Abstract
One of the main problems in culture-oriented studies is related to a fundamental paradox. On the one hand, we aim to achieve a general understanding of the characteristics of a people, a country or a certain part of the world. On the other hand, cultural differences should also be traceable on a micro-level in terms of the culture in an organization, a group or a family. Most of the cross-cultural research ends up in the former trench, and fails to say anything about the latter. The Re.Cri.Re. project aims to unite these perspectives by applying two different approaches. After an analysis of the use of the semiological terms in-absentia and in-praesentia, this author concludes that the Re.Cri.Re. project tends to fall in the same trench as most of the cross-cultural research, quite simply because cultural meaning is still defined as generalized meaning. This paper argues that the cultural meaning has to be defined as particularized meaning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
de Saussure, F. (2011). Course in general linguistics, Trans. W. Baskin, New York: Columbia University Press (original work in French 1916).
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1983). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
ISBEM (2017). TR Synchronic Analysis. [Scientific report. Re.Cri.Re. Consortium. Deliverable 3.2.] http://www.recrire.eu/documents.
Klempe, H., Granskaya, J., & Rundmo, T. (2009). Redefining culture in traffic safety—Russia and Norway compared. In: 11th European Congress of Psychology, Invited symposium on Cultural Differences in Traffic safety and Behaviour, Oslo, July 7–10, 2009.
Klempe, H., Liu, B., & Rundmo, T. (2013). Human values in cross-cultural psychology. Politics and Society, 1(1), 130–142.
Lonner, W. L., & Adamopoulos, J. (1997). Culture as antecedent to behavior. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Portinga, & J. Panday (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Volume 1: Theory and method, second edition (pp. 43–48). Boston, MS: Allyn & Bacon.
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for western civilization. New York: William Morrow.
Rundmo, T., Granskaya, J., & Klempe, H. (2012). Traffic culture as symbol exchange—A cross-country comparison of Russia and Norway. Safety Science, 50, 1261–1267.
Salvatore, S., & Venuleo, C. (2013). Field and dynamic nature of sensemaking: Theoretical and methodological implications. Papers on Social Representations, 22, 21.1–21.41.
Sjöberg, L. (1996). A discussion of the limitations of the psychometric and cultural theory approaches to risk perception. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 68, 219–225.
Sjöberg, L. (2000a). Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis, 20(1), 1–11.
Sjöberg, L. (2000b). Specifying factors in radiation risk perception. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41(2), 169–174.
Toomela, A. (2000). Activity theory is a dead end for cultural-historical psychology. Culture and Psychology, 6(3), 353–364.
Windelband, W. (1873). Ueber die Gewissheit der Erkenntniss: eine psychologischerkenntnisstheoretische Studie [On the certainty of knowledge: A study of theoretical psychology]. Berlin: Henschel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klempe, S.H. (2019). Cultural Meaning—Generalized or Particularized?. In: Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Valsiner, J., Veltri, G. (eds) Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis. Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19497-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19496-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19497-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)