Skip to main content

Informal Governance on Cryptomarkets for Illicit Drugs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance Beyond the Law

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

A global phenomenon has emerged in recent years: that of anonymous drug marketplaces on the Internet that usually combines anonymising software and virtual currencies as a means of payment, concealing the identity and location of its users. These technological innovations on the Internet allow users to proceed with illicit drug transactions with almost completely anonymous identities and physical locations and thus minimise the risk of law enforcement intervention. On cryptomarkets, vendors offer a wide range of psychoactive substances and other goods or services for sale. In addition, the purchased drugs are delivered by traditional postal services without their knowledge. This chapter aims to analyse the development of practices of resistance in relation to antidrug policies, practices that unfold through anonymous drug marketplaces. To explore social practices of informal resistance, the chapter draws on a digital ethnographic study on cryptomarkets. It observes that users on cryptomarkets follow a self-proclaimed libertarian ideology to systematically bypass drug control policies. The chapter also reflects upon how both economically disadvantaged, socially excluded, marginalised, technically non-skilled users and drug addicts, as well as drug producers of the global South are systematically excluded from expressions of informal resistance to prohibition-based drug policies as they do not participate in cryptomarkets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The study was approved by the Austrian Data Protection Authority. Participants were informed of the aim and purpose of the research project, as well as confidentiality measures, through an uploaded consent form and a study website.

References

  • Aldridge, J., and D. Décary-Hétu. 2014. Not an ‘Ebay for Drugs’: The Cryptomarket “Silk Road” as a Paradigm Shifting Criminal Innovation. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2436643

  • Bancroft, A., and P. Scott Reid. 2016. Concepts of Illicit Drug Quality Among Darknet Market Users: Purity, Embodied Experience, Craft and Chemical Knowledge. International Journal of Drug Policy 35: 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M.J., J.A. Ferris, and A.R. Winstock. 2014. Use of Silk Road, the Online Drug Marketplace, in the UK, Australia and the USA. Addiction 109: 774–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M.J., A. Maddox, S. Lenton, and M. Allen. 2016a. ‘What If You Live on Top of a Bakery and You Like Cakes?’—Exploring the Drug Use and Harm Trajectories Before, During and After the Emergence of Silk Road. International Journal of Drug Policy 35: 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, M.J., J.A. Ferris, and A.R. Winstock. 2016b. Safer Scoring? Cryptomarkets, Social Supply and Drug Market Violence. International Journal of Drug Policy 35: 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewley-Taylor, D. 2012. International Drug Control: Consensus Fractured. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, J. 2006. The Political Economy of Narcotics: Production, Consumption & Global Markets. London: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caudevilla, F., M. Ventura, I. Fornís, M.J. Barratt, C.G. lladanosa, P. Quintana, et al. 2016. Results of an International Drug Testing Service for Cryptomarket Users. International Journal of Drug Policy 35: 38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christin, N. 2013. Traveling the Silk Road: A Measurement Analysis of a Large Anonymous Online Marketplace. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E.G. 2010. Ethnographic Approaches to Digital Media. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomber, R., L. Moyle, and N. South. 2016. Reflections on Three Decades of Research on Social Supply in the UK. In Friendly Business. International Views on Social Supply, Self-Supply and Small-Scale Drug Dealing, ed. B. Werse and C. Bernard, 13–28. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • DarkNet Stats. 2017. https://dnstats.net/. Accessed 10 July 2017.

  • Deepdotweb. 2015. Second Interview with Outlaw Market Admin, Oktober 7. Available from: https://www.deepdotweb.com/2015/10/07/second-interview-with-outlaw-market-admin/. Accessed 4 Nov 2015.

  • Fountain, J., S. Howles, J. Marsden, C. Taylor, and J. Strang. 2003. Drug and Alcohol Use and the Link with Homelessness: Results from a Survey of Homeless People in London. Addiction Research & Theory 11 (4): 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwern, B. 2016. Darknet Market Mortality Risks. Retrieved from https://www.gwern.net/DNM%20survival. Accessed 26 May 2016.

  • Jelsma, M., and P. Metaal. 2004. Cracks in the Vienna Consensus: The UN Drug Control Debate. Drug War Monitor, A WOLA Briefing Series. Washington, DC: Washington Office on Latin America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, H. 2003. Critiques of Harm Reduction, Morality and the Promise of Human Rights. International Journal of Drug Policy 14 (2): 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, B. 2008. Minimalstaat: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Robert Nozicks Argumenten. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, H. 2003. Global Drug Prohibition: Its Uses and Crises. International Journal of Drug Policy 14 (2): 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCoun, R., and P. Reuter. 2001. Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Vices, Times and Places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, A., M.J. Barratt, M. Allen, and S. Lenton. 2016. Constructive Activism in the Dark Web: Cryptomarkets and Illicit Drugs in the Digital ‘Demimonde’. Information, Communication and Society 19: 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. 2014. Drugs on the Dark Net. How Cryptomarkets Are Transforming the Global Trade in Illicit Drugs. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, J. 2014. Interview with a DarkNet Vendor: VamonosDab, Oktober 20. Available from: http://www.deepdotweb.com/2014/10/20/darknet-market-vendor-interview-vamonosdab/. Accessed 4 Oct 2015.

  • Moore, D., and S. Fraser. 2006. Putting at Risk What We Know: Reflecting on the Drug-Using Subject in Harm Reduction and Its Political Implications. Social Science & Medicine 62 (12): 3035–3047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munksgaard, R., and J. Demant. 2016. Mixing Politics and Crime: The Prevalence and Decline of Political Discourse on the Cryptomarket. International Journal of Drug Policy 35: 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelmann, E. 1990. Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society. International Organization 44 (4): 479–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., H. Horst, J. Postill, L. Hjorth, T. Lewis, and J. Tacchi. 2016. Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, P. 1983. Disorganized Crime: The Economics of the Visible Hand. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The Unintended Consequences of Drug Policies. In Report on Global Illicit Drug Markets 1998–2007. Full Report, ed. P. Reuter and F. Trautmann, 150–160. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, P., and F. Trautmann, eds. 2009. Report on Global Illicit Drug Markets 1998–2007. Full Report. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soska, K., and N. Christin. 2015. Measuring the Longitudinal Evolution of the Online Anonymous Marketplace Ecosystem. Paper Presented at the 24th USENIX Security Symposium, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., and G.R. Potter. 2013. From “Social Supply” to “Real Dealing”: Drift, Friendship, and Trust in Drug Dealing Careers. Journal of Drug Issues 43 (4): 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautmann, F. 2013. Exploring Trends in the Illicit Drugs Market and Drug Policy Responses in the EU. In Further Insights into Aspects of the EU Illicit Drugs Market, ed. F. Trautmann, B. Kilmer, and P.J. Turnbull, 447–496. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautmann, F., P. Reuter, A. van Gageldonk, and D. van der Gouwe. 2009. The Drugs Problem and Drug Policy, Developments Between 1998–2007. In Report on Global Illicit Drug Markets 1998–2007. Full Report, ed. P. Reuter and F. Trautmann, 110–148. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzanetakis, M. 2015. Online Drug Distribution: Alternatives to Physical Violence in Conflict Resolution. In Between Street and Screen. Traditions and Innovations in the Drugs Field, ed. M. Wouters and J. Fountain, 41–56. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Comparing Cryptomarkets for Drugs. A Characterisation of Sellers and Buyers Over Time. International Journal of Drug Policy 56: 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Zu den Strukturen des Drogenhandels im Darknet. In Drogen, Darknet und Organisierte Kriminalität. Herausforderungen für Politik, Justiz und Drogenhilfe, ed. M. Tzanetakis and H. Stöver, 113–135. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzanetakis, M., and R. von Laufenberg. 2016. Harm Reduction durch anonyme Drogenmärkte und Diskussionsforen im Internet?, akzept e.V. Bundesverband für akzeptierende Drogenarbeit und humane Drogenpolitik: 3. Alternativer Drogen- und Suchtbericht 2016, 189–194. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzanetakis, M., G. Kamphausen, B. Werse, and R. von Laufenberg. 2016. The Transparency Paradox. Building Trust, Resolving Disputes and Optimising Logistics on Conventional and Online Drugs Markets. International Journal of Drug Policy 35: 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, K., and S. Fraser. 2008. Trauma, Damage, and Pleasure: Rethinking Problematic Drug Use. International Journal of Drug Policy 19 (5): 410–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk, J., S. Naicker, A. Roxburgh, R. Bruno, and L. Burns. 2016. Who Sells What? Country Specific Differences in Substance Availability on the Agora Dark Net Marketplace. International Journal of Drug Policy 35: 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hout, M.C., and T. Bingham. 2013a. ‘Silk Road’, the Virtual Drug Marketplace: A Single Case Study of User Experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy 24: 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. ‘Surfing the Silk Road’: A Study of Users’ Experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy 24: 524–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Responsible Vendors, Intelligent Consumers: Silk Road, the Online Revolution in Drug Trading. International Journal of Drug Policy 25: 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Schendel, W., and I. Abraham, eds. 2005. Illicit Flows and Criminal Things. States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalization. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Slobbe, J. 2016. The Drugs Trade on the Deep Web: A Law Enforcement Perspective. In Internet and Drug Markets, EMCDDA Insights, ed. EMCDDA, 77–84. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): J4095-G27.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meropi Tzanetakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tzanetakis, M. (2019). Informal Governance on Cryptomarkets for Illicit Drugs. In: Polese, A., Russo, A., Strazzari, F. (eds) Governance Beyond the Law. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05039-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics