Abstract
Many research programs have been worked out in recent years in order to account for an apparently trivial aspect of the human language activity. We refer to the fact that every speaker hears the sound of his own words. Our paper aims to embed this empirical insight in the theoretical framework of the so-called enactive grammar. This choice is justified by the fact that the enactive grammar introduced a formal distinction which allows to provide a clear formulation of the jakobsonian assert. In order to highlight this point, the paper will be subdivided into seven sections. The first section will be devoted to the experience of the hearing oneself speak. The second one will examine this experience from an enactive point of view. The third and forth section will try to show in which sense every speaker is his own interpreter (or co-speaker). The fifth one will analyze some theoretical consequences deriving from the remarks developed in the first four parts of the paper. Finally, the sixth and seventh section will seek to outline a realistic description of the so-called self-listening process. In the conclusion, we will give a synthetic résumé of the principal steps of our analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Cfr. Jakobson and Hallett (1963, pp. 131–132) cit. in Albano Leoni (2015, p. 56).
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Cfr. at least Lacan (1981), Hartmann (2011).
- 5.
Cfr. at least Tomatis (2013, 1990).
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
Cfr. Bottineau (2013, p. 5).
- 10.
- 11.
Cfr. Bottineau (2006, p. 303).
- 12.
Cfr. Lapaire (2013, p. 57).
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
Cfr. at least Coursil (2015b, p. 227).
- 16.
Cfr. at least Coursil (2015a, p. 45).
- 17.
Cfr. Ibidem p. 40.
- 18.
Cfr. Ibidem p. 46.
- 19.
Cfr. Coursil (2000, p. 3 n. 6).
- 20.
Cit. in Brownell (2012, p. 112).
- 21.
Cfr. Szendy (2017, p. 63).
- 22.
Cfr. Hartsuiker and Kolk (2001, p. 152).
- 23.
Cfr. Ivi.
References
Albano Leoni, F. (2002). Des sons et des sens. La physionomie acoustique des mots. Lyon: ENS éditions.
Authier-Revuz, J. (2004) Ces mots qui ne vont pas de soi. Boucles réflexives et non-coïncidence du dire. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas
Berthoz, A. (1997). Le sens du mouvement. Paris: Odile Jacob
Berthoz, A. (2009). La simplexité. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Bottineau, D. (2006). L’émergence du sens par l’acte de langage, de la syntaxe au submorphème. In M. Banniard & D. Philps (Eds.), La fabrique du signe, Linguistique de l’emergence (pp. 299–325). Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail.
Bottineau, D. (2008). Co-experiencing prosody: the distributed motives and effects of prosody in languaging processes, forthcoming.
Bottineau, D. (2010). Language and enaction. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 267–306). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bottineau, D. (2011). Parole, corporéité, individu et société: l’embodiment entre le représentationnalisme et la cognition incarnée, distribuée, biosémiotique et enactive dans les linguistiques cognitives. Intellectica, 56, 187–220.
Bottineau, D. (2012). La parole comme technique cognitive et incarnée et sociale. La Tribune internationale des langues vivantes, 52–53, 44–55.
Bottineau, D. (2013). Pour une approche enactive de la parole dans les langues. Langages, 192, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.192.0011.
Bottineau, D. (2017). Incarnation langagière et grammaire des langues naturelles: vers la fin d’un clivage. In La cognition incarnée (pp. 251-294). Paris: Vrin.
Brownell, J. (2012). Listening: Attitudes, principles, and skills. London: Routledge.
Coursil, J. (2000). La fonction muette du langage. La Martinique: Ibis.
Coursil, J. (2015a). Valeurs pures. Le paradigme sémiotique de Ferninand de Saussure. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.
Coursil, J. (2015b). Hidden principles of improvisation. SEMEIOTIKE Signs Syst Stud, 15, 226–234. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2015.43.2-3.05.
Coursil, J. (2017). Semiotica dell’ascolto. Scienze e ricerche, 44, 21–27.
Culioli, A. (2014). L’arco e la freccia. Scritti scelti. Bologna: Il Mulino.
De Cristo, A. (2013). La prosodie de la parole. Bruxelles: De Boeck éditeur.
Derrida, J. (1972). Marges de la philosophie. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit.
Derrida, J. (2010). La voce e il fenomeno. Milano: Jaca Book.
Ducrot, O. (1984). Le dire et le dit. Paris:Les éditions de Minuit.
Emmert, P. (1994). A definition of listening. Listening Post, 51 (6), 6–25.
Hartmann, F. (2011). L’imaginaire, c’est le sens. Quelques remarques sur la théorie de Jacqueline Authier-Revuz. La revue lacanienne. La psychanalyse et le langues, 11, 181–186. https://doi.org/10.3917/lrl.113.0181.
Hartsuiker, R.J., & Kolk, H.H.J. 2001. Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 113–157, https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2000.0744.
Hofer, B. (2015). On the dynamics of early multilingualism. A psycholinguistic study. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Hoffman, R. (1997). What Neural Network Studies suggest regarding boundary between Conscious and Unconscious mental processes. In D.J. Stein (Ed.), Cognitive science and unconscious (pp. 121–140). Washington: American Psychiatric Press.
Horn, L. (2004). A natural history of negation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lacan, J. (2007). Le séminaire, Livre III, Les Psychoses 1955-1956. Paris: Les éditions du Seuil.
Lapaire, J.-R. (2013). Gestualité cogrammaticale: de l’action corporelle spontanée aux postures de travail métagestuel guidé. Maybe et le balancement épistémique en anglais. Langages, 192, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.192.0057.
Levelt, W. (1993). Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, MIT Press.
Malabou, C. (2017). Les noveaux blessés. De Freud à la neurologie, penser les traumatismes contemporaines. Paris: PUF.
Maturana, H. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In G. Miller & E. Lennenberg (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lennenberg (pp. 27–64). New York: Academic Press.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Olivier, G. (2012). La cognition gestuelle. Ou de l’écho à l’égo. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Pêcheux, M. (1992). Automatic discourse analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Peter, D., & Elliot, P. (2016). The speech chain: The physics and biology of spoken language. Dordrecht: Springer.
Szendy, P. (2017). Prêter l’oreille. Petite conférence sur l’écoute. Paris: Bayard.
Tomatis, A. (1990). L’oreille et la vie. Itinéraire d’une recherche sur l’audtion, la langue et la communication. Paris: Réponses-Santé/ Robert Laffont.
Tomatis, A. (2013). L’orecchio e il linguaggio. Milano: Ibis.
Tomsen, O.N. (2006). Competing models of linguistic change: Evolution and beyond (CURRENT ISSUES IN LINGUISTIC THEORY). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1993). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilkinson, S. (2014). Accounting for the phenomenology and varieties of auditory verbal hallucination within a predictive processing framework. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
La Mantia, F. (2020). The Silent Work of Speech. On an Enactive Grammar’s Insight. In: Pennisi, A., Falzone, A. (eds) The Extended Theory of Cognitive Creativity. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22090-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22089-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22090-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)