Skip to main content

Distinctiveness and Place: Culture and Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
City Policies and the European Urban Agenda

Abstract

Culture is who we are and creativity shapes what we can become. So more people, more organizations, more towns, cities, regions and countries for more reasons are finding that culture and creativity has something in it for them, especially in the context of renewing their place, their economy and their urban life.

The bigger operating context in discussing the culture and creativity agenda shapes its scope and potential. Within this, the shifting dynamics between vortex cities—that suck in opportunity, talent and resources—and shrinking, struggling cities is key. However, as quality-of-life issues move more strongly to the fore, there is new potential for second-, third- and fourth-tier cities, as larger metro areas become more dysfunctional and digitization allows people to be easily connected. Overriding everything is digitization, the major driver of the new economy. Creativity is seen as a vital, renewable resource as it cannot be automated or robotized, and is seen as contributing well to complex, intractable problems or to creating opportunities.

The renewal of places, often anchored around a so-called creative district, and adapting a local economy at its core is a cultural project as it involves not only economic and physical transformation, but also a shift in mindset and perspective. To attract people, cities need to engage them in their renewal story. Cities on the move need a compelling story based on local distinctiveness and ambition to drive motivation and commitment, and artistically trained people are particularly good at storytelling. Here, using the skills of the creative economy sectors, music, the new media, design, performance and literary expression is important.

Cultural confidence is a vital force in transformation. It needs courage and resilience to gain the strength to respond, to look inward honestly and outward and beyond oneself and then to recognize that alone we can do less than when we work together, both locally and with our neighbours as well as our region. Together, there is more strength and this can trigger a dynamic where people say: ‘It is not OK to be OK’. This is the first sign of ambition and from that a vision of a place can emerge.

Writer and Urban Consultant. Creative City concept creator

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://charleslandry.com/panel/wp-content/themes/twentyeleven/books/The-Creative-City-Index.pdf

Bibliography

  • Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1936). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (reprinted Penguin Great Ideas, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1969). The Age of Discontinuity. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. P. (1998). Cities and Civilization: Culture, Innovation and Urban Order. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, J. (2001). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. (1999). New Rules for the New Economy. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, C. (2000). The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, C. (2006). The Art of City-Making. London: Earthscan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, C., & Bianchini, F. (1995). The Creative City. Bournes Green: Comedia/Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and Competition: New Agendas for Companies, Governments and Institutions. From, On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (2008). Resurgent Metropolis: Economy, Society and Urbanization in an Interconnected World. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, K., & Bentley, T. (1999). The Creative Age: Knowledge and Skills for the New Economy. London: Demos. www.demos.co.uk

  • Touraine, A. (1971). The Post-Industrial Society. Tomorrow’s Social History: Classes, Conflicts and Culture in the Programmed Society. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P., & Landry, C. (2007). The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Landry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Landry, C. (2019). Distinctiveness and Place: Culture and Creativity. In: Fernández-Prado, M., Domínguez Castro, L. (eds) City Policies and the European Urban Agenda. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10847-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics