Fairer.
McDonnell, J. (2017, September 25). Speech to the Labour Party Conference.
Miller, H. (2017). Labour’s Reversal of Corporate Tax Cuts Would Raise Substantial Sums but Come with Important Trade-Offs. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Mirowski, P. (2013). Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.
Mishra, P. (2017, June 20). The Rise of Jeremy Corbyn and the Death Throes of Neoliberalism. New York Times Magazine.
Morris, M. (2018). Leaving the EU, Not the European Model? London: IPPR.
Ostry, J. D., Loungani, P., & Furceri, D. (2016, June). Neoliberalism: Oversold? Finance and Development, 38–41.
Parker, G., & Wright, R. (2017, July 5). Theresa May Defends Austerity After Public Sector Pay Row. The Financial Times.
Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Postneoliberalism and its Malcontents. Antipode, 41(S.1), 94–116.
Pettifor, A. (2018, February 7). The Financialisation of the Housing Market. http://www.annpettifor.com/2018/02/the-financialisation-of-the-housing-market/. Consulted 5 March 2018.
Rustin, M. (2017). Are Real Changes Now Possible: Where Next for Corbyn and Labour? Soundings, 66, 7–22.
Springer, S. (2015). Postneoliberalism? Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(1), 5–17.
Thatcher, M. (1981, May 1). Interview with The Sunday Times. Available from The Margaret Thatcher Foundation. https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/104475. Consulted 5 March 2018.
Tombs, S. (2016). After the Crisis: Regulation Without Enforcement. Bistol: Policy Press.
White, A. (2016). Shadow State: Inside the Secret Companies That Run Britain. London: Oneworld.
Wren-Lewis, S. (2018, March 3). The Economic and Political Cost of UK Austerity. Mainlymacro Blog. https://mainlymacro.blogspot.fr. Consulted 5 March 2018.
Wright, O., & Coates, S. (2018, January 29). Former Aide Nick Timothy Attacks “Confused” Tory Strategists. The Times.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bell, E., Christoph, G. (2020). The Slow Retreat of Neoliberalism in Contemporary Britain?. In: Dawes, S., Lenormand, M. (eds) Neoliberalism in Context . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26017-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26017-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26016-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26017-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)