Skip to main content

Classical Social Theory and the Understanding of Contemporary Religious Terrorism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Religious Violence

Abstract

Classical social theory tends largely to be studied out of historical interest these days and is frequently not regarded as relevant to modern world problems. However, it is the contention here that it is the most relevant perspective from which to understand contemporary religious fundamentalism and conflicts, especially Islamic. Modern concerns over religion directly mirror the core concerns behind the rise of classical social theory as modern industrial society and scientific culture challenged and then displaced the then dominant Christian religious understanding and interpretation of the world in the nineteenth century. The West’s clash with Islam, whilst exaggerated, does reflect the same kind of confrontation that the classical social theorists witnessed in their heyday; hence, they can be studied to great benefit as windows into the modern world. Lessons can be learnt of direct benefit to all, not just in sociology and anthropology, who seek to cope with contemporary problems of religious conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://theweek.com/articles/697599/real-existential-threat-radical-islam: this is just one example of a flurry of articles on the Web and in other media that suggest an existential threat. However, saner voices have now begun to roll back this rhetoric; see: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/24/terrorism-poses-no-existential-threat-toamerica. See also Dingley and Hermann (2017). Here we assume the term to be used as implying a threat to the existence of Western life, society and democracy in generic sense, since all terrorism threatens individual lives, as do motor accidents or ordinary murders.

  2. 2.

    http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/index_en.htm.

  3. 3.

    https://www.dhs.gov/about-dhs#.

  4. 4.

    Dingley and Hermann (2017).

  5. 5.

    Dingley and Hermann (2017).

  6. 6.

    This, one can only assume, is what is meant in discussions of existential threats; see footnote 1.

  7. 7.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/belgium/12194789/Brussels-police-shot-at-during-raid-linked-to-Paris-attacks.html.

  8. 8.

    http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/h2020/topics/sec-06-fct-2016.html.

  9. 9.

    In the sense that it is Western values and (socio-economic and political) order that is invading Islamic states, it may be the West that poses an existential threat to Islam.

  10. 10.

    Caution is needed here, since many Protestant denominations, especially fundamentalist ones, also utilise a scholastic framework.

  11. 11.

    www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36801671. A Muslim drove a lorry into a crowd of pedestrians in Nice.

Bibliography

  • Alder, Ken. 2004. The Measure of All Things. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, Heine, and Lars Kaspersen, eds. 2000. Classical and Modern Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Karen. 2001. Islam: A Short History. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Fields of Blood, Religion and the History of Violence. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, James. 2012. A Line in the Sand. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Bowyer. 1977. Terror Out of Zion: Irgun Zvai Leumi, Lehi, and the Palestine Underground, 1929–1949. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 2000. The Roots of Romanticism. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Mia. 2005. Dying to Kill, The Allure of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossy, John. 1985. Christianity in the West, 1400–1700. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, John. 1991. Science and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleigh, Michael. 2005. Earthly Powers. London: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattan, Henry. 1988. The Palestine Question. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connoll, R.W. 1997. Why is Classical Theory Classical? The American Journal of Sociology 102 (6): 1511–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Martha, ed. 1995. Terrorism in Context. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Terrorism in Context. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, Mike. 2005. Thug: The True Story of India’s Murderous Cult. London: Granta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detter, Ingrid. 2013. The Law of War. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingley, James. 2008. Nationalism, Social Theory and Durkheim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Terrorism and the Politics of Social Change. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011a. Terrorism, Religion and Community. Defence and Security Analysis 27 (4): 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. Sacred Communities: Religion and National Identities. National Identities 13 (4): 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The IRA, the Irish Republican Army. Santa Monica: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Durkheim and National Identity in Ireland. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dingley, James, and Sean Hermann. 2017. Terrorism, Radicalisation and Moral Panics: Media and Academic Analysis and Reporting of 2016 and 2017 ‘Terrorism’. Small Wars and Insurgencies 28 (6): 996–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingley, James, and Michael Kirk-Smith. 2002. Symbolism and Sacrifice in Terrorism. Small Wars and Insurgencies 13 (1): 102–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingley, James, and Marcello Mollica. 2007. The Human Body as a Terrorist Weapon: Hunger-Strikers and Suicide Bombers. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 30 (6): 459–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary. 1984. Purity and Danger. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1970. Suicide. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. The Division of Labour in Society. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eatwell, Roger. 2003. Fascism, A History. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, Elizabeth. 1980. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, Mircea. 1959. The Sacred and the Profane, the Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2016. Horizon 2020, Work Programme. Brussels: EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Allen. 1991. Formations of Violence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrngren, Gary, ed. 2002. Science and Religion. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Roy. 2015. Vivid Faces. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, Julien. 1972. The Sociology of Max Weber. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger, Stephen. 2008. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Plough, Sword and Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Reason and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1987. The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildea, Robert. 1987. Barricades and Borders, Europe 1800–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, Rene. 1977. Violence and the Sacred. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. The Scapegoat. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Security. 2016. http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/iran/nuke.htm.

  • Goody, Jack. 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Leslie. 2000. The Contemporary Law of Armed Conflict. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, Liah. 1993. Nationalism, Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Dipak. 2001. Path to Collective Madness. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallaq, Wael. 2014. The Impossible State. New York: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, Adrian. 1997. The Construction of Nationhood, Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hervieu-Leger, Daniele. 2000. Religion as a Chain of Memory. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindley, Geoffrey. 2004. The Crusades. London: Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E.J. 1973. The Age of Revolution. London: Cardinal.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Nations and Nationalism Since 1789. Cambridge: Canto.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The Age of Extremes. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Stuart. 1961. Consciousness and Society. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, Helen. 1998. Education in Early Modern England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, Mark. 1993. The New Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Terror in the Mind of God. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedourie, Elie. 1993. Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kung, Hans. 2001. The Catholic Church, A Short History. London: Orion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1972. The Savage Mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Bernard. 1993. Islam in History. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C.S. 1994. The Discarded Image. Cambridge: Canto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Brenard. 2003. The Assassins. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour. 1983. Political Man. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, David. 1969. Religion, Order and Law. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven, and Andrew Scull. 2013. Durkheim and the Law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A.R. 1976. Cognitive Development, Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, James. 2015. Serbia and the Balkan Front, 1914. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCulloch, Diarmaid. 2004. Reformation, Europe’s House Divided, 1490–1700. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Christianity, The First Three Thousand Years. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masood, Ehsan. 2009. Science and Islam, a History. London: Icon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matusitz, Jonathan. 2015. Symbolism in Terrorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, A.J. 1975. The Lower Middle Class as Historical Problem. Journal of Modern History 47: 409–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, John, and Mark Stewart. 2011. Terror, Security, and Money. Balancing the Risks, Benefits, and Costs of Homeland Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Peter. 2013. The Trouble With Radicalization. International Affairs 89 (4): 873–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, Robert. 1996. The Sociological Tradition. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Malory. 2004. Religion, the Basics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, L. 1970. The Problem of an Excess of Educated Men in Western Europe, 1800–1850. Journal of Modern History 42 (4): 471–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter. 2002. Orality and Literacy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagden, Anthony. 2009. Worlds at War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, Roberet. 2005. Dying to Win, The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, Robert. 2004. The Anatomy of Fascism. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Geoffrey. 1975. The Deviant Imagination. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pegg, Mark. 2008. A Most Holy War: The Albigensian Crusade and the Battle for Christendom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret, Bryan. 1991. Last Stand, Famous Battles Against the Odds. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, Douglas. 2005. The Challenge of Islam. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramet, Sabine. 1996. Nationalism and the Idiocy of the Countryside: The Case of Serbia. Ethnic and Racial Studies 19 (1): 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, David. 1984. Fear and Trembling: Terrorism in Three Religious Traditions. American Political Science Review 78: 658–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riches, David. 1986. The Anthropology of Violence. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saul, Ben. 2006. Defining Terrorism in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven. 1995. A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Anthony. 1986. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Nationalism and Modernism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Chosen Peoples, Sacred Sources of National Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Christopher. 1999. Sacrifice as Terror, the Rwandan Genocide of 1994. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, Charles. 1983. Political Violence in Ireland. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Bryan. 1991. Religion and Social Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Citizenship and Social Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venturi, Franco. 2001. The Roots of Revolution. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Peter. 2012. The Long European Revolution. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserstein, Bernard. 2003. Israel and Palestine. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1963. The Sociology of Religion. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1976. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Derek. 2002. In the Lion’s Court. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Peter. 2010. Europe’s Tragedy: A New History of the Thirty Years War. London: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, Richard. 2007. Modernity, Religion and the war on Terror. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, Frances. 1992. The Art of Memory. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulaika, Joseba. 1988. Basque Violence. Nevada: University of Nevada Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dingley, J. (2018). Classical Social Theory and the Understanding of Contemporary Religious Terrorism. In: Dingley, J., Mollica, M. (eds) Understanding Religious Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00284-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics