Abstract
A biofilm is defined as adherent microbial communities on biotic or abiotic surfaces surrounded by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) matrix. Biofilm formation by bacteria is very common; however, the pathogenic filamentous fungi and yeast also form biofilms. The microbial biofilm protects microbes against harsh environments, host immune defence and antibiotics. The composition and architecture of the fungal biofilms attribute tolerance to antifungal agents and require up to 10–1000 times greater concentrations of antifungal agents than planktonic cells to eradicate biofilms. In mature biofilms, the cell metabolism is slow and demonstrates differential gene expressions compared to the counterpart planktonic cells; therefore, the common antifungal agents are ineffective on active growing cells. The mode of growth of biofilms increases the frequency of genetic exchange, which results in the origin of an antibiotic-resistant strain. Polymicrobial biofilms of bacteria and fungi is another huge challenge in which cooperation between different species has been detected. The microbial biofilm infections are persisters and resistant to antibiotic therapy. The formation of biofilm is regulated by a process called quorum sensing (cell-to-cell communication) mediated by small molecules (auto-inducers). In animals, various infectious diseases, such as otomycosis, dermatitis, stomatitis, onychomycosis, vulvovaginitis, urinary tract infection and respiratory tract infection, are caused by biofilms of Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., Malassezia spp., Trichosporon spp., Fusarium spp., Scedosporium spp., Lomentospora prolificans and Coccidioides spp. Animal disease caused by fungi forming biofilms is a huge challenge in veterinary medicine. In this review chapter, we provide an overview of biofilm-related fungi diseases of animals.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
10.1 Introduction
Microorganisms, throughout their evolution, modify their physical and metabolic habitats to adapt to the environmental conditions. Bacteria were initially believed to be unicellular; however, this was not accurate, as the pure planktonic mode of growth is uncommon and the bacteria frequently exist in complex communities (Marsh 1999). One of the biggest paradigms among microbiologists is the concept that bacteria are an asocial organism, which divide and reproduce identical copy progeny. However, it has been known for years that bacteria may demonstrate group behaviour, in which bacteria cross-talk with each other and act as a community (Aguilar-Romero et al. 2011). Now, with the use of advanced techniques, direct observation indicates that most microbes remain adherent to surfaces inside a structured ecosystem, called biofilms (Costerton et al. 1987). Microbial biofilm is defined as adherent microbial communities surrounded by self-produced extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) matrix. The microbial biofilm could be formed on biotic or abiotic surfaces, and could consist of a single microbial species or polymicrobial species, such as biofilms of bacteria and fungi. Biofilm formation is an important aspect of many bacteria diseases; however, many pathogenic filamentous fungi and yeasts, such as Candida spp., form biofilms. The composition and architecture of the fungal biofilms attribute tolerance to antifungal agents and require up to 10–1000 times greater concentrations of antifungal agents than planktonic cells to eradicate biofilms. In mature biofilms, the cell metabolism is slow and demonstrates differential gene expressions compared to the counterpart planktonic cells; therefore, the common antifungal agents are ineffective on active growing cells. In addition, the biofilm microbes are resistant to phagocytosis and, thus, are resistant to host responses (Amorena et al. 1999; Jefferson 2004). The biofilm increases the frequency of spread of resistant genes and gives rise to persister cells. As a result, biofilm infections are difficult to treat and increase the cost of treatment and recovery time.
Although filamentous fungi and yeast are also known to form biofilms, most of the fungi biofilms have been studied using a yeast like Candida spp. According to some researchers, the biofilm formation stages in yeast and filamentous fungi are not similar. The biofilm formation by yeast is similar to bacteria. However, the filamentous fungi form biofilms with some additional stages (Harding et al. 2009). The filamentous fungi secrete small proteins called hydrophobins, which facilitate the adhesion of hyphae to hydrophobic surfaces during biofilm formation (Harding et al. 2009; Wosten 2001). In animals, various fungal species, including Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp. (Ajesh and Sreejith 2012; Martinez and Casadevall 2006; Pettit et al. 2010; Martinez et al. 2010), Malassezia spp. (Bumroongthai et al. 2016), Trichosporon spp. (Iturrieta-Gonzalez et al. 2014), Fusarium spp. (Imamura et al. 2008; Mukherjee et al. 2012; Peiqian et al. 2013), Scedosporium spp., Lomentospora prolificans (Mello et al. 2016) and Coccidioides spp. (Davis et al. 2002), cause various biofilm-related infections, such as otomycosis, dermatitis, stomatitis, onychomycosis, vulvovaginitis, urinary tract infection and respiratory tract infection. In addition, the multi-species biofilm of fungi and bacteria is common in animal infections. In this review chapter, we present an overview of fungal biofilm-related infections in animals.
10.2 Fungal Biofilms and Infectious Disease
Although biofilm formation by C. albicans has been known for many years, recently, many studies have reported that various species of filamentous fungi possess the ability to form biofilms. The biofilm mode of growth plays an important role in infectious disease in both humans and animals. Paracoccidioidomycosis is a systemic, endemic mycosis caused by a dimorphic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. In the yeast phase, P. brasiliensis forms biofilm and increases the gene expressions of GP43, enolase, GAPDH and aspartyl proteinase, and decreases the expression of phospholipase, which are required for adhesion and biofilm formation (Sardi Jde et al. 2015). Histoplasmosis is a respiratory systemic mycosis caused by Histoplasma capsulatum, a dimorphic fungus that exists as biofilm in the yeast phase (Pitangui et al. 2012). In humans and animals, dermatophytes fungi invade keratinised tissues, producing dermatophytosis (Weitzman and Summerbell 1995; Costa-Orlandi et al. 2012). It has been reported that the fungi Trichophyton rubrum and T. mentagrophytes form biofilms that result in dermatophytosis and onychomycosis, which often relapse and show non-response to ward treatment (Burkhart et al. 2002; Costa-Orlandi et al. 2012). Moreover, the biofilms of Histoplasma, Paracoccidioides and Trichophyton are resistant to antibiotics. The saprophytic fungi Aspergillus causes severe superficial and systemic infections (Gonzalez-Ramirez et al. 2016; Müller et al. 2011; Kaur and Singh 2014) in humans and animals. Aspergillosis caused by Aspergillus is the second major cause of nosocomial infection, which has a higher mortality rate (Kaur and Singh 2014; Ramage et al. 2011). Aspergillus is an opportunistic fungi and, in immune-suppressed conditions, causes aspergilloma, invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and even systemic dissemination (Kaur and Singh 2014; Ramage et al. 2011; Williams et al. 2016). The aspergilloma caused by Aspergillus is a fungal mass with biofilm characteristics (Ramage et al. 2011). The biofilm formations by Aspergillus take place within 24 h, and the mature biofilms demonstrate increased biofilm biomass, with channels developed between hyphae through which nutrients and fluid transportation occurs (Ramage et al. 2011; Villena et al. 2010). The extracellular matrix (ECM) composition of the biofilms has been detected and is composed of hydrophobins, α-1,3-glucans, galactomannan, polyols, melanin, monosaccharides and antigens (Ramage et al. 2011; Beauvais et al. 2007).
Cryptococcosis is an important fungal infection of animals and humans. It is one of the common infections of various domestic animals, including cats, dogs, ferrets, horses, camelids, goats, sheep, cattle, dolphins, birds, koalas and other marsupials (Malik et al. 2002; Sykes et al. 2010). It is caused by fungi belonging to Cryptococcus spp., C. laurentii and C. albidus, which, together, cause almost 80% of infections in humans and animals (Khawcharoenporn et al. 2007). Cryptococcus laurentii is an encapsulated saprophytic yeast and causes superficial infections like keratitis and deep-seated infections such as fungaemia and meningitis (Cheng et al. 2001; Shankar et al. 2006; Khawcharoenporn et al. 2006). Cryptococcus neoformans forms biofilms, has a worldwide distribution and infects immune-suppressed patients (Walsh et al. 1986; Ingram et al. 1993).
10.3 Candida spp. Biofilms
In animals, C. albicans causes otomycosis, dermatitis, stomatitis, onychomycosis, vulvovaginitis, subclinical mastitis, stomatitis, dermatitis and otitis, urinary tract infection and respiratory tract infection (Vijay and Pal 2013). The biofilm formation by Candida spp. is the most studied fungal biofilm and has been known since 1990. Many in vitro (Marcos-Zambrano et al. 2016) and in vivo studies revealed that Candida biofilms are heterogeneous and composed of hyphal, pseudohyphal, yeast blastospores and ECM (Henriques et al. 2006; Pires et al. 2011). In Candida biofilms, the yeast and hyphae are important structural components (Finkel and Mitchell 2011). The filamentation of fungi increases the suppression of biofilms and increases resistance to adverse conditions, such as sonication and vortexing. Candida biofilms express many genes involved in fungal adhesion, quorum sensing, ECM production and morphogenesis (Blankenship and Mitchell 2006; Bonhomme and d’Enfert 2013; Finkel and Mitchell 2011). Within the genus Candida, the species C. albicans, C.glabrata, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis form biofilms; however, they vary in the carbohydrates and protein compositions in the biofilms’ ECM and in their morphology. The biofilms of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis contain both yeast hyphae and pseudohyphae, while the biofilms of C. glabrata and C. tropicalis contain only yeast cells (Silva et al. 2009).
10.4 Candida albicans Multi-species Biofilms with Streptococcus mutans
Candida albicans is an opportunistic fungus found on various body sites in humans and on animals. However, it causes localised and systemic infection in immune-suppressed conditions (Tsui et al. 2016). Candida can form biofilms on biotic and abiotic surfaces, and frequently form multi-species biofilms with bacteria, which increases the virulence (Kojic and Darouiche 2004; Ramage et al. 2005). Candida albicans causes oral mucosal infections in both animals and humans, where the fungal interacts with the commensal viridans streptococci (Xu et al. 2014; Thein et al. 2009). Various researchers reported that C. albicans is usually absent in dental plaque biofilms of healthy individuals and it neither colonizes alone on the teeth of rodents nor co-colonizes with S. mutans in the absence of sucrose (Gregoire et al. 2011; Xiao et al. 2016). However, a C albicans and S. mutans interaction has been detected in plaque biofilms, with a high number of S. mutans causing aggressive tooth decay and rampant carious lesions (Falsetta et al. 2014; De Carvalho et al. 2006; Xiao et al. 2016). In this interaction, a secretary bacteria exo-enzyme called glucosyltransferase (Gtfs) plays an important role. The S. mutans can utilise host dietary sucrose through Gtfs and produce biofilm extracellular polymeric matrix, which mainly consists of α-glucans. Furthermore, the Gtfs can bind on the C. albicans cell surface and could produce EPS on the fungal surface, which results in enhanced bacterial binding and multi-species biofilm formation (Falsetta et al. 2014; Pereira-Cenci et al. 2008).
Candida albicans forms polymicrobial biofilms with Staphylococcus aureus . The fungus and bacteria has been detected in nosocomial and blood infections (Klotz et al. 2007). Many studies suggested that the polymicrobial interaction of C. albicans and S. aureus give rise to synergism and results in increased mortality in mice (Carlson 1982; Adam et al. 2002). Furthermore, the treatment and eradication of biofilms require a higher concentration of antibiotics. Indeed, C. albicans serves as a scaffold for the biofilm formation of S. aureus, and the bacterial cells were coated with matrix produced by C. albicans (Melphine and Mairi 2009).
10.5 Mode of Biofilm Formation
Both filamentous fungi and yeasts can form biofilms on biotic and abiotic surfaces; however, many reports are available for yeast biofilms but very few for filamentous fungi (Harding et al. 2009; Blankenship and Mitchell 2006). Many authors suggest that the definition of bacterial biofilms does not fit for filamentous fungi; therefore, fungal biofilms need to be revisited. Harding et al. proposed a model for filamentous fungi biofilms and suggested that the basic steps of biofilms formation are similar in filamentous fungi and bacteria, despite their distinct morphology (Harding et al. 2009). In addition, the filamentous fungi secrete small proteins called hydrophobins, which facilities the adhesion of hyphae to a hydrophobic surface during biofilm formation (Harding et al. 2009; Wosten 2001).
As per Harding et al. (2009), the biofilm formations of filamentous fungi are divided into various stages, as described in Fig. 10.1:
-
A.
Propagule adsorption: involving the contact of spores, hyphal fragments or sporangia with a surface;
-
B.
Active adhesion: in which adhesins are secreted by spores during germination and other reproductive structures;
-
C.
First microcolony formation: which involves elongation and hyphal branching, forming a monolayer with the production of ECM;
-
D.
Second microcolony formation or initial maturation: in which compact hyphae networks form in three dimensions, are covered by an ECM and the formation of water channels occurs;
-
E.
Final maturation: in which fruiting bodies and other survivor structures are formed, depending on the fungi;
-
F.
And, finally, the dispersion or planktonic phase: in which conidia and/or hyphae fragments are released, beginning a new cycle.
In yeasts, the C. albicans biofilms are the most often studied and the biofilm development stages are shorter than those of filamentous fungi and bear a close resemblance to those of bacterial biofilms (Chandra et al. 2001; Costa-Orlandi et al. 2017). Harding et al. (2009) reported that the C. albicans biofilm development involves fewer stages compared to the filamentous fungi, as shown in Fig. 10.2:
-
(a)
The adsorption of yeast cells to a surface
-
(b)
Followed by initial adhesion
-
(c)
Formation of basal layers of yeast with early development of hyphae and ECM
-
(d)
Biofilm maturation containing a significant number of yeasts, hyphae, pseudohyphae, ECM and water channels that allow the movement of nutrients
-
(e)
And cell dispersion.
10.6 Mechanism of Resistance in Fungal Biofilms
The biofilms of filamentous fungi and yeasts are difficult to eradicate, as they demonstrate increased resistance to antifungal agents (Scorzoni et al. 2017). The fungal biofilms demonstrate up to 1000-fold more resistance to antifungal agents than the planktonic form (Di Bonaventura et al. 2006; Tre-Hardy et al. 2008). The adaptive resistance acquired by fungal biofilms imparts resistance to antifungal agents (Ramage et al. 2012). The biofilms facilitate the adaptation of fungi to environmental conditions, the structure of biofilms protects cells and obstructs antifungal agent diffusion, the biofilm cells demonstrate altered metabolism and gene expression results in persister cells (Niimi et al. 2010; Rajendran et al. 2013). The adaptive factors which play a vital role in fungal biofilm resistance are shown in Fig. 10.3.
10.6.1 Biofilm Resistance Due to Extracellular Matrix
The bacterial biofilm ECM has been studied extensively. However, there is limited information on fungal biofilms’ ECM . The main characteristic of all mature fungi biofilms, irrespective of the genus, is the presence of extracellular polymer matrix, which confers resistance to antifungal agents (Ramage et al. 2009). ECM production is a highly regulated process and the resistance to antimicrobial agents depends on the diffusion and chemical compositions of the ECM. The ECM of Candida spp., including C. dubliniensis, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata and C. albicans has been characterised (Silva et al. 2009, 2011). The ECM of C. albicans and C. tropicalis biofilms is composed of protein, uronic acid, phosphorous, hexosamine and carbohydrates (Al-Fattani and Douglas 2006). It was detected that the biofilms were detached when treated with glucanase, indicating that β-1-3 glucans are the main carbohydrates components. β-Glucans also prevent neutrophil activation and release reactive oxygen species (ROS), which decreases the host defence response (Xie et al. 2012). In C. albicans, the ECM production is regulated by zinc regulator ZAP1 (Nobile et al. 2009). The other fungi which form biofilms and produce a significant amount of ECM are C. neoformans, Apophysomyces elegans, Rhizopus oryzae, Aspergillus species, Blastoschizomyces capitatus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lichtheimia corymbifera, Malassezia pachydermatis, Pneumocystis species and Rhizomucor pusillus (Beauvais et al. 2009; Cannizzo et al. 2007; Cushion et al. 2009; D’Antonio et al. 2004; Martinez and Casadevall 2006; Singh et al. 2011).
10.6.2 Biofilm Resistance Due to Efflux Pump
The resistance of C. albicans against high-dose azoles is due to the increased efflux of drug mediated by the ATP-binding cassette and the major facilitator’s superfamily transporters (Albertson et al. 1996; Lopez-Ribot et al. 1999; Sanglard et al. 1997). The primary function of efflux pumps is to maintain homeostasis during harsh environmental conditions; however, the exposure to high doses of antifungal agents increase efflux pump expression, resulting in resistance to antifungal agents (Piddock 2006; Bueid et al. 2010). Elevated levels of efflux pump expression have been detected in implanted catheters in animal models and in the Candida biofilm model (Andes et al. 2004; Nett et al. 2009; Bizerra et al. 2008).
10.6.3 Biofilm Resistance Due to Stress Responses
The phenotypic modulation of fungi in response to stress due to micro-environmental conditions and the adaptation of heterogeneity within fungi play vital roles in increasing resistance to antifungal agents (Shapiro et al. 2011). Thermal stress, oxidative stress, ionic stress and osmolality are micro-environmental stresses involved in fungal biofilms. Thermal, ionic and oxidative stressors, in addition to osmolality, are likely to be involved within the micro-environment of a biofilm, particularly in vivo. The adaptation of fungi to stress and biofilm development is controlled by the MAPK signal transduction network (Cannon et al. 2007). In C. albicans, biofilms development involves Mck1p and the mutation of this gene increased the sensitivity of biofilms towards azoles (Cannon et al. 2007; Kumamoto 2005). The calcineurin pathway is also involved in the stress tolerance response employed in fungi and plays an important role in biofilms and increases resistance (Steinbach et al. 2007).
10.6.4 Altered Synthesis of Ergosterol Increases Resistance
Azoles are fungicidal for moulds such as Aspergillus species and are fungi-static for yeasts, including Candida spp. However, gradually, C. albicans can acquire resistance to high levels of azoles due to the alteration of Erg11 (Anderson 2005). In the yeast, the azoles inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis , though blocking enzyme 14 α-demethylase encoded by ERG11 results in the accumulation of toxic sterol pathway intermediates (Akins 2005; Cannon et al. 2007). The main gene Erg11 could be overexpressed or develop mutation. A high level of ergosterol has been detected in early-phase biofilms, whereas it was lower in intermediate or mature biofilms (Mukherjee et al. 2003). Also, the ergosterol fluctuation in biofilms confers resistance against both azole- and polyene-derived antifungal agents (Khot et al. 2006).
10.6.5 Biofilm Resistance Due to Growth Rate
Most of the antimicrobial agents developed in the past are effective on the planktonic cells, which act on the active, rapidly growing cells. However, the cells in biofilms grow slowly and with altered metabolism in nutrient-limited, adverse conditions. For example, the azole inhibits actively growing cells; however, it is ineffective on slowly growing biofilm cells.
10.6.6 Biofilm Resistance Due to Cell Density
The fungal biofilms are characterised by high cell density, which confers resistance to biofilms. The fungal biofilms have a dynamic structure, which consists of high cell density arranged in a stack, micro-colonies and water channels for nutrients supply, aeration and waste transportation. The specialised architecture of biofilms prevents the diffusion of antifungal agents, which results in increasing resistance for antifungal agents (Chandra et al. 2001; De Beer et al. 1994; Lawrence et al. 1991). The high cell density facilitates the communication and coordination behaviours. It is well documented that fungi in biofilms communicate and coordinate their activities through a mechanism called quorum sensing, which is mediated by small molecules called auto-inducers (Miller and Bassler 2001). In C. albicans, farnesol is a quorum sensing molecule (Hornby et al. 2001).
10.6.7 Biofilms are a Source of Persister Cells
The biofilms’ mode of growth prevents the antimicrobial agents from diffusing uniformly inside biofilms; therefore, cells deep inside the biofilm remain unaffected by antifungal agents. A subset of cell populations spontaneously enter in the dormant, non-dividing state, resulting in persister cells. The persister cells are a population of cells that are dormant and highly recalcitrant to antimicrobial challenge (Lewis 2010). Upon antimicrobial treatment, the persister cells survive and, on discontinuation of the antimicrobial therapy, the persistent cells can restore the biofilms. The persister cells with altered cell membrane and independence from efflux pumps have been detected in the Candida biofilms treated with amphotericin B (Khot et al. 2006; LaFleur et al. 2006; Al-Dhaheri and Douglas 2008).
10.7 Conclusions
Filamentous fungi and yeast both form biofilms on biotic or abiotic surfaces. Fungal biofilms are highly organised communities involved in various infections of both humans and animals. The filamentous fungi and yeasts form biofilms as single-species biofilms or in combination with bacteria, called multi-species biofilms. In multi-species biofilms, a cooperativity between bacteria and fungi has been detected, which enhances the survival opportunity of both species. Fungal biofilms are resistant to antifungal agents and the host defence. The ECM constituents and the architecture of the fungal biofilm contribute to the resistance of biofilms against antifungal agents. The biofilm matrix consists of polymer substances that hinder the diffusion of antifungal agents into the biofilms. As a result, the microbial cells deep inside the biofilms are relatively unaffected by antimicrobial agents and give rise to persister cells. Upon antimicrobial treatment, the persister cells survive and, on discontinuation of the antimicrobial therapy, the persister cells can restore the biofilms. The persister cells, with altered cell membrane and independence from efflux pumps, have been detected in the Candida biofilms treated with amphotericin B. The biofilm mode of growth plays an important role in infectious disease in animals and a source of persister cells gives rise to difficult-to-treat infections, resulting in increased treatment cost and recovery time.
References
Adam B, Baillie GS, Douglas LJ (2002) Mixed species biofilms of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Med Microbiol 51:344–349
Aguilar-Romero F, Pérez-Romero N, Díaz-Aparicio E, Hernández-Castro R (2011) Bacterial biofilms: importance in animal diseases. In: Mendez-Vilas A (ed) In current research technology and education topics in applied microbiology and molecular biotechnology. http://microbiologia.org.mx/microbiosenlinea/capitulo04
Ajesh K, Sreejith K (2012) Cryptococcus laurentii biofilms: structure, development and antifungal drug resistance. Mycopathologia 174:409–419
Akins RA (2005) An update on antifungal targets and mechanisms of resistance in Candida albicans. Med Mycol 43:285–318
Albertson GD, Niimi M, Cannon RD, Jenkinson HF (1996) Multiple efflux mechanisms are involved in Candida albicans fluconazole resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:2835–2841
Al-Dhaheri RS, Douglas LJ (2008) Absence of amphotericin B-tolerant persister cells in biofilms of some Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:1884–1887
Al-Fattani MA, Douglas LJ (2006) Biofilm matrix of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis: chemical composition and role in drug resistance. J Med Microbiol 55:999–1008
Amorena B, Gracia E, Monzóna M, Leivab J, Oteizab C, Péreza M, Alabarta J, Hernández-Yagoc J (1999) Antibiotic susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus in biofilms developed in vitro. J Antimicrob Chemother 44:43–55
Anderson JB (2005) Evolution of antifungal-drug resistance: mechanisms and pathogen fitness. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:547–556
Andes D, Nett J, Oschel P, Albrecht R, Marchillo K, Pitula A (2004) Development and characterization of an in vivo central venous catheter Candida albicans biofilm model. Infect Immun 72:6023–6031
Beauvais A, Schmidt C, Guadagnini S, Roux P, Perret E, Henry C, Paris S, Mallet A, Prevost MC, Latge JP (2007) An extracellular matrix glues together the aerial-grown hyphae of Aspergillus fumigatus. Cell Microbiol 9:1588–1600
Beauvais A, Loussert C, Prevost MC, Verstrepen K, Latge JP (2009) Characterization of a biofilm-like extracellular matrix in FLO1-expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. FEMS Yeast Res 9:411–419
Bizerra FC, Nakamura CV, de Poersch C, EstivaletSvidzinski TI, Borsato Quesada RM, Goldenberg S (2008) Characteristics of biofilm formation by Candida tropicalis and antifungal resistance. FEMS Yeast Res 8:442–450
Blankenship JR, Mitchell AP (2006) How to build a biofilm: a fungal perspective. Curr Opin Microbiol 9:588–594
Bonhomme J, d’Enfert C (2013) Candida albicans biofilms: building a heterogeneous, drug-tolerant environment. Curr Opin Microbiol 16:398–403
Bueid A, Howard SJ, Moore CB, Richardson MD, Harrison E, Bowyer P (2010) Azole antifungal resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: 2008 and 2009. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:2116–2118
Bumroongthai K, Chetanachan P, Niyomtham W, Yurayart C, Prapasarakul N (2016) Biofilm production and antifungal susceptibility of co-cultured Malassezia pachydermatis and Candida parapsilosis isolated from canine seborrheic dermatitis. MedMycol 54:544–549
Burkhart CN, Burkhart CG, Gupta AK (2002) Dermatophytoma: recalcitrance to treatment because of existence of fungal biofilm. J Am Acad Dermatol 47:629–631
Cannizzo FT, Eraso E, Ezkurra PA, Villar-Vidal M, Bollo E, Castella G (2007) Biofilm development by clinical isolates of Malassezia pachydermatis. Med Mycol 45:357–361
Cannon RD, Lamping E, Holmes AR, Niimi K, Tanabe K, Niimi M (2007) Candida albicans drug resistance another way to cope with stress. Microbiology 153:3211–3217
Carlson E (1982) Synergistic effect of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus on mouse mortality. Infect Immun 38:921–924
Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Mukherjee PK, Hoyer LL, McCormick T, Ghannoum MA (2001) Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance. J Bacteriol 183:5385–5394
Cheng MF, Chiou CC, Liu YC, Wang HZ, Hsieh KS (2001) Cryptococcus laurentii fungemia in a premature neonate. J Clin Microbiol 39:1608–1611
Costa-Orlandi CB, Magalhães GM, Oliveira MB, Taylor EL, Marques CR, de Resende-Stoianoff MA (2012) Prevalence of dermatomycosis in a Brazilian tertiary care hospital. Mycopathologia 174:489–497
Costa-Orlandi CB, Sardi JCO, Pitangui NS, de Oliveira HC, Scorzoni L, Galeane MC, Mendes-Giannini MJS (2017) Fungal biofilms and polymicrobial diseases. J Fungi 3:22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof3020022
Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Gersey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, Dasgupta M, Marrie TJ (1987) Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu Rev Microbiol 41:435–464
Cushion MT, Collins MS, Linke MJ (2009) Biofilm formation by Pneumocystis spp. Eukaryot Cell 8:197–206
D’Antonio D, Parruti G, Pontieri E, Di Bonaventura G, Manzoli L, Sferra R (2004) Slime production by clinical isolates of Blastoschizomyces capitatus from patients with hematological malignancies and catheter-related fungemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23:787–789
Davis LE, Cook G, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilm on ventriculo-peritoneal shunt tubing as a cause of treatment failure in coccidioidal meningitis. Emerg Infect Dis 8:376–379
De Beer D, Stoodley P, Lewandowski Z (1994) Liquid flow in heterogeneous biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:636–641
De Carvalho FG, Silva DS, Hebling J, Spolidorio LC, Spolidorio DMP (2006) Presence of mutans streptococci and Candida spp. in dental plaque/dentine of carious teeth and early childhood caries. Arch Oral Biol 51:1024–1028
Di Bonaventura G, Pompilio A, Picciani C, Iezzi M, D’Antonio D, Piccolomini R (2006) Biofilm formation by the emerging fungal pathogen Trichosporon asahii: development, architecture, and antifungal resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3269–3276
Falsetta ML, Klein MI, Colonne PM, Scott-Anne K, Gregoire S, Pai C (2014) Symbiotic relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans synergizes the virulence of plaque-biofilms in vivo. Infect Immun 82:1968–1981
Finkel JS, Mitchell AP (2011) Genetic control of Candida albicans biofilm development. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:109–118
Gonzalez-Ramirez AI, Ramirez-Granillo A, Medina-Canales MG, Rodriguez-Tovar AV, Martinez-Rivera MA (2016) Analysis and description of the stages of Aspergillus fumigatus biofilm formation using scanning electron microscopy. BMC Microbiol 16:243
Gregoire S, Xiao J, Silva BB, Gonzalez I, Agidi PS, Klein MI et al (2011) Role of glucosyltransferase B in interactions of Candida albicans with Streptococcus mutans and with an experimental pellicle on hydroxyapatite surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:6357–6367
Harding MW, Marques LL, Howard RJ, Olson ME (2009) Can filamentous fungi form biofilms? Trends Microbiol 17:475–480
Harriott MM, Noverr MC (2009) Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus form polymicrobial biofilms: effects on antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother September 53:3914–3922
Henriques M, Azeredo J, Oliveira R (2006) Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis: comparison of biofilm formation in terms of biomass and activity. Br J Biomed Sci 63:5–11
Hornby JM, Jensen EC, Lisec AD, Tasto JJ, Jahnke B, Shoemaker R et al (2001) Quorum sensing in the dimorphic fungus Candida albicans is mediated by farnesol. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2982–2992
Imamura Y, Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, Lattif AA, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Pearlman E, Lass JH, O’Donnell K, Ghannoum MA (2008) Fusarium and Candida albicans biofilms on soft contact lenses: model development, influence of lens type, and susceptibility to lens care solutions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:171–182
Ingram CW, Haywood HB 3rd, Morris VM, Allen RL, Perfect JR (1993) Cryptococcal ventricular-peritoneal shunt infection: clinical and epidemiological evaluation of two closely associated cases. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 14:719–722
Iturrieta-Gonzalez IA, Padovan AC, Bizerra FC, Hahn RC, Colombo AL (2014) Multiple species of trichosporon produce biofilms highly resistant to triazoles and amphotericin B. PLoS One 9:e109553
Jadhav VJ, Pal M (2013) Human and domestic animal infections caused by Candida albicans. J Mycopathol Res 551:243–249
Jefferson KK (2004) What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol Lett 236:163–173
Kaur S, Singh S (2014) Biofilm formation by Aspergillus fumigatus. Med Mycol 52:2–9
Khawcharoenporn T, Apisarnthanarak A, Kiratisin P, Mundy LM, Bailey TC (2006) Evaluation of Cryptococcus laurentii meningitis in a patient with HIV infection: a case report and review of the literature. Hawaii Med J 65:260–263
Khawcharoenporn T, Apisarnthanarak A, Mundy LM (2007) Non-neoformans cryptococcal infections: a systematic review. Infection 35:51–58
Khot PD, Suci PA, Miller RL, Nelson RD, Tyler BJ (2006) A small subpopulation of blastospores in Candida albicans biofilms exhibit resistance to amphotericin B associated with differential regulation of ergosterol and beta-1,6-glucan pathway genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3708–3716
Klotz SA, Chasin BS, Powell B, Gaur NK, Lipke PN (2007) Polymicrobial bloodstream infections involving Candida species: analysis of patients and review of the literature. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 59:401–406
Kojic EM, Darouiche RO (2004) Candida infections of medical devices. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:255–267
Kumamoto CA (2005) A contact-activated kinase signals Candida albicans invasive growth and biofilm development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:5576–5581
LaFleur MD, Kumamoto CA, Lewis K (2006) Candida albicans biofilms produce antifungal-tolerant persister cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:3839–3846
Lawrence JR, Korber DR, Hoyle BD, Costerton JW, Caldwell DE (1991) Optical sectioning of microbial biofilms. J Bacteriol 173:6558–6567
Lewis K (2010) Persister cells. Annu Rev Micro 64:357–372
Lopez-Ribot JL, McAtee RK, Perea S, Kirkpatrick WR, Rinaldi MG, Patterson TF (1999) Multiple resistant phenotypes of Candida albicans coexist during episodes of oropharyngeal candidiasis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1621–1630
Malik R, Alderton B, Finlaison D et al (2002) Cryptococcosis in ferrets: a diverse spectrum of clinical disease. Aust Vet J 80:749–755
Marcos-Zambrano LJ, Gomez-Perosanz M, Escribano P, Zaragoza O, Bouza E, Guinea J (2016) Biofilm production and antibiofilm activity of echinocandins and liposomal amphotericin B in echinocandin-resistant yeast species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:3579–3586
Marsh PD (1999) Microbiologic aspects of dental plaque and dental caries. Dent Clin N Am 43:599–614
Martinez LR, Casadevall A (2006) Susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans biofilms to antifungal agents in vitro. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:1021–1033
Martinez LR, Mihu MR, Han G, Frases S, Cordero RJ, Casadevall A, Friedman AJ, Friedman JM, Nosanchuk JD (2010) The use of chitosan to damage Cryptococcus neoformans biofilms. Biomaterials 31:669–679
Mello TP, Aor A, Goncalves DS, Seabra SH, Branquinha MH, Santos AL (2016) Assessment of biofilm formation by Scedosporium apiospermum, S. aurantiacum, S. minutisporum and Lomentospora prolificans. Biofouling 32:737–749
Miller MB, Bassler BL (2001) Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annurev Micro 55:165–199
Mukherjee PK, Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Ghannoum MA (2003) Mechanism of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms: phase-specific role of efflux pumps and membrane sterols. Infect Immun 71:4333–4340
Mukherjee PK, Chandra J, Yu C, Sun Y, Pearlman E, Ghannoum MA (2012) Characterization of Fusarium keratitis outbreak isolates: contribution of biofilms to antimicrobial resistance and pathogenesis. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:4450–4457
Müller FM, Seidler M, Beauvais A (2011) Aspergillus fumigatus biofilms in the clinical setting. Med Mycol 49:S96–S100
Nett JE, Lepak AJ, Marchillo K, Andes DR (2009) Time course global gene expression analysis of an in vivo Candida biofilm. J Infect Dis 200:307–313
Niimi M, Firth NA, Cannon RD (2010) Antifungal drug resistance of oral fungi. Odontology 98:15–25
Nobile CJ, Nett JE, Hernday AD, Homann OR, Deneault JS, Nantel A et al (2009) Biofilm matrix regulation by Candida albicans Zap1. PLoS Biol 7:e1000133
Peiqian L, Xiaoming P, Huifang S, Jingxin Z, Ning H, Birun L (2013) Biofilm formation by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum and susceptibility to environmental stress. FEMS Microbiol Lett 350:138–145
Pereira-Cenci T, Deng DM, Kraneveld EA, Manders EMM, Del Bel Cury AA, ten Cate JM et al (2008) The effect of Streptococcus mutans and Candida glabrata on Candida albicans biofilms formed on different surfaces. Arch Oral Biol 53:755–764
Pettit RK, Repp KK, Hazen KC (2010) Temperature affects the susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans biofilms to antifungal agents. Med Mycol 48:421–426
Piddock LJ (2006) Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps – not just for resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:629–636
Pires RH, Santo s JM, Zaia JE, Martins CH, Mendes-Giannini MJ (2011) Candida parapsilosis complex water isolates from a haemodialysis unit: biofilm production and in vitro evaluation of the use of clinical antifungals. Memórias Inst Oswaldo Cruz 106:646–654
Pitangui NS, Sardi JC, Silva JF, Benaducci T, Moraes da Silva RA, Rodriguez-Arellanes G, Taylor ML, Mendes-Giannini MJ, Fusco-Almeida AM (2012) Adhesion of Histoplasma capsulatum to pneumocytes and biofilm formation on an abiotic surface. Biofouling 28:711–718
Rajendran R, Williams C, Lappin DF, Millington O, Martins M, Ramage G (2013) Extracellular DNA release acts as an antifungal resistance mechanism in mature Aspergillus fumigatus biofilms. Eukaryot Cell 12:420–429
Ramage G, Saville SP, Thomas DP, Lopez-Ribot JL (2005) Candida biofilms: an update. Eukaryot Cell 4:633–638
Ramage G, Mowat E, Jones B, Williams C, Lopez-Ribot J (2009) Our current understanding of fungal biofilms. Crit Rev Microbiol 35:340–355
Ramage G, Rajendran R, Gutierrez-Correa M, Jones B, Williams C (2011) Aspergillus biofilms: clinical and industrial significance. FEMS Microbiol Lett 324:89–97
Ramage G, Milligan S, Lappin DF, Sherry L, Sweeney P, Williams C et al (2012) Antifungal, cytotoxic, and immunomodulatory properties of tea tree oil and its derivative components: potential role in management of oral candidosis in cancer patients. Front Microbiol 3:220
Sanglard D, Ischer F, Monod M, Bille J (1997) Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene. Microbiology 143:405–416
Sardi Jde C, Pitangui Nde S, Voltan AR, Braz JD, Machado MP, Fusco Almeida AM, Mendes Giannini MJ (2015) In vitro Paracoccidioides brasiliensis biofilm and gene expression of adhesins and hydrolytic enzymes. Virulence 6:642–651
Scorzoni L, de PaulaeSilva ACA, Marcos CM, Assato PA, de Melo WCMA, de Oliveira HC, Costa-Orlandi CB, Mendes-Giannini MJS, Fusco-Almeida AM (2017) Antifungal therapy: new advances in the understanding and treatment of mycosis. Front Microbiol 8:36
Shankar EM, Kumarasamy N, Bella D et al (2006) Pneumonia and pleural effusion due to Cryptococcus laurentii in a clinically proven case of AIDS. Can Respir J 13:275–278
Shapiro RS, Robbins N, Cowen LE (2011) Regulatory circuitry governing fungal development, drug resistance and disease. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:213–267
Silva S, Henriques M, Martins A, Oliveira R, Williams D, Azeredo J (2009) Biofilms of non-Candida albicans Candida species: quantification, structure and matrix composition. Med Mycol 47:681–689
Silva S, Negri M, Henriques M, Oliveira R, Williams DW, Azeredo J (2011) Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:288–305
Singh R, Shivaprakash MR, Chakrabarti A (2011) Biofilm formation by zygomycetes: quantification, structure and matrix composition. Microbiology 157:2611–2618
Steinbach WJ, Reedy JL, Cramer RA Jr, Perfect JR, Heitman J (2007) Harnessing calcineurin as a novel anti-infective agent against invasive fungal infections. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:418–430
Sykes JE, Sturges BK, Cannon MS et al (2010) Clinical signs, imaging features, neuropathology, and outcome in cats and dogs with central nervous system cryptococcosis from California. J Vet Intern Med 24:1427–1438
Thein Z, Seneviratne C, Samaranayake Y, Samaranayake L (2009) Community lifestyle of Candida in mixed biofilms: a mini review. Mycoses 52:467–475
Tre-Hardy M, Vanderbist F, Traore H, Devleeschouwer MJ (2008) In vitro activity of antibiotic combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm and planktonic cultures. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31:329–336
Tsui C, Kong EF, Jabra-Rizk MA (2016) Pathogenesis of Candida albicans biofilm. Pathog Dis 74:ftw018
Walsh TJ, Schlegel R, Moody MM, Costerton JW, Salcman M (1986) Ventriculoatrial shunt infection due to Cryptococcus neoformans: an ultrastructural and quantitative microbiological study. Neurosurgery 18:373–375
Weitzman I, Summerbell RC (1995) The dermatophytes. Clin Microbiol Rev 8:240–259
Williams C, Rajendran R, Ramage G (2016) Aspergillus biofilms in human disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 931:1–11
Wosten HA (2001) Hydrophobins: multipurpose proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:625–646
Xiao J, Moon Y, Li L, Rustchenko E, Wakabayashi H, Zhao X et al (2016) Candida albicans carriage in children with severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) and maternal relatedness. PLoS One 11:e0164242
Xie Z, Thompson A, Sobue T, Kashleva H, Xu H, Vasilakos J et al (2012) Candida albicans biofilms do not trigger reactive oxygen species and evade neutrophil killing. J Infect Dis 206:1936–1945
Xu H, Jenkinson HF, Dongari-Bagtzoglou A (2014) Innocent until proven guilty: mechanisms and roles of Streptococcus–Candida interactions in oral health and disease. Mol Oral Microbiol 29:99–116
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yadav, M.K., Malvi, Y. (2019). Animal Infections: The Role of Fungal Biofilms. In: Gupta, A., Singh, N. (eds) Recent Developments in Fungal Diseases of Laboratory Animals. Fungal Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18586-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18586-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18585-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18586-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)