Abstract
Worries about the status of informed consent or unintended use of personal information of data collected from the research process are often viewed as an obstacle to collating existing data for reuse. It may seem that when research “data” are shared, there is a risk of eroding the trust initially established in the researcher-participant relationship. With the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe gaining so much recent attention in the world of research, there can be a confusion between the roles that ethical, legal, and moral duties play and represent, and how the principles of open science can mesh with the concept of open data.
In this chapter some of the issues as they relate to data sharing are elucidated, and how access to data can be safely and successfully managed through a robust and trusted governance framework is demonstrated. The principles of research integrity can be met while paying close attention to ethical duties. Challenges for non-research sources where various protections that usually apply in the traditional social research data life cycle may not have taken place are also covered. With the potential risk of disclosure that increases with the capacity to link multiple data sources, the use of informed consent and the “Five Safes” protocol to ensure safe access to data are considered.
Finally, with the pressure for research transparency and reproducibility high on the research agenda, the practical steps that can be taken to document how data have been collected and treated are considered, ensuring that ethical processes are captured.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AJPS (2016) Qualitative data verification checklist, American Journal of Political Science, Version 1.0. https://ajpsblogging.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/qual-data-checklist-ver-1-0.pdf
ARX (2018) ARX data anonymization tool. http://arx.deidentifier.org/
Barocas S, Nissenbaum H (2014) Big data’s end run around procedural privacy protections. Commun ACM 57(11):31–33. Available at: https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2014/11/179832-big-datas-end-run-around-procedural-privacy-protections/abstract
Bishop L (2017) Big data and data sharing: ethical issues. UK Data Service Guide. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/604711/big-data-and-data-sharing_ethical-issues.pdf
Caldicott F (2017) Impact and influence for patients and service users: National Data Guardian for Health and Care 2017 report: Gov.uk. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-data-guardian-2017-report
Chatham House (2018) Chatham House Rule, Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/chatham-house-rule
Corti L, Van den Eynden V, Bishop L, Woollard M (2014) Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage, London. ISBN: 978-1-44626-726-4
Corti L, Haaker M, Janz N, Nettleton S (2018) Show me the data: research reproducibility in qualitative research. UK Data Service Impact Blog, September 18, 2018. UK Data Service, University of Essex. http://blog.ukdataservice.ac.uk/show-me-the-data/
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (2018) Data Ethics Framework: Guidance. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/data-ethics-framework/data-ethics-framework
Dodds C, Keogh P, Weatherburn P (2017) Accessing HIV post-exposure prophylaxis: gay and bisexual men in the UK describe their experiences. [Data collection]. UK Data Archive, Colchester. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-852745
Doward J, Cadwalladr C, Gibbs A (2017) Watchdog to launch inquiry into misuse of data in politics. The Observer, 4 Mar 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/04/cambridge-analytics-data-brexit-trump
Elliot M, Mackay E, O’Hara K, Tudor C (2016) The anonymisation decision-managing framework. UK Anonymisation Network. http://ukanon.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/The-Anonymisation-Decision-making-Framework.pdf
ESRC (2015) Framework for research ethics. Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/files/funding/guidance-for-applicants/esrc-framework-for-research-ethics-2015/
ESRC (2018) Why GDPR matters for research. ESRC Blog 25 May 2018. https://blog.esrc.ac.uk/2018/05/25/why-gdpr-matters-for-research/
European Court of Human Rights (1998) European convention on human rights. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
Finnish Social Science Data Archive (2018a) Anonymisation and personal data. https://www.fsd.uta.fi/aineistonhallinta/en/anonymisation-and-identifiers.html
The Expert Advisory Group on Data Access (2015) Governance of data access. The Wellcome Trust. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/governance-of-data-access-eagda-jun15.pdf
Finnish Social Science Data Archive (2018b) Anonymisation and personal data. https://www.fsd.uta.fi/aineistonhallinta/en/anonymisation-and-identifiers.html
Foster I (2018) Research infrastructure for the safe analysis of sensitive data. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 675(1):102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217742610
Gov.UK (2018) Guide to the general data protection regulation. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation
Imperial College (2018) The importance of patient data sharing. Video Imperial College. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wja81uz7L5A
Kruse F, Thestrup J (eds) (2017) Research data management – a European perspective. De Gruyter Saur, Berlin/Boston. https://www.degruyter.com/view/product/430793
Lane J, Heus P, Mulcahy T (2008) Data access in a cyber world: making use of cyberinfrastructure. Trans Data Priv 1:2–16
Information Commissioner’s Office (2018) Key definitions. The GDPR. Information Commissioner’s Office. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/key-definitions/
Information Commissioners Office (2018a) Data protection impact assessments. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/accountability-and-governance/data-protection-impact-assessments/
Information Commissioners Office (2018b) Anonymisation: managing data protection risk code of practice (2018). https://ico.org.uk/media/1061/anonymisation-code.pdf
Kuula A (2011) Methodological and ethical dilemmas of archiving qualitative data. IASSIST Q 34(3–4) and 35(1–2):12–17. https://iassistdata.org/sites/default/files/iqvol34_35_kuula.pdf
MRC (2018) Data sharing and publishing. Using information about people in health research. Medical Research Council (MRC) Regulatory Support Centre. http://www.highlights.rsc.mrc.ac.uk/PIHR/index.html#/lessons/j9vZgLPLH49AA5cPhzPd8j-zrengyWWl?_k=6ne476
Mort M (2006) Health and social consequences of the foot and mouth disease epidemic in North Cumbria, 2001–2003 [computer file]. UK Data Archive [distributor], Colchester. SN: 5407. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5407-1
Narayana A, Felton E (2014) No silver bullet: de-identification still doesn’t work. http://randomwalker.info/publications/no-silver-bullet-de-identification.pdf
NHS Health Research Authority (2018) Informing participants and seeking consent. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/best-practice/informing-participants-and-seeking-consent/
NHS Health Research Authority (2018a) Governance arrangements for research ethics committees. https://www.hra.nhs.uk/planning-and-improving-research/policies-standards-legislation/governance-arrangement-research-ethics-committees/
Nettleton S (2009) Being a doctor: a sociological analysis, 2005–2006. [Data collection]. UK Data Service. SN: 6124, https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6124-1
OECD (2007) OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/61/38500813.pdf
Office for National Statistics (2018a) Policy for social survey microdata. ONS. https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/methodologytopicsandstatisticalconcepts/disclosurecontrol/policyforsocialsurveymicrodata
Office for National Statistics (2017) The ‘five safes’ – data privacy at ONS. ONS Blog. https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2017/01/27/the-five-safes-data-privacy-at-ons/
Office for National Statistics (2018) Approved Researcher Scheme. https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/whatwedo/statistics/requestingstatistics/approvedresearcherscheme
Open Brain Consent (2018) Make open data sharing a no-brainer for ethics committees. https://www.open-brain-consent.readthedocs.io
Schmidutz D (2018) Implementing consent for record linkage in a cross-national survey: a practical example from SHARE Wave 8. SERISS. https://seriss.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Schmidutz_Consent_SHARE_linkage.pdf
Singer N (2013) Data protection laws, an ocean apart. The New York Times, 2 Feb. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/technology/consumer-data-protection-laws-an-ocean-apart.html?_r=0
The National Archives (2007) The Statistics and Registration Services Act 2007. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/18/contents
Sweeney L, Crosas M, Bar-Sinai M (2016) Sharing sensitive data with confidence: the DataTags system. Technology Science. October 16, 2015. http://techscience.org/a/2015101601
Ritchie F (2007) Statistical detection and disclosure control in a research environment. Mimeo, Office for National Statistics. http://doku.iab.de/fdz/events/2007/Ritchie.pdf
The Royal Society (2012) Science as an open enterprise. The Royal Society Policy Centre report 02/12. http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-SAOE.pdf
Seymour J, Judith Rietjens J, Brown J, van der Heide A, Sterckx S, Deliens L (2011) The perspectives of clinical staff and bereaved informal care-givers on the use of continuous sedation until death for cancer patients: the study protocol of the UNBIASED study. BMC Palliat Care 10(5). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-684X/10/5
Seymour J (2017) Managing suffering at the end of life: a study of continuous deep sedation until death. [Data collection]. Economic and Social Research Council, Colchester. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-850749
Shepherd P (2012) Millennium Cohort Study Ethical review and consent. https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/MCS-Ethical-review-and-consent-Shepherd-P-November-2012.pdf
Springer Nature (2017) Research data policies. https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/journal-policies/15369670
Statistics Netherlands (2018) μ-ARGUS. http://neon.vb.cbs.nl/casc/mu.htm
Tate R, Calderwood L, Dezateux C, Joshi H (2006) Mother’s consent to linkage of survey data with her child’s birth records in a multi-ethnic national cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 35:294–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi287
Templ M, Meindl B, Kowarik A (2018) sdcMicro. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sdcMicro/vignettes/sdc_guidelines.pdf
Unger JM, Barlow WE, Ramsey SD et al (2016) The scientific impact of positive and negative phase 3 cancer clinical trials. JAMA Oncol 2:875. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6487
University of Cambridge (2015) Computers using digital footprints are better judges of personality than friends and family. Research, 12 Jan 2015. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/computers-using-digital-footprints-are-better-judges-of-personality-than-friends-and-family
University of London, Institute of Education, Centre for Longitudinal Studies (2018). Millennium Cohort Study: Sixth survey, 2015, 4th edn. [Data collection]. UK Data Service. SN: 8156. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-8156-4
Understanding Patient Data (2018) Data saves lives animations. Animations, understanding patient data. https://understandingpatientdata.org.uk/animations
UK Data Service (2018a) Terms and conditions of access. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/get-data/how-to-access/conditions/eul
UK Data Service (2018b) UK Data Service anonymisation of qualitative data. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/manage-data/legal-ethical/anonymisation/qualitative
UK Data Service (2017a) Secure lab: the 5 safes. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/use-data/secure-lab/security-philosophy.aspx
UK Data Service (2017b) Depositor stories. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/deposit-data/stories.aspx
UK Research Integrity Office (2018) Code of practice for research, UK Research Integrity Office. https://ukrio.org/publications/code-of-practice-for-research/
UK Statistics Authority (2018) National Statistician’s Data Ethics Advisory Committee. https://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/about-the-authority/committees/nsdec/
Wales Cancer Bank (2007) Annual report 2006–2007, Wales Cancer Bank. https://www.walescancerbank.com/getfile.php?type=reports&id=WCB_AnnualReport_2006-07.pdf
Wilson RC, Butters OW, Avraam D, Baker J, Tedds JA, Turner A, Murtagh M, Burton PR (2017) DataSHIELD – new directions and dimensions. Data Sci J 16:21. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Corti, L., Bishop, L. (2020). Ethical Issues in Data Sharing and Archiving. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16758-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16759-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities