Abstract
The circulatory system is among the earliest organ systems to develop during embryogenesis. It is comprised of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems. We discuss early events in blood vessel formation in the developing embryo and the placenta. The establishment of the great vessels, namely, dorsal aorta and cardinal vein, and smaller intersomitic vessels and capillaries, blood/lymphatic vessel specification, and artery/vein specification are discussed during embryonic development and in the context of vascular anomalies. Processes unique to placental vascularization are elaborated. The goal of this chapter is to provide a working knowledge of vasculogenic and angiogenic processes involved in the establishment of circulatory systems during embryonic and placental development and to discuss aberrant mechanisms associated with vascular anomalies.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
The development of the circulatory system is one of the earliest events in organogenesis [1]. This system is comprised of interconnected tubes that form an intricate network for transporting blood and lymph across tissues. The endothelial cells (ECs) line the inner walls of the tubes, and vascular smooth muscle cells surround them on the outside. The circulatory system is comprised of two primary vessel types, namely, the blood vessels and the lymphatic vessels [2]. These vessels differ in the content of their lumen. Blood vessels primarily carry blood, while lymphatic vessels carry lymph fluid. Blood vessels are comprised of arteries and veins. Arteries carry oxygenated blood that flows under high pressure, while the veins carry deoxygenated blood back to the heart under low pressure. The dorsal aorta (DA) and cardinal vein (CV) are the first to arise in a developing embryo. These are formed de novo via the assembly of endothelial precursors into a primitive vascular network (or plexus) through a process called “vasculogenesis ” [3]. Once the primitive vascular plexus is established, a complex remodeling process consisting of migration, proliferation, sprouting, and pruning ensues and leads to the development of a functional circulatory system. This remodeling process is referred to as “angiogenesis ” [4]. Small capillaries and the intersomitic vessels (ISVs ; vessels that traverse early body segments or somites) are formed through the angiogenesis mechanism.
Embryonic programs of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis are recapitulated in the adult during repair and healing processes and in mammalian reproduction. Ovulation, menstruation, implantation, and placentation are critically dependent on angiogenesis and neovascularization. The placenta undergoes extensive vascular growth and remodeling throughout pregnancy. Vascularization of the placenta is unique in its requirement for coordinated development of maternal and fetal vessels. This allows formation of large surface areas of exchange between maternal and fetal circulations, necessary for placental function. Specialized placental cells, termed trophoblast cells, are involved in the regulation of this process. Inadequate or abnormal vascularization of the placenta impacts the start of life and has far-reaching consequences on the metabolic and cardiovascular health in adult life [5, 6]. Abnormal angiogenesis and neovascularization are also associated with other pathological conditions such as tumor growth. Tumors secrete EC stimulatory growth factors that induce the host vasculature to sprout and grow in an angiogenic fashion. The new vessels are used by the tumor to traverse to distant sites, thus promoting metastases. In this chapter, we will discuss the basic principles governing vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in the embryo and placenta. In addition, we will discuss the molecules involved in these processes and the role that they play in the development of vascular anomalies.
Origin of Cells of the Vascular Lineage
All tissues of the body emerge from the three germ layers of ectoderm, endoderm, and mesoderm . Post gastrulation, the mesoderm germ layer gives rise to cells of the heart, kidney, muscle, and blood-forming tissues in addition to the cells of the circulatory system, namely, the vascular ECs. The vascular ECs emerge from the lateral most region of the mesoderm termed as the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM ). The specification step from the LPM to the precursor cells of the vascular lineage is poorly understood. One putative intermediate step in this specification pathway is the formation of a bipotential precursor cell from the LPM that has capabilities to differentiate into the vascular and hematopoietic lineage. Evidence for the existence of such a bipotential precursor cell is observed during embryonic development, especially in the extraembryonic mouse yolk sac “blood islands”; these are loose aggregates of blood cells surrounded by the endothelium [7]. The outer cells of the blood island clusters appear flattened and subsequently differentiate into ECs, whereas the inner cells become hematopoietic cells [8]. In mouse embryo, this precursor cell is mainly located in the primitive streak (thickening region of the embryo showing noticeable first stages of development) and is only detectable for a very brief period of time [9] and eventually expresses CD31, flk-1, flt-1, and tie-2 [10] markers, which are characteristic of EC lineage. Similarly, in chick, flk-1 + cells (Quek1) are abundant in the mesoderm that exits from the posterior primitive streak during gastrulation [11]. These cells contribute to the formation of both embryonic and extraembryonic mesoderm tissue, which gives rise to the first blood islands [12]. Gene targeting experiments in mouse demonstrate that a functional Flk-1 receptor tyrosine kinase is required for the development of the blood islands, providing further evidence that both hematopoietic and endothelial lineages are derived from a common precursor [13]. This common precursor cell is referred to as hemangioblast, which will be discussed in detail in the next section.
The Case for Hemangioblast
Nearly a century ago, based on observations in chick embryos that both hematopoietic and ECs are closely situated and develop together, a new term called “hemangioblast” was proposed to describe the common precursor cell [14, 15] that gives rise to both lineages. In terms of model systems, zebrafish has contributed immensely to our understanding of hemangioblast because of the identification of the first genetic mutant in vertebrate, “cloche,” which lacks both ECs and blood cells suggesting that the mutation lies in the critical gene (as yet unidentified) that specifies the critical dual potential hemangioblast cell to vascular and blood lineage [16, 17]. More recently, Vogeli and his group constructed single-cell-resolution fate maps that show individual cells in zebrafish late blastula and gastrula can give rise to both hematopoietic and ECs [18]. Substantial characterization of the hemangioblasts has occurred in vitro through the utilization of the embryonic stem cell (ESC)-derived embryoid body (EB) model system . In the mouse and human ESC-derived EB cultures, single blast colony-forming cells (BL-CFCs) generate colonies that contain both hematopoietic and ECs. These cells emerge in the presence of VEGF-A and bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4) [10, 19, 20]. Further, they express flk-1 and the mesodermal marker brachyury [21]. Based on the ability of genetically engineered ESCs to differentiate into BL-CFCs in vitro, flk-1, Scl, Runx-1, Hhex, Mixl-1, Bmp-4, Smad-1, Gata-2, and Lycat have all been shown to be essential for the generation of BL-CFCs [22–31]. In addition to these genes, Lmo, fli-1, and etsrp have been recently implicated in the specification of hemangioblast from the posterior LPM in zebrafish [32–37]. Importantly, constitutive activation of fli1 is shown to be sufficient to induce expression of key hemangioblast genes such as scl, lmo, gata2, etsrp, and flk-1 [38]. At present, our knowledge of hemangioblast specification from LPM is emerging; however, our knowledge downstream of hemangioblast is better known, as will be discussed in the next section.
Vasculogenesis Mechanisms in the Developing Embryo
The hemangioblast cell can differentiate down either the vascular lineage or the hematopoietic lineage. If the program for vascular lineage differentiation is initiated, the hemangioblast becomes more differentiated, and this cell type is called angioblast . The great vessels of the developing embryo such as the aorta and vein are formed directly from this cell population via a process of vasculogenesis [39]. The essential steps in vasculogenesis post angioblast specification are the migration of angioblasts toward the location of future developing vessels, the coalescence of precursor cells to tube formation, and the final maturation of vessels to establish functional circulation [40–42].
Both mice and zebrafish have extensively contributed to our knowledge of vasculogenesis. In mice, the first intraembryonic angioblasts are seen as early as 1 somite (som) stage at the lateral edges of the anterior intestinal portal and ventral to the somites [43]. In zebrafish, angioblasts are observed as early as 1 som in the LPM. An ets-related transcription factor protein (etsrp or etv2) was recently shown to be necessary and sufficient for angioblast specification at the LPM [36] and serves as a marker of angioblasts in the developing embryo. Moreover, etsrp is induced by fli1 transcription factor [38], therefore implying that fli1 is upstream of etsrp. Therefore, double positive fli + /etsrp + cells are used as pre-migratory vascular precursor cells (FEVPs) that are ideal for cell tracking during the vasculogenesis processes in zebrafish embryos. The etsrp cells in the head, trunk, and tail of a developing zebrafish follow unique patterns of movement, trajectory, and congregation that highlight the complex series of events that occurs when angioblasts are moving from the LPM to the midline. This unprecedented observation illuminates a highly organized series of events that are dictated by spatial and temporal cues [44].
The vasculogenesis process in zebrafish occurs in multiple stages: initially at pre-10 som stage followed by post-10 som stage. A cartoon is depicted in Fig. 3.1 that describes these events. During pre-10 som stage, the FEVPs increase in number at the LPM (at 10 som), and this increase is attributed to a proliferative mechanism that involves the Shh-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-Notch-Hey2 signaling pathway [44]. It is noteworthy that the number of angioblasts is not critical for their next step in vasculogenesis [45], i.e., migration to midline. At post-10 som stage (10–12 som), angioblast migration starts from the LPM toward the midline, which is in part controlled by signals from the endoderm [45]. At the midline, angioblasts first aggregate to form cord-like structures with no cell-cell junctions established, thereby resembling a poorly organized cluster of cells. However, for angioblast coalescence at the midline to occur effectively, cell-cell junctions need to form first, which occurs at ~17 hpf (16 som) in zebrafish [45]. In addition to cell-cell junctions, adherens junctions are also formed at this stage indicating that angioblasts are in close contact with each other. The next step in vasculogenesis is the coalescence of angioblasts to lumen formation in axial vessels (DA and PCV), which is poorly understood. An EC-derived secreted factor Egfl-7 was identified to regulate vascular tube formation in zebrafish [46], but the mechanisms involved in this process are not clear. A recent study proposes intracellular vacuolization as a proposed model for endothelial tube formation in vivo [47], but this mechanism was shown for smaller vessels and is not clear if it is applicable to larger vessels such as the primary axial vessels (DA and PCV) [45].
Artery vs. Vein (A/V) Specification Mechanisms in Developing Embryo
Once the primary vessels are formed, they take an identity of an artery or vein. Until recently, it was thought that flow dictated artery vs. vein (A/V) formation of primitive vessels [48, 49]. However, recent evidence shows that molecularly, artery and veins are fundamentally distinct in the early embryo thereby challenging the existing paradigm [50]. The embryonic expression pattern of ligand ephrin-B2 (efnb2) (specifically in artery ECs but not in venous ECs) prior to the onset of circulation in mouse embryos and its cognate receptor Ephrin-b4 (Ephb4) (expressed more in vein and less in artery) opened the door for identifying molecular markers that define arterial and venous cell identity [50]. At present, several artery- and vein-specific genes have been identified in vertebrate embryos [51, 52].
During the vasculogenesis process, the specification of angioblasts into artery or venous ECs is a critical step in the formation of arteries and veins, respectively [50]. In zebrafish, the differentiation of angioblasts into arterial and venous ECs first occurs at 17 hpf (16 som) [45]. The sonic hedgehog (Shh)-VEGF-Notch pathway is involved in A/V specification [52, 53], and a model is proposed to explain how and when A/V specification occurs in vivo. In this model, shh expressed in midline notochord cells induces medioventral somites to express VEGF. Because of this VEGF gradient, angioblasts migrate medially toward the midline [53]. VEGF overexpression in shh-deficient embryos induces arterial marker efnb2 but not in Notch-induced embryos thereby placing VEGF downstream of Shh but upstream of Notch in arterial differentiation pathway [53]. Similarly in mice, VEGF and its isoforms promote arterial differentiation by inducing efnb2-positive vessels [54, 55]. Notch, downstream of VEGF, induces arterial-specific genes such as efnb2 and represses venous-specific genes such as flt-4 resulting in A/V specification [56]. Zebrafish embryos with reduced Notch activity have poorly formed DA and PCV often leading to arteriovenous malformation [56]. The hairy-and-enhancer-of-split-related (hey) family of transcription factors is a direct target of the Notch pathway [57]. In zebrafish, the hey-2 genetic mutant gridlock (grl) [58] shows abnormal fusion of the lateral DA leading to aortic coarctation, a cardiovascular defect observed in humans [59]. Although grl expression is restricted to DA in zebrafish embryos, it does not appear to play a role in repressing venous markers such as flt-4, which might be mediated by another member of the hey family. Interestingly, in the grl m145 allele, arterial differentiation is normal, and defects in trunk vessel patterning are apparent suggesting that grl functions in the formation of DA, but its role in differentiation of artery ECs is unclear [52, 58, 60, 61]. Besides hey transcription factors (TF), members of FoxC TF family FoxC1 and FoxC2 are also involved in A/V specification. FoxC1/C2 upregulates the expression of notch-1, notch-4, and arterial markers efnb2 and notch target hey-2 [62] in mouse embryonic ECs suggesting that FoxC TF functions upstream of Notch to promote arterial specification.
In terms of signaling mechanisms, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK ) and phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K ) pathways downstream of Flk-1 have been implicated as integral biochemical pathways for A/V specification [63]. Blocking of PI3K signaling pathway and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 and kinase-2 (ERK-1/2) MAPK promote arterial fate, and conversely, activation of PI3K and blocking of ERK activation promote venous fate [63]. Compared to arterial specification, less emphasis has been placed on venous specification markers. Of the venous markers, the chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor II (COUP-TFII ) is the best studied and is a member of the orphan nuclear receptor family that has been shown to actively maintain the venous state by inhibiting Notch activation [64].
Lymphatic Vessel Specification
Like A/V formation, the origins of lymphatics were controversial, until recent evidence conclusively shows that lymphatic ECs are specified from venous ECs [65, 66]. Similar to arteries and veins emerging from dual potential angioblasts, lymphatic cells emerge from dual potential venous ECs. Prox-1, a transcription factor, initiates lymphatic specification by expressing in a subset of bipotential venous ECs that differentiate into LECs [67, 68]. Prox-1 is also required for maintenance of lymphatic cell identity [69]. Recent work suggests that Sox-18 transcription factor may in part be responsible for inducing prox-1 expression [70], thereby placing Sox-18 upstream of Prox-1. The Sox-18-induced prox-1 expression commits dual potential venous cells to the lymphatic lineage. In addition to Prox-1 and Sox-18, Notch, FoxC2, and Efnb2 molecules that are involved in arterial specification are also involved in lymphatic specification [71]. In humans and mice, Notch1 and Notch4 are expressed in the lymphatics [72], and Notch signaling directly regulates VEGFR-3 expression in blood ECs [72]. Of the five isoforms of VEGF, VEGF-C is widely considered to mediate lymphatic sprouting through signals triggered on binding to cognate tyrosine kinase receptor VEGFR-3 in lymphatic ECs. FoxC2, transcription factor (TF) of the forkhead family, is also critical for lymphatic development, is expressed by LECs, and functions in lymphatic differentiation [73]. Loss of FoxC2 in mice results in failure to form lymphatic valves, abnormal accumulation of SMC to the lymphatic vasculature, and lymphatic dysfunction [74]. In terms of ephrins, mice at postnatal day 0 (P0) express both efnb2 and Ephb4 in dermal lymphatic vasculature [75]. Efnb2 signals via the intracellular PDZ domain, and deletion of the Efnb2 PDZ domain in mice results in lymphatic defects. These include defective dermal lymphatic remodeling, absence of lymphatic valves, abnormal accumulation of SMC in lymphatic capillaries, and chylothorax [75]. These defects suggest a role for efnb2 signaling in lymphangiogenesis .
Angiogenesis
In the developing embryo, once the great vessels of the embryo, namely, DA and CV, are formed, secondary vasculature is initiated via an angiogenic mechanism. Zebrafish, chickens, and mice have extensively contributed to our understanding of this process. However, recently, zebrafish studies have provided mechanistic-based evidence of the angiogenesis process in vivo especially in the trunk region [76–78]. In the embryonic zebrafish trunk, vessels that traverse the somite (early muscle) boundaries are formed via the angiogenic process and are referred to as intersomitic vessels (ISVs ). The ISVs in zebrafish form by discrete steps, and they first sprout from the established DA in pairs and align along the dorsoventral axis. The dorsal-most cell in the sprouting ISVs is called the “tip cell” or “leading cell,” which progressively navigates through intersomitic boundaries and traverses the length of the chevron-like somites to join with its anterior and posterior neighbors, thus establishing a dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessel (DLAVs ). Interestingly, recent evidence shows the involvement of macrophage cells in linking the adjoining DLAVs in zebrafish and mice [79, 80]. Previously, it was thought that ISVs are comprised of three cells [81], but recent evidence shows that ISVs are comprised of multiple cells that overlap extensively to form a multicellular tube [77]. Recent data from Blum et al. [77] suggest that ISVs lumen formation is a multicellular process containing an extracellular lumen with adjoining ISVs connected with tight junctions. Also, ISVs show a number of cellular behaviors including cell divisions, cell rearrangements, and dynamic changes in cell-cell contacts [77] that were previously unknown.
The mechanisms utilized for ISV formation are similar to another branching network, the nerves. In vertebrate ontogeny, the neural and vascular networks develop side-by-side [82] and utilize the branching processes of axons and blood vessels, respectively, to penetrate different regions of the body. Axons travel great distances to innervate tissues, while vessels travel shorter distances to perfuse tissues. A growing axon projects a sensory structure called a “growth cone” that integrates directional information provided by attraction and repulsion cues from the surrounding environment. Recent evidence suggests that capillaries sprout similarly from specialized ECs called “tip cells” [83]. Similar to the growth cone, the tip cell is a highly motile structure that constantly extends and retracts filopodia. The original idea came from retinal tip cells [83], which were thought not to proliferate but only provide guidance to the following stalk cell. However, ISVs’ tip cells in zebrafish [77] do proliferate suggesting that tip cells from different tissue beds may have different functions. The VEGF and Notch family members participate in the tip vs. stalk cell positioning during angiogenic sprouting [84, 85]. Recent evidence suggests that relative levels of VEGF2 and VEGFR1, cognate receptors for VEGF, dictate which cell becomes a tip cell [86]. Guidance decisions of axons and tip cells are relayed by shared mechanisms at a molecular level [82], and members of the axon guidance molecule family, namely, ephrins, semaphorins, netrins, and slits along with their cognate receptors, work cooperatively to guide axonal growth cone pathfinding and vascular development (10) and are reviewed elsewhere [82].
Angiogenesis
In mammals, angiogenic processes are recapitulated in the adult female during reproductive cycle and in pregnancy. The requirement for rapid and extensive neovascularization and remodeling perhaps makes the placenta the most active site of physiological angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. In this section, we discuss the unique aspects of blood vessel formation in the context of hemochorial placentation. This type of placentation is observed in humans, apes, and rodents and is characterized by direct contact of maternal blood with cells of fetal origin. While in all other organs blood flows through tubes of ECs, in the hemochorial placenta, maternal blood flows through channels formed by specialized fetal cells, the trophoblast cells (Fig. 3.2 f). Trophoblast cells arise from the extraembryonic epithelium and are a unique cell type of the placenta. They play a critical role in regulating uterine vascular remodeling and fetoplacental vascularization. The next few paragraphs outline the processes involved in the establishment of maternal and fetal circulation in the hemochorial placenta and the regulatory role of trophoblast cells . For ease of discussion, these processes have been grouped as (1) uterine angiogenesis and vascular remodeling, (2) trophoblast differentiation and pseudovasculogenesis, and (3) fetoplacental vascularization.
The uterus (the organ where the embryo implants) undergoes several changes postconception. These changes, broadly termed as decidualization, include uterine angiogenesis and vascular remodeling . Uterine angiogenesis is initiated before, and continues after, implantation or the attachment of the blastocyst to the uterus. Trophoblast cells present in the outermost layer of the conceptus mediate this attachment. In rodents, initial uterine angiogenesis involves degeneration of epithelial cells surrounding the implantation chamber; changes in morphology of arterial capillaries in the vicinity, such that their lumens are enlarged and walls become thin to resemble sinusoids, and hypertrophy of ECs lining these sinusoids [87–89]. As a result of these processes, an anastomosing network of maternal blood sinuses surrounds the implantation chamber and fetal trophoblast cells (Fig. 3.2a, c). In rodents, around 8 days post coitum (dpc), some of the sinusoids open into the implantation chamber and bathe fetal trophoblast cells with maternal blood.
As pregnancy proceeds beyond 9 dpc (corresponding to the end of the first trimester in human pregnancy), the placenta undergoes tremendous growth at a rapid rate. In preparation for this growth, in addition to vascular adaptations at the fetomaternal interface, changes are necessary in larger vessels supplying the uterus. These include significant increases in diameter and length and changes in extracellular matrix composition of arteries that supply the uterus [90]. Extensive remodeling is observed in spiral arteries within the uterus (Fig. 3.2e). The endothelium and smooth muscle layers of uterine spiral arteries are disrupted and replaced by invading trophoblast cells [91]. The net result of these changes is reduced resistance of uterine arteries and an increased and privileged blood supply to the placenta.
Various molecular events involved in uterine angiogenesis and decidualization have been identified [92]. These are regulated by steroid hormones, estrogen and progesterone, and by prostaglandins [93, 94]. Similar to embryonic angiogenesis, VEGF and its receptor VEGFR-2 have also been identified as important mediators of uterine angiogenesis [94, 95]. Angiogenesis can proceed to a large extent with mechanical stimulation of hormonally primed uteri (without blastocyst implantation), suggesting a maternal hormonal control independent of direct regulation by fetal cells. It is, however, clear that fetal trophoblast cells also contribute to uterine angiogenesis. This is exemplified by the observation that abnormal hormonal expression by trophoblast cells in Gata-2 or Gata-3 knockout blastocysts implanted in heterozygous mothers (with normal gene expression) results in reduced uterine neovascularization [96]. Similar to uterine angiogenesis, the remodeling of spiral arteries is initiated when trophoblast cells are absent from its vicinity, but requires trophoblast invasion to proceed normally. Among other factors, maternal uterine natural killer cells play an important role in spiral artery remodeling (review [97]).
Trophoblast differentiation and pseudovasculogenesis comprise a second group of events intimately coupled with placental vascularization. About 70 % of the mature rodent placenta is made up of zygote-derived trophoblast cells [98]. They regulate many aspects of maternal vascular adaptation to pregnancy and provide the main structural and functional components needed to bring maternal and fetal blood systems in close contact (reviews [99, 100]). The trophoblast cell lineage is specified even before the embryo implants on the uterine wall. In mice, it appears as a sphere of epithelial cells, the trophectoderm, surrounding the inner cell mass and the blastocoel. Trophoblast cells depend on their interactions with embryonic tissues for continued proliferation and regulated differentiation [101]. Cells in direct contact with the inner cell mass maintain the trophoblast stem cell phenotype and form the chorionic plate (extraembryonic ectoderm). These later differentiate and form the bulk of the chorioallantoic placenta in a process initiated by fusion of the allantois (extraembryonic mesoderm extended by the embryo proper) with the chorionic plate (Fig. 3.2c). In mice, chorioallantoic fusion occurs around 8.5 dpc. Almost immediately, trophoblast differentiation is seen as the expression of gcm1 in clusters of trophoblast cells in the chorionic plate. The chorion folds into branches initiated at sites of gcm1 expression [102]. As the fetoplacental vasculature elaborates from the extraembryonic mesoderm filling these branches, trophoblast cells differentiate to form three distinct cell layers surrounding fetal vessels. Gene expression pattern in the early chorion suggests that trophoblast subtypes of these layers may be specified soon after chorioallantoic fusion [103]. Gene knockout studies and tetraploid aggregation assays have led to the identification of a number of genes that regulate trophoblast differentiation [99, 100]. By disrupting specific genes in the trophoblast compartment, their effects on placental development have been evaluated. These studies have underscored a critical role of trophoblast cell differentiation in fetoplacental vascularization.
As alluded to above, distinct subtypes of trophoblast cells constitute the placenta. They have been classified based on their origin, location in the placenta, and gene expression [26, 103–106]. Of these, trophoblast giant cells (TGCs ), named after the large size of their polyploid nucleus, are the first to terminally differentiate. Based on their anatomic location, TGCs are thought to play an important role in uterine vascular remodeling. In the murine placenta, for example, at least four subtypes of TGCs occupy the blood-tissue interface [26, 103, 104]. These include spiral artery-associated TGCs (equivalent to endovascular trophoblasts in humans) that invade uterine spiral arteries and replace maternal ECs. In human pregnancies, shallow invasion by trophoblast cells is associated with incomplete remodeling of spiral arteries and obstetric syndromes of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation [107, 108]. It has been further noted that invading trophoblast cells downregulate the expression of adhesion receptors characteristic of epithelial cells and begin to express EC-specific repertoire of adhesion receptors [109, 110]. This process has been termed as endothelial mimicry or pseudovasculogenesis and has been found to be incomplete or defective in preeclamptic pregnancies. More recent studies have shown that anticoagulant gene expression, characteristic of ECs, is also widely observed in trophoblast cells [111–113] and that trophoblast differentiation may be programmatically coupled to the acquisition of an EC-like anticoagulant gene expression profile [113]. Thus, the ability to mimic endothelial gene expression is not limited to the subpopulation of trophoblast cells that invade spiral arteries, but rather extends to trophoblast cells resident in the placenta. Trophoblast pseudovasculogenesis is likely to play an important role in the development and maintenance of an effective maternal circulation in the hemochorial placenta.
Trophoblast differentiation is regulated by several growth factors including activin, EGF, TGFβ, IGF-I, IGF-II, and PTHrP [106]. Upon differentiation, trophoblast cells produce a number of angiogenic hormones and their receptors, as well as vasoactive factors and proteases capable of mediating cellular degradation. These include proteins in the prolactin and growth hormone family, the VEGF gene family, adrenomedullin, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and members of the cathepsin family of proteases [106, 114–116]. The expression of these factors is spatially and temporally restricted and often associated with certain subtypes of trophoblast cells. Subsets of trophoblast cells also express alternately spliced form of VEGFR-1, a secreted protein also called sFlt-1, which blocks VEGF action. Expression of sFlt-1 by trophoblast cells is thought to be a part of mechanisms by which fetal cells regulate excessive uterine angiogenesis and prevent maternal vessels from growing into the placental junctional zone [117, 118].
Concomitant with trophoblast differentiation, development of fetal vessels in the placenta, termed as fetoplacental vascularization, is also initiated with the formation of the chorioallantoic placenta. The fusion of the allantois with the chorion initiates branching morphogenesis at sites of gcm1 expression. The trophoblast branches get filled with allantoic mesoderm from which the stromal and vascular components of the fetal placenta arise [102, 103, 119]. Fetal vessels in the placenta are formed de novo from hemangiogenic precursors that arise from the mesenchyme of fetal villi (Fig. 3.2e) rather than sprouting of vessels from the embryo into the placenta. Morphologically distinct CD34+ cells can be observed forming primitive cords in human placental villi as early as day 22 of pregnancy [120]. Continuous branching morphogenesis and angiogenic processes produce a complex structure with a large surface area of exchange with maternal blood sinuses (Fig. 3.2d–f).
The molecular regulators and pathways of fetoplacental vascularization are thought to be similar to those identified for vascularization of the embryo (review [121]). Angiogenesis factors expressed in the allantoic mesoderm include members of VEGF and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) gene families and their receptors [122–125]. Gene knockout studies in mice suggest that these may be involved in vascularization of the yolk sac and, by extension, the allantoic mesoderm [122, 124, 126–128]. Fetoplacental vascularization also involves mechanisms regulated by trophoblast cells. It is clear that trophoblast branching morphogenesis is essential for fetoplacental vascularization. Mice mutants affected in branching morphogenesis are simultaneously affected in fetoplacental vascularization, although the location of primary defect is not very clear [100]. Angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors secreted by trophoblast cells are candidate mechanisms involved in regulation of fetoplacental vascularization [116, 129, 130].
Abnormal Placental Vascularization and Pregnancy Complications
Optimal vascularization and blood flow are critical for placental function. Defective or inadequate maternal spiral artery remodeling, thrombotic lesions in maternal and fetal vasculature, and benign placental vascular tumors, such as chorioangiomas, are the most common types of pathologies affecting placental blood flow. Depending on the severity of defect, these placental vasculopathies are associated with increased risk of pregnancy complications affecting maternal health and fetal development. While severe defects result in fetal loss, continuation of pregnancy with suboptimal placental function is associated with fetal growth restriction and maternal hypertensive disorders, such as preeclampsia. In rodents, suppression of angiogenesis reduces fetal and placental size and causes hypertension in the mother [131, 132]. Administration of anti-angiogenic factors such as the soluble form of VEGFR-1 (sVEGFR-1, also called sFlt-1) or the soluble form of TGF-β1 co-receptor, endoglin (sEng), in maternal circulation of pregnant rats leads to severe preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction [133, 134]. An accumulating body of evidence suggests that human pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia are also associated with changes in levels of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in maternal circulation. These include increases in sFlt-1 and sEng levels and lowering of PIGF (placental growth factor), VEGF, and TGF-β1 [133, 135–137]. These findings have opened the possibility of using circulating levels of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors as early biomarkers of preeclampsia and restoring angiogenic balance with therapeutic agents [138]. Consistent with the highly angiogenic nature of the placenta and its ability to suppress inappropriate angiogenesis in adjacent maternal and fetal tissues, placenta has been implicated as the site of origin of infantile hemangiomas, discussed in the next section and in more detail in Chapter 1 [139].
Vascular Anomalies
Vascular anomalies are classified into two distinct groups: vascular tumors and vascular malformations. Infantile hemangioma, classified as a vascular tumor, is the most common tumor of infancy and develops within weeks after birth, rapidly proliferates during the first year of life via endothelial and pericytic hyperplasia, then slowly involutes over a period of years [140, 141]. Infantile hemangiomas share common immunomarkers and a genome-wide transcriptional similarity with placental ECs [139, 142]. This unique similarity, along with perinatal presentation, limited growth and eventual spontaneous involution has led to the hypothesis that infantile hemangiomas arise from embolized placental ECs that become dislodged into fetal circulation [139, 143]. A correlation has been observed between the incidence of infantile hemangiomas and premature birth, low birth weight, and maternal preeclampsia. Examination of a relationship between the presence of placental vascular abnormalities and the incidence of infantile hemangiomas is a matter of active research.
Vascular malformations on the other hand are present at birth, do not proliferate, but grow proportionately with the infant throughout the life of the individual [144]. They are thought to be inborn embryonic errors in vascular development. Vascular malformations are named according to the vessel type they affect. For example, venous malformations are those associated with veins, and lymphatic malformations are those associated with lymphatic vessels. The incidence of venous malformation is 1 in 10,000 [145]. Venous anomalies are subdivided into venous malformations (VM) and glomuvenous malformations (GVM ). The majority of cases (95 %) fall into the VM category, which include sporadic VM and cutaneomucosal VM (VMCM), while GVM include 5 % of the cases [144]. The etiology of sporadic VMs and syndromes such as Maffucci syndrome and Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome that are associated with VMs is unknown.
Besides histological classifications, vascular malformations can be classified according to hemodynamic features during angiography. For example, lymphatic and VMs are “low-flow” lesions, while arterial or arteriovenous malformations (AVM s) are “high-flow” lesions. AVMs have been postulated to result from the defective separation of uncommitted angioblasts as arteries and veins, i.e., impaired arterial specification/differentiation during blood vessel formation. Lymphatic malformations (LMs ) may be focal or generalized. LMs usually enlarge slowly over time and often displace adjacent organs. The incidence rate of LMs is 1.2–2.8 per 1000 live births [146]. Despite their “benign” nature, vascular malformations present major medical challenges, both diagnostically and in terms of clinical management. Current therapies are limited in efficacy and have significant complications [147].
Genetic Causes of Vascular Malformations
Vascular malformations are usually focal and sporatic, without familial association. However, inheritance of vascular malformations in families has been observed. Sporadic forms often present with a single lesion, while multiple lesions are often observed in inherited forms. The prevailing hypothesis attributes familial forms of some types of vascular malformations to a “double-hit mechanism” where the primary hit is germline heterozygous resulting in incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity, and multifocality of lesions often observed in inherited VMs [144]. A second somatic hit either in the same gene or in a signaling pathway regulated by the primary hit results in full penetrance of the phenotype including multifocal lesions. Lymphatic malformations on the other hand are usually congenital with no evidence for inheritance, suggesting that somatic mutations in a restricted area of the lymphatic network result in lesions.
Significant advances have been made in identifying genetic and molecular determinants of a variety of vascular anomalies. Mutations in TIE2 [145, 148] for multiple cutaneous and mucosal VMs, in GLOMULIN [149] for GVMs, and in VEGFR-3, FOXC-2, NEMO, and SOX-18 for lymphedema or related syndromes have been identified [150]. For a more complete listing, see Chapter 4. The concept of somatic mutations as a possible cause for vascular anomalies although not absolute is definitely gaining strength. We recently identified mutations in two genes, namely, sucrose non-fermenting-related kinase-1 (SNRK-1) and dual-specific phosphatase-5 (DUSP-5) in patients with vascular anomalies [151]. Snrk-1 and Dusp-5 both participate together in controlling early endothelial precursor cell population in zebrafish. We have observed DUSP-5 mutations, but not SNRK-1 mutations, in infantile hemangioma. Because IH is characterized by initial rapid growth and eventual involution, we hypothesize that loss of dusp-5 function may promote vascular precursor cell migration or growth during the tumor’s proliferative phase. This may occur via the removal of dusp-5’s blockade of snrk-1 signaling. Alternatively, DUSP-5 mutations might promote endothelial apoptosis during involution because this has been observed in Dusp-5 loss-of-function differentiated ECs [151]. The coordination of dusp-5 and snrk-1 signaling in regulating angioblast numbers and migration in the zebrafish suggests that somatic mutations in either gene might cause or modulate congenital vascular malformations. We found DUSP-5 mutations in 1 of 3 IH specimens and in 12 of 17 vascular and lymphatic malformations. All DUSP-5 mutations observed in vascular anomaly specimens were not conservative substitutions, but ones that would alter protein structure, charge, and in turn, function. Thus, we conclude that alterations in Dusp-5 may be associated with a variety of vascular abnormalities.
Interestingly, the SNRK-1 mutations observed were found exclusively in venous and lymphatic malformations, suggesting that loss of SNRK-1 expression influences these vascular anomalies. The lymphatic vascular system develops from the venous system [152], and venous and lymphatic malformations are often mixed as was the case in 5 of 8 tissue specimens containing a SNRK-1 mutation. Our data suggests that somatic mutations in SNRK-1 and DUSP-5 may be found in a minority of cells present in affected tissues, although direct evidence will be obtained from sequencing these genes from blood cells of these patients. Based on high expression of SNRK-1 in infantile hemangioma tissue (Paula North & RR data not published), we hypothesize that the mutation is present in ECs or EC precursor population. However, its presence in other supporting cells such as mesenchyme [153] cannot be excluded. To better evaluate the clinical relevance of SNRK-1 and DUSP-5 mutations, future studies will focus on analyzing tissues from more patients with vascular anomalies and correlate our findings with clinical presentations. Nevertheless, our studies suggest that the pathogenesis of vascular malformations may be impacted by aberrant dusp-5 and snrk-1 signaling. Recently, reactive oxygen species have been reported to inhibit the catalytic activity of specific tyrosine phosphatases (Dusp-1) in an angiomyolipoma cell model [154] and treatment using nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (reduced form) oxidase (Nox) inhibitors abolished tumor growth in vivo in a mouse model of hemangioma via blockage of angiopoietin-2 production [155]. Therefore, vascular anomaly therapy based on blocking aberrant kinases and phosphatases is an avenue worth exploring in the clinic.
Summary
The circulatory system is a critical component for a developing embryo. The cells of the circulatory system primarily originate from mesoderm tissue and more specifically from the LPM. Because blood cells and ECs emerge side-by-side from LPM, a common precursor cell, namely, hemangioblast that gives rise to both lineages, has been speculated. Hemangioblasts committed to a vascular lineage are called angioblasts. Angioblasts proliferate at LPM and migrate to midline where they coalesce to form the primary vessels of the embryo via a vasculogenic process. During this process of migration to the midline, angioblasts differentiate into arteries and veins, and the Shh-Notch-VEGF-Notch signaling pathway is responsible for A/V specification. Once the primary vessels are formed, secondary vessels emerge, and those that emerge in the trunk region are called ISVs that are formed via an angiogenic process. The ISVs utilize axon guidance mechanisms and are guided by tip cells that sense local milieu, which directs the following stalk cell. Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis are rarely invoked in the adult, except during reproduction, wound healing, and in pathological conditions. The placenta is the site of most rapid and extensive neovascularization and remodeling observed in the adult. At the molecular level, angiogenic and vasculogenic mechanisms involved in placentation appear to recapitulate those observed during embryonic development. Vascularization of the placenta differs from other organs in its requirement for coordinated elaboration of maternal and fetal circulations that occurs in a matrix of trophoblast cells. Dysregulation of vascular growth control can result in formation of vascular anomalies. Several gene products have been identified to be mutated in vascular anomalies which, despite their “benign” nature, present major medical challenges, both diagnostically and in terms of clinical management. Current therapies are limited in efficacy and have significant complications. Identification of specific mutations in the lesions of individual patients will lead to better prediction of biological behaviors and outcomes and to the development of effective, targeted therapies.
References
Sabin FR. Studies on the origins of blood-vessels and of red blood corpuscles as seen in the living blastoderm of chicks during the second day of development. Contrib Embryol. 1920;36:213–62.
Sabin F. Studies on the origin of blood-vessels and of red blood corpuscles as seen in the living blastoderm of chicks on the second day of incubation. Contrib Embryol. 1920;36:213–61.
Risau W, Sariola H, Zerwes HG, Sasse J, Ekblom P, et al. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in embryonic-stem-cell-derived embryoid bodies. Development. 1988;102:471–8.
Hunter J (1787) Lectures on the principles of surgery. In: Palmer J, editor. The works of John Hunter, Haswell, Barrington and Haswell.
Barker DJ. In utero programming of chronic disease. Clin Sci (Lond). 1998;95:115–28.
Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Living with the past: evolution, development, and patterns of disease. Science. 2004;305:1733–6.
Flamme I, Frolich T, Risau W. Molecular mechanisms of vasculogenesis and embryonic angiogenesis. J Cell Physiol. 1997;173:206–10.
Kessel J, Fabian BC. Graded morphogenetic patterns during the development of the extraembryonic blood system and coelom of the chick blastoderm: a scanning electron microscope and light microscope study. Am J Anat. 1985;173:99–112.
Huber TL, Kouskoff V, Fehling HJ, Palis J, Keller G. Haemangioblast commitment is initiated in the primitive streak of the mouse embryo. Nature. 2004;432:625–30.
Choi K, Kennedy M, Kazarov A, Papadimitriou JC, Keller G. A common precursor for hematopoietic and endothelial cells. Development. 1998;125:725–32.
Eichmann A, Marcelle C, Breant C, Le Douarin NM. Two molecules related to the VEGF receptor are expressed in early endothelial cells during avian embryonic development. Mech Dev. 1993;42:33–48.
Garcia-Martinez V, Schoenwolf GC. Primitive-streak origin of the cardiovascular system in avian embryos. Dev Biol. 1993;159:706–19.
Shalaby F, Ho J, Stanford WL, Fischer KD, Schuh AC, et al. A requirement for Flk1 in primitive and definitive hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis. Cell. 1997;89:981–90.
Sabin FR. Studies on the origin of blood vessels and of red corpuscles as seen in the living blastoderm of the chick during the second day of incubation: contributions to embryology. Contrib Embryol. 1920;9:213–62.
Murray PDF. The development in vitro of the blood of the early chick embryo. Proc R Soc Lond. 1932;111:497–521.
Stainier DY, Weinstein BM, Detrich 3rd HW, Zon LI, Fishman MC. Cloche, an early acting zebrafish gene, is required by both the endothelial and hematopoietic lineages. Development. 1995;121:3141–50.
Parker L, Stainier DY. Cell-autonomous and non-autonomous requirements for the zebrafish gene cloche in hematopoiesis. Development. 1999;126:2643–51.
Vogeli KM, Jin SW, Martin GR, Stainier DY. A common progenitor for haematopoietic and endothelial lineages in the zebrafish gastrula. Nature. 2006;443:337–9.
Kennedy M, D’Souza SL, Lynch-Kattman M, Schwantz S, Keller G. Development of the hemangioblast defines the onset of hematopoiesis in human ES cell differentiation cultures. Blood. 2007;109:2679–87.
Lu S-J, Feng Q, Caballero S, Chen Y, Moore MAS, et al. Generation of functional hemangioblasts from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Meth. 2007;4:501–9.
Fehling HJ, Lacaud G, Kubo A, Kennedy M, Robertson S, et al. Tracking mesoderm induction and its specification to the hemangioblast during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Development. 2003;130:4217–27.
Hidaka M, Stanford WL, Bernstein A. Conditional requirement for the Flk-1 receptor in the in vitro generation of early hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:7370–5.
Schuh AC, Faloon P, Hu QL, Bhimani M, Choi K. In vitro hematopoietic and endothelial potential of flk-1(−/−) embryonic stem cells and embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:2159–64.
Faloon P, Arentson E, Kazarov A, Deng CX, Porcher C, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor positively regulates hematopoietic development. Development. 2000;127:1931–41.
Robertson SM, Kennedy M, Shannon JM, Keller G. A transitional stage in the commitment of mesoderm to hematopoiesis requiring the transcription factor SCL/tal-1. Development. 2000;127:2447–59.
Chung YS, Zhang WJ, Arentson E, Kingsley PD, Palis J, et al. Lineage analysis of the hemangioblast as defined by FLK1 and SCL expression. Development. 2002;129:5511–20.
Lacaud G, Gore L, Kennedy M, Kouskoff V, Kingsley P, et al. Runx1 is essential for hematopoietic commitment at the hemangioblast stage of development in vitro. Blood. 2002;100:458–66.
Lacaud G, Kouskoff V, Trumble A, Schwantz S, Keller G. Haploinsufficiency of Runx1 results in the acceleration of mesodermal development and hemangioblast specification upon in vitro differentiation of ES cells. Blood. 2004;103:886–9.
Lugus JJ, Chung YS, Mills JC, Kim SI, Grass J, et al. GATA2 functions at multiple steps in hemangioblast development and differentiation. Development. 2007;134:393–405.
Wang C, Faloon PW, Tan Z, Lv Y, Zhang P, et al. Mouse lysocardiolipin acyltransferase controls the development of hematopoietic and endothelial lineages during in vitro embryonic stem-cell differentiation. Blood. 2007;110:3601–9.
Zafonte BT, Liu S, Lynch-Kattman M, Torregroza I, Benvenuto L, et al. Smad1 expands the hemangioblast population within a limited developmental window. Blood. 2007;109:516–23.
Gering M, Rodaway AR, Gottgens B, Patient RK, Green AR. The SCL gene specifies haemangioblast development from early mesoderm. EMBO J. 1998;17:4029–45.
Liao W, Ho CY, Yan YL, Postlethwait J, Stainier DY. Hhex and scl function in parallel to regulate early endothelial and blood differentiation in zebrafish. Development. 2000;127:4303–13.
Gering M, Yamada Y, Rabbitts TH, Patient RK. Lmo2 and Scl/Tal1 convert non-axial mesoderm into haemangioblasts which differentiate into endothelial cells in the absence of Gata1. Development. 2003;130:6187–99.
Dooley KA, Davidson AJ, Zon LI. Zebrafish scl functions independently in hematopoietic and endothelial development. Dev Biol. 2005;277:522–36.
Sumanas S, Lin S. Ets1-related protein is a key regulator of vasculogenesis in zebrafish. PLoS Biol. 2006;4, e10.
Patterson LJ, Gering M, Patient R. Scl is required for dorsal aorta as well as blood formation in zebrafish embryos. Blood. 2005;105:3502–11.
Liu F, Walmsley M, Rodaway A, Patient R. Fli1 acts at the top of the transcriptional network driving blood and endothelial development. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1234–40.
Poole TJ, Coffin JD. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis: two distinct morphogenetic mechanisms establish embryonic vascular pattern. J Exp Zool. 1989;251:224–31.
Cleaver O, Krieg PA. VEGF mediates angioblast migration during development of the dorsal aorta in Xenopus. Development. 1998;125:3905–14.
Drake CJ, Fleming PA. Vasculogenesis in the day 6.5 to 9.5 mouse embryo. Blood. 2000;95:1671–9.
Ferguson 3rd JE, Kelley RW, Patterson C. Mechanisms of endothelial differentiation in embryonic vasculogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:2246–54.
Risau W, Flamme I. Vasculogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1995;11:73–91.
Chun CZ, Remadevi I, Schupp MO, Samant GV, Pramanik K, et al. Fli+ etsrp+ hemato-vascular progenitor cells proliferate at the lateral plate mesoderm during vasculogenesis in zebrafish. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14732.
Jin SW, Beis D, Mitchell T, Chen JN, Stainier DY. Cellular and molecular analyses of vascular tube and lumen formation in zebrafish. Development. 2005;132:5199–209.
Parker LH, Schmidt M, Jin SW, Gray AM, Beis D, et al. The endothelial-cell-derived secreted factor Egfl7 regulates vascular tube formation. Nature. 2004;428:754–8.
Kamei M, Brian Saunders W, Bayless KJ, Dye L, Davis GE, et al. Endothelial tubes assemble from intracellular vacuoles in vivo. Nature. 2006;442:453–6.
Girard H. Arterial pressure in the chick embryo. Am J Physiol. 1973;224:454–60.
Gonzalez-Crussi F. Vasculogenesis in the chick embryo. An ultrastructural study. Am J Anat. 1971;130:441–60.
Wang HU, Chen ZF, Anderson DJ. Molecular distinction and angiogenic interaction between embryonic arteries and veins revealed by ephrin-B2 and its receptor Eph-B4. Cell. 1998;93:741–53.
Hirashima M, Suda T. Differentiation of arterial and venous endothelial cells and vascular morphogenesis. Endothelium. 2006;13:137–45.
Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. Arteries and veins: making a difference with zebrafish. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:674–82.
Lawson ND, Vogel AM, Weinstein BM. Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor act upstream of the Notch pathway during arterial endothelial differentiation. Dev Cell. 2002;3:127–36.
Visconti RP, Richardson CD, Sato TN. Orchestration of angiogenesis and arteriovenous contribution by angiopoietins and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8219–24.
Mukouyama YS, Shin D, Britsch S, Taniguchi M, Anderson DJ. Sensory nerves determine the pattern of arterial differentiation and blood vessel branching in the skin. Cell. 2002;109:693–705.
Lawson ND, Scheer N, Pham VN, Kim CH, Chitnis AB, et al. Notch signaling is required for arterial-venous differentiation during embryonic vascular development. Development. 2001;128:3675–83.
Iso T, Kedes L, Hamamori Y. HES and HERP families: multiple effectors of the Notch signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2003;194:237–55.
Zhong TP, Rosenberg M, Mohideen MA, Weinstein B, Fishman MC. gridlock, an HLH gene required for assembly of the aorta in zebrafish. Science. 2000;287:1820–4.
Weinstein BM, Stemple DL, Driever W, Fishman MC. Gridlock, a localized heritable vascular patterning defect in the zebrafish. Nat Med. 1995;1:1143–7.
Zhong TP. Zebrafish genetics and formation of embryonic vasculature. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2005;71:53–81.
Zhong TP, Childs S, Leu JP, Fishman MC. Gridlock signalling pathway fashions the first embryonic artery. Nature. 2001;414:216–20.
Hayashi H, Kume T. Foxc transcription factors directly regulate Dll4 and Hey2 expression by interacting with the VEGF-Notch signaling pathways in endothelial cells. PLoS One. 2008;3, e2401.
Hong CC, Peterson QP, Hong JY, Peterson RT. Artery/vein specification is governed by opposing phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase and MAP kinase/ERK signaling. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1366–72.
You LR, Lin FJ, Lee CT, DeMayo FJ, Tsai MJ, et al. Suppression of Notch signalling by the COUP-TFII transcription factor regulates vein identity. Nature. 2005;435:98–104.
Yaniv K, Isogai S, Castranova D, Dye L, Hitomi J, et al. Imaging the developing lymphatic system using the zebrafish. Novartis Found Symp. 2007;283:139–48. discussion 148–151, 238–141.
Srinivasan RS, Dillard ME, Lagutin OV, Lin FJ, Tsai S, et al. Lineage tracing demonstrates the venous origin of the mammalian lymphatic vasculature. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2422–32.
Wigle JT, Oliver G. Prox1 function is required for the development of the murine lymphatic system. Cell. 1999;98:769–78.
Wigle JT, Harvey N, Detmar M, Lagutina I, Grosveld G, et al. An essential role for Prox1 in the induction of the lymphatic endothelial cell phenotype. EMBO J. 2002;21:1505–13.
Johnson NC, Dillard ME, Baluk P, McDonald DM, Harvey NL, et al. Lymphatic endothelial cell identity is reversible and its maintenance requires Prox1 activity. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3282–91.
Francois M, Caprini A, Hosking B, Orsenigo F, Wilhelm D, et al. Sox18 induces development of the lymphatic vasculature in mice. Nature. 2008;456:643–7.
Shawber CJ, Kitajewski J. Arterial regulators taken up by lymphatics. Lymphat Res Biol. 2008;6:139–43.
Shawber CJ, Funahashi Y, Francisco E, Vorontchikhina M, Kitamura Y, et al. Notch alters VEGF responsiveness in human and murine endothelial cells by direct regulation of VEGFR-3 expression. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:3369–82.
Seo S, Fujita H, Nakano A, Kang M, Duarte A, et al. The forkhead transcription factors, Foxc1 and Foxc2, are required for arterial specification and lymphatic sprouting during vascular development. Dev Biol. 2006;294:458–70.
Petrova TV, Karpanen T, Norrmen C, Mellor R, Tamakoshi T, et al. Defective valves and abnormal mural cell recruitment underlie lymphatic vascular failure in lymphedema distichiasis. Nat Med. 2004;10:974–81.
Makinen T, Adams RH, Bailey J, Lu Q, Ziemiecki A, et al. PDZ interaction site in ephrinB2 is required for the remodeling of lymphatic vasculature. Genes Dev. 2005;19:397–410.
Ellertsdottir E, Lenard A, Blum Y, Krudewig A, Herwig L, et al. Vascular morphogenesis in the zebrafish embryo. Dev Biol. 2010;341:56–65.
Blum Y, Belting HG, Ellertsdottir E, Herwig L, Luders F, et al. Complex cell rearrangements during intersegmental vessel sprouting and vessel fusion in the zebrafish embryo. Dev Biol. 2008;316:312–22.
Isogai S, Lawson ND, Torrealday S, Horiguchi M, Weinstein BM. Angiogenic network formation in the developing vertebrate trunk. Development. 2003;130:5281–90.
Fantin A, Vieira JM, Gestri G, Denti L, Schwarz Q, et al. Tissue macrophages act as cellular chaperones for vascular anastomosis downstream of VEGF-mediated endothelial tip cell induction. Blood. 2011;116:829–40.
Rymo SF, Gerhardt H, Wolfhagen Sand F, Lang R, Uv A, et al. A two-way communication between microglial cells and angiogenic sprouts regulates angiogenesis in aortic ring cultures. PLoS One. 2011;6, e15846.
Childs S, Chen JN, Garrity DM, Fishman MC. Patterning of angiogenesis in the zebrafish embryo. Development. 2002;129:973–82.
Carmeliet P, Tessier-Lavigne M. Common mechanisms of nerve and blood vessel wiring. Nature. 2005;436:193–200.
Gerhardt H, Golding M, Fruttiger M, Ruhrberg C, Lundkvist A, et al. VEGF guides angiogenic sprouting utilizing endothelial tip cell filopodia. J Cell Biol. 2003;161:1163–77.
Hellstrom M, Phng LK, Hofmann JJ, Wallgard E, Coultas L, et al. Dll4 signalling through Notch1 regulates formation of tip cells during angiogenesis. Nature. 2007;445:776–80.
Phng LK, Potente M, Leslie JD, Babbage J, Nyqvist D, et al. Nrarp coordinates endothelial Notch and Wnt signaling to control vessel density in angiogenesis. Dev Cell. 2009;16:70–82.
Jakobsson L, Franco CA, Bentley K, Collins RT, Ponsioen B, et al. Endothelial cells dynamically compete for the tip cell position during angiogenic sprouting. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:943–53.
Welsh AO, Enders AC. Chorioallantoic placenta formation in the rat: I. Luminal epithelial cell death and extracellular matrix modifications in the mesometrial region of implantation chambers. Am J Anat. 1991;192:215–31.
Welsh AO, Enders AC. Chorioallantoic placenta formation in the rat: II. Angiogenesis and maternal blood circulation in the mesometrial region of the implantation chamber prior to placenta formation. Am J Anat. 1991;192:347–65.
Kaloglu C, Gursoy E, Onarlioglu B. Early maternal changes contributing to the formation of the chorioallantoic and yolk sac placentas in rat: a morphological study. Anat Histol Embryol. 2003;32:200–6.
Osol G, Mandala M. Maternal uterine vascular remodeling during pregnancy. Physiology (Bethesda). 2009;24:58–71.
Brosens I, Robertson WB, Dixon HG. The physiological response of the vessels of the placental bed to normal pregnancy. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1967;93:569–79.
Lim HJ, Wang H. Uterine disorders and pregnancy complications: insights from mouse models. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:1004–15.
Ramathal CY, Bagchi IC, Taylor RN, Bagchi MK. Endometrial decidualization: of mice and men. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:17–26.
Matsumoto H, Ma WG, Daikoku T, Zhao X, Paria BC, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 differentially directs uterine angiogenesis during implantation in mice. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:29260–7.
Douglas NC, Tang H, Gomez R, Pytowski B, Hicklin DJ, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) functions to promote uterine decidual angiogenesis during early pregnancy in the mouse. Endocrinology. 2009;150:3845–54.
Ma GT, Roth ME, Groskopf JC, Tsai FY, Orkin SH, et al. GATA-2 and GATA-3 regulate trophoblast-specific gene expression in vivo. Development. 1997;124:907–14.
Zhang J, Chen Z, Smith GN, Croy BA. Natural killer cell-triggered vascular transformation: maternal care before birth? Cell Mol Immunol. 2011;8:1–11.
Tanaka M, Gertsenstein M, Rossant J, Nagy A. Mash2 acts cell autonomously in mouse spongiotrophoblast development. Dev Biol. 1997;190:55–65.
Rossant J, Cross JC. Placental development: lessons from mouse mutants. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:538–48.
Watson ED, Cross JC. Development of structures and transport functions in the mouse placenta. Physiology (Bethesda). 2005;20:180–93.
Tanaka S, Kunath T, Hadjantonakis AK, Nagy A, Rossant J. Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF4. Science. 1998;282:2072–5.
Anson-Cartwright L, Dawson K, Holmyard D, Fisher SJ, Lazzarini RA, et al. The glial cells missing-1 protein is essential for branching morphogenesis in the chorioallantoic placenta. Nat Genet. 2000;25:311–4.
Simmons DG, Natale DR, Begay V, Hughes M, Leutz A, et al. Early patterning of the chorion leads to the trilaminar trophoblast cell structure in the placental labyrinth. Development. 2008;135:2083–91.
Simmons DG, Fortier AL, Cross JC. Diverse subtypes and developmental origins of trophoblast giant cells in the mouse placenta. Dev Biol. 2007;304:567–78.
Georgiades P, Ferguson-Smith AC, Burton GJ. Comparative developmental anatomy of the murine and human definitive placentae. Placenta. 2002;23:3–19.
Hu D, Cross JC. Development and function of trophoblast giant cells in the rodent placenta. Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54:341–54.
Brosens IA, Robertson WB, Dixon HG. The role of the spiral arteries in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. J Pathol. 1970;101:Pvi.
Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R. The “Great Obstetrical Syndromes” are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;204:193–201.
Zhou Y, Damsky CH, Fisher SJ. Preeclampsia is associated with failure of human cytotrophoblasts to mimic a vascular adhesion phenotype. One cause of defective endovascular invasion in this syndrome? J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2152–64.
Zhou Y, Fisher SJ, Janatpour M, Genbacev O, Dejana E, et al. Human cytotrophoblasts adopt a vascular phenotype as they differentiate. A strategy for successful endovascular invasion? J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2139–51.
Aharon A, Brenner B, Katz T, Miyagi Y, Lanir N. Tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor levels in trophoblast cells: implications for placental hemostasis. Thromb Haemost. 2004;92:776–86.
Lanir N, Aharon A, Brenner B. Procoagulant and anticoagulant mechanisms in human placenta. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29:175–84.
Sood R, Kalloway S, Mast AE, Hillard CJ, Weiler H. Fetomaternal cross talk in the placental vascular bed: control of coagulation by trophoblast cells. Blood. 2006;107:3173–80.
Cross JC, Hemberger M, Lu Y, Nozaki T, Whiteley K, et al. Trophoblast functions, angiogenesis and remodeling of the maternal vasculature in the placenta. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002;187:207–12.
Screen M, Dean W, Cross JC, Hemberger M. Cathepsin proteases have distinct roles in trophoblast function and vascular remodelling. Development. 2008;135:3311–20.
Jackson D, Volpert OV, Bouck N, Linzer DI. Stimulation and inhibition of angiogenesis by placental proliferin and proliferin-related protein. Science. 1994;266:1581–4.
He Y, Smith SK, Day KA, Clark DE, Licence DR, et al. Alternative splicing of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-R1 (FLT-1) pre-mRNA is important for the regulation of VEGF activity. Mol Endocrinol. 1999;13:537–45.
Clark DE, Smith SK, He Y, Day KA, Licence DR, et al. A vascular endothelial growth factor antagonist is produced by the human placenta and released into the maternal circulation. Biol Reprod. 1998;59:1540–8.
Basyuk E, Cross JC, Corbin J, Nakayama H, Hunter P, et al. Murine Gcm1 gene is expressed in a subset of placental trophoblast cells. Dev Dyn. 1999;214:303–11.
Demir R, Kayisli UA, Seval Y, Celik-Ozenci C, Korgun ET, et al. Sequential expression of VEGF and its receptors in human placental villi during very early pregnancy: differences between placental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Placenta. 2004;25:560–72.
Coultas L, Chawengsaksophak K, Rossant J. Endothelial cells and VEGF in vascular development. Nature. 2005;438:937–45.
Ciruna BG, Schwartz L, Harpal K, Yamaguchi TP, Rossant J. Chimeric analysis of fibroblast growth factor receptor-1 (Fgfr1) function: a role for FGFR1 in morphogenetic movement through the primitive streak. Development. 1997;124:2829–41.
Dumont DJ, Fong GH, Puri MC, Gradwohl G, Alitalo K, et al. Vascularization of the mouse embryo: a study of flk-1, tek, tie, and vascular endothelial growth factor expression during development. Dev Dyn. 1995;203:80–92.
Yamaguchi TP, Harpal K, Henkemeyer M, Rossant J. fgfr-1 is required for embryonic growth and mesodermal patterning during mouse gastrulation. Genes Dev. 1994;8:3032–44.
Hirashima M, Lu Y, Byers L, Rossant J. Trophoblast expression of fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 is not required for the establishment of the maternal-fetal interface in the mouse placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:15637–42.
Ema M, Takahashi S, Rossant J. Deletion of the selection cassette, but not cis-acting elements, in targeted Flk1-lacZ allele reveals Flk1 expression in multipotent mesodermal progenitors. Blood. 2006;107:111–7.
Sakurai Y, Ohgimoto K, Kataoka Y, Yoshida N, Shibuya M. Essential role of Flk-1 (VEGF receptor 2) tyrosine residue 1173 in vasculogenesis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:1076–81.
Deng CX, Wynshaw-Boris A, Shen MM, Daugherty C, Ornitz DM, et al. Murine FGFR-1 is required for early postimplantation growth and axial organization. Genes Dev. 1994;8:3045–57.
Carmeliet P, Moons L, Luttun A, Vincenti V, Compernolle V, et al. Synergism between vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor contributes to angiogenesis and plasma extravasation in pathological conditions. Nat Med. 2001;7:575–83.
Autiero M, Waltenberger J, Communi D, Kranz A, Moons L, et al. Role of PlGF in the intra- and intermolecular cross talk between the VEGF receptors Flt1 and Flk1. Nat Med. 2003;9:936–43.
Carlstrom M, Wentzel P, Skott O, Persson AE, Eriksson UJ. Angiogenesis inhibition causes hypertension and placental dysfunction in a rat model of preeclampsia. J Hypertens. 2009;27:829–37.
Rutland CS, Mukhopadhyay M, Underwood S, Clyde N, Mayhew TM, et al. Induction of intrauterine growth restriction by reducing placental vascular growth with the angioinhibin TNP-470. Biol Reprod. 2005;73:1164–73.
Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, Lim KH, Li J, et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:649–58.
Venkatesha S, Toporsian M, Lam C, Hanai J, Mammoto T, et al. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat Med. 2006;12:642–9.
Purwosunu Y, Sekizawa A, Yoshimura S, Farina A, Wibowo N, et al. Expression of angiogenesis-related genes in the cellular component of the blood of preeclamptic women. Reprod Sci. 2009;16:857–64.
Vaisbuch E, Whitty JE, Hassan SS, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, et al. Circulating angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors in women with eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:152.e1–9.
Wang A, Rana S, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia: the role of angiogenic factors in its pathogenesis. Physiology (Bethesda). 2009;24:147–58.
Reynolds LP, Borowicz PP, Caton JS, Vonnahme KA, Luther JS, et al. Uteroplacental vascular development and placental function: an update. Int J Dev Biol. 2010;54:355–66.
North PE, Waner M, Mizeracki A, Mrak RE, Nicholas R, et al. A unique microvascular phenotype shared by juvenile hemangiomas and human placenta. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:559–70.
North PE, Waner M, Buckmiller L, James CA, Mihm Jr MC. Vascular tumors of infancy and childhood: beyond capillary hemangioma. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2006;15:303–17.
Frieden IJ, Haggstrom AN, Drolet BA, Mancini AJ, Friedlander SF, et al. Infantile hemangiomas: current knowledge, future directions. Proceedings of a research workshop on infantile hemangiomas, April 7–9, 2005, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22:383–406.
Barnes CM, Huang S, Kaipainen A, Sanoudou D, Chen EJ, et al. Evidence by molecular profiling for a placental origin of infantile hemangioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:19097–102.
North PE, Waner M, Brodsky MC. Are infantile hemangioma of placental origin? Ophthalmology. 2002;109:223–4.
Brouillard P, Vikkula M. Genetic causes of vascular malformations. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16 Spec No. 2:R140–9.
Boon LM, Mulliken JB, Vikkula M, Watkins H, Seidman J, et al. Assignment of a locus for dominantly inherited venous malformations to chromosome 9p. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3:1583–7.
Filston HC. Hemangiomas, cystic hygromas, and teratomas of the head and neck. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1994;3:147–59.
Werner JA, Dunne AA, Folz BJ, Rochels R, Bien S, et al. Current concepts in the classification, diagnosis and treatment of hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;258:141–9.
Boon LM, Brouillard P, Irrthum A, Karttunen L, Warman ML, et al. A gene for inherited cutaneous venous anomalies (“glomangiomas”) localizes to chromosome 1p21-22. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:125–33.
Brouillard P, Boon LM, Mulliken JB, Enjolras O, Ghassibe M, et al. Mutations in a novel factor, glomulin, are responsible for glomuvenous malformations (“glomangiomas”). Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:866–74.
Wang QK. Update on the molecular genetics of vascular anomalies. Lymphat Res Biol. 2005;3:226–33.
Pramanik K, Chun CZ, Garnaas MK, Samant GV, Li K, et al. Dusp-5 and Snrk-1 coordinately function during vascular development and disease. Blood. 2009;113:1184–91.
van der Putte SC. The early development of the lymphatic system in mouse embryos. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand. 1975;13:245–86.
Fong GH, Zhang L, Bryce DM, Peng J. Increased hemangioblast commitment, not vascular disorganization, is the primary defect in flt-1 knock-out mice. Development. 1999;126:3015–25.
Boivin B, Zhang S, Arbiser JL, Zhang ZY, Tonks NK. A modified cysteinyl-labeling assay reveals reversible oxidation of protein tyrosine phosphatases in angiomyolipoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:9959–64.
Perry BN, Govindarajan B, Bhandarkar SS, Knaus UG, Valo M, et al. Pharmacologic blockade of angiopoietin-2 is efficacious against model hemangiomas in mice. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126:2316–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chun, C.Z., Sood, R., Ramchandran, R. (2016). Vasculogenesis and Angiogenesis. In: North, P., Sander, T. (eds) Vascular Tumors and Developmental Malformations. Molecular and Translational Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3240-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3240-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3239-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3240-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)