Skip to main content

Telecollaboration Among Qatari and US Undergraduates in a Multicultural Course: Opportunities and Obstacles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching

Abstract

In this telecollaboration project, engineering students enrolled in a semester-long multicultural education course at a higher education institution in Qatar engaged online with pre-service teachers simultaneously enrolled in the same course in the USA. Learning community dyads including students from both institutions were formed. Cross-cultural competencies were developed as issues related to cultural values, race, diversity, gender, pedagogy and intercultural communication were explored through reflective journals written and responded to by the students. Qualitative methodology leveraged thematic analysis to find convergence and divergence of student voices. The authors conclude the chapter with lessons learned for implementing a post-secondary telecollaborative curriculum that fosters intercultural communication skills and cross-cultural competence among engineering students in the Middle East.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    STEM is an interdisciplinary curriculum approach that utilizes high engagement and application of knowledge. Rather than teach the four disciplines as separate and discrete subjects, STEM integrates them into a cohesive learning paradigm based on real-world applications.

References

  • Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2015). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/E001-15-16-EAC-Criteria-03-10-15.pdf.

  • Andersen, A. (2005). Preparing engineering students to work in a global environment to co-operate, to communicate and to compete. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 549–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection for applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belz, J. A. (2007). The development of intercultural communicative competence in telecollaborative partnerships. In R. O’Dowd (Ed.), Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers (pp. 127–167). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, R. (2015). Diversity consciousness: Opening minds to people, cultures, and opportunities (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M., & Golubeva, I. (Eds.). (2016). From principles to practice in education for intercultural citizenship. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. J. (2015). Narrative inquiry in teaching and teacher education. In Narrative inquiries into curriculum making in teacher education (pp. 19–42). Published Online 8 March 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3687(2011)00000130005.

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, F. (2010). Assessing intercultural competence in language learning and teaching: A critical review of current efforts. New Approaches to Assessment in Higher Education, 5, 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wit, H., Hunter, F., Howard, L., & Ergon-Polak, E. (2015). Internationalisation of higher education. Brussels: Committee on Culture and Education, European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyler, J. (2000). What do we most need to know about the impact of service-learning on student learning? Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning. Retrieved from https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mjcsl/3239521.spec.102/–what-do-we-most-need-to-know-about-the-impact-of-service?view=text&seq=6&size=100.

  • Gelfuso, A., & Dennis, D. V. (2014). Getting reflection off the page: The challenges of developing support structures for pre-service teacher reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P. (2016). Poverty and the ideological imperative: A call to unhook from deficit and grit ideology and to strive for structural ideology in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(4), 378–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, M. (2017). Selecting Star teachers for children and youth in poverty. In V. Hill-Jackson & D. Stafford (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools: What Star teachers know, believe, and do (pp. 1–12). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2002). Wherefore art thou, telecollaboration? Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(6): 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. D. (1988). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1994). Uncommon sense about organizations: Cases, studies, and field observations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, A. (2011). Intercultural communication and ideology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2006). Points of view and blind spots: ELF and SLA. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurteš, S. (2012). Key competences in foreign language learning: Historical perspectives and theoretical frameworks. In M. Eisenmann & T. Summer (Eds.), Basic issues in EFL teaching and learning (pp. 43–54). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurteš, S., & Kopytowska, M. (2014). Communicating identities in daily interaction: Theory, practice, pedagogy. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 10(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, J., Rollins, H., & Hoey, J. (2006). Defining, developing, and assessing global competence in engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2016). Telecollaboration as a tool for building intercultural and interreligious understanding: The Sousse-Villanova programme. In S. Jager, M. Kurek, & B. O’Rourke (Eds.), New directions in telecollaborative research and practice: Selected papers from the second conference on telecollaboration in higher education (pp. 267–273). Dublin, Ireland: Research-Publishing.net.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, R. M., & Goode, M. L. (2009). Cultural mentoring: International education professionals and the development of intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 333–349). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, A., & Levine, G. S. (2010). What is language pedagogy for? In G. Levine & A. Phipps (Eds.), Critical and intercultural theory and language pedagogy (pp. 1–14). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1995). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenker, T. (2012). Intercultural competence and cultural learning through telecollaboration. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J., & von der Emde, S. (2006). Conflicts in cyberspace: From communication breakdown to intercultural dialogue in online collaborations. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 178–206). Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, K., Dominick, P., & Aronson, Z. (2004). Preparing engineering students for the new business paradigm of international teamwork and global orientation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 475–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. L., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R. S., & Gabelnick, F. (2004). Learning communities: Reforming undergraduate education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, H. (2002). Guide for the development of language education policies in Europe, from linguistic diversity to plurilingual education. In Reference study in democratic citizenship, languages, diversity and human rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toom, A., Husu, J., & Patrikainen, S. (2015). Student teachers’ patterns of reflection in the context of teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 320–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 41–133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (2016). The state of racial diversity in the educator workforce. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/racial-diversity/state-racial-diversity-workforce.pdf.

  • Ware, P., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsko, C., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2000). Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 635–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zohreh R. Eslami .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eslami, Z.R., Hill-Jackson, V., Kurteš, S., Asadi, L. (2019). Telecollaboration Among Qatari and US Undergraduates in a Multicultural Course: Opportunities and Obstacles. In: Reinders, H., Coombe, C., Littlejohn, A., Tafazoli, D. (eds) Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. New Language Learning and Teaching Environments. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13413-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13413-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13412-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-13413-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics