Abstract
Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) are uncommon neoplasms of the pancreas that are characterized by a distinctive-type ovarian stroma. They tend to occur in the distal pancreas in middle-aged women. The majority of MCNs are slow growing with the prevalence of invasive carcinoma ranging from 3.9% to 34.4%. The preoperative diagnosis of MCNs is based on a multimodal approach comprising clinical features, tumor markers, imaging findings, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration, and cyst fluid analysis. As per the 2012 Fukuoka consensus guidelines, surgical resection is recommended for all surgically fit patients with MCNs. Although surgical resection has been the traditional management for MCNs, conservative management options are being increasingly explored. This chapter will discuss various aspects of MCNs including the clinical features, imaging findings, pathologic features, molecular genetics, and treatment and prognosis.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Clinical Features
Mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) is an uncommon tumor of the pancreas that is characterized by the presence of subepithelial ovarian-type stroma. Although most of these tumors are benign, they are considered to be premalignant as they can develop dysplasia and invasive carcinoma. The prevalence of invasive carcinoma has been reported to range from 3.9% to 34.4% in these lesions [1].
They occur almost exclusively in women in the fifth to sixth decades of life; the mean age being 48 years. Though patients may present with symptoms including abdominal pain, recurrent pancreatitis , abdominal mass, or weight loss, an increasing number of MCNs are asymptomatic, being incidentally detected on imaging [2].
Pathogenesis
The expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and steroidogenic enzymes by the ovarian-type stroma in MCNs suggests a role of female sex steroids in their pathogenesis [3, 4]. Also, these tumors are mostly seen in women and are histologically similar to tumors arising in the liver and biliary tract and in the retroperitoneum. One possibility is that MCNs may originate from the ovarian primordium. This is supported by their similar morphology and immunophenotype and the presence of luteinized cells.
Another hypothesis is that they are derived from ectopic ovarian-type stroma in the distal pancreas which by producing hormones and growth factors may cause endodermally derived epithelium to proliferate and form cystic neoplasms. However, such mechanisms do not explain the occasional occurrence of MCNs in men [3].
Imaging Findings
Majority (>95%) of MCNs are located in the body or tail of the pancreas [5]. On imaging, they usually appear as macrocystic lesions that may have a solid component. Unlike side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), there is usually no communication with the pancreatic duct.
MCNs, especially if small in size, may be indistinguishable from pseudocysts, serous cystadenomas, and IPMNs on imaging. Lesion shape on computed tomography (CT) scan has been reported to be a helpful discriminating feature between oligocystic serous adenomas, MCNs, and IPMNs. Serous cystadenomas tend to have a multicystic or lobulated contour with or without septation, while MCNs have a smooth contour with or without septation, and IPMNs either have a pleomorphic or a clubbed fingerlike cystic shape [6]. In a study of 33 patients with unilocular pancreatic cystic lesions, Cohen-Scali reported that location in the pancreatic head, lobulated contour, and lack of wall enhancement were specific for serous cystadenomas in comparison to MCNs [7]. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can help visualize septations, thick cyst walls, and mural nodules better than CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Fig. 8.1). Also, it can allow the aspiration of the cyst contents and biopsy of the cyst wall for a tissue diagnosis [8].
The predictors of malignancy in MCNs on imaging have been variably reported. A retrospective study of 52 patients by Procacci and colleagues showed that the presence of septal or wall calcifications, septations, and a thick wall on CT scan was associated with malignancy in 95% of cases [9]. In a study of 90 MCNS, Park et al. found that the presence of mural nodules on CT scan was a significant predictor of malignancy [2]. A study of 32 resected MCNs with preoperative MDCT or MRI showed that MCN size (>8.5 cm) and volume were the only features that correlated with high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma. A cyst size of >8.5 cm was associated with 60% sensitivity and 97% specificity for the presence of high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma [10].
Pathologic Features
Gross Findings
MCNS are usually solitary, large, multilocular or unilocular cysts with a thick fibrotic capsule and a mean diameter of 6.5 cm [1].The cysts contain abundant mucus and cloudy brown fluid. Solid areas may be seen in the cysts that should be sampled extensively for histologic examination. Typically, there is no communication with the pancreatic duct system.
Histology
MCNs are characterized by mucinous epithelium with varying degrees of dysplasia. The epithelium may be mostly bland with tall columnar to cuboidal cells with basally located nuclei in a flat or papillary architecture (Fig. 8.2). Although scattered goblet cells may be present, intestinal differentiation is not a usual feature of MCNs [11]. Some foci of the epithelium may be lined by a single layer of pancreatobiliary-type, non-mucinous cuboidal cells [12].
The subepithelial ovarian-type stroma is essential for the diagnosis of MCN and should be present at least focally in the tumor. At times, the epithelium may be denuded; but the ovarian-type stroma may still be identifiable, providing an important clue to the diagnosis. The spindle cell stroma may also contain nests of epithelioid cells with features suggestive of luteinization. The stroma can also exhibit degenerative changes such as hyalinization, calcification, and cholesterol clefts.
As per the 2010 World Health Organization classification, the dysplasia in MCN is graded as low, intermediate, or high, based on the most severely dysplastic focus [13]. It is critical that the tumor is extensively, if not completely, sampled for histologic examination as high-grade dysplasia may be present only focally in the tumor. In low-grade dysplasia, the lining epithelium is cytologically bland with minimal architectural complexity. Intermediate-grade dysplasia is characterized by loss of nuclear polarity, moderate atypia, and mild architectural complexity. High-grade dysplasia is associated with marked cytologic atypia and mitotic figures with significant architectural complexity.
Invasive carcinomas arising in MCNs are usually of the tubular type, resembling conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Adenosquamous carcinoma and undifferentiated carcinoma (with or without osteoclast-like giant cells) may rarely occur in MCNs [3, 14].
Cytology
On FNA specimens, MCNs and IPMNs cannot be distinguished from one another based on cytologic features [15, 16].The subepithelial ovarian-type stroma that is considered a prerequisite for the diagnosis of MCNs cannot be visualized on cytologic samples.
The cytologic diagnosis for a neoplastic mucinous cyst is based on the presence of extracellular thick mucin and/or neoplastic mucinous epithelium that can show a range of atypias (Figs. 8.3 and 8.4). The aspirates of MCNs are usually paucicellular. In an analysis of 61 MCNs, Scourtas et al. reported lack of epithelial cells in 74% of cases. Extracellular mucin was seen in 39% of low-risk cysts and 33% of high-risk cysts. Necrosis or cellular debris were identified in 31% of low-risk cysts and 50% of high-risk cysts. The presence of mucin or necrosis/cellular debris was not found to be significantly associated with the degree of dysplasia on histology. Inflammation and/or histiocytes were more frequently seen in low-risk cysts in contrast to high-risk cysts [8].
A purely cytologic approach is inferior to an integrated approach of cytology with ancillary testing in diagnosing a neoplastic mucinous cyst of the pancreas. Until recently, there had been no standardized guidelines for the cytopathologist to report pancreatico-biliary cytology. The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (Pap Society) advocates a multidisciplinary approach for the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions and recommends the incorporation of all available relevant ancillary data to make a cytologic diagnosis. In addition, they support a two-tiered approach for grading cytologic atypia in mucinous cysts when features suspicious or unequivocal for malignancy are not seen: low-grade atypia (usually correlates with low-grade or intermediate-grade dysplasia on histology) and high-grade atypia (usually correlates with high-grade dysplasia or worse on follow-up) [15, 16].
Scourtas et al. reported the finding of high-grade atypia in 33% of high-risk MCNs with available cytology. Though the sensitivity of cytology was limited in the detection of high-risk cysts, its specificity was 100% and accuracy 95% [8].
Immunohistochemistry
The lining epithelium of MCNs is typically positive for MUC5AC and negative for MUC1. MUC2 expression is restricted to goblet cells that are dispersed within the epithelium [14]. The stromal cells are positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors; and the luteinized cells exhibit positivity for inhibin, tyrosine hydroxylase, and calretinin.
p53 positivity increases with the grade of dysplasia and can also be seen in the invasive component [3]. Loss of DPC4 protein expression is a frequent event in invasive MCNs in contrast to noninvasive ones [17].
Molecular Genetics
Whole-exome sequencing of MCNs has revealed 16 ± 7.6 nonsynonymous somatic mutations per tumor. Mutations have been identified in RNF43 (which codes for a protein with intrinsic E3 ubiquitin ligase activity), KRAS, TP53, SMAD4, and CDKN2A. KRAS mutation is an early event, while tumor suppressor gene mutations (TP53, SMAD4, and CDKN2A) occur in MCNs with high-grade dysplasia or associated invasive carcinomas [19, 20]. GNAS mutations are not found in MCNs, in contrast to IPMNs [21]. PIK3CA mutations have also been detected in MCNs with high-grade dysplasia and may contribute to tumor progression [22].
Management
As per the 2012 Fukuoka consensus guidelines, surgical resection is recommended for all surgically fit patients with MCNs. Surgical resection has been the traditional management for MCNs due to their potential for malignant transformation, their location in the distal pancreas, and the relatively young age of the patients. MCNs are usually located in the pancreatic body and tail and therefore require distal pancreatectomy. Furthermore, there is no definitive method to determine preoperatively whether the tumor is benign or malignant, and conservative management would require years of surveillance with high-resolution imaging that is associated with high costs [23].
Although surgical resection has been the treatment of choice, more conservative management options are being explored for the management of MCNs. A study of 90 patients with MCNs showed that regardless of histologic grade, long-term outcome was excellent in MCNs. In this study, only 10% of MCNs were malignant. The overall 5-year disease-free survival was 98.8% for all patients, 100% for MCNs with high-grade dysplasia, and 75% for those with invasive carcinoma. Based on the results of this study, MCNs which are smaller than 3 cm that lack mural nodules and elevated serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 are very likely to be benign. Therefore, the authors suggested that MCNs that met the aforementioned criteria could be followed conservatively [2].
In a study of 168 MCNs, Crippa et al. identified a low risk of cancer in these tumors (11% invasive and 6% in situ) and thereby indicated that nonoperative management could potentially be allowed in MCNs that are asymptomatic, <4 cm in size, and without solid components [24].
As per the 2018 European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms, MCNs ≥ 40 mm should undergo surgical resection. Resection is also recommended for MCNs which are symptomatic or have risk factors (i.e., mural nodule) irrespective of their size. MCNs measuring <40 mm without a mural nodule or symptoms may undergo surveillance with MRI, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), or a combination of both [25].
Prognosis
The complete resection of a noninvasive MCN is curative, requiring no postoperative surveillance with a 5-year disease-specific survival rate of 100% [26, 27]. However, the 5-year disease-specific survival rate drops to 20% to 60% for patients with MCNs with advanced invasive carcinoma [24, 28, 29].
Minimally invasive carcinomas (<0.5 cm) as well as MCNs with invasion limited to ovarian-like stroma or intratumoral septa reportedly have a good prognosis [13, 30]. Another study showed that MCN with T1a (≤0.5 cm) and T1b (>0.5 cm and <1.0 cm) carcinomas had an excellent prognosis similar to MCNs with low-grade or high-grade dysplasia after complete tumor sampling for histologic examination. These studies suggest that for such tumors, close follow-up may be a better approach as compared to aggressive systemic therapy [31].
References
Fukushima N, Zamboni G. Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: update on the surgical pathology and molecular genetics. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2014;31:467–74. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2014.08.007.
Park JW, Jang JY, Kang MJ, Kwon W, Chang YR, Kim SW. Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: is surgical resection recommended for all surgically fit patients? Pancreatology. 2014;14:131–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2013.12.006.
Zamboni G, Scarpa A, Bogina G, Iacono C, Bassi C, Talamini G, et al. Mucinous cystic tumors of the pancreas: clinicopathological features, prognosis, and relationship to other mucinous cystic tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:410–22.
Ishida K, Sasano H, Moriya T, Takahashi Y, Sugimoto R, Mue Y, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of steroidogenic enzymes in ovarian-type stroma of pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms: comparative study of subepithelial stromal cells in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Pathol Int. 2016;66:281–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/pin.12406.
Thompson LD, Becker RC, Przygodzki RM, Adair CF, Heffess CS. Mucinous cystic neoplasm (mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of low-grade malignant potential) of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic study of 130 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:1–16.
Kim SY, Lee JM, Kim SH, Shin KS, Kim YJ, An SK, et al. Macrocystic neoplasms of the pancreas: CT differentiation of serous oligocystic adenoma from mucinous cystadenoma and intraductal papillary mucinous tumor. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1192–8.
Cohen-Scali F, Vilgrain V, Brancatelli G, Hammel P, Vullierme MP, Sauvanet A, et al. Discrimination of unilocular macrocystic serous cystadenoma from pancreatic pseudocyst and mucinous cystadenoma with CT: initial observations. Radiology. 2003;228:727–33.
Scourtas A, Dudley JC, Brugge WR, Kadayifci A, Mino-Kenudson M, Pitman MB. Preoperative characteristics and cytological features of 136 histologically confirmed pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125:169–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21806.
Procacci C, Carbognin G, Accordini S, Biasiutti C, Guarise A, Lombardo F, et al. CT features of malignant mucinous cystic tumors of the pancreas. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1626–30.
Garces-Descovich A, Beker K, Castillo-Angeles M, Brook A, Resnick E, Shinagare S, et al. Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: high-resolution cross-sectional imaging features with clinico-pathologic correlation. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43:1413–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261–017–1326-x.
Baker ML, Seeley ES, Pai R, Suriawinata AA, Mino-Kenudson M, Zamboni G, et al. Invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Exp Mol Pathol. 2012;93:345–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2012.07.005.
Albores-Saavedra J, Manivel C, Dorantes-Heredia R, Chablé-Montero F, Godoy-Valdés C, Chan-Nuñez C, et al. Nonmucinous cystadenomas of the pancreas with pancreatobiliary phenotype and ovarian-like stroma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;139:599–604. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPHSV7TV2WOJFE.
Zamboni G, Fukushima N, Hruban RH, Klöppel G. Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. In: Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, editors. WHO classification of tumors of the diagestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2010. p. 300–3.
Lüttges J, Feyerabend B, Buchelt T, Pacena M, Klöppel G. The mucin profile of noninvasive and invasive mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:466–71.
Pitman MB, Centeno BA, Ali SZ, Genevay M, Stelow E, Mino-Kenudson M, et al. Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42:338–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23092.
Pitman MB, Layfield LJ. Guidelines for pancreaticobiliary cytology from the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology: a review. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:399–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21427.
Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Wilentz RE, Argani P, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Kern SE, et al. Dpc4 protein in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: frequent loss of expression in invasive carcinomas suggests a role in genetic progression. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:1544–8.
Oh HC, Kang H, Brugge WR. Cyst fluid amylase and CEA levels in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: a single-center experience with histologically proven cysts. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:3111–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620–014–3254–8.
Wu J, Jiao Y, Dal Molin M, Maitra A, de Wilde RF, Wood LD, et al. Whole-exome sequencing of neoplastic cysts of the pancreas reveals recurrent mutations in components of ubiquitin-dependent pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:21188–93. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118046108.
Wood LD, Hruban HR. Genomic landscapes of pancreatic neoplasia. J Pathol Transl Med. 2015;49:13–22. https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2014.12.26.
Singhi AD, Nikiforova MN, Fasanella KE, McGrath KM, Pai RK, Ohori NP, et al. Preoperative GNAS and KRAS testing in the diagnosis of pancreatic mucinous cysts. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:4381–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078–0432.CCR-14–0513.
Garcia-Carracedo D, Chen ZM, Qiu W, Huang AS, Tang SM, Hruban RH, et al. PIK3CA mutations in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreas. 2014;43:245–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000034.
Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, Adsay V, Chari S, Falconi M, Jang JY, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12:183–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2012.04.004.
Crippa S, Salvia R, Warshaw AL, Domínguez I, Bassi C, Falconi M, et al. Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas is not an aggressive entity: lessons from 163 resected patients. Ann Surg. 2008;247:571–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31811f4449.
European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas. European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Gut. 2018;67:789–804. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018–316027.
Wilentz RE, Albores-Saavedra J, Zahurak M, Talamini MA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL. Pathologic examination accurately predicts prognosis in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:1320–7.
Xourafas D, Tavakkoli A, Clancy TE, Ashley SW. Noninvasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms: recurrence rates and postoperative imaging follow-up. Surgery. 2015;157:473–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.09.028.
Suzuki Y, Atomi Y, Sugiyama M, Isaji S, Inui K, Kimura W, et al. Cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: a Japanese multiinstitutional study of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor and mucinous cystic tumor. Pancreas. 2004;28(3):241–6.
Testini M, Gurrado A, Lissidini G, Venezia P, Greco L, Piccinni G. Management of mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:5682–92.
Lewis GH, Wang H, Bellizzi AM, Klein AP, Askin FB, Schwartz LE, et al. Prognosis of minimally invasive carcinoma arising in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:601–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318273f3b0.
Hui L, Rashid A, Foo WC, Katz MH, Chatterjee D, Wang H, et al. Significance of T1a and T1b carcinoma arising in mucinous cystic neoplasm of pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:578–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001040.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yoxtheimer, L., Goyal, A. (2019). Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms. In: Goyal, A., Rao, R., Siddiqui, M. (eds) Pancreas and Biliary Tract Cytohistology. Essentials in Cytopathology, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22433-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22433-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22432-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22433-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)