Skip to main content

Playing with Patterns

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From Astrophysics to Unconventional Computation

Part of the book series: Emergence, Complexity and Computation ((ECC,volume 35))

Abstract

Susan Stepney has created novel research in areas as diverse as formal software modelling and evolutionary computing. One theme that spans almost her whole career is the use of patterns to capture and express solutions to software engineering problems. This paper considers two extremes, both in time and topic: patterns for formal modelling languages, and patterns related to the principled modelling and simulation of complex systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the youTube recording of the 1996 talk, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98LdFA-_zfA is slightly different from the journal reprint [10].

  2. 2.

    http://hillside.net/plop/archive.html.

  3. 3.

    In line with usage in the Z Patterns report [55], we use a sans-serif font for pattern names and an italicised font for anti-pattern names.

  4. 4.

    In 2018, the various papers had only some 30 citations. However, to put that in context, the LFM book [15], has only 142 citation.

  5. 5.

    The CoSMoS project, 2007–11, was led by Susan Stepney (York: EPSRC EP/E053505) and Peter Welch (Kent: EPSRC EP/E049419), along with researchers from York, Kent, University of the West of England and Abertay. The outputs of CoSMoS can be found online at https://www.cosmos-research.org/about.html. Background and motivation to CoSMoS can be found in [13, 42,43,44,45, 58].

  6. 6.

    https://www.scrumalliance.org/.

  7. 7.

    see e.g. the simulation projects of the York Computational Immunology Lab, https://www.york.ac.uk/computational-immunology/.

  8. 8.

    www.cs.ox.ac.uk/chaste.

  9. 9.

    Argument representations in this paper have been produced using YCIL’s open-source Artoo argumentation tool https://www.york.ac.uk/computational-immunology/software/artoo/, which runs in a browser, loads and stores argument structures as XML, and generates .png images. The tool underpins Simomics Ltd’s Reason tool, www.simomics.com.

  10. 10.

    https://www.york.ac.uk/computational-immunology/software/.

References

  1. Abrial, J.-R.: The B-book: Assigning Programs to Meanings. CUP (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alden, K.: Simulation and statistical techniques to explore lymphoid tissue organogenesis. Ph.D. thesis, University of York (2012). http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/3220/

  3. Alden, K., Andrews, P., Timmis, J., Veiga-Fernandes, H., Coles, M.C.: Towards argument-driven validation of an in-silico model of immune tissue organogenesis. In: Proceedings of ICARIS, vol. 6825, LNCS, pp. 66–70. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alden, K., Andrews, P.S., Polack, F.A.C., Veiga-Fernandes, H., Coles, M.C., Timmis, J.: Using argument notation to engineer biological simulations with increased confidence. J. R. Soc. Interface 12(104) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alden, K., Andrews, P.S., Veiga-Fernandes, H., Timmis, J., Coles, M.C.: Utilising a simulation platform to understand the effect of domain model assumptions. Nat. Comput. 14(1), 99–107 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Alden, K., Read, M., Andrews, P.S., Timmis, J., Coles, M.C.: Applying Spartan to understand parameter uncertainty in simulations. R J. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alden, K., Read, M., Timmis, J., Andrews, P., Veiga-Frenandes, H., Coles, M.: Spartan: a comprehensive tool for understanding uncertainty in simulations of biological systems. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9(2) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alden, K., Timmis, J., Andrews, P.S., Veiga-Fernandes, H., Coles, M.C.: Extending and applying Spartan to perform temporal sensitivity analyses for predicting changes in influential biological pathways in computational models. IEEE Trans. Comput. Biol. 14(2), 422–431 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander, C.: The Timeless Way of Building. OUP (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander, C.: The origins of pattern theory: the future of the theory, and the generation of a living world. IEEE Softw. 16(5), 71–82 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S.: A Pattern Language—Towns, Buildings, Construction. OUP (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander, R.: Using simulation for systems of systems hazard analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York, YCST-2007-21 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andrews, P.S., Polack, F.A.C., Sampson, A.T., Stepney, S., Timmis, J.: The CoSMoS process, version 0.1. Technical Report, Computer Science, University of York, YCS-2010-450 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Andrews, P.S., Stepney, S., Hoverd, T., Polack, F.A.C., Sampson, A.T., Timmis, J.: CoSMoS process, models and metamodels. In: CoSMoS Workshop, pp. 1–14. Luniver Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barden, R., Stepney, S., Cooper, D.: Z in Practice. Prentice-Hall (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bjørner, D., Jones, C.B. (eds.): The Vienna Development Method: The Meta-Language, vol. 61, LNCS. Springer (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bowen, J.P., Hinchey, M.G.: Seven more myths of formal methods. IEEE Softw. 12(4), 34–41 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Wimmer, M.: Model-driven Software Engineering (MDSE) in Practice, 2nd edn. Morgan & Claypool (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brown, W.H., Malveau, R.C., McCormick, H.W., Mowbray, T.J.: AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis, 1st edn. Wiley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bryden, J., Noble, J.: Computational modelling, explicit mathematical treatments, and scientific explanation. In: Proceedings of Artificial Life X, pp. 520–526. MIT Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dearden, A., Finlay, J.: Pattern languages in HCI: a critical review. Hum. Comput. Interact. 21(1), 49–102 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Paolo, E., Noble, J., Bullock, S.: Simulation models as opaque thought experiments. In: Proceedings of Artificial Life VII, pp. 497–506. MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Duncan, I.M.M., de Muijnck-Hughes, J.: Security pattern evaluation. In: Proceedings of SOSE, pp. 428–429. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Epstein, J.M.: Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity 4(5), 41–60 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Fowler, M.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-oriented Software. Addison-Wesley (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Greaves, R.B., Read, M., Timmis, J., Andrews, P.S., Butler, J.A., Gerckens, B., Kumar, V.: In silico investigation of novel biological pathways: the role of CD200 in regulation of T cell priming in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Biosystems (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hall, A.: Seven myths of formal methods. IEEE Softw. 7(5), 11–19 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Humphreys, P.: Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. OUP (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Information Technology—Z formal specification notation—syntax, type system and semantics. ISO Standard 13568 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kelly, T.P.: Arguing safety—a systematic approach to managing safety cases. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York, YCST 99/05 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Krasner, G.E., Pope, S.T.: A cookbook for using the model-view controller user interface paradigm in Smalltalk-80. J. Object Oriented Program. 1(3), 26–49 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Le Charlier, B., Flener, P.: Specifications are necessarily informal or: some more myths of formal methods. Syst. Softw. 40(3), 275–296 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller, G.F.: Artificial life as theoretical biology: how to do real science with computer simulation. Technical Report Cognitive Science Research Paper 378, University of Sussex (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Morgan, C.: Programming from Specifications, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moyo, D.: Investigating the dynamics of hepatic inflammation through simulation. Ph.D. thesis, University of York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nance, R.E., Sargent, R.G.: Perspectives on the evolution of simulation. Oper. Res. 50(1), 161–172 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Origin Consulting (York): GSN community standard version 1. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of York (2011). http://www.goalstructuringnotation.info

  40. Polack, F., Stepney, S.: Emergent properties do not refine. ENTCS 137(2), 163–181 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Polack, F.A.C.: Arguing validation of simulations in science. In: CoSMoS Workshop, pp. 51–74. Luniver Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Polack, F.A.C.: Filling gaps in simulation of complex systems: the background and motivation for CoSMoS. Nat. Comput. 14(1), 49–62 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Polack, F.A.C., Andrews, P.S., Ghetiu, T., Read, M., Stepney, S., Timmis, J., Sampson, A.T.: Reflections on the simulation of complex systems for science. In: Proceedings of ICECCS, pp. 276–285. IEEE Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Polack, F.A.C., Andrews, P.S., Sampson, A.T.: The engineering of concurrent simulations of complex systems. In: Proceedings of CEC, pp. 217–224. IEEE Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Polack, F.A.C., Hoverd, T., Sampson, A.T., Stepney, S., Timmis, J.: Complex systems models: engineering simulations. In: Proceedings of ALife XI, pp. 482–489. MIT press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Potter, B., Till, D., Sinclair, J.: An Introduction to Formal Specification and Z, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Read, M., Andrews, P.S., Timmis, J., Kumar, V.: Techniques for grounding agent-based simulations in the real domain: a case study in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 18(1), 67–86 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Read, M.N.: Statistical and modelling techniques to build confidence in the investigation of immunology through agent-based simulation. Ph.D. thesis, University of York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stepney, S.: A tale of two proofs. In: BCS-FACS Northern Formal Methods Workshop. Electronic Workshops in Computing (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stepney, S.: A pattern language for scientific simulations. In: CoSMoS Workshop, pp. 77–103. Luniver Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Stepney, S., Cooper, D., Woodcock, J.C.P.: An electronic purse: specification, refinement, and proof. Technical Monograph PRG-126, Oxford University Computing Laboratory (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stepney, S., Nabney, I.T.: The DeCCo project papers, I to VI. Technical Report, Computer Science, University of York, YCS-2002-358 to YCS-2002-363 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stepney, S., Polack, F., Toyn, I.: An outline pattern language for Z: five illustrations and two tables. In: Proceedings of ZB2003, vol. 2651, LNCS, pp. 2–19. Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stepney, S., Polack, F., Toyn, I.: Patterns to guide practical refactoring: examples targetting promotion in Z. In: Proceedings of ZB2003, vol. 2651, LNCS, pp. 20–39. Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Stepney, S., Polack, F., Toyn, I.: A Z patterns catalogue I: specification and refactorings, v0.1. Technical Report, Computer Science, University of York, YCS-2003-349 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Stepney, S., Polack, F., Toyn, I.: Diagram patterns and meta-patterns to support formal modelling. Technical Report, Computer Science, University of York, YCS-2005-394 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Stepney, S., Polack, F., Turner, H.: Engineering emergence. In: ICECCS, pp. 89–97. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stepney, S., Polack, F.A.C.: Engineering Simulations as Scientific Instruments: A Pattern Language. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Valentine, S.H., Stepney, S., Toyn, I.: A Z patterns catalogue II: definitions and laws, v0.1. Technical Report, Computer Science, University of York, YCS-2003-383 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vargha, A., Delaney, H.D.: A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 25(2), 101–132 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wania, C.E.: Investigating an author’s influence using citation analyses: Christopher Alexander (1964–2014). Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52(1), 1–10 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wania, C.E., Atwood, M.E.: Pattern languages in the wild: exploring pattern languages in the laboratory and in the real world. In: Proceedings of DESRIST, pp. 12:1–12:15. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Weaver, R.A.: The safety of software—constructing and assuring arguments. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York, YCST-2004-01 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Welch, P.H., Barnes, F.R.M.: Communicating mobile processes: introducing occam-pi. In: Proceedings of 25 Years of CSP, vol. 3525, LNCS, pp. 175–210. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wheeler, M., Bullock, S., Di Paolo, E., Noble, J., Bedau, M., Husbands, P., Kirby, S., Seth, A.: The view from elsewhere: perspectives on ALife modelling. Artif. Life 8(1), 87–100 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Williams, R.A., Greaves, R., Read, M., Timmis, J., Andrews, P.S., Kumar, V.: In silico investigation into dendritic cell regulation of CD8Treg mediated killing of Th1 cells in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. BMC Bioinform. 14, S6–S9 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wilson, S.P., McDermid, J.A.: Integrated analysis of complex safety critical systems. Comput. J. 38(10), 765–776 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Woodcock, J., Loomes, M.: Software Engineering Mathematics. Addison-Wesley (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Woodcock, J., Stepney, S., Cooper, D., Clark, J.A., Jacob, J.L.: The certification of the Mondex electronic purse to ITSEC Level E6. Form. Asp. Comput. 20(1), 5–19 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona A. C. Polack .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Polack, F.A.C. (2020). Playing with Patterns. In: Adamatzky, A., Kendon, V. (eds) From Astrophysics to Unconventional Computation. Emergence, Complexity and Computation, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15792-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics