Abstract
The reduction of fossil fuels usage and increase of local agricultural and forest residues for energy purposes belong to the main drivers to face with a climate change in a sustainable and environmentally friendly way. One of the alternative sources of wooden residues from agriculture is biomass generated during a regular fruit trees pruning. In Poland, there is a significant potential of pruned biomass from apple orchards that might be used to produce energy. In the paper the options of pruned biomass harvesting applying baling technology are presented. Next, the possibilities of the bales handling and their optional further treatment to produce energy are described. It was shown that depending on the local market requirements, the energetic use of pruning residues is feasible and may parallel lead to the CO2 emission reduction to the atmosphere.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Biomass is a very important source of energy having a significant contribution to achieve the European target expected in the climate and energy package by 2020 [1]. To increase further their share on the energy market and strengthen the European strategy on bio-economy, it is necessary to use more and more of agriculture by-products [2]. In apple orchards there are many options to gain the biomass residues suitable for energy production (see Fig. 1).
One of the interesting and valuable resources of waste biomass is pruning. Prunings are woody residues composed mainly by small branches and twigs produced during the regular management activity related to the care of agricultural crops such as orchards, vineyards or olive groves. One of the fruit orchards having potential to generate energy from wooden residues are apple orchards. To maintain high fruits quality and productivity, apple orchards require proper treatment, including branches pruning in the winter-spring period [3]. In case of significant deterioration of the apples production (after 20–30 years in average), the old trees are removed and to new one are planted. As a result, the pruning residues from apple orchards (see Fig. 2) are characterized by a regular yearly production of lower amounts of biomass per hectare (up to few Mg ha−1, in average 3.5 Mg ha−1) [4], and uprooting residues obtained at the end of the commercial life of the given plantation (even up to 100 Mg ha−1 or more). Both residues must be disposed of, but different possible strategies might be applied leading to different final results, profits or costs.
Taking into account the size distribution area of the apple orchards in Europe, harvesting losses of branches and high heating value of wooden material the total energetic potentials from yearly pruning operations are: 29.11 PJ/year for theoretical, 22.50 PJ/year for technical and 18.63 PJ/year for economic. According to Poland, which possess the highest shares of the apple orchards in Europe, these values are 9.3 PJ/year, 7.4 PJ/year and 5.9 PJ/year, respectively [3].
In relation to the year by year trees pruning in the apple orchards, the following options might be recognized (see Fig. 3):
-
pruned biomass mulching on the inter-row area,
-
pruned biomass removal from the inter-row area and open-air combustion on site,
-
pruned biomass harvesting and use for other purposes (i.e. energy production).
After pruning, ligneous residues are generally left spread all over the ground in the orchard. Processing in the orchard requires to carry out their elimination. If they are not removed, they become an obstacle for the other cultivation operations related to fruit (apples) production. In case of mulching and on-site burning, both options are costly and do not bring any financial benefits for a farmer. Leaving mulched residues in the soil contribute to enhance the organic matter content, but on the other hand it does not solve a problem with increasingly aggressive pests [5]. Removal of the pruned branches is usually carried out with tractors provided with rakes or similar devices for dragging (picking-up) the branches along the rows to dispose burn them on site (at the end of the orchards headland). However, open-air combustion is forbidden in most European countries due to the fire hazards. Therefore, the harvesting of the wooden residues in the apple orchard and their use for energetic purposes (PtE – Pruning to Energy) seems to be more efficient and reasonable. There are three general options the branches can be harvested:
-
manual collection,
-
mechanical collection combined with chipping,
-
mechanical collection combined with compaction (baling).
Manual collection of cut branches is performed very rarely as it is time consuming. Moreover, the loose form and a very low bulk density of manually harvested biomass disqualifies its combustion in the boilers.
Mechanical collection and chipping is an effective procedure [6, 7], but the harvested wet biomass residues requires later more strict storage conditions (i.e. forced drying, under a roof storage or periodic pile overturning) to prevent material properties deterioration or rotting. As a result, this technology is attractive and good in terms of chips combustion in the energetic units, but the harvesting process is more expensive and demands more direct energy input (i.e. fuel consumption) [8] than baling technology [9].
The alternative solution is mechanical collection combined with baling. The procedure is cheaper and requires less energy input in comparison to chipping [9, 10]. Additionally, the natural open air drying of bales, preventing material decomposition during storage, might be applied. However, some inconvenience is the necessity of having dedicated boilers for bales combustion to maintain the whole logistics chain simple in realization.
The aim of the paper is (i) the review of the options of pruned biomass harvesting in the apple orchards applying baling technology and (ii) the review of the possibilities of pruned biomass bales conversion to energy.
2 The Pruning to Energy Strategy
The concept of pruned biomass baling system, which is focused on PtE strategy with ecological and economic footprint (see Fig. 4), is simple [11]. The idea is to harvest the pruning residues in the orchard in a single pass and with one operator only. The baler picks up and compacts pruning residues into dense round bale. After the harvest the produced bales are collected and stored on site (or delivered to the plant). It is important that the pruning bales will not deteriorate during storage over a long period (unlike a pile of woodchips that are rotting), even though they are harvested in very wet conditions. During the next few weeks the natural drying process takes place without a risk of spontaneous combustion. It arises from the fact, that although the wet pruned residues are compacted, there is still enough space for the air flow between the branches under open-air storage. As a result, the moisture content in the raw material decreases from 45–55% to 15–20% increasing the lower heating value [12, 13]. Finally, the bales are ready to be transported to the final consumer.
Having a suitable biomass boiler the bales might be directly combusted to produce heat and/or electricity. It should be marked that the shape and density of bales allow a better cost efficient transportation from the field to the power plant with conventional equipment (transportation platform, open trailer, etc.).
3 Pruning Harvesting Options Applying Baling Technology
Many adopted and dedicated machineries have been developed to scrape, pick-up, harvest and convert the pruning residues into valuable product in the form of bales [14] that might be stored and used later by final consumer for heating. Therefore, many options are available on the market which the farmer can choose and apply in the apple orchard (see Fig. 5).
Depending on the advancement of the technology the pruned biomass in the apple orchard might be harvested in one or two-stage processes. Currently, the most common approach is two-stage technology [14, 15]. Because of in the majority of the cases, after the pruning, the cut branches and shoots lie scattered around the apple trees, in the first stage, they must be gathered in the middle of the interrow. This operation might be done by the workers during the pruning of the trees. Although it requires more time, it increases harvesting efficiency (there are lower harvesting losses). However, to save time and facilitate the harvesting process, the device called a sweeper or windrower are in use [16]. Usually, they are attached to the tractor (in front or in rear) as well as to the baling machinery (see Fig. 6). As a result, the machine simultaneously removes the branches from both sides of the interrows and sweeps them to the middle part. In more developed models, thanks to the adjustable arms, it is possible to regulate the distance between the sweeping rotors and the range of the operation [16].
The windrowers are made of flexible and highly resistant plastic bars or rubber. The rotational speed of rotors may be smoothly adjusted with the use of hydraulic drives, depending on the needs and conditions. The examples of the selected machineries in operation are shown in Fig. 6.
The second stage of this process is an appropriate baling of the pruned biomass arranged in the middle of the interrows. For this purpose the professional machineries for pressing the pruned biomass, called balers, are used [17, 18]. The pruned residues are collected from the interrows with the use of a pick-up system and then fed into the baling chamber, where the rubber belts, rolls, or a combination of rolls and chains, roll up the pruned residues into cylindrical-shaped bales. At the end of the process the bale is wrapped with a plastic or organic string (or net) to avoid bale destruction and maintain the proper shape during the storage or transportation period [16]. These machineries are mounted on the back of the tractor and they are supplied with power from PTO (Power Take-Off). In Figs. 7 and 8 some examples of the balers with optional equipment are shown.
It should be added that on the market there is also available a pressing (baling) machinery producing the rectangular bales (Fig. 9), but it is not so popular, like a round baler.
In case of compaction, there are two forms possible to be produced (see Fig. 10):
-
rectangular bales (very rarely),
-
round bales.
The size of rectangular bales produced from pruned biomass in the orchards is 32 × 42 cm or 36 × 46 cm (www.lerdaagri.com), whereas diameter of the round bales might vary from 30–40 cm up to 120 cm. The length of the bales is ca. 60 cm (small bales) and ca. 100–120 cm (big bales), respectively [9, 20, 21].
It should be marked that in practice about the choice of the baling strategy and the size of the produced bales decide many parameters, like [22, 23]: orchards size and characteristics, economic pruning potential, local market requirements and demand for biomass, biomass price etc.
4 Conversion Options of Pruned Biomass Bales to Energy
The pruned bales from apple orchards are a good wooden material to be used for energetic purposes. It is characterized by heating value in the range of 17–19 MJ/kg [4, 24] which is similar to other wastes coming from agricultural and forestry sector [25]. The conversion of chemical energy contained in biomass bales into useful energy might be realized throughout their direct or indirect combustion in the boiler (see Fig. 11).
In case of direct pruned bales burning to generate heat and/or electricity the dedicated boilers with an appropriate volume of the combustion chamber are required. The size of the boiler decides about the thermal capacity and the feeding frequency. As a consequence, the large bales are designed for institutional heating systems or commercial central heat and power plants (see Fig. 12), whereas the small bales are suggested for smaller and individual heating units assigned mainly to households (see Fig. 12a).
If direct combustion of bales is not possible, the indirect method have to be applied. The bales are transformed to other form of solid fuel. Depending on the requirements, they might be converted to wood chips, pellets or briquettes. Then, the obtained solid biofuels are suitable for small scale (see Fig. 12b–d) as well as for commercial scale utilization. The main disadvantages of indirect direction of bales combustion are higher costs of the process caused by the additional energy input to comminute the bales and produce wood chips, pellets or briquettes. The approximated values of the energy demand required for chipping, pelletisation and briquetting processes are shown in Fig. 13.
Besides the energetic benefits, there is also an environmental aspect that is of added value to this logistics chain. The usage of pruned biomass for energetic purposes contributes also to the reduction of CO2 emission. The CO2 emission index from bituminous coal combustion (as the typical conventional fuel) is 94.7 kg/GJ [34] or 357 kg/MWh [35]. Assuming the combustion efficiency in the heating boilers (0.92) and the lower heating value for pruned biomass 18.0 GJ/Mg), the avoided carbon dioxide emission amounts to more than 1500 kg per tonne of wooden by-product material.
5 Conclusions
The removal of pruned biomass in the apple orchards is obligatory. Across the various options, the harvesting of the biomass applying baling technology seems to be the most effective, especially in terms of energetic input. Depending on the technical facilities and financial possibilities, the harvesting process might be realized using simple or sophisticated machinery. The bales collected in the apple orchard are after several-month storage period ready for combustion in the heating unit having also an positive environmental impact in reduction of carbon dioxide emission. However, it is conditioned by the possibility of whole bale combustion in the boiler. Otherwise, additional steps of biomass conversion will have to be applied to adopt the biomass form to other boiler requirements which results on significant energy input and make a whole logistic chain more complex.
References
European Union, Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (European Union, Brussels, Belgium 2009)
N. Scarlat, J.-F. Dallemand, B. Monforti-Ferrario, V. Nita, The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy. Policies Facts 15, 3–34 (2015)
A. Dyjakon, K. Mudryk. Energetic potential of apple orchards in Europe in terms of mechanized harvesting of pruning residues, in Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation, ed. by K. Mudryk, S. Werle. Springer Proceedings in Energy (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 593–602
A. Dyjakon, J. Den Boer, P. Bukowski, F. Adamczyk, P. Frąckowiak, Wooden biomass potential from apple orchards in Poland. Wood 59(198), 73–86 (2016)
M.A. Jacometti, S.D. Wratten, M. Walter, Management of understorey to reduce the primary inoculum of Botrytis cinerea: enhancing ecosystem services in vineyards. Biol. Control 40, 57–64 (2007)
B. Velázquez-Martí, E. Fernández-González, Analysis of the process of biomass harvesting with collecting-chippers fed by pick up headers in plantations of olive trees. Biosyst. Eng. 104, 184–190 (2009)
R. Spinelli, G. Picchi, Industrial harvesting of olive tree pruning residue for energy biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 730–735 (2010)
L. Pari, A. Suardi, A. Del Giudice, A. Scarfone, E. Santangelo, Influence of chipping system on chipper performance and wood chip particle size obtained from peach prunings. Biomass Bioenergy 112, 121–127 (2018)
A. Dyjakon, Harvesting and baling of pruned biomass in apple orchards for energy production. Energies 11, 1680 (2018)
C. Nati, M. Boschiero, G. Picchi, G. Mastrolonardo, M. Kelderer, S. Zerbe, Energy performance of a new biomass harvester for recovery of orchard wood wastes as alternative to mulching. Renew. Energy 124, 121–128 (2018)
A. Dyjakon, J. Den Boer, P. Bukowski, Europruning: a new direction for energy production from biomass. Agric. Eng. 3(151), 163–174 (2014)
C. Bisaglia, E. Romano, Utilization of vineyard prunings: a new mechanization system from residues harvest to chips production. Biomass Bioenergy 115, 136–142 (2018)
B. Velazquez-Marti, E. Fernandez-Gonzalez, I. Lopez-Cortes, D.M. Salazar-Hernandez, Quantification of the residual biomass obtained from pruning of vineyards in Mediterranean area. Biomass Bioenergy 35(8), 3453–3464 (2011)
L. Pari, A. Suardi, E. Santangelo, D. García-Galindo, A. Scarfone, V. Alfano, Current and innovative technologies for pruning harvesting: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 107, 398–410 (2017)
N. Magagnotti, L. Pari, G. Pichci, R. Spinelli, Technology alternatives for tapping the pruning residue resource. Bioresour Techol. 128, 697–702 (2012)
F. Adamczyk, A. Dyjakon, P. Frąckowiak, L. Romański, Conception of machine for pressing branches with pruning fruit tree. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 59(2), 5–9 (2014)
F. Lavoie, P. Savoie, L. D’Amours, H. Joannis, Development and field performance of a willow cutter-shredder-baler. Appl. Eng. Agric. 24(2), 165–172 (2008)
Wolagri COLUMBIA: R98 ENERGY, http://www.tonuttiwolagri.it/en/prodotti/columbia-r98-energy/. Accessed 28 May 2018
P. Frąckowiak, F. Adamczyk, G. Wąchalski, M. Szaroleta, A. Dyjakon, L. Pari, A. Suardi, A prototype machine for harvesting and baling of pruning residues in orchards: first test on apple orchard (MALUS MILL.) in Poland. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 61(3), 88–93 (2016)
R. Spinelli, C. Lombardini, L. Pari, L. Sadauskiene, An alternative to field burning of pruning residues in mountain vineyards. Ecol. Eng. 70, 212–216 (2014)
Anderson BIOBALER WB-55, http://biobaler.com/wb-55.html. Accessed 28 May 2018
A. Dyjakon, Best practices on the sustainable use of prunings, Discussion panel: mobilising pruning residues to expand Europe’s biomass market - hosted by Czesław Adam Siekierski MEP (Member of European Parliament), Chair of the European Parliament’s Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, European Parliament, 15 June 2016, Brussels, Belgium (2016)
D. Garcia-Galindo, M. Gomez-Palmero, S. Germer, L. Pari, V. Afano, A. Dyjakon, J. Sagarna, S. Rivera, C. Poutrin, Agricultural pruning as biomass resource: generation, potentials and current fates. An approach to its state in Europe, in 24th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition (EUBCE), 6–9 June 2016, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2016)
G. Picchi, C. Lombardini, L. Pari, R. Spinelli, Physical and chemical characteristics of renewable fuel obtained from pruning residues. J. Cleaner Prod. 171, 457–463 (2018)
R. Garcia, C. Pizarro, A.G. Lavin, J.L. Bueno, Spanish biofuels heating value estimation. Part II: Proximate analysis data. Fuel 117, 1139–1147 (2014)
A. Gąsiorski, Z. Posyłek, T. Dróżdż, Nakłady energetyczne podczas mielenia biomasy przygotowywanej do procesu peletowania. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny 93(1), 229–232 (2017)
J. Frączek, K. Mudryk, M. Wróbel, Nakłady energetyczne w procesie brykietowania wierzby Salix Viminalis L. Inżynieria Rolnicza 3(121), 45–52 (2010)
J. Koppejan, S. Sokhansanj, S. Mellin, S. Mandrali, Status overview of torrefaction technologies, Technical Report, International Energy Agency (2012)
J.S. Tulumuru, Specific energy consumption and quality of wood pellets produced using high-moisture lodgepole pine grind in a flat die pellet mill. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 110, 82–97 (2016)
A. Žandeckis, F. Romagnoli, A. Beloborodko, V. Kirsanovs, A. Menind, M. Hovi, D. Blumberga, Briquettes from mixtures of herbaceous biomass and wood: biofuel investigation and combustion tests, in Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems (2013)
D. Kuptz, H. Hartmann, Throughput rate and energy consumption during wood chip production in relation to raw material, chipper type and machine setting, in Proceedings of 22nd European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 23–26 June 2014, Hamburg, Germany (2014)
J. Frączek, K. Mudryk, M. Wróbel, Nakłady energetyczne w procesie mielenia zrębków wierzby Salix Viminalis L. Inżynieria Rolnicza 4(122), 43–49 (2010)
M. Wróbel, K. Mudryk, A. Gąsiorski, Z. Posyłek, T. Dróżdż, Nakłady energetyczne procesu peletowania wybranych rodzajów biomasy. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny 93(1), 233–236 (2017)
A.-J. Perea-Moreno, M.-A. Perea-Moreno, M. Pilar-Dorado, F. Manzano-Agugliaro, Mango stone properties as biofuel and its potential for reducing CO2 emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 190, 53–62 (2018)
KOBiZE (The National Centre for Emissions Management), Calorific Values and CO2 Emission Factors in 2015 for Reporting within Emission Trading System (ETS) for 2018 (KOBiZE, Warsaw, Poland 2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dyjakon, A. (2020). Technical Options of Pruned Biomass Harvesting in the Apple Orchards Applying Baling Technology and Its Conversion to Energy. In: Wróbel, M., Jewiarz, M., Szlęk , A. (eds) Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13888-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13888-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13887-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13888-2
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)