Abstract
The recent discovery of a new class of massive chromosomal rearrangements, occurring during one unique cellular event and baptized “chromothripsis,” deeply modifies our perception on the genesis of complex genomic rearrangements, but also it raises the question of the potential driving role of chromothripsis in species evolution. The occurrence of chromothripsis appears to be in good agreement with macroevolution models proposed as a complement to phyletic gradualism. The emergence of this unexpected phenomenon may help to demonstrate the contribution of chromosome rearrangements to speciation process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stephens PJ, Greenman CD, Fu B et al (2011) Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144:27–40
Kloosterman WP, Gurvey V, van Roosmalen M et al (2011) Chromothripsis as a mechanism driving complex de novo structural rearrangements in the germline. Hum Mol Genet 20:1916–1924
Molenaar JJ, Koster J, Zwijnenburg DA et al (2012) Sequencing of neuroblastoma identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes. Nature 483:589–593
Chiang C, Jacobsen JC, Ernst C et al (2012) Complex reorganization and predominant non-homologous repair following chromosomal breakage in karyotypically balanced germline rearrangements and transgenic integration. Nat Genet 44:390–998
Tubio JMC, Estivill X (2011) When catastrophe strikes a cell. Nature 470:476–477
Rausch T, Jones DTW, Zapatka M et al (2012) Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations. Cell 148:59–71
Jones MJK, Jallepalli PV (2010) Chromothripsis: chromosomes in crisis. Dev Cell 23:908–917
Crasta K, Ganem NJ, Dagher R et al (2012) DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 482:53–58
Ledbetter DH (2008) Chaos in the embryo. Nat Med 5:490–491
Pellestor (2014) Chromothripsis: how does such a catastrophic event impact human reproduction ? Hum Reprod 29(3):388–393
Korbel JO, Campbell PJ (2013) Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes. Cell 152:1226–1236
Govind SK, Zia A, Hennings-Yeomans PH et al (2014) ShatterProof: operational detection and quantification of chromothripsis. BMC Bioinformatics 15:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-78
Yang J, Liu J, Ouyang L et al (2016) CTLPScanner: a web server for chromothripsis-like pattern detection. Nucleic Acids Res 8 44(W1):W252–W258. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw434
Goldschmidt R (1940) The material basis of evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, London
Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJM (ed) Models in Paleobiology. Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, pp 82–115
Gould SJ, Eldredge N (1993) Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366:223–227
Mallet J (2007) Hybrid speciation. Nature 446:279–283
Chouard T (2010) Revenge of the hopeful monster. Nature 463:864–867
Reiseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83:363–372
Dittrich-Reed DR, Fitzpatrick B (2013) Transgressive hybrids as hopeful monsters. Evol Biol 40:310–315
Neme R, Amador C, Yildirim B et al (2017) Random sequences are an abundant source of bioactive RNAs or peptides. Nat Ecol Evol 1(6):0217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0127
Wilson BA, Foy SG, Neme R et al (2017) Young genes are highly disordered as predicted by the preadaptation hypothesis of de novo gene birth. Nat Ecol Evol 1(6):0146–0146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0146
Gu S, Szafranski P, Akdemir ZC (2016) Mechanisms for complex chromosomal insertions. PLoS Genet 12(11):e1006446. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006446
Symer DE, Connelly C, Szak ST et al (2002) Human L1 retrotransposition is associated with genetic instability in vivo. Cell 110:327–328
Beck CR, Garcia-Perez JL, Badge RM et al (2011) LINE-I elements in structural variation and disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 12:187–215
Valton AL, Dekker J (2016) TAD disruption as oncogenic driver. Curr Opin Genet Dev 36:34–40
Lupianez DG, Spielmann M, Mundlos S (2016) Breaking TADs: how alterations of chromatin domains result in disease. Trends Genet 33(4):225–237
Middelkamp S, van Heesch S, Braat AK et al (2017) Molecular dissection of germline chromothripsis in a developmental context using patient-derived iPS cells. Genome Med 9(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-017-0399-z
Collins RL, Brand H, Redin CE et al (2017) Defining the diverse spectrum of inversions, complex structural variation, and chromothripsis in the morbid human genome. Genome Biol 18(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1158-6
Tan EH, Henry IM, Ravi M et al (2015) Catastrophic chromosomal restructuring during genome elimination in plants. elife 4:e06516. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06516
Froment JV, Kaidi A, Jackson SP (2012) Chromothripsis and cancer: causes and consequences of chromosome shattering. Nat Rev Cancer 12(10):663–670
Notta F, Chang-Seng-Yue M, Lemire M et al (2016) A renewed model of pancreatic cancer evolution based on genomic rearrangement patterns. Nature 538(7625):378–382
de Pagter MS, van Roosmalen MJ, Baas AF et al (2015) Chromothripsis in healthy individuals affects multiple protein-coding genes and can result in severe congenital abnormalities in offspring. Am J Hum Genet 96(4):651–656
Bertelsen B, Nazaryan-Petersen L, Sun W et al (2016) A germline chromothripsis event stably segregating in 11 individuals through three generations. Genet Med 18(5):494–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.112
Fukami M, Shima H, Suzuki E et al (2017) Catastrophic cellular events leading to complex chromosomal rearrangements in the germline. Clin Genet 91:653–660
McDermott DH, Gao JL, Liu Q et al (2015) Chromothriptic cure of WHIM syndrome. Cell 160:686–699
Sheldon PR (1990) Shaking up evolutionary patterns. Nature 345:772
Dutrillaux B (1979) Chromosomal evolution in primates: tentative phylogeny from microcebus murinus (prosimian) to man. Hum Genet 48:251–314
Britton-Davidian J, Catalan J, Ramalhinho M et al (2000) Rapid chromosomal evolution in island mice. Nature 403:158
Noor MAF, Grams KL, Bertucci LA et al (2001) Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:12084–12088
Yunis JJ, Sawyer JR, Dunham K (1980) The striking resemblance of high-resolution g-banded chromosomes of man and chimpanzee. Science 208:145–1148
Newman TL, Tuzun E, Morrison VA et al (2005) A genome-wide survey of structural variation between human and chimpanzee. Genome Res 15:1344–1356
Pevzner P, Tesler G (2003) Genome rearrangements in mammalian evolution: lessons from human and mouse genomes. Genome Res 13:37–45
Dennis MY, Harshman L, Nelson BJ et al (2017) The evolution and population diversity of human-specific segmental duplications. Nat Ecol Evol 1:0069. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-016-0069
Carbone L, Harris RA, Gnerre S et al (2014) Gibbon genome and the fast karyotype evolution of small apes. Nature 513:195–201
Lässig M, Mustonen V, Walczak AM (2017) Predicting evolution. Nat Ecol Evol 1:0077. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0077
Acknowledgments
Work in the unit of Chromosomal Genetics is supported by the CHU research platform ChromoStem (http://www.chu-montpellier.fr/fr/chercheurs/plateformes/les-plateformes-recherche/chromostem/).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Pellestor, F. (2018). Chromothripsis and the Macroevolution Theory. In: Pellestor, F. (eds) Chromothripsis. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1769. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7780-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7780-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7779-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7780-2
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols