Abstract
In this chapter we review the etiological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects as well as diagnostic aids and treatment of joint infection and osteomyelitis by fungi such as aspergillosis, sporotrichosis, cryptococcosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, and mucormycosis.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Osteomyelitis
- Arthritis by fungi
- Aspergillosis
- Cryptococcosis
- Sporotrichosis
- Paracoccidioidomycosis
- Mucormycosis
Introduction
There are around 100,000 species of known fungi, and about 150 are pathogenic to humans and animals; they can be challenging to identify and to define an appropriate therapy. Fungal arthritis and osteomyelitis are rare, and the causative agent often depends on the geographical location, occupation, sex, and social stratum, although today, with human mobility, these conditions can vary [1,2,3].
Osteoarticular infection can affect the joint cavity, bone, capsule, ligaments, tendons, and muscles, and its location is usually due to hematogenous spread but also by direct inoculation or contiguity from neighboring structures. It can affect primarily immunocompromised but sometimes immunocompetent patients; the most affected are those undergoing transplantation, chemotherapy for neoplasms, chronic granulomatous disease, AIDS, and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) associated with debilitating conditions, disease activity, or the use of corticosteroids or immunosuppressants [4,5,6].
This topic is important since the diagnosis of fungal infections by health personnel is a challenge due to a low index of suspicion of fungal origin of osteoarticular infection, thus leading to late diagnosis with high morbidity and frequently devastating results. Herein, some other species are described.
Aspergillus Species
Aspergillus is a ubiquitous, saprophytic but invasive fungus that can affect the lung. Pathogenic species include A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. nidulans, and A. tubingensis [7, 8]. Aspergillus species has a worldwide distribution, and its infection is frequently associated with debilitating conditions such as chronic granulomatous disease, solid organ or bone marrow transplantation, chemotherapy, intravenous drug use, diabetes mellitus, or malnutrition [7,8,9]. It has also been described in patients undergoing surgical interventions [8, 10, 11], immunocompetent individuals [12], and also in coinfection with tuberculosis [13, 14].
Aspergillus infection occurs through hematogenous spread, contiguous of a pulmonary foci in vertebral involvement, from chronic otitis in skull-base osteomyelitis, and lastly by inoculation in the case of surgeries or trauma [7, 8, 11,12,13].
Aspergillosis involves more males than females, with a median age of 50 years as demonstrated by Gameletsou et al. in 31 patients compiled by the International Consortium of Osteoarticular Mycosis, affecting both adults and children [8]. The most common clinical findings are pain and tenderness at the site of location, yet fever, edema, erythema, and decreased ranges of motion are rare. Most of the time the infection is monoarticular, predominately in knees and intervertebral joints and hips, among others. In the case of osteomyelitis, the tibia is the most compromised bone and juxta-articular osteomyelitis is common [8, 13]. Axial involvement is more frequent from a pulmonary foci; it often occurs with spondylodiscitis and can cause neurological deficit [2] (Figs. 24.1 and 24.2). Leukocytosis and neutrophilia may be present along with an elevation of acute-phase reactants. In synovial fluid, variable cell counts are described, mostly with a predominance of neutrophils [8].
Localized osteoporosis, joint space narrowing, lytic lesions, and adjacent periostitis can be observed [8, 10] with conventional radiography. Joint effusion, extension to neighboring soft tissues, increase in intensity signal in T2 and with contrast in T1, plus bone marrow edema can be demonstrated with magnetic resonance imaging [8, 9, 11, 12]. PET-CT can allow early diagnosis as well as treatment follow-up [7]. Arthrocentesis and open biopsy are the most commonly used methods for a definitive diagnosis of Aspergillus arthritis since fluid culture detects 100% of the cases; adjacent bone tissue culture is also highly sensitive [8]. In the histological study, about 50% of the cases are detected. With hematoxylin phloxine saffron stain, multinucleated giant cells with vacuolated cytoplasm are demonstrated [7]. Biomarkers such as galactomannan and β-D glucan and polymerase chain reaction are useful to establish a probable diagnosis [7, 15].
Cryptococcus Species
There are 19 cryptococcal species, but only two are pathogenic, C. neoformans and C. gattii; its life cycle is sexual and asexual. It has a worldwide distribution and is found in soil, in the feces of pigeons, and on trees such as eucalyptus [1, 3, 16]. Cryptococcus gattii is an emerging pathogen in the northwestern region of the United States and in western Canada [1].
Cryptococcus is usually acquired by means of inhalation and occasionally secondary to trauma or inoculation through the gastrointestinal tract [1]. Three factors determine its pathogenicity: host defense, virulence of the strain, and inoculum size, but generally cryptococcosis is considered a relapsing disease [1, 14, 16]. It has a hematogenous dissemination in immunosuppressed patients, such as recipients of solid organ or bone marrow transplantation, with neoplasms undergoing chemotherapy, sarcoidosis, AIDS, or in autoimmune diseases such as SLE with high disease activity, corticosteroid use, and in RA with employment of biological agents against tumor necrosis factor [4, 6, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], but it has also been described in immunocompetent subjects [22].
Cryptococcus, after Candida and Aspergillus, is the most common fungal infection, and its spread generally causes meningoencephalitis, pneumonia, pulmonary nodules, and kidney and skin involvement which can manifest as papules, nodules, acneiform lesions, ulcers, and cellulitis [22, 23] (Fig. 24.3). Osteoarticular infection is very rare since the number of reported cases is very low [16, 17, 20, 22, 24], and osteoarticular infection by C. gattii has not been described [2]. Osteoarticular infection can be subacute/chronic and produces evident inflammatory symptoms such as warmth, redness, edema, functional impairment, and joint effusion. In only 10–20% of cases, it is associated with osteomyelitis, the ribs, skull, pelvis, epiphysis of long bones, and vertebrae being the most affected. Tenosynovitis and myositis have also been reported [18, 19, 21, 25] (Table 24.1).
Laboratory findings include both C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate elevation. The joint fluid may be turbid or purulent in appearance with variable cellularity but predominantly mononuclear, and the culture should always be searched for the germ on Sabouraud glucose agar with chloramphenicol. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid cultures should also be taken, as well as cultures of urine and other compromised tissues [18, 19, 21, 23, 25]. When Cryptococcus isolation is performed, lumbar puncture is necessary to rule out central nervous system involvement [21].
Another important aid is the detection of the blood antigen that can be done by latex agglutination or ELISA , being almost as sensitive as the isolation of the fungus, which does not happen with the detection of the antibody [21]. Another diagnostic aid is a biopsy in which stains are used, such as hematoxylin and eosin, methenamine silver, or PAS that enable yeast identification and also reveal acute and chronic inflammation with giant cell granulomas without caseification [18, 26] (Fig. 24.4).
Conventional radiological images can be normal or show osteopenia and erosive and frankly lytic lesions with diminution or loss of joint space and periosteal elevation, depending on the time of evolution [19, 23, 25, 26]. Magnetic resonance imaging can demonstrate soft tissue masses in T1 with gadolinium and fat suppression, bone edema with a focal replacement of the bone marrow, and increased intensity in tendons and muscle, with tendon thickening [19, 21].
Finally, it is necessary to draw attention to the importance of thinking about fungi as responsible for osteoarticular infection in predisposed patients as described earlier, in order to achieve a timely diagnosis, improving joint prognosis and survival.
Sporotrichosis Arthritis
It is a subacute/chronic mycosis caused by Sporothrix schenckii, of which five species capable of producing infection in humans have been described: S. schenckii sensu stricto, S. brasiliensis, S. globosa, S. mexicana, and S. luriel. It has a worldwide distribution and is found on soil and plants. It is a dimorphic fungus, which mostly involves men working in gardening, construction, mining, or peasants [27,28,29,30]. The first cases were reported in the USA, and later in France [29, 30].
Acquisition has not been totally elucidated, yet it is thought to be by inoculation secondary to trauma (even minimal), by cat scratch, contamination of soil or organic material, and even rose thorns [30,31,32]. It is assumed that the inhalation route is possible, when there is no evidence of trauma [33]. Sporotrichosis generally presents in alcoholic patients, diabetics, immunosuppressed by AIDS, use of corticosteroids or biological agents, myelodysplasia, neoplasia, organ transplantation [30, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41], and even in immunocompetent subjects [29, 31, 32, 39, 42,43,44].
Patients who undergo osteoarticular involvement do not regularly present significant systemic symptoms and have an indolent course [28, 31, 32, 35, 38]. The most frequent clinical affection is determined by the findings in the skin that can appear as painful nodules, sometimes with erythema or ulceration with or without exudate, or late with fistulous trajectories [34, 35, 39, 41]. More rarely, erythema nodosum has been described [41]. A finding that has been described as characteristic is a lymphangitic spread [29, 31] (Fig. 24.5). Another type of compromise is given by cervical or axillary satellite lymph nodes [28, 41]. Pneumonitis and meningitis have also been described.
Osteoarticular compromise is a late diagnosis, because clinicians rarely think Sporothrix schenckii as a cause of chronic arthritis that manifests with pain, erythema, functional impairment, with joint effusion and destruction, localized osteoporosis, and lytic lesions causing great morbidity [27, 29, 37, 44]. There is also bursal, tenosynovial, and muscle involvement [27, 40, 43, 44] (Figs. 24.6 and 24.7). This osteoarticular affection is rare, comprising 2–4% of all cases of sporotrichosis, and even more exceptional as an isolated clinical manifestation [30]; therefore, it is postulated that Sporothrix schenckii may have a hematogenous spread after inhalation, and it has also been isolated in the blood [37, 45]. Arthritis is more frequently monoarticular, although, as can be seen in a compilation of 19 cases, 10 were monoarticular and 8 were polyarticular; the most affected joints were knee (13), wrist (9), elbow (5), and ankle (2), among others, and there was concomitant osteomyelitis in 4 patients and only in one case, it was isolated (Table 24.2). The delay in diagnosis ranges from 3 to 96 months [33].
Laboratory studies are not very specific; the most striking feature is a high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, as well as C-reactive protein elevation. Synovial fluid is usually inflammatory or serohematic, with a predominance of neutrophils or lymphocytes. In this case, as well in the biopsies, the presence of the fungus is scarce, which also makes the diagnosis difficult [27, 40]. Serology for sporotrichosis has been used, employing ELISA with a fraction of SsCBF antigen, which is recognized by IgG antibodies and has shown a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 80% [42].
The gold standard for diagnosis is the culture, whether in synovial fluid, tissue samples, exudates of ulcers, and, occasionally, blood (see Table 24.2). The culture is done in Sabouraud dextrose agar [28, 30]. The biopsy shows granulomas with a central area of necrosis surrounded by multinucleated giant cells and palisaded histiocytes, but sometimes it does not have central necrosis which makes it indistinguishable from sarcoidosis. Although nonspecific and infrequent, oval bodies with a cigar shape and occasionally yeasts can be observed. The employed stains are glycol methacrylate, silver methenamine, or hematoxylin-eosin; asteroid bodies can also be observed [30, 40, 43, 44].
Conventional radiography is the most useful technique due to the chronic disease progression, demonstrating juxta-articular osteoporosis, soft tissue edema, diminution or loss of joint space, erosions, lytic bone lesions, periostitis, and great joint destruction [35, 38, 39]. Occasionally ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance is used [29, 30, 40].
Paracoccidioidomycosis
Paracoccidioidomycosis is a disease that can be acute/subacute or chronic which is caused by Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and P. lutzii. It is a dimorphic fungus identified by multiple yeasts in what has become known as “ pilot’s wheel” [47]. Its study began in Brazil in 1908, when Lutz reported the first two patients, isolating the germ, and later described by Splendore, but it was not until 1930 when Almeida determined that it was a fungus and gave it its current name [48].
Paracoccidioidomycosis is the most frequent systemic mycosis in Latin America from Mexico to Argentina, with a high endemicity in Brazil, so that the cases described in other countries are imported due to the current high mobility [48, 49]. Approximately half of the described cases occur in rural areas, including landowners and agricultural workers; however, they have also been described in construction workers and generally occur in humid tropical and subtropical forest areas [48, 49].
The infection occurs through inhalation of the saprophytic fungus that is found in soil and plants and can be located in the lung where the human tissue can surround it or produce clinical involvement and disseminate hematogenously, affecting the skin, mucous membranes, reticuloendothelial system, gastrointestinal tract, central nervous system, osteoarticular system, genitals, and suprarenal glands [50,51,52]. This fungus’ behavior has been associated with smoking, alcoholism, tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, AIDS, and neoplasms [49].
The most common form of clinical presentation is chronic (75%), predominantly in males in a 6:1 ratio with respect to females; the average age is 40.8 years and is characterized by pulmonary involvement [49]. The acute/ subacute form has no predilection for gender and is more common in children and adolescents with multisystemic manifestations: adenopathies, hepatosplenomegaly, skin lesions (papules, nodules, or ulcers), lung and osteoarticular involvement, as well as severe conditions of the general state with fever and anemia [50, 51].
Osteoarticular compromise is more predominant in the acute/subacute type and is occasionally observed in the chronic form. Most of the lesions are seen in long bones, involving metaphyses, clavicles, ribs, scapula, skull, and vertebrae [50,51,52]. Arthritis has been described affecting the hip, knee, shoulder, wrist, and small hand joints as acute or, very rarely, chronic manifestations [52,53,54]. It may cause myositis and has been described to be associated with rheumatoid arthritis [54, 55].
Laboratory studies can reveal anemia, leukocytosis (sometimes with eosinophilia), and elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. In conventional radiography, lytic lesions without or minimal sclerosis are observed, single or multiple, and typically without periostitis [50,51,52]. Ultrasound has been used when there is soft tissue involvement, with the demonstration of tenosynovitis and intense signal in power Doppler [53]. Magnetic resonance imaging is described as a high-intensity signal that enhances with gadolinium, bone edema, and the penumbra sign in T1, similarly to other conditions that cause abscesses, findings that can be useful to differentiate it from neoplasms; none of these are characteristic of the entity [54].
Diagnosis is based on the identification of the fungus, either by direct microscopic examination or histopathology [47]. IgM and IgG antibody detection (serological study) has also been used, applying different techniques such as gel immunodiffusion, complement fixation, ELISA, or counterimmunoelectrophoresis. Complement fixation and ELISA have the limitation of cross-reacting with histoplasmosis [56]. Bellissimo-Rodrigues et al., in 1000 patients, found that counterimmunoelectrophoresis was positive in 97.2% and histopathology in 64.7%, while the culture of the fungus was only positive in 25.3% of the subjects [49]. Pathological anatomy reveals a granulomatous reaction with epithelioid and giant cells using silver methenamine or hematoxylin-eosin stains, allowing yeast identification [55, 57] (Figs. 24.8 and 24.9).
Bone and Joint Infections Caused by Mucormycetes
Mucormycosis is a rare infection caused by filamentous fungi of the Mucorales order, previously called zygomycosis. The Mucorales are fungi of worldwide distribution, whose predominant pathogenic genera include Rhizopus species, followed by Mucor, Rhizomucor, and Lichtheimia, among others [58,59,60]. They are saprophytic and can be found in soil, decomposing materials, wastewater, decomposed plants, bread mold, and garbage. They are acquired by inoculation after trauma (even minimal), penetrating injuries, surgical procedures, and arthrocentesis [59, 60].
This infection is more commonly found in immunocompromised patients, such as diabetics, neutropenic, neoplasms in chemotherapy, solid organ or bone marrow transplantation, use of corticosteroids, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis treated with TNF blockers, and AIDS [2, 60,61,62,63,64]; however, it has also been described in immunocompetent individuals [65]. Diabetic patients, especially with ketoacidosis, have a greater predisposition since metabolic acidosis increases the pathogenic potential of the fungus by altering iron clearance [58].
This bone and joint infection predominates in men, corresponding to 71% in a series of 34 patients. It affects adults and children, and the average time for diagnosis was 73 days, being more indolent than other types of affection [60]. Skin involvement is more common on the face, cheeks, and periorbital region but can affect other body areas. It can present as papules, painful subcutaneous nodules, necrotic crusts, ulcers, fistulas, and abscesses. It is locally very invasive and can spread by contiguity or hematogenously to affect the central nervous system (rhinocerebral mucormycosis), lungs, gastrointestinal tract, or osteoarticular system [59,60,61,62] (Fig. 24.10). Joint involvement manifests with pain, decreased range of motion, and edema which are predominant findings. The most involved joints are the hip, knee, and ankle, while osteomyelitis affects the tibia, femur, maxilla, vertebrae, skull, and humerus, among others [58,59,60].
Leukocytosis can be found, as well as elevation of acute-phase reactants, but the most important diagnostic aid is a skin biopsy with hematoxylin-eosin, methenamine silver, and/or PAS stains, showing suppurative granulomas suggestive of infectious panniculitis in the deep dermis and subcutaneous fat. Angioinvasive hyphae are also demonstrated in the light or wall of vessels, causing thrombosis and necrosis responsible for the aggressiveness of the affection. Such hyphae are large, broad, and not-septated and branch at right angles, unlike those of Aspergillus that do so at an acute angle, which is sufficient to prove the presence of the fungus [58, 62, 63]. Calcofluor white stain reveals up to 80% the presence of hyphae and allows their differentiation between septate and non-septate with 5% of false positives [66]. Culture in a non- selective medium allows identification of the germ with rapid growth [58]. There are still no biomarkers available for the diagnosis of mucormycosis [63, 66].
Imaging studies are important since multiple types of injuries can be observed, including lytic, erosive, and destructive with conventional radiography. Magnetic resonance imaging shows low-intensity signal in T1 and high-intensity patches in T2, enabling detection of invasion of neighboring tissues, which is why it is preferred over CT. Ultrasound and CT are used to take guided samples [58, 66].
Finally, it can be noted that joint and bone infections caused by Mucorales have been increasing in frequency since the number of patients at risk is rising. It is important to highlight the aggressiveness of this infection due to its capacity to cause angioinvasion with extensive tissue damage which makes early diagnosis mandatory, along with aggressive medical and surgical treatment to reduce its high morbidity and mortality.
Treatment
There are no controlled studies for the treatment of these bone and joint infections, given their low frequency. The management applied is based on the results of case series presentations although more recently there are recommendations from international societies for mucormycosis [66], sporotrichosis [67], and cryptococcosis [68], but are not centered in osteoarticular infection. Therefore, this management is extrapolated and adapted to individual conditions of the patient.
Treatment, in general, involves prolonged medical management with antifungal agents. In the surgical aspect, debridement of soft tissues, arthrotomy, bone curettage, removal of osteosynthesis material or joint prosthesis, and even amputation in some cases must be performed. Medical and surgical management results in better survival [1, 7, 8, 19, 21, 26, 39, 54, 58, 61, 63].
The drug most commonly used as a first option is amphotericin B with liposomal formulation (4–6 mg/kg IV) which has fewer side effects, such as renal failure and hypokalemia, compared to deoxycholate (0.5–1.0 mg/kg/day IV), the use of which should be discouraged [66, 67]. It should be noted that all treatments initiated with amphotericin B, after obtaining a good response, are continued with other medications such as itraconazole 200 mg bid PO. In the case of sporotrichosis, treatment is continued for up to 12 months, during which it is recommended to determine serum levels after two weeks of use to ensure adequate exposure to the medication [67] (Table 24.3).
For cryptococcosis , the recommendation is amphotericin B plus 5-flucytosine for 3–6 weeks as consolidation therapy, followed by fluconazole 400 mg/day for 10 weeks and then 200 mg/day for 12 months. The alternative is itraconazole 200 mg bid PO for individuals intolerant to fluconazole [21, 68].
For aspergillosis, the recommendation is voriconazole , which may be superior to amphotericin B initiated with an IV loading dose of 6 mg/kg bid for the first day and continued with 4 mg/kg/day bid for 3 more days. Afterward, it is switched to 100–150 mg bid PO 1 hour after or before a meal, achieving suitable concentrations both in synovial fluid and blood, yet monitoring of blood drug concentrations is required. The duration of treatment should be 6–12 weeks; however, it should always be individualized according to the severity of involvement and the degree of immunosuppression of the patient as with any fungal treatment [21]. Amphotericin B followed by itraconazole has also been used [8].
In mucormycosis , the drug of choice is amphotericin B in the liposomal formulation, and, in some cases, it has been recommended to combine it with caspofungin [58]. Posaconazole with delayed release has also been employed [58, 63].
The treatment of choice for paracoccidioidomycosis is itraconazole 600 mg/day for 3 days followed by 200 mg/day for 6–9 months. Amphotericin B , voriconazole, or trimethoprim/sulfa methoxazole has also been used [47, 54].
Conclusion
In conclusion, the cornerstone for proper treatment of these bone and joint infections is that clinicians keep in mind to facilitate early diagnosis, which is not easy due to the scarcity of their occurrence, in addition to their torpid evolution (except for mucormycosis), and the necessary installation of aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to Amalia Patiño MD (Clínica Las Américas), Isabel Ramírez MD (Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe), and Oscar Uribe MD (Universidad de Antioquia) for giving us the clinical and radiological figures of Aspergillus and sporotrichosis, respectively.
References
Bariteau JT, Waryasz GR, McDonnell M, Fischer SA, Hayda RA, et al. Fungal osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:390–401.
Henry MW, Miller AO, Walsh TJ, Brause BD. Fungal musculoskeletal infections. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2017;31:353–68.
Schwarz J. What’s new mycotic bone and joint diseases? Path Res Pract. 1984;178:617–34.
Wang LR, Barber CE, Johnson AS, Barnabe C. Invasive fungal disease in systemic lupus erythematous: a systematic review of disease characteristics, risk factor and prognosis. Sem Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44(3):325–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.06.0010049-0172.
González LA, Vásquez G, Restrepo JP, Velásquez M, Ramírez LA. Cryptococcosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: a series of six cases. Lupus. 2010;19:639–45.
Ramírez LA, Velásquez JF, Granda P, Builes CA, Jaimes F. Asociación de actividad lúpica y el riesgo de infección nosocomial en pacientes de un hospital universitario en Medellín: estudio prospectivo 2001-2004. Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2007;14:177–86.
Koehler P, Tacke D, Cornely OA. Aspergillosis of bones and joints- a review from 2002 until today. Mycoses. 2014;57:323–35.
Gamaletsou MN, Rammaert B, Bueno MA, Sipsas NV, Moriyama B, et al. Aspergillus arthritis: analysis of clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of 31 reported cases. Med Mycol. 2017;55(3):246–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myw077.
Gunsilius E, Lass-Flörl C, Mur E, Gabl C, Gastl G, et al. Aspergillus osteoarthritis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Ann Hematol. 1999;78:529–30.
Kwong CA, Puloski SKT, Hildebrand KA. Fungal periprosthetic joint infection following total elbow arthroplasty: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2017;11:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-1176-0.
Sun L, Zhang L, Wang K, Wang W, Tian M. Fungal osteomyelitis after arthroscopy anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report with review of the literature. Knee. 2012;19:728–31.
Yoon PW, Song JH, Yoon KS, Chang JS, Kim HJ, et al. Aspergillus septic arthritis of the hip in an immunocompetent middle-aged female with undiagnosed recurrent pulmonary aspergillosis. Hip Pelvis. 2015;27:196–200.
Cortet B, Depres X, Triki R, Savage C, Flipo RM, et al. Aspergillus spondylodiscitis. Apropos of 5 cases. Rev Rhum. 1993;60:37–44.
Kumar M, Thilak J, Zahoor A, Jyothi A. Septic arthritis due to tubercular and aspergillus co-infection. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50:327–30.
Patterson TF. Aspergillus species. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennet’s Infectious disease essentials. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017. p. 381–2.
Perfect JR. Cryptococcosis (Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii). In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennet’s infectious disease essentials. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017. p. 390–2.
Liao T-L, Chen Y-M, Chen D-Y. Risk factors for cryptococcal infection among patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving different immunosuppressive medications. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:815.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.cmi.2016.05.030.
Garau M, del Palacio A. Artritis por Cryptococcus neoformans en receptor de trasplante renal. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2002;19:186–9.
Geller DS, Pope JB, Thornhill BA, Dorfman HD. Cryptococcal pyarthrosis and sarcoidosis. Skelet Radiol. 2009;38:721–7.
Kozic H, Riggs K, Ringpfeil F, Lee JB. Letter. Disseminated Cryptococcus neoformans after treatment with infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis. J Am Acad Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Jaad.2006.12.012.
Bruno KM, Farhoomand L, Libman BS, Pappas CN, Landry FJ. Cryptococcal arthritis, tendinitis, tenosynovitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome: report of a case and review of the literature. Arthritis Care Res. 2002;47:104–8.
Moosbruger EA, Adams BB, Kralovic SM. Cutaneous cryptococcosis in a patient on corticosteroid therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Inter J Dermatol. 2008;47:630–2.
Bunning RD, Barth WF. Cryptococcal arthritis and cellulitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984;43:508–10.
Jang DW, Jeong I, Kim SJ, Kim SW, Park SY, et al. Pulmonary cryptococcosis that mimicked rheumatoid nodule in rheumatoid arthritis lesion. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2014;77(6):266–70. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2014.77.6.266.
Gil G, Foster C, Neira O, Palma S, Basualdo J, et al. Artritis por Cryptococcus neoformans en un adulto mayor: presentación de un caso y revisión. Rev Chil Infect. 2006;23:330–5.
Stead KJ, Klugman KP, Painter ML, Koornhof HJ. Septic arthritis due to Cryptococcus neoformans. J Infect. 1988;17:139–45.
Lesperance M, Baumgartner D, Kauffman CA. Polyarticular arthritis due to Sporothrix schenckii. Mycoses. 1988;31:599–603.
Solorzano S, Ramirez R, Cabada MM, Montoya M, Cazorla E. Esporotricosis cutánea diseminada con compromiso articular en una mujer con diabetes tipo 2. Rev Per Med Exp Salud Pública. 2015;32:187–90.
Campos-Macias P, Arenas R, Vega-Memije ME, Kawasaki M. Sporothrix schenckii type 3D (mtDNA-RFLP): report of an osteoarticular case. J Dermatol. 2006;33:295–9.
Barbaryan A, El Atrouni W, Bailuc S, Jones MW, Bhakta M, et al. Isolated Sporothrix schenckii monoarthritis. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2018;2018:1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9037657.
Orofino-Costa R, Bóia MN, Magalhäes GAP, Damasco PS, Bernardes-Engemann AR, et al. Arthritis as a hypersensitivity reaction in a case of sporotrichosis transmitted by a sick cat: clinical and serological follow up of 13 months. Mycoses. 2009;53:81–3.
Appenzeller S, Amaral TN, Amstalden EMI, Bertolo MB, et al. Sporothrix schenckii infection presented as monoarthritis: report of two cases and review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol. 2006;25:926–8.
Cuéllar ML, Silveira LH, Espinoza LR. Fungal arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51:690–7.
Carvalho Aguinaga F, Moritz Trope B, Conceicao Fernandes N, Celser Engel D, Ramos-e-Silva M. Sporotrichosis with bone involvement: an alert to an occupational disease. Case Rep Dermatol. 2014;6:114–8.
Purvis RS, Diven DG, Drechsel RD, Calhoun JH, Tyring SK. Sporotrichosis presenting as arthritis and subcutaneous nodules. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;28:879–84.
Downs NJ, Hinthorn DR, Mhatre VR, Liu C. Intra-articular amphotericin B treatment of Sporothrix schenckii arthritis. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:954–5.
Goddhan A, Ramdial PK, Morar N, Moodley SD, Aboobaker J. Disseminated cutaneous sporotrichosis: a marker of osteoarticular sporotrichosis masquerading as gout. Inter J Dermatol. 2001;40:717–9.
Chowdhary G, Weinstein A, Klein R, Mascarenhas BR. Sporotrichal arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50:112–4.
Crout JE, Brewer NS, Tompkins RB. Sporotrichosis arthritis. Clinical features in seven patients. Ann Int Med. 1977;86:294–7.
Shimizu T, Akita S, Harada Y, Oguro E, Okita Y, et al. Sporotrichal tenosynovitis diagnosed helpfully by musculoskeletal ultrasonography. Int Med. 2017;56:1243–6.
Orzechowski Xavier M, Riffel Bittencourt L, Moss da Silva C, Stone Vieira R, Pacheco Pereira HC. Atypical presentation of sporotrichosis: report of three cases. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013;46:116–8.
Orofino Costa R, Celso de Mesquita K, Damasco PS, Bernardes-Engemann AR, Dias CMP, Silva IC, et al. Infectious arthritis as the single manifestation of sporotrichosis: serology from serum and synovial fluid samples as an aid to diagnosis. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2008;25:54–6.
Schwartz DA. Sporothrix tenosynovitis- differential diagnosis of granulomatous inflammatory disease of the joints. J Rheumatol. 1989;18:550–3.
Halverson PB, Lahiri S, Wojno WC, Sulaiman AR. Sporotrichal arthritis presenting as granulomatous Myositis. Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28:1425–9.
Yamaguchi T, Ito S, Takano Y, Umeda N, Goto M, et al. A case disseminated sporotrichosis treated with prednisolone, immunosuppressants, and tocilizumab under diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Int Med. 2012;51:2035–9.
Gottlieb GS, Lesser CF, Holmes KK, Wald A. Disseminated sporotrichosis associated with treatment with immunosuppressants and tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists. CID. 2003;37:838–40.
Restrepo A, Tobón AM, Cano LE. Paracoccidioidomycosis. In: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s infectious disease essentials. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017. p. 402–3.
Torrado E, Castañeda E, de la Hoz F, Restrepo A. Paracoccidioidomicosis: definición de las áreas endémicas de Colombia. Biomedica. 2000;20:327–34.
Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Artioli Machado A, Martinez R. Paracoccidioidomycosis epidemiological features of a 1,000-cases series from a hyperendemic área on the southeast of Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85:544–50.
Moretti Monsignore L, Martinez R, Novelino Simao M, Reis Teixeira S, Elias J Jr, et al. Radiologic findings of osteoarticular infection in paracoccidioidomycosis. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41:203–8.
Moira T, Rosanova MT, Bes D, Lisdero ML, Iglesias V, et al. Paracoccidioidomicosis en Pediatria. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2014;31:141–4.
Bonilla-Abadía F, Vélez JD, Zárate-Correa LC, Carrascal E, Guarín N, et al. Overinfection by Paracoccidioides brasiliensis in gouty crystal arthritis. Case Report Med. 2012;2012:1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/128103.
Mendonca JA, Peron Filho F, Bossolan Schincariol N, Vierhout CV, Provenza JR. Musculoskeletal ultrasound findings in paracoccidioidomycosis. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2016;56:75–8.
Savarese LG, Monsignore LM, de Andrade Hernandes M, Martinez R, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of paracoccidioidomycosis in the musculoskeletal system. Tropical Med Int Health. 2015;20:1346–54.
Cardona Gómez MC, Martinez lópez CI, Ramírez Barrera JD. Paracoccidiodomicosis y artritis reumatoide. Una rara asociación. Med Lab. 2010;16:243–52.
de Camargo ZP. Serology of paracoccidioidomycosis. Mycopathologia. 2008;165:289–302.
Almeida Araujo S, Magalhaes Espindola B, Pietra Pedroso ER. Cutaneous disseminated paracoccidiodomycosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:1. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0347.
Kohelert P, Tacke D, Cornely OA. Bone and joint infections by Mucorales, Scedosporium, Fusarium and even rarer fungi. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2014;42:158. https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2014.910749.
Odessey E, Cohn A, Beaman K, Schechter L. Invasive mucormycosis of the maxillary sinus: extensive destruction with an indolent presentation. Surg Infect. 2008;9:91–8.
Taj-Aldeen SJ, Gamaletsou MN, Rommaert B, Sipsas NV, Zeller V, et al. Bone and joint infections caused by mucormycetes: A Challenging osteoarticular mycosis of the twenty-first century. Med Mycol. 2017;55(7):691–704. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myw136.
Taj-Aldeen SJ, Rammaert B, Gamaletsou M, Sipsas NV, Zeller V, et al. Osteoarticular infections caused by non-Aspergillus filamentous fungi in adult and pediatric patients. A systematic review. Medicine. 2015;94:1–13.
Requena L, Sitthinamsuwan P, Santoja C, Fernández-Figueras MT, Rodriguez-Peralto JL, et al. Cutaneous and mucosal mucormycosis mimicking pancreatic panniculitis and gouty panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(6):975–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-jaad.2011.06.024.
Camargo JF, Yakoub D, Cho-Vega JH. Successful treatment cutaneous mucormycosis complicating anti-TNF therapy with a combination of surgical debridement and oral posaconazole. Mycopathologia. 2015;180:187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-015-9914-1.
Gadadhar H, Hawkins S, Huffsttutter JE, Panda M. Cutaneous mucormycosis complicating methotrexate, prednisone, and infliximab therapy. J Clin Rheumatol. 2007;13:361–2.
Muscolo DL, Carbo L, Aponte-Tinao LA, Ayerza MA, Makino A. Massive bone loss from fungal infection after anterior cruciate ligament arthroscopic reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2420–5.
Cornely OA, Petrikkos G. ESCMID and ECMM joint clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20. (Suppl. 3:5–26.
Kauffman CA, Bustamante B, Chapman SW, Pappas P. Clinical practical guidelines for the management of sporotrichosis: 2007 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1255–65.
Perfect JR, Disnukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman D, Graybill JR, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:291–322.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramírez Gómez, L.A., Vélez Hoyos, A. (2019). Other Fungal Arthritis. In: Espinoza, L. (eds) Infections and the Rheumatic Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23311-2_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23311-2_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23310-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-23311-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)