Skip to main content

How to Support Girls’ Participation at Projects in Makerspace Settings. Overview on Current Recommendations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Educational Robotics in the Context of the Maker Movement (Edurobotics 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 946))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Several biases and thresholds challenge the reach of girls in technology-related activities. For this contribution we collected and structured existing research and good practices on how to reach girls within projects in the field educational robotics, makerspaces, coding and STEM in general. The contribution presents general guidelines for future activities with a potential higher rate of participating girls in makerspace settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Legewie, J., DiPrete, T.A.: The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering. Sociol. Educ. 87(4), 259–280 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wittemyer, R., et al.: MakeHers: engaging girls and women in technology through making, creating, and inventing. Study by Intel Corporation (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cussó-Calabuig, R., Carrera Farran, X., Bosch-Capblanch, X.: Are boys and girls still digitally differentiated? The case of Catalonian teenagers. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res. 16, 411–435 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sullivan, A., Bers, M.U.: Girls, boys, and bots: gender differences in young children’s performance on robotics and programming tasks. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract. 15, 145–165 (2016). http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3547. Accessed 15 July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  5. UNESCO: STEM and gender advancement (SAGA) (project homepage). https://en.unesco.org/saga. Accessed 14 July 2018

  6. Schön, S., Jagrikova, R., Voigt, C.: Social innovations within makerspace settings for early entrepreneurial education - the DOIT project. In: Proceedings of the EdMedia Conference, Amsterdam, 25–29 June 2018, pp. 1716–1725. (2018). http://www.learntechlib.org/primary/j/EDMEDIA/v/2018/n/1/. Accessed 15 July 2018

  7. Hyun, T.: Middle school girls: perceptions and experiences with robotics. ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. dissertation, California State University, Fullerton (2014). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1553689179. Accessed 15 July 2018

  8. Macdonald, A.: Gender action guidelines. Inventory of considerations that must be taken into account during the development of a workshop for Fab Labs. Phalabs 4.0 - PHotonics enhanced fAB LABS supporting the next revolution in digitalization (2018). http://www.phablabs.eu/. Accessed 15 July 2018

  9. Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., O’Neill, T.: Desiring a career in STEM-related fields: how middle school girls articulate and negotiate identities-in-practice in science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 50(10), 1143–1179 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kekelis, L., Ryoo, J., McLeod, E.: Making and mentors: what it takes to make them better together. Afterschool Matters 26, 8–17 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schön, S., Ebner, M., Reip, I.: Kreative digitale Arbeit mit Kindern in einer viertägigen offenen Werkstatt. Medienimpulse, no. 1 (2016). https://www.medienimpulse.at/articles/view/829. Accessed 15 July 2018

  12. Gappmaier, L.: MakerDays for kids – analyse und Konzepterstellung. In: Ebner, M., Schön, S. (eds.) iTUG, vol. 8. Book On Demand. Norderstedt (2018). https://itug.eu. Accessed 23 July 2018

  13. Kuhar, R., Zobec, A.: The anti-gender movement in Europe and the educational process in public schools. CEPS J. 7(2), 29–46 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gomoll, A., Hmelo-Silver, C., Šabanović, S., Francisco, M.: Dragons, ladybugs, and softballs: girls’ STEM engagement with human-centered robotics. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 25(6), 899–914 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schön, S., Ebner, M., Kumar, S.: The maker movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching. In: eLearning Papers, vol. 39, pp. 14–25 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Schön .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schön, S., Rosenova, M., Ebner, M., Grandl, M. (2020). How to Support Girls’ Participation at Projects in Makerspace Settings. Overview on Current Recommendations. In: Moro, M., Alimisis, D., Iocchi, L. (eds) Educational Robotics in the Context of the Maker Movement. Edurobotics 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 946. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18141-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics