Abstract
High content screening (HCS) has established itself in the world of the pharmaceutical industry as an essential tool for drug discovery and drug development. HCS is currently starting to enter the academic world and might become a widely used technology. Given the diversity of problems tackled in academic research, HCS could experience some profound changes in the future, mainly with more imaging modalities and smart microscopes being developed. One of the limitations in the establishment of HCS in academia is flexibility and cost. Flexibility is important to be able to adapt the HCS setup to accommodate the multiple different assays typical of academia. Many cost factors cannot be avoided, but the costs of the software packages necessary to analyze large datasets can be reduced by using Open Source software. We present and discuss the Open Source software CellProfiler for image analysis and KNIME for data analysis and data mining that provide software solutions which increase flexibility and keep costs low.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnston AR, Powell RV (1970) Optics at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Appl Opt 9:271–275
Harmon LD, Knowlton KC (1969) Picture processing by computer. Science 164:19–29
Lipkin LE, Lipkin BS (1975) Computers in the clinical pathologic laboratory: chemistry and image processing. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 4:529–577
Blackwell RJ, Crisci WA (1975) Digital image processing technology and its application in forensic sciences. J Forensic Sci 20:17
Archer JR (2004) History evolution, and trends in compound management for high throughput screening. ASSAY Drug Dev Technol 2:675–681
Newman DJ, Cragg GM, Snader KM (2003) Natural products as sources of new drugs over the period 1981–2002. J Nat Prod 66:1022–1037
Ortholand J-Y, Ganesan A (2004) Natural products and combinatorial chemistry: back to the future. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:271–280
Giuliano KA, DeBiasio RL, Dunlay RT et al (1997) High-content screening: a new approach to easing key bottlenecks in the drug discovery process. J Biomol Screen 2:249
Verkman AS (2004) Drug discovery in academia. Am J Physiol: Cell Physiol 286:C465–C474
Cressey D (2011) Drug-maker plans to cut jobs and spending as industry shies away from drug discovery. Nature 470:154
Holt R (2011) Dueling visions for science. Science 333:1549
Gulledge J (2011) Debt crisis: crunch time for US science. Nature 477:155–156
Hunter P (2010) Facing the credit crunch. EMBO Rep 11:924–926
Roy A, McDonald PR, Sittampalam S, Chaguturu R (2010) Open access high throughput drug discovery in the public domain: a mount everest in the making. Curr Pharmaceut Biotechnol 11:764–778
D’Ausilio A (2012) Arduino: a low-cost multi purpose lab equipment. Behav Res Meth. 44(2):305–313
Santos AF, Zaltsman AB, Martin RC et al (2008) Angiogenesis: an improved in vitro biological system and automated image-based workflow to aid identification and characterization of angiogenesis and angiogenic modulators. ASSAY Drug Devel Technol 6:693–710
Carpenter A, Jones T, Lamprecht M et al (2006) Cell Profiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol 7:R100
Kamentsky L, Jones TR, Fraser A et al (2011) Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics 27:1179–1180
Bray M-A, Fraser AN, Hasaka TP et al (2011) Workflow and metrics for image quality control in large-scale high-content screens. J Biomol Screen 17:135–143
Jones R, Carpenter E, Lamprecht R et al (2009) Scoring diverse cellular morphologies in image-based screens with iterative feedback and machine learning. PNAS 106:1826–1831
Jones T, Kang I, Wheeler D et al (2008) CellProfiler analyst: data exploration and analysis software for complex image-based screens. BMC Bioinformatics 9:482
Zhang J-H, Chung TDY, Oldenburg KR (1999) A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J Biomol Screen 4:67–73
Zhang X. D, (2007) A pair of new statistical parameters for quality control in RNA interference high-throughput screening assays, Genomics 89:552–561
Moddemeijer R (1999) A statistic to estimate the variance of the histogram based mutual information estimator based on dependent pairs of observations. Signal Process 75:51–63
Pearson K (1896) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity and panmixia. Phil Trans Roy Soc London Ser A 187:253–318
Brideau C, Gunter B, Pikounis B et al (2003) Improved statistical methods for hit selection in high-throughput screening. J Biomol Screen 8:634–647
Birmingham A, Selfors LM, Forster T et al (2009) Statistical methods for analysis of high-throughput RNA interference screens. Nat Meth 6:569–575
Shun TY, Lazo JS, Sharlow ER et al (2011) Identifying actives from HTS data sets. J Biomol Screen 16:1–14
Mahalanobis PC (1936) On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc Natl Inst Sci India 2:49–55
Conrad C, Gerlich DW (2010) Automated microscopy for high-content RNAi screening. JCB 188:453–461
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Max Planck Gesellschaft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 SpringerScience+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Stöter, M., Niederlein, A., Barsacchi, R., Meyenhofer, F., Brandl, H., Bickle, M. (2013). CellProfiler and KNIME: Open Source Tools for High Content Screening. In: Moll, J., Colombo, R. (eds) Target Identification and Validation in Drug Discovery. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 986. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-311-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-311-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-310-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-311-4
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols