Abstract
Developed in 1995 and refined in 2004, control balance theory seeks to explain and predict the cause of deviant acts. Integrating components of existing theories with novel sociological thought, the theory proposes deviance as one response to acute awareness of control imbalance. More specifically, the theory hypothesizes that perceived control ratio imbalances may produce feelings of disrespect or humiliation thus promoting contemplations of how to extend control of people, events, and circumstances without stimulating counter control. Certain desirable acts, including acts of deviance, are enacted in an attempt to relieve the negative emotions associated with control imbalance while also minimizing the potential for retaliation or other forms of resistance. In this chapter, we review the basic theory of control balance. Following, we answer ten inquiries frequently asked about the theory, including questions about control ratios and control balance desirability, self-control’s relation to control ratios, the subjectivity of provocations, the process of control balancing, beliefs about human rationality and desire for control, the reciprocal nature of control, the role of revenge, and the empirical standing of the theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.
Agnew, R. (2007). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Agnew, R. (2016). Strain, economic status, and crime. In A. R. Piquero (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 209–229). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Baron, S. W., & Forde, D. R. (2007). Street youth crime: A test of control balance theory. Justice Quarterly, 24, 335–355.
Baumer, E. P., & Arnio, A. N. (2016). Macro-level theory: A critical component of criminological exploration. In A. R. Piquero (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 445–474). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
Braithwaite, J. (1997). Charles Tittle’s control balance and criminological theory. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 77–97.
Brauer, J. R., & Tittle, C. R. (2017). When crime is not an option: Inspecting the moral filtering of criminal actions alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 34, 818–846.
Burger, J. M. (1992). Desire for control: Personality, social and clinical perspectives. New York: Springer.
Castro, E. D., Nobles, M. R. & Zavala, E. (2017). Assessing intimate partner violence in a control balance theory framework. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi-org.libproxy.uncg.edu/10.1177/0886260516689776.
Curry, T. R. (2005). Integrating motivating and constraining forces in deviance causation: A test of causal chain hypotheses in control balance theory. Deviant Behavior, 26, 571–599.
Curry, T. R., & Piquero, A. R. (2003). Control ratio and defiant acts if deviance: Assessing additive and conditional effects with constraints and impulsivity. Sociological Perspectives, 46, 397–415.
Delisi, M., & Hochstetler, A. L. (2002). An exploratory assessment of Tittle’s control balance theory: Results from the National Youth Survey. Justice Professional, 15, 261–272.
Dunaway, R. G., Cullen, F. T., Piquero, A. R., Wood, P. B., Burton, Jr., V. S. & Evans, T. D. (1999). Job autonomy and work place crime: A test of control balance theory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association: Toronto, November 1999.
Fox, K. A., Nobles, M. R., & Lane, J. (2016). Control balance behind bars: Testing the generality of Tittle’s theory among incarcerated men and women. Crime and Delinquency, 62, 925–953.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hay, C., & Meldaum, R. (2016). Self-control and crime over the life course. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Hickman, M., & Piquero, A. R. (2001). Exploring the relationships between gender, control balance, and deviance. Deviant Behavior, 22, 323–351.
Hickman, M., Piquero, A. R., Lawton, B. A., & Greene, J. R. (2001). Applying Tittle’s control balance theory to police deviance. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 24, 497–519.
Higgins, G. E., & Lauterbach, C. (2004). Control balance theory and exploitation: An examination of contingencies. Criminal Justice Studies, 38, 241–260.
Higgins, G. E., Lauterbach, C., & Tewksberry, R. (2005). Control balance theory and violence: An examination of contingencies. Sociological Focus, 38, 241–260.
Hughes, L. A., Antonaccio, O., & Botchkovar, E. V. (2015). How general is control balance theory? Evidence from Ukraine. Justice Quarterly, 32, 950–975.
Jensen, G. A. (1999). A critique of control balance theory: Digging into the details. Theoretical Criminology, 3, 339–343.
Messner, S. F., Krohn, M. D., & Liska, A. E. (1985). Deviance and crime: Problems and prospects. Albany: State University of New York Press.
McCarthy, B. (2002). New economics of sociological criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 417–442.
Nobles, M. R., & Fox, K. A. (2013). Assessing stalking behaviors in a control balance theory framework. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 763–783.
Paternoster, R., & Pogarsky, G. (2009). Rational choice, agency, and thoughtfully reflective decision making: The short and long-term consequences of making good decisions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 103–127.
Piquero, A. R., & Hickman, M. (1999). An empirical test of Tittle s control balance theory. Criminology, 44, 319–341.
Piquero, A. R., & Hickman, M. (2003). Extending Tittle’s control balance theory to account for victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 282–301.
Piquero, A. R., & Piquero, N. L. (2006). Control balance and exploitative corporate crime. Criminology, 44, 397–430.
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 381, 931–964.
Rafeld, H., Fritz-Morgenthal, S., & Posch, P. (2017). Behavioral patterns in rogue trading. Analysing the cases of Nick Leeson, Jerome Kerviel, and Kweku Adoboli in light of the control balance theory. Journal of Financial Compliance, 1(2), 156–171.
Savelsberg, J. J. (1999). Human nature and social control in complex society: A critique of Charles Tittle’s control balance. Theoretical Criminology, 3, 331–338.
Short, J. F., Jr. (1998). The level of explanation problem revisited the American Society of Criminology 1997 Presidential Address. Criminology, 36, 3–36.
Stets, J. E. (1995). Job autonomy and control over one’s spouse: A compensatory process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 244–258.
Tittle, C. R. (1995). Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Tittle, C. R. (2004a). Refining control balance theory. Theoretical Criminology, 8, 395–428.
Tittle, C. R. (2004b). Control balance theory and violence. In H. Brownstein, M. A. Zahn, & S. I. Jackson (Eds.), Violence: From theory to research (pp. 51–69). Newark, NJ: Lexus/Nexus/Anderson.
Wikström, P. O. H. (2006). Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In P. O. H. Wikström & R. J. Sampson (Eds.), The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms and development (pp. 61–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, K. S. (2008). Using Tittle’s control balance theory to understand computer crime and deviance. International Review of Law, Computers, and Technology, 22, 145–155.
Wood, P. B., & Dunaway, R. G. (1997). An application of control balance theory to incarcerated sex offenders. Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium, 4(1997–1998), 1–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tittle, C.R., Dollar, C.B. (2019). Control Balance Theory of Deviance. In: Krohn, M., Hendrix, N., Penly Hall, G., Lizotte, A. (eds) Handbook on Crime and Deviance. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20779-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20778-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20779-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)