Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comprehensive Evaluation of Dog Training and Rehabilitation Initiatives in Correctional Facilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prison Dog Programs

Abstract

Dog care and training programs housed in correctional facilities are part of a larger field of animal-assisted interventions happening across the globe. With the increase in prevalence has come the need for an evidence base on the effects of such programs, as well as theory to explain those effects. This chapter will discuss the need for formative (process) and summative (product) examination of prison-dog programs and make recommendations for comprehensive program evaluation . Suggestions include assessing all program stakeholders, examining human-animal interactions and related constructs, and monitoring the institutional environment. Challenges to evaluation are addressed, including institutional constraints and subsequent methodological limitations (e.g., ceiling effects, selection bias). Throughout the chapter, points are illustrated with examples drawn from an empirical study of a prison-dog training program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Findings on treatment level and social skills are discussed in detail elsewhere (Fournier et al. 2007) and reviewed briefly here.

  2. 2.

    For example, the handler asks the dog to maintain a down, stay. Measure distance from handler to dog and duration of time the dog maintains the down position.

References

  • Affleck, G., Tennen, H., & Apter, A. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and daily life with chronic illness. In E. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 147–168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, M., & Ramaswamy, M. (2016). Adapting animal-assisted therapy trials to prison-based animal programs. Public Health Nursing, 33(5), 472–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. C. (2007). Assessing the human-animal bond: A compendium of actual measures. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anestis, M. D., Anestis, J. C., Zawilinski, L. L., Hopkins, T. A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014). Equine-related treatments for mental disorders lack empirical support: A systematic review of empirical investigations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(12), 1115–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, M. E., Davis, R. G., & Shutt, S. R. (2017). Dog training programs in Pennsylvania’s department of corrections: Perceived effectiveness for inmates and staff. Society & Animals, 25(5), 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auty, K. M., & Liebling, A. (2019). Exploring the relationship between prison social climate and reoffending. Justice Quarterly, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachi, K. (2013). Equine-facilitated prison-based programs within the context of prison-based animal programs: State of the science review. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52, 46–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beetz, A., Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Julius, H., & Kotrschal, K. (2012). Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: The possible role of oxytocin. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(234), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D. M., & Button, A. (2007). This isn’t about us: Benefits of dog training programs in a women’s prison. In S. L. Miller (Ed.), Criminal justice and diversity: Voices from the field (pp. 195–209). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (May, 2017). Occupational employment and wages: 33-3012 correctional officers and jailers. Retrieved from: https://www.bls.gov/oes/2017/may/oes333012.htm.

  • Bustad, L. K. (1990). Prison programs involving animals. In L. K. Bustad (Ed.), Compassion, our last great hope (pp. 72–73). Renton, WA: Delta Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2015). The effects of dog-training programs: Experiences of incarcerated females. Women & Criminal Justice, 25(3), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2016). The effectiveness of dog-training programs in prison: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. The Prison Journal, 96(6), 854–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R. (Ed.). (1961). The prison: Studies in institutional organization and change. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, N. S. (2008). A case study of incarcerated males participating in a canine training program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Special Education, Counseling, and Student Affairs College of Education, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, C. (2005). Humanizing prisons with animals: A closer look at “cell dogs” and horse programs in correctional institutions. Journal of Correctional Education, 56(1), 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingson, K. (2019, February 11). Coyote Ridge Dogs Program Interview. (L. Winston, Interviewer)

    Google Scholar 

  • FETCH a Cure. (2018). Pen pals. Retrieved from: https://fetchacure.org/pen-pals/.

  • Fournier, A. K. (2016). Pen pals: An examination of human–animal interaction as an outlet for healthy masculinity in prison. In C. Blazina & L. R. Kogan (Eds.), Men and their dogs (pp. 175–194). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, A. K., Berry, T. D., Letson, E., & Chanen, R. (2016). The human–animal interaction scale: Development and evaluation. Anthrozoös, 29(3), 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, A. K., & Geller, E. S. (2004). Behavior analysis of companion-animal overpopulation: A conceptualization of the problem and suggestions for intervention. Behavior and Social Issues, 13(1), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, A. K., Geller, E. S., & Fortney, E. E. (2007). Human-animal interaction in a prison setting: Impact on criminal behavior, treatment progress, and social skills. Behavior and Social Issues, 16(1), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furst, G. (2006). Prison-based animal programs: A national survey. The Prison Journal, 86(4), 407–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furst, G. (2011). Animal programs in prison: A comprehensive assessment. Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, M., Zito, S., Thomas, J., & Dale, A. (2018). Post-adoption problem behaviours in adolescent and adult dogs rehomed through a New Zealand animal shelter. Animals, 8(93), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerst, M., & Moos, R. H. (1972). The social ecology of university student residences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(6), 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitt, W., Hummel, J., & Kaeck, D. (2001). Assessment, measurement, evaluation, and research. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from: http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/intro/sciknow.html.

  • Human-Animal Interaction, Section 13 of Division 17. (2019). HAI section home. Retrieved from: https://www.apa-hai.org/human-animal-interaction/.

  • Humby, L., & Barclay, E. (2018). Pawsitive solutions: An overview of Prison Dog Programs in Australia. The Prison Journal, 98(5), 580–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Society on Anthrozoology. (2014). What is ISAZ? Retrieved from: http://www.isaz.net/isaz/.

  • Johnson, T., Garrity, T., & Stallones, L. (1992). Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS). Anthrozoös, 5(3), 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julius, H., Beetz, J. H. A., Kotrschal, K., Turner, D., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2012). Attachment to pets: An integrative view of human-animal relationships with implications for therapeutic practice. Boston: Hogrefe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., Griffin, M. L., & Kelley, T. (2015). The correctional staff burnout literature. Criminal Justice Studies, 28(4), 397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, D. S., Pearson, F. S., Cleland, C. M., & Yee, D. (2002). The effects of therapeutic communities and milieu therapy on recidivism. In J. McGuire (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programmes and policies to reduce re-offending (pp. 39–77). West Sussex, London: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marsa-Sambola, F., Muldoon, J., Williams, J., Lawrence, A., Connor, M., & Currie, C. (2016). The short attachment to pets scale (SAPS) for children and young people: Development, psychometric qualities and demographic and health associations. Child Indicators Research, 9(1), 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1971). Manual for the profile of mood states (POMS). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1968). The assessment of the social climates of correctional institutions. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 5, 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242786800500207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1974). Evaluating correctional and community settings. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1987). Correctional institutions environment scale (2nd ed.). Redwood, CA: Mindgarden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1989). Ward atmosphere scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H., & Houts, P. S. (1968). Assessment of the social atmospheres of psychiatric wards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73(6), 595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association for Biomedical Research. Functions of the IACUC. Retrieved from: https://www.nabr.org/animal-welfare-2/animal-welfare-in-practice/functions-of-the-iacuc/.

  • Nef, N. (2004, October 6–9). The cat programme, an animal-assisted therapy at Saxierriet prison for men: Its effects and results in a correctional establishment. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Human-Animal Interactions, Glasgow, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poresky, R. H., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J. E., & Samuelson, M. L. (1987). The companion animal bonding scale: Internal reliability and construct validity. Psychological Reports, 60(3), 743–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poresky, R. H., Hendrix, C., Mosier, J. E., & Samuelson, M. L. (1988). Young children’s companion animal bonding and adults’ pet attitudes: A retrospective study. Psychological Reports, 62(2), 419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson-Taylor, K., & Blanchette, K. (2001). Results of an evaluation of the Pawsitive Directions Canine Program at Nova Institution for Women. Ottawa, Ontario: Correctional Service of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 649–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., Craig, L. A., & Tonkin, M. (2016). Perceptions of social climate and aggressive behavior in forensic services: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(4), 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalast, N., & Groenewald, I. (2009). Ein Kurzfragebogen zur Einschätzung des sozialen Klimas im Strafvollzug [A short questionnaire to assess the social climate in prisons] (Erste Befunde auf Abteilungen des Regelvollzugs und der Sozialtherapie). In R. Haller & J. M. Jehle (Eds.), Drogen – Sucht – Kriminalität (pp. 329–352). Mönchengladbach, Germany: Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, J. A. (1990). Evidence for long term effects of pet ownership on human health. Pets, Benefits and Practice (Proceedings of Waltham Symposium), 20, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkin, B. S., & Ruff, L. A. (2011). Broken bonds: Understanding the experience of pet relinquishment. In C. Blazina, G. Boyraz, & D. Shen-Miller (Eds.), The psychology of the human-animal bond (pp. 275–288). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Secolsky, C., & Denison, D. B. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook on measurement, assessment, and evaluation in higher education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selby, A., & Smith-Osborne, A. (2013). A systematic review of effectiveness of complementary and adjunct therapies and interventions involving equines. Health Psychology, 32(4), 418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strimple, E. O. (2003). A history of prison inmate-animal interaction programs. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templer, D., Arikawa, H., Canfield, M., Munsell, K., & Tangan, K. (2004). Modification of the pet attitude scale. Society & Animals, 12(2), 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toch, H. (1992). Living in prison: The ecology of survival. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin, M. (2015). A review of questionnaire measures for assessing the social climate in prisons and forensic psychiatric hospitals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(12), 1376–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W. G. (2007). The experiences of offenders in a prison canine program. Federal Probation, 71(1), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Helm, P., Stams, G. J., & Van der Laan, P. (2011). Measuring group climate in prison. The Prison Journal, 91(2), 158–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virginia Department of Corrections. (2015). Pen pals. Retrieved August 13, 2015 from: https://vadoc.virginia.gov/offenders/institutions/programs/penpals.shtm.

  • Wenk, E. A., & Moos, R. H. (1972). Social climates in prison: An attempt to conceptualize and measure environmental factors in total institutions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 9(2), 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, K. D., Germain, S., & Theule, J. (2016). Evaluating the efficacy of equine therapy among at-risk youth: A meta-analysis. Anthrozoös, 29(3), 377–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkle, M., Crowe, T. K., & Hendrix, I. (2012). Service dogs and people with physical disabilities partnerships: A systematic review. Occupational Therapy International, 19(1), 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. N. (1985). Developing the prison environment inventory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(3), 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. N. (1993). Prison environment and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 20(1–2), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedeck, S. (Ed.). (2014). APA dictionary of statistics and research methods. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Bemidji State University, Bemidji, MN, USA

    Angela K. Fournier

  2. Fetch Please Dog Training, LLC, Moses Lake, WA, USA

    Lori Winston

Authors
  1. Angela K. Fournier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lori Winston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela K. Fournier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Emerita, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA, USA

    Mary Renck Jalongo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fournier, A.K., Winston, L. (2019). Comprehensive Evaluation of Dog Training and Rehabilitation Initiatives in Correctional Facilities. In: Jalongo, M. (eds) Prison Dog Programs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25618-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25618-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25617-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25618-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation