Skip to main content

Race, Criminal Law and Ethical Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law
  • 1355 Accesses

Abstract

Race is central to the construction and application of American criminal law and, in turn, criminal law significant to the American racial experience. Yet, there remains controversy about the very nature of the question of “race in criminal law.” This chapter takes up different possible views of race and racism in criminal law, scanning questions surrounding hate crimes and racist intent, before focusing on structural racism in legislation, policing, prosecution, sentencing, mass incarceration and collateral sanctioning as the most pressing facets of race in criminal law. The endemic nature of this racism often prompts legal theorists to speculate about the obligations of oppressed racial minorities to obey the law. Ironically, less explored is the more pressing dilemma, how can privileged citizens find a way to live ethically under a system of criminal law that imposes racial injustice in their name.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    That is not to say that the distinction between “individual racism” and “structural racism” is at all new (Carmichael and Hamilton 1967, p. 4).

  2. 2.

    U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Criminal Offender Statistics. Available at: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p13.pdf (3/5/19).

  3. 3.

    Sabol et al. (2010): U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, December 2009, NCJ 228417, https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p08.pdf, p. 2.

  4. 4.

    Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99–570, 100 Stat. 3207 (codified as amended at 21 U.S.C.§§ 841–904 (2012)). As one might imagine, whether Congress was motivated by or blind to the racial impact of this disparity is now generally denied by those in Congress at the time. 156 Cong. Rec. H6202 (daily ed. July 28, 2010) (statement of Rep. Daniel E. Lungren) (noting that Congress enacted the 100-to-1 ratio “thinking we were doing the right thing at the time”); 155 Cong. Rec. S10491 (daily ed. Oct. 15, 2009) (statement of Sen. Richard Durbin) (“Those of us who supported the law establishing this disparity had good intentions”); ibid., S10493 (statement of Sen. Specter) (“I do not believe that the 1986 Act was intended to have a disparate impact on minorities but the reality is that it does”).

  5. 5.

    Kolata and Cohen (2016).

  6. 6.

    Yankah (2016).

  7. 7.

    Report of Jeffrey Fagan, Ph.D. at 22 tbl.3, Floyd v. City of New York, No. 08-01034 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008). In New York City, home of the nation’s largest police force, near 4.5 million stop and friskswere recorded between 2004 and 2012. New York’s population is roughly 23% Black, 29% Hispanic and 33% White. Nonetheless, in 52% of all searches, the persons searched were Black. In another 31% of the searches, the persons were Hispanic. Blacks and Hispanics were not only vastly disproportionately the target of searches but they also disproportionately experienced police violence. Though over half of these searches were justified as weapons searches, a weapon was found in only 1.5% of these searches. In bitter irony, weapons and contraband were slightly more likely to be found on White persons searched than on either Black or Hispanic persons searched. Just as in Terry, the overwhelming stated justifications for initiating the stops are vague descriptors that are easily influenced by racial stereotypes or prejudice such as “furtive movements” and “high crime areas.” Examining the record in Floyd v. City of New York highlights the obvious: a regime that allows and shields such wildly disparate practices from legal check and all but declares that persons of color live under a different policing regime without recourse.

  8. 8.

    Kutateladze et al. (2014, p. 3).

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    Gross et al. (2017).

  11. 11.

    Kerby (2012).

  12. 12.

    United States Sentencing Commission (2010); Spohn (2017, pp. 211–226).

  13. 13.

    McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987). Specifically, the famous Baldus study, featured in that case, found that a defendant who killed a White victim was vastly more likely to receive the death penalty than one who killed a Black victim. Additionally, the study found that Black defendants were slightly more likely to receive the death penalty than similarly situated White defendants. The study concluded that a Black defendant who killed a White victim was most likely to receive the death penalty.

  14. 14.

    Michelle Alexander comprehensively and eloquently illuminated this problem while giving it a powerful name in her book-length treatment (Alexander 2010).

  15. 15.

    Sabol et al. (2010, p. 2).

  16. 16.

    Brown v. Plata.

  17. 17.

    How confident one has to be in their assessment of the legitimacy of a system is an important issue I leave largely unaddressed. For now, it is enough to note that a thoughtful citizen will not causally decide that his idiosyncratic assessment will be sufficient and begin treating the system as illegitimate. A thoughtful citizen will consult a range of experts across the ideological spectrum and engage in meaningful deliberation with fellow citizens before reaching a conclusion. This does not guarantee that he will not reach deeply mistaken conclusions. The dangers of self-selected sources or simply flawed reasoning are unavoidable.

  18. 18.

    Indeed, to the extent some philosophical cosmopolitans assert that one has equal duties to victims of injustice in other polities, they often ground these duties in the argument that international economic relationships are unjustly created for the enrichment of citizens of rich nations. Beitz (2010).

  19. 19.

    Judge (2017).

  20. 20.

    Bridges and Johnson (2017).

  21. 21.

    As I very roughly understand it, while it is unlawful to file a return without identifying the person, one will be liable for a much more minor offense associated with a failure to file a complete claim rather than a failure to pay. 26 U.S.C. § 6651(a)(1) (2012) (failure to file return); ibid., at § 6651(a)(2) (failure to pay). I am very grateful to tax law colleagues who walked me patiently through this thinking, Mitch Attas, Mitchell Engler and, most especially, Edward Zelinsky. Highly public claims of avoiding taxes on undocumented workers are too numerous to catalogue but a particularly salient pair of examples can be seen in the President Bill Clinton’s twin nominations of Zoë Baird for United States Attorney General and, the following month, Kimba Wood as a federal judge. It became known that both of them had employed undocumented immigrants as childcare workers. Importantly, Baird had avoided paying any associated taxes for her employees. Wood, who had hired her employee when it was legal, had paid the associated social security tax. Following so shortly after Baird’s bruising nomination, Wood’s nomination was also withdrawn. For our purposes, it is important to note that Wood was in a better position to show that her employment was not exploitative or for her unfair benefit.

  22. 22.

    Among the most prominent of these is the National Lawyers Guild and its various workshops on street lawyering.

References

  • 21 U.S.C.§§ 841–904 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 26 U.S.C. § 6651(a)(1) (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • 156 Cong. Rec. H6202 (daily ed. July 28, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 155 Cong. Rec. S10491 (daily ed. Oct. 15, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown v. Plata, 563 U.S. 493 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd v. City of New York, No. 08–01034 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaronson, Ely. 2014. From slave abuse to hate crime: The criminalization of racial violence in American history. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Michelle. 2010. The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, Shamena, Patrick Bayer, and Randi Hjalmarsson. 2012. The impact of jury race in criminal trials. Quarterly Journal of Economics 127: 1017–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene, Bernadette. 2018. “Our taxes are too damn high”: Institutional racism, property tax assessments, and the fair housing act. Northwestern University Law Review 112: 1501–1564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene, Bernadette, and Timothy Hodge. 2018. Stategraft. Southern California Law Review 91: 263–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagenstos, Samuel R. 2006. The structural turn and the limits of antidiscrimination law. California Law Review 94: 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, Charles R. 2010. Justice and international relations. In The cosmopolitanism reader, ed. Garret Wallace Brown and David Held, 85–99. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Monica. 2017. Police reform and the dismantling of legal estrangement. Yale Law Journal 126: 2054–2150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John, and Philip Pettit. 1990. Not just deserts: A republican theory of criminal justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, Virginia, and Joe Johnson. 2017. Durham DA drops charges against 3 people accused of toppling Confederate monument. Herald Sun.https://www.heraldsun.com/news/local/counties/durham-county/article183661686.html. Accessed 5 Mar 2019.

  • Brooks, Richard R.W. 2000. Fear and fairness in the city: Criminal enforcement and perceptions of fairness in minority communities. Southern California Law Review 73: 1219–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Paul. 1995. Racially based jury nullification: Black power in the criminal justice system. Yale Law Journal 105: 677–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. The system is working the way it is supposed to: The limits of criminal justice reform. Georgetown Law Review 104: 1419–1478.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Race and adjudication. In Vol. 3 of Reforming criminal justice, ed. Erik Luna, 211–226. Phoenix: Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capers, Bennett. 2009. Policing, place, and race. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 44: 43–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Crime, surveillance, communities. Fordham Urban Law Journal 40: 959–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbado, Devon W. 2016. Blue-on-black violence: A provisional model of some of the causes. Georgetown Law Journal 104: 1479–1529.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. From stop and frisk to shoot and kill: Terry v. Ohio’s pathway to police violence. UCLA Law Review 64: 1508–1552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, Stokely, and Charles V. Hamilton. 1967. Black power: The politics of liberation in America. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear, Todd R. 2007. Imprisoning communities: How mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, John. 2005. Political animals and civic friendship. In Aristotle’s politics: Critical essays, ed. Richard Kraut and Steven Skultety, 65–90. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottoral, Robert J. 1996. Outlawing outcasts: Comparative perspectives on the differing functions of the criminal law of slavery in the Americas. Cardozo Law Review 18 (2): 717–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989: 139–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, Richard. 2011. Rodrigo’s reconsideration: Intersectionality and the future of critical race theory. Iowa Law Review 96: 1247–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demleitner, Nora. 1999. Preventing internal exile: The need for restrictions on collateral sentencing consequences. Stanford Law & Policy Review 11: 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R.A. 2001. Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Answering for crime: Responsibility and liability in the criminal law. Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, Jennifer L., P.G. Davies, Valerie J. Purdie-Vaughns, and Sheri Lynn Johnson. 2006. Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science 17: 383–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epp, Charles R., Steven Maynard-Moody, and Donald Haider-Markel. 2014. Pulled over: How police stops define race and citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. 1984. Harm to others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, George P. 1999. Disenfranchisement as punishment: Reflections of the racial uses of infamia. UCLA Law Review 46: 1895–1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, James, Jr. 2004. Community policing and youth as assets. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95: 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Racial critiques of mass incarceration: Beyond the new Jim Crow. New York University Law Review 87: 21–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Locking up our own: Crime and punishment in black America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galster, George C. 1993. Polarization, place, and race. North Carolina Law Review 71: 1421–1462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamal, Fanna. 2016. The racial politics of protection: A critical race examination of police militarization. California Law Review 104: 979–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, Harvey. 2010. Asian Americans and criminal law and criminal procedure: A missing chapter from race jurisprudence anthology. Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspectives 2: 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, Amanda, and Jeffrey Fagan. 2010. Pot as pretext: Marijuana, race, and the new disorder in New York City street policing. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7: 591–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennon, Theresa. 1995. Race, education, and the construction of a disabled class. Wisconsin Law Review 1995: 1237–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Tristin K. 2007. A structural approach as antidiscrimination mandate: Locating employer wrong. Vanderbilt Law Review 60: 847–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Samuel R., Maurice Possley, and Klara Stephens. 2017. Race and wrongful convictions in the United States. University of California Irvine. http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2019.

  • Hampton, Jean. 1998. Punishment, feminism, and political identity: A case study in the expressive meaning of law. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 11: 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, Alon, and Gideon Parchomovsky. 1999. On hate and equality. Yale Law Journal 109: 507–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, David A. 1997. “Driving while black” and all other traffic offenses: The Supreme Court and pretextual traffic stops. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 87: 544–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Car wars: The Fourth Amendment’s death on the highway. George Washington Law Review 66: 556–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Lee A. 2006. From Vermont to Mississippi: Race and cash welfare. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 38: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, García, and César Cuauhtémoc. 2015. Crimmigration law. Chicago: American Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huigens, Kyron. 1995. Virtue and inculpation. Harvard Law Review 108: 1423–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. On Aristotelian criminal law: A reply to Duff. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 18: 465–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Heidi M. 2001. Why liberals should hate “hate crime” legislation. Law and Philosophy 20: 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Heidi M., and Michael S. Moore. 2004. Punishing hatred and prejudice. Stanford Law Review 56: 1081–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, Monique. 2017. Durham, NC, activists stand in solidarity, crowds gather to turn themselves in for toppling Confederate statue. Root. https://www.theroot.com/durham-activists-stand-in-solidarity-crowds-gather-to-1797941708. Accessed 5 Mar 2019.

  • Kahan, Dan M. 2001. Two liberal fallacies in the hate crimes debate. Law and Philosophy 20: 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, Dan M., and Martha C. Nussbaum. 1996. Two conceptions of emotion in criminal law. Columbia Law Review 96: 269–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, George L., and Catherine M. Coles. 1996. Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerby, Sophia. 2012. The top 10 most startling facts about people of color and criminal justice in the United States. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/race/news/2012/03/13/11351/the-top-10-most-startling-facts-about-people-of-colorand-criminal-justice-in-the-united-states/. Accessed 5 Mar 2019.

  • Kim, Janine Young. 2006. Hate crime law and the limits of inculpation. Nebraska Law Review 84: 846–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Hausmann, Issa. 2014. Managerial justice and mass misdemeanors. Stanford Law Review 66: 611–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolata, Gina, and Sarah Cohen. 2016. Drug overdoses propel rise in mortality rates of young whites. New York Times, January 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutateladze, Besiki, Whitney Tymas, and Mary Crowley. 2014. Race and prosecution in Manhattan: [specific report]. New York: Vera Institute of Justice. https://storage.googleapis.com/vera-web-assets/downloads/Publications/race-and-prosecution-in-manhattan/legacy_downloads/race-and-prosecution-manhattan-summary.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2019.

  • Lopez, Ian F. Haney. 2007. “A nation of minorities”: Race, ethnicity, and reactionary colorblindness. Stanford Law Review 59: 985–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Post-racial racism: Racial stratification and mass incarceration in the age of Obama. California Law Review 98: 1023–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. Is patriotism a virtue? Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclin, Tracey. 1991. “Black and blue encounters” some preliminary thoughts about Fourth Amendment seizures: Should race matter? Valparaiso University Law Review 26: 243–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Race and the Fourth Amendment. Vanderbilt Law Review 51: 331–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Coramae Richey. 1993. Unequal justice: A question of color. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manza, Jeff, and Christopher Uggen. 2006. Locked out: Felon disenfranchisement and American democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, Peter L., and Lindsay Nash. 2018. Pardoning immigrants. New York University Law Review 93: 58–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Douglas S. 2007. Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Bruce E. 1995. The character component of occupational licensing laws: A continuing barrier to the ex-felon’s employment opportunities. North Dakota Law Review 71: 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, Allegra. 2016. Confronting the carceral state. Georgetown Law Review 104: 1405–1418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meares, Tracey L. 1997. Charting race and class differences in attitudes toward drug legalization and law enforcement: Lessons for federal criminal law. Buffalo Criminal Law Review 1: 137–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Eric J. 2006. Role-based policing: Restraining police conduct “Outside the legitimate investigative sphere”. California Law Review 94: 617–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. David. 2007. Undermining individual and collective citizenship: The impact of exclusion laws on the African American community. Fordham Urban Law Journal 34: 833–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, Khalil Gibran. 2010. The condemnation of blackness: Race, crime, and the making of modern America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Natapoff, Alexandra. 2012. Misdemeanors. Southern California Law Review 85: 1313–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nourse, Victoria. 1998. The new normativity: The abuse excuse and the resurgence of judgment in the criminal law. Review of Moral judgment: Does the abuse excuse threaten our legal system?, by James Q. Wilson. Stanford Law Review 50: 1435–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Hearts and minds: Understanding the new culpability. Buffalo Criminal Law Review 6: 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pager, Devah. 2007. Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paul-Emile, Kimani. 2018. Blackness as disability. Georgetown Law Review 106: 293–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaff, John F. 2012. The micro and macro causes of prison growth. Georgia State University Law Review 28: 1239–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Waylaid by a metaphor: A deeply problematic account of prison growth. Review of A plague of prisons, by Ernest Drucker. University of Michigan Law Review 111: 1087–10110.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Escaping from the standard story: Why the conventional wisdom on prison growth is wrong, and where we can go from here. Federal Sentencing Reporter 26: 265–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox. 2003. Why welfare is racist. In Race and the politics of welfare reform, ed. Sanford F. Schram, Joe Soss, and Richard C. Fording, 323–335. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roithmayr, Daria. 2000. Barriers to entry: A market lock-in model of discrimination. Virginia Law Review 86: 727–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabol, William J., Heather C. West, and Matthew Cooper. 2010. Bureau of Justice statistics bulletin: Prisoners in 2008. Washington, DC. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p08.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2019.

  • Scheffler, Sam. 2016. Death and the afterlife. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, Bobby, and Stephen Shames. 2016. Power to the people: The world of the Black Panthers. New York: Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelby, Tommie. 2016. Dark ghettos: Injustice, dissent, and reform. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Kami Chavis. 2014. The legacy of stop and frisk: Addressing the vestiges of a violent police culture. Wake Forest Law Review 49: 849–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Kenneth W. 2000. On equality, bias crimes and just deserts. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 91: 237–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklansky, David A. 1995. Cocaine, race, and equal protection. Stanford Law Review 47: 1283–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Traffic stops, minority motorists, and the future of the Fourth Amendment. Supreme Court Review 1997: 271–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Sandra Susan. 2010. Race and trust. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 453–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, Cassia. 2017. Race and sentencing disparity. In Vol. 4 of Reforming criminal justice, ed. Erik Luna, 211–226. Phoenix: Academy for Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, Sonja B., and M. Marit Rehavi. 2014. Racial disparity in federal criminal sentences. Journal of Political Economy 122: 1320–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiker, Carol S. 1999. Punishing hateful motives: Old wine in a new bottle revives calls for prohibition. Review of Hate crimes: Criminal law & identity politics, by James B. Jacobs and Kimberly Potter. Michigan Law Review 97: 1857–1873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Anthony C. 1999. Stopping the usual suspects: Race and the Fourth Amendment. New York University Law Review 74: 956–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Releasing prisoners, redeeming communities: Reentry, race, and politics. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, Michael. 1994. Race and the war on drugs. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1994: 25–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, K.B., David Giacopassi, and Margaret Vandiver. 2006. Ignoring the past: Coverage of slavery and slave patrols in criminal justice texts. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 17: 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Sentencing Commission. 2010. Demographic differences in federal sentencing practices: An update of the Booker report’s multivariate regression analysis. USSC Government. https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/research-publications/2010/20100311_Multivariate_Regression_Analysis_Report.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2019.

  • Varnum, Thomas G. 2008. Let’s not jump to conclusions: Approaching felon disenfranchisement challenges under the voting rights act. Michigan Journal of Race and Law 14: 109–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez, Yolanda. 2017. Crimmigration: The missing piece of criminal justice reform. University of Richmond Law Review 51: 1093–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, Jordon Blair. 2015. Decriminalization, police authority, and routine traffic stops. UCLA Law Review 62: 672–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankah, Ekow N. 2004. Good guys and bad guys: Punishing character, equality and the irrelevance of moral character to criminal punishment. Cardozo Law Review 25 (3): 1019–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. A paradox in overcriminalization. New Criminal Law Review 14: 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Republican responsibility in criminal law. Criminal Law and Philosophy 9: 457–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. When addiction had a white face. New York Times, February 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019a. Pretext and justification: Republicanism, policing, and race. Cardozo Law Review 40: 1543.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b. Forthcoming. Whose burden to bear? Criminal Law & Philosophy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekow N. Yankah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yankah, E.N. (2019). Race, Criminal Law and Ethical Life. In: Alexander, L., Kessler Ferzan, K. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22811-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics