Skip to main content

Mixed Methods in Global Health Research

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Global Health
  • 245 Accesses

Abstract

Public health originated from the need to understand upstream factors that were causing or spreading diseases, to understand and address structural factors including social, commercial, and corporate determinants of health. To explore and explain the complex interplay of these determinants of health, research approaches in global health shifted accordingly with an increasing use of mixed methods. This chapter introduces the philosophical and theoretical explanations of mixed method research, with research traditions briefly explained to provide principles underpinning mixed method research, the challenges, and potential contradictions of using mixed methods. Furthermore, this chapter explains how to use mixed methods, including design and sampling strategies, data collection, analyses, and writing up of mixed method research findings by using relevant examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barkin JS (2003) Realist constructivism. Int Stud Rev 5(3):325–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D (2006) Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health 60(10):854

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brannen J, Moss P (1991) Managing mothers. Dual career eamilies after maternity leave. Unwin Hyma, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A (2008) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman A (2017) Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. In: Mixing methods: qualitative and quantitative research. Routledge, New York, pp 57–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrapani V, Kaur M, Tsai AC, Newman PA, Kumar R (2020) The impact of a syndemic theory-based intervention on HIV transmission risk behaviour among men who have sex with men in India: pretest-posttest non-equivalent comparison group trial. Soc Sci Med (1982):112817

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark VP, Badiee M (2010) Research questions in mixed methods research. In: SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 275–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte AA (1848) General View of Positivism. Paris, London Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2003) Research design: qualitative. Quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Clark VP, Garrett A (2003) Advanced mixed methods research. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 209–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Hanson WE, Clark Plano VL, Morales A (2007) Qualitative research designs: selection and implementation. Couns Psychol 35(2):236–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC (2011) Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, pp 541–545, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing JT (1998) Philosophical concepts in physics: the historical relation between philosophy and scientific theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • da Costa L, Remedios R (2014) Different methods, different results: examining the implications of methodological divergence and implicit processes for achievement goal research. J Mixed Methods Res 8(2):162–179

    Google Scholar 

  • David R, Teddlie C, Reynolds D (2000) The international handbook of school effectiveness research. Psychology Press, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK (2012) Triangulation 2.0. J Mixed Methods Res 6(2):80–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzberger C, Kelle U (2003) Making inferences in mixed methods: the rules of integration. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 457–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfort-Nachmias C, Nachmias D (1996) Study guide for research methods in the social sciences. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene JC (2007) Mixed methods in social inquiry, vol 9. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene JC, Hall JN (2010) Dialectics and pragmatism: being of consequence. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 119–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest G (2013). Describing mixed methods research: An alternative to typologies. Journal of mixed methods research 7(2):141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivankova NV, Creswell JW, Stick SL (2006) Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods 18(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha P, Gajalakshmi V, Gupta PC, Kumar R, Mony P, Dhingra N, … Collaborators R-CPS (2005) Prospective study of one million deaths in India: rationale, design, and validation results. PLoS Med 3(2):e18

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q 24(4):602–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33(7):14–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res 1(2):112–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalafat J, Illback R (1999) Evaluation of Kentucky’s school based family resource and youth services centers: part I. REACH of Louisville, Louisville

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur M (2020) Assessing State level capacity to implement Multisectoral Action Plan for prevention and control of common NCDs. Manuscript in preparation

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur J, Kaur M, Webster J, Kumar R (2018) Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial on information technology-enabled nutrition intervention among urban adults in Chandigarh (India): SMART eating trial. Glob Health Action 11(1):1419738

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper EA, Stringfield S, Teddlie C (2003) Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 273–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (2012) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R (2020) Vulnerability Mapping and Assessment for Urban Health in Haryana. Ongoing study

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JA, Loomis DM (2003) Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 1:241–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JA, Mittapalli K (2010) Realism as a stance for mixed methods research. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 145–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM, Huberman MA, Huberman M (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DL (1998) Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual Health Res 8(3):362–376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morse JM (2003) Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, vol 1. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 189–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie AJ, Collins KM (2007) A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qual Rep 12(2):281–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL (2006) Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. Qual Rep 11(3):474–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie AJ, Teddlie C (2003) A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, vol 2. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 397–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K (2015) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res 42(5):533–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Passi R (2020) Protocol on health literacy for management and control of hypertension: a participatory action intervention in a village of Chandigarh, India. Department of community medicine and school of public health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qual Soc Work 1(3):261–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce FN (1914) The Genitalia of the Group Geometridae of the Lepidoptera of the British Islands… Illustrated by the Author. Author, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Spencer L, O’Connor W (2003) Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage, London, pp 219–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (2003) The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research 671–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (2008) Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: calling for an integrative framework. In: Advances in mixed methods research. Sage, London, pp 101–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, Teddlie CB (1998) Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, vol 46. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie C, Tashakkori A (2003) Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie C, Tashakkori A (2009) Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie C, Yu F (2007) Mixed methods sampling: a typology with examples. J Mixed Methods Res 1(1):77–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Bala H (2013) Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Q 37:21–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams G (1997) Chaos theory tamed. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manmeet Kaur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editors and the World Health Organization

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kaur, M., Kumar, R. (2020). Mixed Methods in Global Health Research. In: Haring, R., Kickbusch, I., Ganten, D., Moeti, M. (eds) Handbook of Global Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05325-3_11-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05325-3_11-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05325-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05325-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics