Abstract
Should we refrain from watching the films of Lars von Trier as some critics, philosophers, feminists, and cultural theorists have suggested? Trier’s films and his public antics have certainly given his critics ground upon which to defend the claim that we should stop watching him. However, there are multiple depths that may be plumbed in order to understand that which his films have to offer. For instance, he may be sacrificing women for some sort of cheap thrill that may be experienced by himself and his audience; he may be deploying a kind of irony that seeks to make explicit the sacrificial treatment of woman as something written into Western cultural practices—a sordid practice that he believes ought to be stopped; he may be exorcising some of his own psychosexual demons; and he may be exploring the relationship between all these possibilities. This chapter seeks to clarify these possibilities through an examination of his trilogies and through an examination of his own public and private commentary about the issue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Cited from the press conference at Cannes, 2011, in Butler and Denny (2017).
- 2.
Lars von Trier, Manifesto 1 (released to accompany The Elements of Crime), reproduced in Bainbridge (2007).
- 3.
My sense is that an evolution in thought can be gleaned from and within the order in which I have articulated them here, but it is noteworthy that The Antichrist was released two years before Melancholia .
- 4.
- 5.
I am aware here of a departure from Zizek’s account according to which Jan, in making the request that Bess have sex with other men and give a report after each occurrence, is taken to be already aware that the effect of such reports will be to “keep awake his will to live” (Zizek 2013). On my account, it seems a much more complicated affair in which Jan’s “will to live” is integrally intertwined with Bess’ perceived jouissance at sexual encounters. It appears to me that Jan, foolishly and yet typically, has interpreted his introduction of sexual jouissance into Bess’ cache of desires as his having performed some sort of spiritual task, ushering Bess beyond her womanly limitations of modesty and prudence.
References
Badley, Linda. 2010. Lars von Trier. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Bainbridge, Caroline. 2007. The Cinema of Lars von Trier: Authenticity and Artifice. London: Wallflower Press.
Butler, Rex, and David Denny. 2017. Introduction: The Feminine Act and the Question of Women in Lars von Trier’s Films. In Lars von Trier’s Women. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Plato. 1981. Apology. Trans. G.M.A. Grube. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Thomas, Dana. 2004. Meet the Punisher: Lars von Trier Devastates Audiences—and Actresses. Interview with Lars von Trier. Newsweek, April 5.
Zizek, Slavoj. 2013. Femininity Between Goodness and Act. The Symptom 14. http://www.lacan.com/symptom14/feminimity-between.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gurley, S.W. (2019). The Ass I Kick Today May Be the Ass I’ll Have to Kiss Tomorrow: What’s Up with the Sacrifice of Women in the Films of Lars von Trier?. In: Haro, J., Koch, W. (eds) The Films of Lars von Trier and Philosophy. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24918-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24918-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24917-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24918-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)