Abstract
The primary aim of this chapter is to consider mathematicians’ working philosophy of mathematics as emerging in and defining actual mathematical thinking and practice, as exemplified in three cases stated in my subtitle: Niels Henrik Abel and Évariste Galois, Nikolai Lobachevsky and Bernhard Riemann, and André Weil and Alexander Grothendieck. I speak of “and” and hence “conjunction,” rather than the disjunctive “or,” in all three paired cases considered in this chapter because, while my primary concern is on the (historically) second figure – Galois, Riemann, and Grothendieck – in each case, my aim is not merely to juxtapose these figures, especially given the significance of their thinking for transforming mathematics. The work of Abel, Lobachevsky, and Weil were revolutionary events as well. Instead, while granting the differences between their thinking, my aim is to explore the shared grounding that gives rise to these differences, defining, and defined by, their mathematical practice as philosophy. The chapter’s approach to their mathematical practice and to creative mathematical practice in general is parallel to that of Deleuze and Guattari in creative philosophical practice, which or even true philosophy itself is defined by them as the practice of the invention of new concepts, with philosophical concepts given a particular definition, in part in juxtaposition to mathematical and scientific concepts. The working philosophy of mathematics this chapter considers, under the heading of “mathematical practice as philosophy,” is, analogously, defined as the practice of the invention of new mathematical concepts, defined, against the grain of Deleuze and Guattari’s argument, in affinity with (although not identically to) philosophical concepts in their definition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A’Campo N, Ji L, Papadopoulos A (2016) On Grothendieck's construction of the Teichmüller space. In: Papadopoulos A (ed) Handbook of Teichmüller theory, volume VI. European Mathematical Society, Zürich, pp 35–70
Cartier P (2001) A mad day’s work: from Grothendieck to Connes and Kontsevich, the evolution of concepts of space and symmetry. Bull Am Math Soc 38(4):389–408
Connes A (2003) Symétries Galoisiennes et renormalization. In: Duplantier B, Rivasseau V (eds) Poincaré seminar 2002: vacuum energy, renormalization, Progress in mathematical physics 30. Birkhäuser, Boston/Cambridge
Connes A, Kreimer D (2001) Renormalization in quantum field theory and the Riemann-Hilbert problem. II. Comm Math Phys 216(1):215–241
Connes A, Marcolli M (2004) Renormalization and motivic Galois theory. Int Math Res Notices 76:4073–4092
Connes A, Marcolli M (2007) Noncommutative geometry, quantum fields, and motives. American Mathematical Society, Hindustan Book Agency
Corfield D (2006) Towards a philosophy of real mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Corfield D (2020) Modal homotopy type theory: the prospect for a new logic of philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Corry L (2003) Modern algebra and the rise of mathematical structures. Birkhäuser, Boston
De Bianchi S, Wells JD (2015) Explanation and the dimensionality of space Kant’s argument revisited. Synthese 192(1):287–303
Deleuze G (1995) Difference and repetition (trans: Patton P). Columbia University Press, New York
Deleuze G, Guattari F (1987) A thousand plateau (trans: Massumi B). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Deleuze G, Guattari F (1996) What is philosophy? (trans: Tomlinson H, Burchell G). Columbia University Press, New York
Doxiadis A, Mazur B (eds) (2012) Circles disturbed: the interplay of mathematics and narrative. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Ferreirós J (2006) Riemann’s Habilitationsvortrag at the crossroads of mathematics, physics, and philosophy. In: Ferreirós J, Gray J (eds) The Architecture of modern mathematics: Essays in history and philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 67–96
Ferreirós J (2010) Labyrinth of thought: a history of set theory and its role in modern mathematics. Birkhäuser, Boston
Gray J, Ferreirós J (2021) Epistemology of Geometry, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), EN Zalta (ed). URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/epistemology-geometry/
Heisenberg W (1962) Physics and philosophy: the revolution in modern science. Harper & Row, New York
Hilbert D (1979) Foundations of geometry, 10th ed (trans: Unger L). Open Court, La Salle
Husserl E (1970) The origin of geometry. In: The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: an introduction to phenomenological philosophy (trans: Carr D), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, pp 353–378
Ji L, Papadopoulos A, Yamada S (eds) (2017) From Riemann to differential geometry and relativity. Springer, Berlin
Kant I (1997) Critique of pure reason (trans: Guyer P, Wood AW). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kant I (2012[1747]) Thoughts on the true estimation of living forces. In: Watkins E (ed) Immanuel Kant: Natural science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kontsevich M (1999) Operads and motives in deformation quantization. Lett Math Phys 48(1):35–72
Kuhn T (2012) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lakatos I (1980) Mathematics, science and epistemology, philosophical papers volume 2 (Worral J, Currie G, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Langlands R, Shelstad D (2007) Descent for transfer factors. In: Cartier P, Katz NM, Manin YI, Illusie L, Laumon G, Ribet KA (eds) The Grothendieck Festschrift. Birkhäuser, Boston, pp 485–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4575-5_12
Laugwitz D (1999) Bernhard Riemann: turnings points in the conception of mathematics (trans: Shenitzer A). Birkhäuser, Boston
Manin Y (2002) Georg cantor and his heritage, ArXiv.math.AG/0209244 v1. 19 Sept 2002
Manin Y (2019) Time and periodicity from Ptolemy to Schrödinger: paradigm shift vs. continuity in history of mathematics. In: Dani SG, Papadopoulos A (eds) Geometry in history. Springer, Berlin, pp 129–138
Negrepontis S (2019) Plato on geometry and the geometers. In: Dani SG, Papadopoulos A (eds) Geometry in history. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–88
Nietzsche F (1966) Beyond good and evil: a prelude to a philosophy of the future (trans: Kaufmann W). Vintage, New York
Pambuccian V, Struve H, Struve R (2017) Metric geometries in an axiomatic perspective. In: Ji L, Papadopoulos A, Yamada S (eds) From Riemann to differential geometry and relativity. Springer, Berlin, pp 414–455
Papadopoulos A (2010) Introduction. In: Lobachevsky N, Pangeometry (edit and trans: Papadopoulos A) heritage of European mathematics. European Mathematical Society, Zürich, pp 229–234
Papadopoulos A (2017) Riemann surfaces: reception by the French school. In: Ji L, Papadopoulos A, Yamada S (eds) From Riemann to differential geometry and relativity. Springer, Berlin, pp 237–294
Pesic P (2007) Introduction. In: Beyond geometry: classic papers from Riemann to Einstein. Dover, Mineola, pp 1–22
Picard É (1891–1896) Traité d’analyse, 3 volumes, Paris, Gauthier-Villars
Plotnitsky A (2017) ‘Comprehending the connection of things:’ Bernhard Riemann and the architecture of mathematical concepts. In: Ji L, Papadopoulos A, Yamada S (eds) From Riemann to differential geometry and relativity. Springer, Berlin, pp 329–363
Plotnitsky A (2019) On the concept of curve: geometry and algebra, from mathematical modernity to mathematical modernism. In: Dani SG, Papadopoulos A (eds) Geometry in history. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–212
Plotnitsky A (2020) The ghost and the spirit of Pythagoras: the 20th and 21st century mathematics between and beyond geometry and algebra. In: Sriraman B (ed) Handbook of the history & philosophy of mathematical practice. Springer/Nature, London
Plotnitsky A (2021a) Returns of geometry: from the Pythagoreans to mathematical modernism and beyond. In: Papadopoulos A (ed) Topology and geometry: a collection of essays dedicated to Vladimir G. Turaev. EMS Press, Berlin
Plotnitsky A (2021b) Reality without realism: matter, thought, and technology in quantum physics. Springer, Heidelberg
Polya G (1990) Mathematics and plausible reasoning, volume 1: induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Reed D (1995) Figures of thought: mathematics and mathematical texts. Routledge, London
Riemann B (1854) On the hypotheses that lie at the foundations of geometry. In: Pesic P (ed) Beyond geometry: classic papers from Riemann to Einstein. Dover, Mineola, pp 23–40
Riemann B (1991) Gesammelte mathematische Werke und wissenschaftlicher Nachlass (Narasimhan R, ed). Springer, New York
Russell B (1897) Essays on foundations of geometry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Silverman J, Tate J (2015) Rational points on elliptic curves. Springer, Heidelberg/New York
Stäckel P (1913) Wolfgang und Johann Bolyai, Geometrische Untersuchungen, vol I. Teubner, Leipzig/Berlin
Teller P (1995) An interpretive introduction to quantum field theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Voevodsky V et al (2013) Homotopy type theory: univalent foundations of mathematics. Univalent Foundations Program, Princeton
Vuillemin J (1962) La Philosophie de l'algèbre. Tome I : Recherches sur quelques concepts et méthodes de l'Algèbre moderne est un ouvrage d'une grande technicité, à la fois mathématique et philosophique, Presses universitaires de France, Paris
Weil A (1946) Foundations of algebraic geometry. American Mathematical Society, Providence
Weil A (1962) Foundations of algebraic geometry, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence
Weyl H (2013) The concept of a Riemann surface (trans: MacLane GL). Dover, Mineola
Weyl H (2021) Philosophy of mathematics and natural science. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Plotnitsky, A. (2022). Mathematical Practice as Philosophy, with Galois, Riemann, and Grothendieck. In: Sriraman, B. (eds) Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19071-2_97-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19071-2_97-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19071-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19071-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Mathematical Practice as Philosophy, with Galois, Riemann, and Grothendieck- Published:
- 19 September 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19071-2_97-2
-
Original
Mathematical Practice as Philosophy, with Galois, Riemann, and Grothendieck- Published:
- 31 December 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19071-2_97-1