Abstract
This chapter explicates that the smart city is defined by a techno-utopian discourse, which presents smart technology as a value-neutral and rational tool in solving all kinds of urban problems. After analyzing several ethical issues relating to the smart city concept, Lefebvre’s notion of the “right to the city” from the 1960s is examined. While the Lefebvrian “right to the city” is a utopian project, it offers an opportunity to reflect upon what an emancipatory and fair smart city should be like. We examine the current debate on the smart city by looking at three contemporary perspectives on the “right to the city.” The chapter concludes by describing three trajectories that could lead to a more open, flexible, diverse, and participatory smart city, particularly in relation to issues of (a) participation, (b) communing, and (c) citizenship. These trajectories are illustrated by providing examples of different smart initiatives in the city of Barcelona.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, F., & Harvey, D. (2012). Interview: David Harvey on the right to the city. https://www.iconeye.com/architecture/features/interview-david-harvey-on-the-right-to-the-city. Accessed 18 Aug 2020.
Anastasiu, I. (2019). Unpacking the smart city through the lens of the right to the city: A taxonomy as a way forward in participatory city-making. In M. de Lange & M. de Waal (Eds.), The hackable city: Digital media and collaborative city-making in the network society (pp. 239–260). Singapore: Springer.
Angelidou, M. (2016). Four European smart city strategies. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 4(4), 18–30.
Barredo Arrieta, A., Diaz-Rodriguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., & Al Barbado, A. e. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.
Bela, J. (2014). User-generated urbanism and the right to the City. In J. Hou, B. Spencer, T. Way, & K. Yocom (Eds.), Now urbanism: The future city is here (pp. 149–164). London: Routledge.
Birkinbine, B. J. (2018). Commons praxis: Toward a critical political economy of the digital commons. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 16(1), 290–305.
Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2019). Free, fair and alive: The insurgent power of the commons. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
Busquet, G. (2019). Right to the city. In A. Orum (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell. Encyclopedia of urban and regional studies (pp. 1–9). Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Butler, C. (2012). Henri Lefebvre: Spatial politics, everyday life and the right to the city. London: Routledge.
Capdevila, I., & Zarlenga, M. I. (2015). Smart city or smart citizens? The Barcelona case. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(3), 266–282.
Cardullo, P. (2019). Smart commons, or a ‘smart approach’ to the commons? In P. Cardullo, C. Di Feliciantonio, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), The right to the smart city (pp. 85–98). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019a). Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84(1), 1–13.
Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019b). Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. EPC: Politics and Space, 37(5), 813–830.
Cowley, R., Joss, S. & Dayot, Y. (2018). The smart city and its publics: insights from across six UK cities. Urban Research and Practice, 11(1), 53–77.
Crawford, M. (2011). Rethinking ‘rights’, rethinking ‘cities’: A response to David Harvey’s ‘the right to the city’. In Z. Begg & L. Stickells (Eds.), The right to the city (pp. 33–36). Sydney: Tin Sheds Gallery, Faculty of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney.
Engelbert, J., Van Zoonen, L., & Hirzalla, F. (2019). Excluding citizens from the European smart city: The discourse practices of pursuing and granting smartness. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 347–353.
Gabrys, J. (2014). Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(1), 30–48.
Galič, M. (2019). Surveillance, privacy and public space in the Stratumseind Living Lab: The smart city debate, beyond data. Ars Aequi, juli/augustus, 570–579.
Galič, M. & Gellert R. (2020). Data protection law beyond identifiability? Atmospheric profiles, nudging and the Stratumseind Living Lab. Computer Law & Security Review (forthcoming).
Harcourt, B. E. (2007). Against prediction: Profiling, policing, and punishing in an actuarial age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities. From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.
Iveson, K. (2013). Cities within the city: Do-it-yourself urbanism and the right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 941–956.
Iveson, K., & Fincher, R. (2012). “Just diversity” in the city of difference. In G. Bridge & S. Watson (Eds.), The new Blackwell companion to the city (pp. 407–418). Oxford: Blackwell.
Jacobs, J. (2011). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Modern Library.
Keymolen, E., & Voorwinden, A. (2019). Can we negotiate? Trust and the rule of law in the smart city paradigm. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2019.1588844.
Kitchin, R. (2016). Getting smarter about smart cities: Improving data privacy and data security. Dublin: Data Protection Unit, Department of the Taoiseach.
Kitchin, R. (2019a). The ethics of smart cities: Using big data and AI to manage cities creates many ethical issues, but efforts to address these concerns can be just as contentious. https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2019/0425/1045602-the-ethics-of-smart-cities/. Accessed 20 Aug 2020.
Kitchin, R. (2019b). Toward a genuinely humanizing smart urbanism. In P. Cardullo, C. Di Feliciantonio, & R. Kitchin (Eds.), The right to the smart city (pp. 193–204). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
Lacinák, M., & Ristvej, J. (2017). Smart city, safety and security. Procedia Engineering, 192, 522–527.
Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Éditions Anthropos.
Lefebvre, H. (1970). Le manifeste différentialiste. Paris: Galimard.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (2014). Dissolving city, planetary metamorphosis. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 203–205.
Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2–3), 185–197.
McLaren, D., & Agyeman, J. (2015). Sharing cities. A case for truly smart and sustainable cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Merrifield, A. (2017). Fifty years on: The right to the city. In The right to the city: A Verso report (pp. 13–18). London: Verso.
Mitchell, D. (1995). The end of public space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85, 108–133.
Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city. Social justice and the right to public space. New York: The Guilford Press.
Mitchell, D. (2009). Against safety, against security: Reinvigorating urban life. In M. J. Thompson (Ed.), Fleeing the city (pp. 231–248). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mitchell, D. (2018). Revolution and the critique of human geography: Prospects for the right to the city after 50 years. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 100(1), 2(11.
Mitchell, D., & Heynen, N. (2009). The geography of survival and the right to the city: Speculations on surveillance, legal innovation, and the criminalization of intervention. Urban Geography, 30(6), 611–632.
Monahan, T. (2017). Regulating belonging: Surveillance, inequality, and the cultural production of abjection. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10(2), 191–206.
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click Here. New York: Public Affairs Books.
Morozov, E., & Bria, F. (2018). Rethinking smart cities: Democratizing urban technology. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung.
Mouffe, C. (2005). For an agonistic public sphere. In L. Tonder & L. Thomassen (Eds.), Radical democracy: Politics between abundance and lack (pp. 123–132). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Pali, B., & Schuilenburg, M. (2019). Fear and fantasy in the smart city. Critical Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-019-09447-7.
Peeters, R., & Schuilenburg, M. (2018). Machine justice: Governing security through the bureaucracy of algorithms. Information Polity. An International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age, 23)3, 267–280.
Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108.
Purcell, M. (2003). Citizenship and the right to the global city: Reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), 564–590.
Sadowski, J., & Bendor, R. (2019). Selling smartness: Corporate narratives and the Smart City as a sociotechnical imaginary. Science, Technology & Human Values, 44(3), 540–563.
Sadowski, J., & Pasquale, F. (2015). The spectrum of control: A social theory of the smart city. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5903/4660. Accessed 5 Aug 2020.
Schuilenburg, M., & Pali, B. (2021). Smart city imaginaries: Looking beyond the techno-utopian vision. In M. Schuilenburg & R. Peeters (Eds.), The algorithmic society. Technology, power, and knowledge. London/New York: Routledge. (in press).
Schuilenburg, M., & Peeters, R. (2018). Smart cities and the architecture of security: Pastoral power and the scripted design of public space. City, Territory and Architecture, 5(13), 1–9.
Sennett, R. (1992). The uses of disorder: Personal identity and city life. New York: W.W. Norton.
Shaw, J., & Graham, M. (2017). An informational right to the city? Code, content, control, and the urbanization of information. Antipode, 49(4), 907–927.
Smith, G. J. D., Bennett Moses, L., & Chan, J. (2017). The challenges of doing criminology in the big data era: Towards a digital and data-driven approach. The British Journal of Criminology, 57(2), 259–274.
Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Globalisation or ‘glocalisation’? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 25–48.
Thatcher, J., O’Sullivan, D., & Mahmoudi, D. (2016). Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(6), 990–1006.
Toli, A. M., & Murtagh, N. (2020). The concept of sustainability in smart city definitions. Frontiers in Built Environment, 6, 77), 1–77),10.
Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883–898.
Wagner, B. (2018). Ethics as an escape from regulation. From “ethics-washing” to ethics-shopping? In E. Bayamlioğlu, I. Baraliuc, L. Janssens, et al. (Eds.), Being profiled: Cogitas ergo sum. 10 years of ‘profiling the European citizen’ (pp. 84–88). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Galič, M., Schuilenburg, M. (2020). Reclaiming the Smart City: Toward a New Right to the City. In: Augusto, J.C. (eds) Handbook of Smart Cities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15145-4_59-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15145-4_59-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15145-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15145-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering