Abstract
Surveys are built up of standardized interviews with larger samples of individuals in order to make inferences about a specific population. They belong to the most popular methods within the social sciences; this is particularly true for research in different areas of policy, where surveys, initiated by all kinds of actors that are involved in policy-making, have become an integral element of the whole policy cycle. With regard to media policy research surveys can provide data on patterns of media use and on opinions on specific media policy issues. In order to achieve meaningful results researchers who consider applying surveys have to reflect their main characteristics: they are based on self-reports, they are reactive methods, and they include standardized measurements. The design of a survey includes the following steps: defining the relevant population, sampling, decision on specific comparative designs, selecting a mode of interviewing, designing the questionnaire, data analysis and presentation. As an illustration of surveys that are particularly relevant for media policy research two international studies are shortly presented: the Reuters Institute Digital News Report on current trends of news consumption, and the EU Kids Online survey on children’s and young people’s online experiences and online safety.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). (2016). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (9th ed.). Lenexa, KS: AAPOR. Retrieved July 25, 2018, from https://www.aapor.org/Standards-Ethics/Standard-Definitions-(1).aspx.
Banducci, S., & Stevens, D. (2015). Surveys in context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 214–243.
Boehm, M., Bowman, D., & Zinn, J. O. (2013). Survey research and the production of evidence for social policy. Social Policy & Society, 12(2), 309–318.
Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583.
Elmelund‐Præstekær, C., Hopmann, D. N., & Pedersen, R. T. (2017). Survey methods, traditional, public opinion polling. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0245.
Erba, J., Ternes, B., Bobkowski, P., Logan, T., & Liu, Y. (2018). Sampling methods and sample populations in quantitative mass communication research studies: A 15-year census of six journals. Communication Research Reports, 35(1), 42–47.
Esser, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (2012). On the why and how of comparative inquiry in communication studies. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
Eveland, W. P., Jr., Hutchens, M. J., & Shen, F. (2009). Exposure, attention, or “use” of news? Assessing aspects of the reliability and validity of a central concept in political communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 3(4), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450903378925.
Fink, A. (2013). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods (4th ed.). London: Sage.
Hasebrink, U. (2011). Giving the audience a voice: The role of research in making media regulation more responsive to the needs of the audience. Journal of Information Policy, 1, 321–336.
Hasebrink, U., Görzig, A., Haddon, L., Kalmus, V., & Livingstone, S. (2011). Patterns of risk and safety online: In-depth analyses from the EU Kids Online survey of 9–16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. London: LSE; EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39356/.
Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., & Ólafsson, K. (2009). Comparing children’s online opportunities and risks across Europe: Cross-national comparisons for EU Kids Online (2nd ed.). London: EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24368/.
Hasebrink, U., & Lobe, B. (2013). The cultural context of risk: On the role of intercultural differences for safer Internet issues. In B. O’Neill, E. Staksrud, & S. McLaughlin (Eds.), Towards a better Internet for children? Policy pillars, players and paradoxes (pp. 283–299). Göteborg: Nordicom.
Hastak, M., Mazis, M. B., & Morris, L. A. (2001). The role of consumer surveys in public policy decision making. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(2), 170–185.
Henry, T. G. (1990). Practical sampling. Newbury Park: Sage.
Hepp, A., Breiter, A., & Friemel, T. (2018). Digital traces in context: An introduction. International Journal of Communication, 12, 439–449. https://doi.org/1932-8036/20180005.
Herbst, S. (1993). Numbered voices: How opinion polling has shaped American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hocevar, K. P., & Flanagin, A. J. (2017). Online research methods, quantitative. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0174.
Holcomb, J., & Spalsbury, A. (2005). Teaching students to use summary statistics and graphics to clean and analyze data. Journal of Statistics Education, 13, 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2005.11910567.
Hooghe, M., Stolle, D., Mahéo, V. A., & Vissers, S. (2010). Why can’t a student be more like an average person? Sampling and effects in social science field and laboratory experiments. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209351516.
Hooker, C. M., & de Zúniga, H. G. (2017). Survey methods, online. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0244.
Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Vol. 2). London: Sage.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the Internet: The perspective of European children. London: EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/.
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., O’Neill, B., & Donoso, V. (2012). Towards a better Internet for children. London: EU Kids Online.
Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., & Staksrud, E. (2011). Social networking, age and privacy. London: EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35849/.
Newman, N., Richard, F., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute digital news report 2017. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
O’Neill, B., Staksrud, E., & McLaughlin, S. (Eds.). (2013). Towards a better Internet for children? Policy pillars, players and paradoxes. Göteborg: Nordicom.
Peterson, R. A. (2000). Constructing effective questionnaires. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349022.
Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (Eds.). (2009). Communication research measures II: A sourcebook. New York: Routledge.
Ryan, K., Gannon-Slater, N., & Culbertson, M. J. (2012). Improving survey methods with cognitive interviews in small- and medium-scale evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 414–430.
Sala, E., & Lillini, R. (2015). Undercoverage bias in telephone surveys in Europe: The Italian case. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(1), 133–156.
Scherpenzeel, A. C., & Bethlehem, J. G. (2011). How representative are online panels? Problems of coverage and selection and possible solutions. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies (pp. 105–132). New York: Routledge.
Smyth, J. D., & Pearson, J. E. (2011). Internet survey methods: A review of strengths, weaknesses, and innovations. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies (pp. 11–44). New York: Routledge.
Further Reading
Elmelund‐Præstekær, C., Hopmann, D. N., & Pedersen, R. T. (2017). Survey methods, traditional, public opinion polling. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0245.
Fink, A. (2013). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fowler, F. J. (2008). Survey research methods. London: Sage.
Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods (Vol. 2). London: Sage.
Smyth, J. D., & Pearson, J. E. (2011). Internet survey methods: A review of strengths, weaknesses, and innovations. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies (pp. 11–44). New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hasebrink, U., Hölig, S. (2019). Talking to People I: Surveys. In: Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16064-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16065-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)