Abstract
Risk assessment describes the overall process regarding identifying hazards and risk factors that have the potential to cause harm, analyzing and evaluating the risk associated with that hazard and determining appropriate ways to eliminate the hazard or control the risk. In the literature, lots of approaches are proposed to prioritize hazards and associated risks quantitatively. Fuzzy sets-based multi-criteria decision-making approaches are forefront that they have the ability in expressing the risks verbally based on decision-maker’s opinions and judgments. MCDA-based risk assessment approaches explain different types of uncertainties, which are generally modeled using stochastic analysis or fuzzy sets. The stochastic analysis is more suitable in modelling the probabilistic uncertainty. Therefore, in this study, a risk assessment approach using both stochastic data and subjective judgments is proposed, and a case study is also performed in a construction project. The VIKOR method is extended and a new risk assessment approach is developed where part of the data is stochastic. A three-year data is used to determine a fitted probability distribution of respected frequency. Evaluation of risks with respect to severity and probability parameters are then made by subjective judgments. In conclusion, a risk prioritization and potential action plan suggestion is performed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Occupational_safety_and_health_risk_assessment_methodologies#Risk_management. Last Accessed 2019/11/02
Gul, M.: A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J. 24(7), 1723–1760 (2018)
Tavana, M., Mavi, R.K., Santos-Arteaga, F.J., Doust, E.R.: An extended VIKOR method using stochastic data and subjective judgments. Comput. & Ind. Eng. 97, 240–247 (2016)
Celik, E., Gul, M., Yucesan, M., Mete, S.: Stochastic multi criteria decision making: an overview to methods and applications. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. In press (2019)
Opricovic, S.: Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Fac. Civ. Engineering. Belgrade 2(1), 5–21 (1998)
Cobuloglu, H.I., Büyüktahtakın, İ.E.: A stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainable biomass crop selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(15), 6065–6074 (2015)
Erdogan, M., Kaya, I.: Prioritizing failures by using hybrid multi criteria decision making methodology with a real case application. Sustain. Cities Soc. 45, 117–130 (2019)
Emeç, Ş., Akkaya, G.: Stochastic AHP and fuzzy VIKOR approach for warehouse location selection problem. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 31(6), 950–962 (2018)
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.: Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data. J. Intell. & Fuzzy Syst. 33(3), 1627–1638 (2017)
Zhao, H., Li, N.: Performance evaluation for sustainability of strong smart grid by using stochastic AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Sustainability 8(2), 129 (2016)
Gul, M., Celik, E., Aydin, N., Gumus, A.T., Guneri, A.F.: A state-of-the-art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Appl. Soft Comput. 46, 60–89 (2016)
Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., Gold, S.: Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195, 106–117 (2018)
Sennaroglu, B., Celebi, G.V.: A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 59, 160–173 (2018)
Chen, T.Y.: Remoteness index-based Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR methods with a generalized distance measure for multiple criteria decision analysis. Inf. Fusion 41, 129–150 (2018)
Gul, M.: Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: The case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. Inpress, 1–26 (2018)
Gul, M., Ak, M.F.: A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 196, 653–664 (2018)
Mete, S.: Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA-based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.: Int. J., 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1546115
Gul, M., Guven, B., Guneri, A.F.: A new Fine-Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 53, 3–16 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mete, S., Oz, N.E., Gul, M., Serin, F., Celik, E. (2020). A Risk Assessment Approach Using Both Stochastic Data and Subjective Judgments. In: Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Tolga, A., Sari, I. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making. INFUS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_130
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23756-1_130
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23755-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23756-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)