Skip to main content

The Digital Preservation in Chimborazo: A Pending Responsibility

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (TIC.EC) (TICEC 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 884))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Currently, every public or private institution generates digital information that by legal mandate, social responsibility, cultural and historical value must be preserved in the long term by means of techniques, methods or appropriate models that allow a technical way to have digital information accessible and informationally useful in a near and far future. In the world and in Ecuador there is a legal basis that motivates and demands that this responsibility is fulfilled, as well as several models of digital preservation that could be applicable. This research intends to know the current state of preservation of digital information of public and private institutions of Ecuador, specifically Chimborazo, valued by means of a validated survey of 68 items, applied to 63 public and private institutions, which measures 4 aspects globally accepted and of fundamental compliance, these are: (A) Organizational infrastructure, (B) Administration of digital objects, (C) Infrastructure management and security risks, and (D) Management of aspects of integrity in institutions, aspects that allow a guarantee of an acceptable level of integrity and security of digital information and its correct preservation. After a statistical analysis it is determined that there is a very low percentage of companies that apply some formal method and in the same way a very low compliance with the minimum aspects necessary for an adequate digital preservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Preserving Our Digital Heritage: Plan for the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program” 2002, p.19.

References

  1. Allinson J (2006) OAIS as a reference model for repositories. An evaluation. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/3464/. Accessed 29 Apr 2018

  2. Ashoire AB (2013) An overview of the use of digital evidence in international criminal courts. In: Salzburg workshop on cyber investigations, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  3. CCSD (2012) Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS) 650.0-M-2. Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. CCSDS (2012) Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS) 650.0-M-2. Washington, DC, USA: CCSDS. Obtenido de http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf

  5. Plaza LAC, Guadalupe JMP (2015) Diseño experimental en el desarrollo del conocimiento científico, vol 1. Riobamba, La Caracola Editores, Ecuador

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corral Y (2009) Validez y confiabilidad de los instrumentos de investigación para la recolección de datos. Revista Ciencias De La Educación 19(33):228–247

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreira M (2006) Introdução à Preservação Digital: Conceitos, estratégias e actuais consensos. https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/5820/1/livro.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2018

  8. Gladney HM (2009) Critique of Architectures for Long-Term Digital Preservation. HMG Consulting, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gomez LS (2013) Delitos, prueba y evidencia digital. http://listas.hackcoop.com.ar/archivos/bla/attachments/20131026/b708d60b/attachment.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018

  10. ISO (2012) Space data and information transfer systems – Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories. ISO 16363:2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kotler P (2010) Fundamentos de Marketing. Prentice Hall, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  12. LeFurgy W (2009) NDIIPP partner perspectives on economic sustainability. Libr Trends, 413–426

    Google Scholar 

  13. Molina F, Rodriguez G (2015) Digital preservation and criminal investigation: a pending subject. In: Molina Granja F, Rodriguez G New contributions in information systems and technologies. Springer, US, pp 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Molina F, Rodriguez G (2017) Model for digital evidence preservation in criminal research institutions – predeci. Int J Electron Secur Digit Forensics 9(2):150–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Molina F, Rodriguez G (2017) The preservation of digital evidence and its admissibility in the court. Int J Electron Secur Digit Forensics 9(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morales P (2010) Investigación e innovación educativa. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación 8(2):47–73. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/551/55114080004.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2018

  17. National digital stewardship alliance (2015) National agenda for digital stewardship. The Library of Congress, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nestor working Group (2009) Catalogue of criteria for trusted digital repositories Version 2. Nestor working Group Trusted Repositories – Certification, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martinez R (2012) La importancia de la evidencia y el análisis forense digital. Obtenido de http://www.bsecure.com.mx/opinion

  20. Serra Serra J (2001) Gestión de los documentos digitales: estrategias. El profesional de la información, 4(18)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Hougthon Mifflin Company, Boston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Térmens M (2009) Investigación y desarrollo en preservación digital: un balance internacional. El profesional de la información 4(8):4–18

    Google Scholar 

  23. Torres Freixinet L (2008) Preservacion Digital, el Reto del Futuro. Actas de las VIII Jornadas de Archivos Aragoneses. Gobierno de Aragón

    Google Scholar 

  24. Unesco (2004) Charter on the preservation of the heritage digital, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Molina-Granja .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Molina-Granja, F. (2019). The Digital Preservation in Chimborazo: A Pending Responsibility. In: Botto-Tobar, M., Barba-Maggi, L., González-Huerta, J., Villacrés-Cevallos, P., S. Gómez, O., Uvidia-Fassler, M. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies of Ecuador (TIC.EC). TICEC 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 884. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02828-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics