Abstract
At the present stage, weight is often used to express the user preference to QoS (Quality of Service). Due to the user’s subjective judgment and the fuzziness of preference description, weight calculated through the traditional weighting method is difficult to express the user preference correctly. To solve the fuzziness of QoS attribute preference description and improve the correctness of service selection, the improved order relation analysis method (G1-method) by fuzzy number is adopted to represent the subjective weight of the user firstly; and the entropy weight method is adopted to determine the objective weight of the QoS attribute; finally, the objective weight is used to revise the subjective weight to calculate the comprehensive weight. Based on the user preference, the service is selected by improving the TOPSIS method with COSINE similarity. According to the experiment, the uncertainty of user preference description is effectively solved, the accuracy of service selection is improved through the improved TOPSIS method, and the selected service is more in line with the user requirement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Song, J.: Research and Application of Multi-attribute Decision-making Algorithm. North China Electric Power University, Beijing (2015)
Ding, X., Zhang, D.: K-means algorithm based on AHP and CRITIC integrated weighting. J. Comput. Syst. 25(7), 182–186 (2016). 888/j.cnki.csa.005267
Chen, Y.: Expert investigation method. Prediction 4, 63–64 (1983)
Wang, X., Guo, Y.: Consistency analysis of judgment matrix based on G1 method. CMS 14(3), 65–70 (2006). https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2006.03.012
Li, G., Cheng, Y., Dong, L.: Research on objective weighting method of gini coefficient. Manag. Rev. 26(1), 12–22 (2014). https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2014.01.004
Zhang, L., Dong, C., Yu, Y.: A service selection method supporting mixed QoS attributes. J. Comput. Appl. Softw. 33(9), 15–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0775.2016.07.004
Xie, H., Li, S., Sun, Y.: Research on DEMATEL method for solving attribute weights based on cloud model. Comput. Eng. Appl. 7, 17–25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.1610-0169
Fan, Z., Li, N., Hao, B.: A method for uncertain weight calculation of QoS attributes of web services. Softw. Eng. 19(7), 14–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0775.2016.07.004
Sun, R., Zhang, B., Liu, T.: A web service quality evaluation ranking method using improved entropy weight TOPSIS. J. Chin. Comput. Syst. 38(6), 1221–1226 (2017)
Sun, X., Niu, J., Gong, Q.: A web service selection strategy based on combined weighting method. J. Comput. Appl. 34(8), 2408–2411 (2017)
Duan, J.: Research on Web Service Composition Method Based on User Preference. Southwest University, Chongqin (2014)
Zhang, S.: Several fuzzy multi-attribute decision making methods and their applications. Xidian University of Electronic Technology, Xian (2012)
Chen, Y., Yan, H., Guo, C.: QoS quantization algorithm for web services based on triangular fuzzy numbers. Microprocessor 37(4), 38–42 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2279.2016.04.011
Wang, W.: A TOPSIS improved evaluation method based on weighted mahalanobis distance and its application. J. Chongqing Technol. Bus. Univ. 35(1), 40–44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.16055/j.issn.1672-058x.2018.0001.007
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Key Research and Development Plan Project of Shandong Province, China (No. 2017GGX201001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wu, M., Lu, Q. (2019). Research on Web Service Selection Based on User Preference. In: Krömer, P., Zhang, H., Liang, Y., Pan, JS. (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth Euro-China Conference on Intelligent Data Analysis and Applications. ECC 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 891. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03766-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03766-6_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03765-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03766-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)