Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strategy Formation in Public Agencies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategy Formation and Policy Making in Government

  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

Johanson deals with the alternative ways of categorising strategy in public agencies. Strategic design, internal strategic scanning and strategic governance capture the essence of micro-level strategies within government agencies. These strategy modes differ from one another in terms of temporal orientation, the role of the managerial control , the position of the professions and the primary type of capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, A. (2014). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P., & Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J. (2001). The implications of ‘publicness’ for strategic management theory. In G. Johnson & K. Scholes (Eds.), Exploring public sector (pp. 1–16). Harlow: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkdoll, G., & Bosin, M. R. (1997). Targeted planning: A paradigm for the public service. Long Range Planning, 30(4), 476–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., & Hesterly, W. (1999). Organizational economies, understanding the relationship between organizations and economic analysis. In S. Clegg & C. Hardy (Eds.), Studying organization: Theory and method (pp. 109–141). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1974). On the nature of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. (1995). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunning, C. (1992). Effective strategic planning in the public sector: Some learnings. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 5(4), 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2004). The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1257–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. (1989). Performance indicators: ‘Backseat driving’ or ‘hands off’ control? Policy and Politics, 17(2), 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, E. (1985). Three models of strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colin, S. (2000). Accountability in the regulatory state. Journal of Law & Society, 27(1), 38–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T., & Teng, B. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Emmitsburg: National Emergency Training Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P. (1989). The architecture of the British Central State, part I: Framework for analysis. Public Administration, 67(3), 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunsire, A., Hood, C., & Huby, M. (2010). Cutback management in public bureaucracies: Popular theories and observed outcomes in Whitehall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J., & Sing, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F., & Trist, E. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18(1), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1986). Mixed scanning revisited. Public Administration Review, 46(1), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, N. (2009). Public sector management. London, Los Angeles and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goold, M., Pettifer, D., & Young, D. (2001). Redesigning the corporate centre. European Management Journal, 19(1), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gortner, H., Mahler, J., & Nicholson, J. B. (1997). Organization theory: A public perspective. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. (1997). Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. Journal of Management and Governance, 1(1), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1991). Contemporary analysis: Concepts, techniques, applications. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, C. (2006, February). Global Administrative Law: The quest for principles and values. European Journal of International Law, 17(1), 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjern, B., & Porter, D. (1981). Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Organization Studies, 2(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, B., & Gunn, L. (1984). Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A. (1990). The logic of social control. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. E., & Vakkuri, J. (2017). Governing hybrid organisations: Exploring the variety of institutional life. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. E. (2009). Strategy formation in public agencies. Public Administration, 87(4), 872–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, P. (1999). Strategic management for the public services. Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, F., Majone, G., & Ostrom, V. (1986). Guidance, control, and evaluation in the public sector: The Bielefeld interdisciplinary project. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, K. V., & Waarden, F. V. (2004). “Governance” as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koteen, J. (1997). Strategic management in public and nonprofit organizations: Managing public concerns in an era of limits. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, G. A., & Douglas, J. W. (2006). Does agency competition improve the quality of policy analysis? Evidence from OMB and CBO fiscal projections. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J. (1993). The public sector: Concepts, models and approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Review, 6(4), 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, S., & Tappin, E. (2003). Strategy in the public sector: Management in the wilderness. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 955–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., & Thompson, S. (2004). Edith Penrose’s contributions to the resource-based view: An alternative perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyden, F., & Miller, E. (1982). Public budgeting: Program planning and implementation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L. (2009). Public management: Old and new. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, K. M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2005). Economic foundations of strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Pandian, J. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naschold, F., & Lahtonen, M. (1995). The modernisation of the public sector in Europe: A comparative perspective on the Scandinavian experience: Evaluation report. Helsinki: Ministry of Labour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P., & Backoff, R. (1992). Strategic management of public and third sector organizations: A handbook for leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Financial management and control of public agencies. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, P., & Sohal, A. S. (1999). Business process reengineering a review of recent literature. Technovation, 19(9), 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1952). Biological analogies in the theory of the firm. The American Economic Review, 42(5), 804–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1960). The growth of the firm a case study: The Hercules Powder Company. Business History Review, 34(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2001). The future of governing. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R., & Guthrie, J. (2000). Intellectual capital literature review measurement, reporting and management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined-up government: A survey. Political Studies Review, 1(1), 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, A. (2005). Agencies: How governments do things through semi-autonomous organizations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1980). Competitive: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of corporation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, B. J. (1980). Strategic change: ‘Logical incrementalism’. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(4), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, J., Miller, G., & Hildreth, W. (2000). Handbook of strategic management. New York: M. Dekker.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1974). Wicked problems. Man-Made Futures, 26(1), 272–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2002). Edith Penrose’s contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Beyond project management: New perspectives on the temporary permanent dilemma. Malmö: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (1997). Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition. European Management Journal, 15(3), 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, K., & Johnson, G. (2001). Exploring public sector. Harlow, UK and New York: Financial Times and Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seetharaman, A., Sreenivasan, J., & Boon, L. P. (2006). Critical success factors of total quality management. Quality & Quantity, 40(5), 675–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltani, E., van der Meer, R., Williams, T. M., & Lai, P. (2006). The compatibility of performance appraisal systems with TQM principles—Evidence from current practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), 92–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, B. A. (1994). Models of organization and total quality management: A comparison and critical evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 446–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J. (2000). Electricity and telecommunications regulatory institutions in small and developing countries. Utilities Policy, 9(3), 131–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teisman, G. R., & Klijn, E. (2002). Partnership arrangements: Governmental rhetoric or governance scheme? Public Administration Review, 62(2), 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. (2003). Between hierarchies and markets: The logic and limits of network forms of organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinzant, J. C., & Vinzant, D. H. (1996). Strategic management and total quality management: Challenges and choices. Public Administration Quarterly, 20, 201–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weggeman, M. (1989). Is the professional self-managing or is there really a need for professional management? European Management Journal, 7(4), 422–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettenhall, R. (2005). Agencies and non-departmental public bodies—The hard and soft lenses of agencification theory. Public Management Review, 7(4), 615–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (2001). ‘Effective governance’ through complexity thinking and management science. Systems Research and Behavioral Science: The Official Journal of the International Federation for Systems Research, 18(3), 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (1993). What is strategy and does it matter? London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1990). The process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11(3), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland

    Jan-Erik Johanson

Authors
  1. Jan-Erik Johanson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-Erik Johanson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Johanson, JE. (2019). Strategy Formation in Public Agencies. In: Strategy Formation and Policy Making in Government . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03439-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation