Abstract
Experimental design is one aspect of a scientific method. A well-designed, properly conducted experiment aims to control variables in order to isolate and manipulate causal effects and thereby maximize internal validity, support causal inferences, and guarantee reliable results. Traditionally employed in the natural sciences, experimental design has become an important part of research in the social and behavioral sciences. Experimental methods are also endorsed as the most reliable guides to policy effectiveness. Through a discussion of some of the central concepts associated with experimental design, including controlled variation and randomization, this chapter will provide a summary of key ethical issues that tend to arise in experimental contexts. In addition, by exploring assumptions about the nature of causation and by analyzing features of causal relationships, systems, and inferences in social contexts, this chapter will summarize the ways in which experimental design can undermine the integrity of not only social and behavioral research but policies implemented on the basis of such research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alderson P (1996) Equipoise as a means of managing uncertainty: personal, communal and proxy. J Med Ethics 223:135–139
Arabatzis T (2014) Experiment. In: Curd M, Psillos S (eds) The Routledge companion to philosophy of science, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 191–202
Baele S (2013) The ethics of new development economics: is the experimental approach to development economics morally wrong? J Philos Econ 7(1):2–42
Beauchamp T, Childress J (2013) Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Binmore K (1999) Why experiment in economics? Econ J 109(453):16–24
Bogen J (2002) Epistemological custard pies from functional brain imaging. Philos Sci 69(3):59–71
Bordens K, Abbott B (2013) Research and design methods: a process approach. McGraw-Hill, Boston
Brady H (2011) Causation and explanation in social science. In: Goodin R (ed) The Oxford handbook of political science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1054–1107
Broome J (1984) Selecting people randomly. Ethics 95(1):38–55
Brown A, Mehta T, Allison D (2017) Publication bias in science: what is it, why is it problematic, and how can it be addressed? In: Jamieson K, Kahan D, Scheufele D (eds) The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 93–101
Cartwright N (1999) The dappled world: a study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Cartwright N (2007) Hunting causes and using them. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Cartwright N (2012) RCTs, evidence, and predicting policy effectiveness. In: Kincaid H (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of social science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 298–318
Cartwright N (2014) Causal inference. In: Cartwright N, Montuschi E (eds) Philosophy of social science: a new introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 308–337
Churchill L (1980) Physician-investigator/patient-subject: exploring the logic and the tension. J Med Philos 5(3):215–224
Clarke S (1999) Justifying deception in social science research. J Appl Philos 16(2):151–166
Conner R (1982) Random assignment of clients in social experimentation. In: Sieber J (ed) The ethics of social research: surveys and experiments. Springer, New York, pp 57–77
Cook T, Campbell D (1986) The causal assumptions of quasi-experimental practice. Synthese 68(1):141–180
Cook C, Sheets C (2011) Clinical equipoise and personal equipoise: two necessary ingredients for reducing bias in manual therapy trials. J Man Manipulative Ther 19(1):55–57
Crasnow S (2017) Bias in social science experiments. In: McIntyre L, Rosenberg A (eds) The Routledge companion to the philosophy of social science. Routledge, London, pp 191–201
Douglas H (2014) Values in social science. In: Cartwright N, Montuschi E (eds) Philosophy of social science: a new introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 162–182
Feest U, Steinle F (2016) Experiment. In: Humphreys P (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 274–295
Freedman B (1987) Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 317(3):141–145
Freedman B, Glass K, Weijer C (1996) Placebo orthodoxy in clinical research II: ethical, legal, and regulatory myths. J Law Med Ethics 24(3):252–259
Fried C (1974) Medical experimentation: personal integrity and social policy. Elsevier, New York
Gangl M (2010) Causal inference in sociological research. Annu Rev Sociol 36:21–47
Geller D (1982) Alternatives to deception: why, what, and how? In: Sieber JE (ed) The ethics of social research: surveys and experiments. Springer, New York, pp 38–55
Gifford F (1986) The conflict between randomized clinical trials and the therapeutic obligation. J Med Philos 11:347–366
Gillon R (1994) Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. Br Med J 309(6948):184–188
Goldthorpe J (2001) Causation, statistics, and sociology. Eur Sociol Rev 17(1):1–20
Guala F (2005) The methodology of experimental economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Guala F (2009) Methodological issues in experimental design and interpretation. In: Kincaid H, Ross D (eds) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 280–305
Guala F (2012) Experimentation in economics. In: Mäki U (ed) Philosophy of economics. Elsevier/North Holland, Oxford, pp 597–640
Hacking I (1999) The social construction of what? Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Hammersley M (2008) Paradigm war revived? On the diagnosis of resistance to randomized controlled trials and systematic review in education. Int J Res Method Educ 31(1):3–10
Hegtvedt K (2014) Ethics and experiments. In: Webster M, Sell J (eds) Laboratory experiments in the social sciences. Academic, London, pp 23–51
Holmes D (1976) ‘Debriefing after psychological experiments: I. Effectiveness of postdeception dehoaxing’ and ‘Debriefing after psychological experiments: II. Effectiveness of postexperimental desensitizing’. Am Psychol 32:858–875
Humphreys M (2015) Reflections on the ethics of social experimentation. J Glob Dev 6(1):87–112
Kaidesoja T (2017) Causal inference and modeling. In: McIntyre L, Rosenberg A (eds) The Routledge companion to philosophy of social science. Routledge, London, pp 202–213
Kelman H (1982) Ethical issues in different social science methods. In: Beauchamp T et al (eds) Ethical issues in social science research. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 40–98
Kuorikoski J, Marchionni C (2014) Philosophy of economics. In: French S, Saatsi J (eds) The Bloomsbury companion to the philosophy of science. Bloomsbury, London, pp 314–333
Levine R (1979) Clarifying the concepts of research ethics. Hast Cent Rep 9(3):21–26
Lilford R, Jackson J (1995) Equipoise and the ethics of randomization. J R Soc Med 88(10):552–559
Miller F, Brody H (2003) A critique of clinical equipoise: therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials. Hast Cent Rep 33(3):19–28
Miller P, Weijer C (2006) Fiduciary obligation in clinical research. J Law Med Ethics 34(2):424–440
Mitchell S (2009) Unsimple truths: science, complexity, and policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Morton R, Williams K (2010) Experimental political science and the study of causality: from nature to the lab. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Oakley A et al (2003) Using random allocation to evaluate social interventions: three recent UK examples. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 589(1):170–189
Papineau D (1994) The virtues of randomization. Br J Philos Sci 45:437–450
Pearl J (2000) Causality-models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Risjord M (2014) Philosophy of social science: a contemporary introduction. Routledge, London
Sieber, Joan (1982) Ethical dilemmas in social research. In: Sieber J (ed) The ethics of social research: surveys and experiments. Springer, New York, pp 1–29
Sieber J (1992) Planning ethically responsible research: a guide for students and internal review boards. Sage, Newbury Park
Sobel M (1996) An introduction to causal inference. Sociol Methods Res 24(3):353–379
Sullivan J (2009) The multiplicity of experimental protocols. A challenge to reductionist and non-reductionist models of the unity of neuroscience. Synthese 167:511–539
Urbach P (1985) Randomization and the design of experiments. Philos Sci 52:256–273
Veatch R (2007) The irrelevance of equipoise. J Med Philos 32(2):167–183
Wilholt T (2009) Bias and values in scientific research. Stud Hist Phil Sci 40(1):92–101
Woodward J (2008) Invariance, modularity, and all that. Cartwright on causation. In: Cartwright N et al (eds) Nancy Cartwright’s philosophy of science. Routledge, New York, pp 198–237
Worrall J (2002) What evidence in evidence-based medicine? Philos Sci 69(3):316–330
Worrall J (2007) Why there’s no cause to randomize. Br J Philos Sci 58(3):451–488
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lewis, J. (2020). Experimental Design. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16758-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16759-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities