Abstract
Over the past decade attention has been focused on the role of followership as part of the leadership process. Conceptualizations and definitions of what followership is and how it is demonstrated in the workplace have evolved over time: from follower as a passive recipient of leadership, to follower as an active participant, to followership as a form of shared leadership, then moving beyond the concepts of leadership and followership to gain a shared understanding of the process of how people organize work together. This chapter provides a review of the followership literature, in the context of both constructive and destructive leadership. Key followership theories and frameworks are reviewed, practical implications discussed, and directions for future research offered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvesson M, Blom M (2018) Beyond leadership and followership. Working with a variety of modes of organizing. Organ Dyn 48(1):28–37
Baker S (2007) Followership: the theoretical foundations of a contemporary construct. J Leadersh Org Stud 14(1):50–60
Barbuto JE (2000) Influence triggers: a framework for understanding follower compliance. Leadersh Quart 11(3):365–387
Bastardoz N, Van Vugt M (2019) The nature of followership: evolutionary analysis and review. Leadersh Q 30(1):81–95
Bjugstad D, Thach E, Thompson K, Morris A (2006) A fresh look at followership: a model for matching followership and leadership styles. J Behav Appl Manag 7(3):304–319
Bligh MC (2011) Followership and follower-centered approaches. In: Bryman A, Collinson D, Grint K, Jackson B, Uhl-Bien M (eds) The Sage handbook of leadership. Sage Publications Ltd, London, pp 425–436
Branch S, Ramsay S, Barker M (2007) Managers in the firing line: contributing factors to workplace bullying by staff – an interview study. J Manag Organ 13(3):264–281
Carsten MK, Uhl-Bien M, West BJ, Patera JL, McGregor R (2010) Exploring social constructions of followership: a qualitative study. Leadersh Q 21:543–562
Chaleff I (2009) The courageous follower. Standing up to and for our leaders. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco
Crossman B, Crossman J (2011) Conceptualising followership–a review of the literature. Leadership 7(4):481–497
Cunha MP, Rego A, Clegg S, Neves P (2013) The case for transcendent followership. Leadership 9(1):87–106
Goh UW, Sawang, TPS O (2010) The revised transactional model (RTM) of occupational stress and coping: an improved process approach. Australian N Z J Organ Psychol 3:13–20
Gronn P (2002) Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadersh Q 13(4):423–451
Hansbrough T, Schyns B (2010) Heroic illusions. How implicit leadership theories shape follower attributions about poor leader performance. In: Schyns B, Hansbrough T (eds) When leadership goes wrong. Destructive leadership, mistakes and ethical failures. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 513–524
Heifetz RA, Heifetz R, Grashow A, Linsky M (2009) The practice of adaptive leadership: tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press, Boston
Hoch JE, Dulebohn JH (2017) Team personality composition, emergent leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams: a theoretical framework. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(4):678–693
Hoegl M, Muethel M (2007 August) Shared leadership in dispersed innovation teams: Mutual influence and proactive followership. In: Academy of management proceedings, vol 1. Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, pp 1–6
Hollander EP (1992) The essential interdependence of leadership and followership. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1:71–75
Kellerman B (2008) Followership: how followers are creating change and changing leaders. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston
Kelley R (1992) The power of followership. Doubleday, New York
Kelley R (1998) Followership in a leadership world. In: Spears L (ed) Insights on leadership: service, stewardship, spirit and servant leadership. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto, pp 170–184
KPMG (2020) Our new reality: predictions after COVID-19. https://home.kpmg/au/en/home/insights/2020/05/predictions-after-covid-19/remote-work-reshaping-ways-of-working.html
Lipman-Blumen J (2005) The allure of toxic leaders: why we follow destructive bosses and corrupt politicians – and how we can survive them. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Malakyan PG (2019) Digital leader-followership for the digital age: a North American perspective. Leadership, IntechOpen
Martinko MJ, Harvey P, Brees JR, Mackey J (2013) A review of abusive supervision research. J Organ Behav 34:S120–S137
May D, Wesche JS, Heinitz K, Kerschreiter R (2014) Coping with destructive leadership. Putting forward an integrated theoretical framework for the interaction process between leaders and followers. J Psychol 222(4):203–213
Nandkeolyar AK, Shaffer JA, Li A, Ekkirala S, Bagger J (2014) Surviving an abusive supervisor: the joint roles of conscientiousness and coping strategies. J Appl Psychol 99(1):138–150
Oc B, Bashshur MR (2013) Followership, leadership and social influence. Leadersh Q 24:919–934
O'Driscoll MP, Brough P (2010) Work organization and health. In: Leka S, Houdmont J (eds) Occupational health psychology. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 57–87
Padilla A, Hogan R, Kaiser RB (2007) The toxic triangle: destructive leaders, susceptible followers and conducive environments. Leadersh Q 18:176–194
Patterson E, Branch S, Barker M, Ramsay S (2018) Playing with power: examinations of types of power used by staff members in workplace bullying – a qualitative interview study. Qual Res Organ Manag 13(1):32–52
Pearce CL, Conger JA (2003) Shared leadership: reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Prince L (2005) Eating the menu rather than the dinner: Tao and leadership. Leadership 1(1):105–126
Rost J (1995) Leadership: a discussion about ethics. Bus Ethics Q 5(1):129–142
Salin D (2003) Ways of explaining workplace bullying: a review of enabling, motivating, and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Hum Relat 56(10):1213–1232
Schyns B, Schilling J (2013) How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. Leadersh Q 24:138–158
Sy T (2010) What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 113(2):73–84
Sy T (2011) I think, therefore I do: influence of leaders’ and followers’ implicit followership theories on relationship quality and follower performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, San Antonio, TX, August 2011
Thoroughgood CN, Padilla A, Hunter ST, Tate BW (2012) The susceptible circle: a taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership. Leadersh Q 23:897–917
Uhl-Bien M, Riggio RE, Lowe KB, Carsten MK (2014) Followership theory: a review and research agenda. Leadersh Q 25:83–10
Wallace B (2009) Bullying the boss: upwards bullying as a response to destructive supervisory leadership in the workplace. Masters Thesis, University of Canterbury
Webster V, Brough P, Daly K (2016) Fight, flight or freeze: common responses for follower coping with toxic leadership. Stress Health 32:346–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2626
Yagil D, Ben-Zur H, Tamir I (2011) Do employees cope effectively with abusive supervision at work? An exploratory study. Int J Stress Manag 18(1):5–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Webster, V. (2021). Beyond the Leadership/Followership Dichotomy. In: Brough, P., Gardiner, E., Daniels, K. (eds) Handbook on Management and Employment Practices. Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24936-6_5-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24936-6_5-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24936-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24936-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences