Abstract
Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) is a multipurpose robust grain legume crop with high nutritional value and a great potential for utilization in harsh environments. This robust crop is rightly considered as a model for sustainable agriculture. However, as a result of little breeding efforts when compared to other legume crops, grass pea potential has been underexploited. The growing interest in its use in Mediterranean-type environments, all over the world, is boosting a change. In this chapter, we review the presently available genetic resources, major breeding achievements and recent biotechnological approaches used in the improvement of grass pea, highlighting the necessary changes in grass pea research to provide a brighter future to this highly potential crop.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) is a multipurpose robust grain legume crop. It can grow in both drought- and flooding-prone environments and poor soils due to its hardy and penetrating root systems (Campbell 1997; Vaz Patto et al. 2006b). It has a high nutritional value (protein content ranging from 25 to 30 %) , being important both for human food and animal feed. In what concerns human consumption, it can be consumed uncooked as a green snack, cooked in a stew, milled into flour or by roasting the seed (Peña-Chocarro and Peña 1999). In addition to its uses as food and feed, symbiosis with rhizobia allows an efficient nitrogen fixation in the soil, lowering the inputs needed in crop rotation and making them suitable to be used as green manure in sustainable farming systems (Hanbury et al. 2000). As an example of its versatility, grass pea is easily introduced in intercropping systems, rotations or used along with paddy rice in relay cropping systems (Abd El Moneim et al. 2001; Campbell et al. 1994; Hillocks and Maruthi 2012).
There is great potential for the expansion in the utilization of grass pea in dry areas or zones which are becoming more drought prone, with increased salinity or increased tendency to suffer from biotic stresses . However, the crop is unpopular with governments and donors because the plant contains small amounts of a toxin, β-N-ozalyl-l-α, β-diaminopropanoic acid (ODAP). Although this toxin can cause a neuronal disorder, known as “lathyrism”, the condition develops in humans with a 6 % chance only when grass pea is consumed in large quantities, unaccompanied by other foodstuffs in an unbalanced diet and during a long period of time (Lambein et al. 2009). Also, seeds can be partly detoxified by various processing methods (Kumar et al. 2011; Kuo et al. 2000).
Even though this robust crop is rightly considered as a model crop for sustainable agriculture and despite the lathyrism stigma, the development of new breeding technologies and the growing interest in its use in Mediterranean-type environments, all over the world, will provide a bright future to this crop (Vaz Patto et al. 2006b; Vaz Patto and Rubiales 2014).
2 Origin and Systematics
Grass pea belongs to genus Lathyrus, within the Fabaceae family (syn. Leguminosae), subfamily Faboideae (syn. Papilionoideae), tribe Fabeae (syn. Vicieae), along with genera Pisum, Vicia, Lens and Vavilovia (Kenicer et al. 2005; Schaefer et al. 2012; Smýkal et al. 2011; Wojciechowski et al. 2004).
Natural distribution of grass pea has been completely obscured by human cultivation. Its use for food, feed and forage makes it difficult to distinguish between wild and domesticated populations, toughening the task to precisely locate its centre of origin (Kumar et al. 2013). The most probable grass pea centre of origin is believed to have been in the eastern Mediterranean or Fertile Crescent, around 6000 before present (BP). This has been supported by archaeobotanical and recent phylogenetic reports (Kislev 1989; Schaefer et al. 2012), refuting the hypothesis by Smartt (1984) that the centre of origin was located in Southwest or Central Asia. Domestication of grass pea seems to have occurred alongside with other pulses , being normally found with early domesticates of pea (Pisum sativum L.) , lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.) and bitter vetch (Vicia ervilia (L.) Willd.; Erskine et al. 1994).
Hopf (1986) hypothesized that L. sativus is a derivative from Lathyrus cicera, its genetically nearest wild species. In addition, in what concerns domestication in Southern Europe (France and Iberian peninsula), evidences of cultivation of L. cicera were found, dating from 4000 or 3000 BP, suggesting that expansion of L. sativus farming may have also led to the domestication of the local L. cicera (Campbell 1997).
Within the economically important legume crops and model species, P. sativum is reported as the closest relation to grass pea, followed by lentil, faba bean (Vicia faba L.) , barrel medic (Medicago truncatula Gaertn.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and Lotus corniculatus L. (Asmussen and Liston 1998; Ellison et al. 2006; Wojciechowski et al. 2004).
The infrageneric classification of Lathyrus genus has been revised several times, the one reported by Kupicha (1983) being the most accepted one. In this treatment, the genus is organized in 13 clades (Orobus, Lathyrostylis, Lathyrus, Orobon, Pratensis, Aphaca, Clymenum, Orobastrum, Viciopsis, Linearicarpus, Nissolia, Neurolobus and Notolathyrus). This morphological-based classification has been recently supported by molecular phylogenetic studies using sequence data from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and from cpDNA (Kenicer et al. 2005, 2009). Schaefer et al. (2012), using nuclear and chloroplast phylogenetic data, further suggested that the genus Lathyrus is not monophyletic and recommended that a more natural classification would be to transfer Pisum and Vavilovia to a then monophyletic Lathyrus genus.
3 Varietal Groups
Great morphological variation is reported in grass pea, especially in vegetative characters such as leaf length, while, for instance, its floral characters are much less variable, showing a clear grouping in flower colour (Fig. 8.1; Jackson and Yunus 1984), as well as its seed and yield traits (Hanbury et al. 1999). Several studies divided grass pea accessions broadly into two groups: those from the Indian subcontinent and those from the Mediterranean region. Jackson and Yunus (1984) reported that all blue-flowered accessions came from Southwest and South Asia, while the white and mixed-coloured accessions had a more western distribution, from the Canary Isles to the western republics of the Soviet Union. These authors also pointed out that white-flowered accessions only had white seeds with no secondary markings on the seed coat. In accordance with this, Hanbury et al. (1999) reported that Mediterranean accessions were characterized by larger and whiter seeds, selected for human consumption, with higher yield potential than the Indian accessions. Grass pea small-seeded accessions are considered more primitive types and normally associated with hardened seeds like what happens in other Old World grain legumes such as pea, chickpea or lentil (Chowdhury and Slinkard 2000).
A particular case is the germplasm selected for forage, in the Mediterranean region, with landraces with broad leaves and pods, but low seed yield (Chowdhury and Slinkard 2000; Kumar et al. 2013).
4 Genetic Resources and Utilization
Conservation of Lathyrus genetic resources has recently attracted more attention because of the potential role of this species under the climate change scenario (Kumar et al. 2013).
Grass pea is mentioned in two conservation programmes for major food legumes. One is the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA; FAO 2009), which aims at guaranteeing food security through conservation of biodiversity , fair exchange and sustainable use of plant genetic resources. This is being accomplished by establishing a global system to provide farmers, plant breeders and scientists access to plant genetic materials, ensuring that recipients share benefits with the countries where they have been originated and by recognizing the contribution of farmers to the diversity of crops used as food.
The other, a more specific programme developed by the Global Crop Diversity Trust (CGDT) in collaboration with the International Center for Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), aims for a long-term conservation strategy of L. sativus, L. cicera and L. ochrus (GCDT 2009). This programme is detailing the current status of national collections and identifying gaps in collections of these three species from areas of diversity. Their strategy recommends that documentation on collections should be upgraded and that more work should be carried out on characterizing and evaluating collections for key traits, making this data widely available (Gurung and Pang 2011) .
Several ex situ and a few in situ conservation examples exist for grass pea germplasm . The largest Lathyrus ex situ collections are maintained at the Conservatoire Botanique National des Pyrénées et de Midi-Pyrénées in France (4.477 accessions; previously at Pau University), by the ICARDA comprising 3.239 accessions and by the National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR) in India (2.619 accessions). Smaller, but still relevant, collections are maintained by other banks such as the Germplasm Resource Information Network (GRIN) from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) in the USA, the Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) in Germany and the Centro de Recursos Fitogenéticos (CRF) from the Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) in Spain. Backups from 2.134 grass pea accessions, from 44 countries, are deposited at the Svalbard Global Seed Vault (http://www.nordgen.org/sgsv/, accessed June 2014). In what concerns in situ conservation, five genetic reserves for Lathyrus diversity conservation have been proposed in Syria and Turkey (Heywood et al. 2007). These authors also stressed the importance of increasing public awareness for the significance of crop wild relatives in agricultural development and the need for their simultaneous conservation.
This conserved germplasm represents a valuable reservoir of diversity, providing access to sources of a wide range of interesting agromorphological traits such as earliness, plant architectural traits, disease and pest tolerance, as well as low ODAP content. Characterization of this diversity through phenotyping and genotyping studies will unveil novel alleles that can be used to improve this crop. Diversity characterization in Lathyrus germplasm has focused, for example, on ODAP content (Fikre et al. 2008; Grela et al. 2012; Kumar et al. 2011), phenology and yield (Grela et al 2012; Mera 2010), parasitic weed resistance (Fernández-Aparicio et al. 2012), disease resistance (Gurung et al. 2002; Vaz Patto et al. 2006a; Vaz Patto and Rubiales 2009) or quality traits (Granati et al. 2003). Some of these characterization studies have represented the first step of selection programmes .
5 Major Breeding Achievements
Conventional grass pea-breeding programmes have been established in several countries, including Australia (Hanbury et al. 1995), Bangladesh (Malek 1998), Canada (Campbell and Briggs 1987), China (Yang and Zhang 2005), Chile (Mera et al. 2003), Ethiopia (Tadesse and Bekele 2003), India (Lal et al. 1986; Pandey et al. 1996), Nepal (Yadav 1996) and Syria (Abd El-Moneim et al. 2000). Some of these breeding programmes are still active, but most are small in comparison to other legume crops (Vaz Patto et al. 2011).
Due to the occurrence of lathyrism in humans, major breeding programmes are essentially aimed for low ODAP content, besides productivity and adaptability. This has resulted at present in several L. sativus or L. cicera breeding lines or released varieties with reduced ODAP content (from 0.5 to 1.5 %, down to 0.01 % or less; Kumar et al. 2011). For instance, low ODAP cultivars have been released in several countries, such as ‘Wasie’ in Ethiopia, ‘Ali-Bar’ in Kazakhstan and ‘Gurbuz 1’ in Turkey (ICARDA 2006, 2007). Similarly, low ODAP, high-yielding cultivars have been released in India such as ‘Pusa 24’, ‘Prateek’, ‘Ratan’ and ‘Mahateora’ (ICAR 2009). In Bangladesh, examples of the low ODAP and high-yielding varieties are ‘BARI Khesari 1’, ‘BARI Khesari 2’ and ‘BARI Khesari 3’ (Malek 1998) or the ‘BINA Khesari 1’ (Kumar et al. 2011). In Canada, high yield and low ODAP (0.03 %) ‘LS8246’ was released for feed and fodder (Campbell and Briggs 1987), and in addition, a high N-fixation variety, ‘AC Greenfix’ was released specially as green manure (Krause and Krause 2003). In Chile, ‘Luanco-INIA’, a large-seeded, high-yielding grass pea variety was released, used locally as feed and for export, especially for some European markets where larger seed size is desirable for human consumption (Mera et al. 2003). Finally, in Australia, the variety ‘Ceora’ was bred to be used as forage, hay or as a green manure crop (Siddique et al. 2006). Also in Australia, a L. cicera cultivar, ‘Chalus’, was selected for high yields and low ODAP levels (Hanbury and Siddique 2000).
6 Specific Goals in Current Breeding
Low ODAP content is still one important goal of many of the current grass pea- breeding programmes. Nevertheless, other traits have always been associated with this.
Increased yield has been a selection criterion for most crop improvement programmes. However, some of the yield components that affect yield such as double podding or increased seeds per pod have received insufficient attention. Also the biomass yield of L. sativus has started to receive more attention during the past few years (Campbell 1997; Abd El Moneim et al. 2001; Vaz Patto et al. 2006b). This is a very important area due to the large potential of this crop for forage and straw in the North African and South Asian regions (Campbell 1997). Additionally, undesirable traits such as prostrate plant habit, indeterminate growth, late maturity and pod shattering (Rybinski 2003) are being handled by several breeding programmes.
The concentrated effort on reducing ODAP content resulted in many other areas of evaluation and crop improvement, such as resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, being neglected. However, with the release of these low ODAP lines, the development of varieties with increased resistance to prevalent pests and diseases has gained new strength. This crop is usually grown by poor farmers and under poor management, where it is difficult to adopt chemical control for diseases and pests. Therefore, the development of varieties having resistance to prevalent biotic stresses is essential, and more efforts are required in this area of improvement of this very hardy pulse crop (Vaz Patto et al. 2006b).
7 Breeding Methods and Specific Techniques
Collection and evaluation of germplasm, local or introduced, is the cornerstone in any breeding programme. Subsequent hybridization and selection of the resulting progeny using different strategies will allow incorporating interesting traits into a more adapted background. This may include backcrossing, recurrent selection, single-seed descent and pedigree/bulk breeding methods. All of these methods can be applied on grass pea improvement.
Grass pea is predominantly a self-pollinated crop, although outcrossing up to 30 % has been reported (Ben Brahim et al. 2001; Chowdhury and Slinkard 1997; Rahman et al. 1995). Large size of flower, bright colour of petals, flower density and nectar production are reported to influence the outcrossing in Lathyrus species (Kiyoshi et al. 1985). Entomophilic pollination in grass pea is due especially to bees and bumblebees (Kumar et al. 2011). Due to this observed outcrossing level, in most grass pea -breeding programmes, crosses are done under controlled conditions, in greenhouse or under insect-proof coverings (Vaz Patto et al. 2011).
Conventional grass pea breeding focussed essentially on hybridization of selected accessions, with the screening and evaluation of the resulting progeny. In the particular case of breeding to reduce ODAP content, low ODAP accessions are crossed with high-yield material with good agronomic potential (Campbell 1997).
Intergeneric hybridization, although difficult, is possible with L. amphicarpos and L. cicera (Yunus and Jackson 1991). Crosses have also been made with other species such as L. chrysanthus, L. gorgoni, L. marmoratus and L. pseudocicera (Heywood et al. 2007), but only ovules were produced.
Also with the objective of reducing ODAP content, grass pea has been subjected to induced mutagenesis by physical and/or chemical mutagens. Other traits have been affected by mutagenesis such as plant habit, maturity, branching, stem shape, leaf size, stipule shape, flower colour and structure, pod size, seed size and colour and NaCl tolerance (Biswas 2007; Nerkar 1972, 1976; Rybinski 2003; Talukdar 2009a, b, 2011). In vitro culture was also employed, inducing somaclonal variation (Ochatt et al. 2002a; Roy et al. 1993; Zambre et al. 2002). Induced mutagenesis and somaclonal variation created new diversity, allowing the selection of lines with interesting traits.
Ochatt et al. (2002b) developed an in vitro system coupled with in vitro stages in order to shorten regeneration cycles, obtaining up to almost four cycles per year. However, this approach is only applicable when few seeds/plant are intended, as in single-seed descendant breeding schemes.
The advent of various molecular-marker techniques and the ability to transfer genes across different organisms, using transgene technology, have begun to have an impact on plant genome research and breeding. These techniques offer new approaches for improving important agronomic traits in Lathyrus species and breaking down transfer barriers to related legume species (Vaz Patto et al. 2006b). This would allow exploring the variability existing in other Lathyrus genepools and hopefully transfer the interesting grass pea traits to related legume species.
Genetic transformation of grass pea was attempted with only one successful report obtaining stable transformed plants (Barik et al. 2005). Given that regeneration protocols for grass pea are often genotype specific, it may be necessary either to develop more generally applicable protocols or to adapt the protocol after transformation (Ochatt et al. 2013).
8 Integration of New Biotechnologies in Breeding Programmes
In order to be able to perform marker-assisted selection (MAS) , it is necessary to identify molecular markers that are closely linked to the trait of interest. Once a trait is associated with a marker (or more), plants can be selected early on its growth stage, allowing a faster and more efficient breeding process.
Until now, only two linkage maps using molecular markers were developed for L. sativus. One developed by Chowdhury and Slinkard (1999) used 11 random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers, 1 isozyme marker and 1 morphological trait (flower colour). The other linkage map was constructed by Skiba et al. (2004), using 47 RAPDs, 7 cross-amplified pea microsatellite simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers and 13 cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers and was used to study the genetic basis of resistance to Ascochyta blight. Nevertheless, these maps were not informative enough to allow bridging that mapping information between them, as reviewed by Vaz Patto et al. (2006b).
Compared to other grain legumes such as pea, faba bean or chickpea, genomic recourses for grass pea are still scarce. In July 2014, the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database had made available the information of 178 EST sequences from a cDNA library of one L. sativus accession inoculated with Mycosphaerella pinodes (Skiba et al. 2005), 89 nucleotide sequences mainly from the Bowman–Birk (BBI) inhibitor coding sequences (41 accessions), chloroplast sequences (21 accessions) and 216 protein sequences (44 amino acid sequences from BBI inhibitors, 150 sequences from chloroplast proteins).
Specific molecular markers have been developed or adapted for grass pea in order to assist diversity studies and further develop linkage maps. Almeida et al. (2014a) studied the transferability of molecular markers from M. truncatula, P. sativum, L. culinaris, Lupinus spp. and V. faba to Lathyrus spp. and their application in mapping and diversity studies. Cross-genera amplification of molecular markers provided an alternative for the development of new molecular markers on understudied genus, allowing also performing comparative mapping between the sequence donor and the target species. This survey for similar genetic regions among closely related species will contribute to the potential future exchange of interesting traits among them.
Earlier molecular markers, specific or cross amplification studies in grass pea, included the work of Shiferaw et al. (2011) that successfully amplified nine expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeats (EST-SSRs) developed from the EST sequences of Skiba et al. (2005) and 12 EST-SSRs from M. truncatula, which have been previously proven to be transferable to other legume species by Gutierrez et al. (2005).
Lioi et al. (2011) were able to genotype in a grass pea diversity study, ten SSRs developed from nucleotide sequences stored at public databases, being nine from L. sativus sequences and one from a L. japonicus sequence.
More recently, Yang et al. (2014) employed next-generation sequencing (NGS) to develop 144 specific grass pea SSRs, from which, 74 where polymorphic and therefore useful for diversity studies and genetic mapping.
The first grass pea expression analysis was performed by Skiba et al. (2005), identifying 29 potential defence-related genes differentially expressed in response to M. pinodes inoculation. These included genes associated with pathogen recognition, the phenylpropanoid pathway, hypersensitivity, pathogenesis-related and disease resistance response proteins .
In addition, expression analysis using RNA-sequencing was also employed in grass pea to tackle the molecular mechanisms underlying prehaustorial rust resistance (Almeida et al. 2014b). These authors identified several pathogenesis-related proteins as possibly involved in grass pea resistance to rust, that included some regulated by the well-studied mildew resistance locus O (MLO) gene. In this study, several potential rust effectors were also identified. These could be used as probes to identify target grass pea host proteins, as a first step in the development of effector-driven legume breeding, maximizing the durability of resistance against this quickly evolving pathogen (Vleeshouwers et al. 2011). Finally this RNA-sequencing study also identified several polymorphic single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) and EST-SSRs between parental lines of existing grass pea segregating recombinant inbred lines (RILs), allowing its use for linkage mapping.
Expression analysis of the response to infection with Ascochyta lathyri in a resistant grass pea accession was performed using deepSuperSAGE. This approach has identified several differentially expressed genes (Almeida et al. 2015), opening the way to a powerful route of identification of candidate resistance genes and more detailed study of resistance gene networks in L. sativus (Vaz Patto and Rubiales 2014).
9 Future Prospects
The present paradigm change towards the study of crop species instead of focusing on model species will aid in the development of plant species that have been neglected. Lowering costs in high-throughput sequencing and the development of high-throughput phenotyping have encouraged the development of new molecular tools to boost the genetic characterization and utilization of the rich Lathyrus germplasm.
Grass pea research was tied to the persecution of an ODAP-free variety for several decades. This has hampered progress in this crop for the improvement of other traits. As an example and despite its importance, ODAP-related research should not block the understanding of the reasons behind the success of grass pea when dealing with biotic and abiotic stresses , and for which it is considered a survival crop. In an alternative to low ODAP varieties, an option might be improving quality traits that can lower ODAP’s negative effects. These include increasing the content in homoarginine, cysteine or methionine. Although this is an old objective, it is still unachieved, due to the presence of technical barriers in the regeneration of transformed tissues (Girma and Korbu 2012) or the high influence of genotype × environment in those traits (Piergiovanni et al. 2011; Piergiovanni and Damascelli 2011).
For quicker progress on these and other quantitative traits improvement via MAS, it would also be useful to have a saturated linkage map, including cross-transferable markers to other related species such as pea, faba bean or the model M. truncatula, to apply in quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. In this way, comparative mapping would also be possible to other closely related legume species, assisting knowledge transfer among these species and facilitating candidate gene discovery for the detected potential QTL regions.
With the development of high-throughput and dense genotyping, assessment of the correlation between phenotype and genotype, needed for the development of MAS approaches, has shifted from focusing on two parental lines, differing strongly in phenotype, to the analysis of populations of unrelated individuals. Association mapping panels by sampling more genetic diversity can take advantage of many more generations of recombination and avoid the time-consuming generations of crosses (Morrell et al. 2012). High-throughput genotyping associated with a core collection evaluation will facilitate trait dissection and gene discovery through association mapping as well as characterization of the collection genetic structure (Cobb et al. 2013). That is why Vaz Patto and Rubiales (2014) supported the idea of concentrating international evaluation efforts on to a grass pea core collection, representative of all the existing diversity, but of a manageable size. For adaptive traits, core and mini-core collections may not capture the needed diversity (Gepts 2006). As an alternative, the Focused Identification of Germplasm Strategy (FIGS) approach, which is a trait-based approach with high probability of identification of desired genetic material (Khazaei et al. 2013) is being applied at ICARDA to the Lathyrus germplasm collection to develop subset collections.
In terms of grass pea plant resources for functional genomics studies, various mapping populations including RILs, near isogenic lines (NILs) and targeting induced local lesions in genomes (TILLING) populations are critically needed for trait–marker association and gene inactivation/deletion studies (Kumar et al. 2013).
10 Seed Production
Several grass pea improved varieties have been originated from various breeding programmes as already described in the section “Major Breeding Achievements” section. As in any plant species with outcrossing frequency rate up to 30 %, special efforts are needed for cultivar conservation. Strategies like an isolation distance or the use of a buffer crop between cultivars when producing seeds are essential to maintain genetic purity and phenological features of the developed cultivars .
Nevertheless, the most common seed available is from landraces or farmers’ varieties, inherently heterogeneous. These farm-saved seeds are obtained and traded within an informal seed system where seeds are exchanged among farmers that mainly do not sell the product of the seed, but use it for self-consumption.
In conclusion, presently available genetic resources, established breeding achievements and recent biotechnological progress, associated with a growing international interest on grass pea cultivation, will definitely provide a bright future to this highly potential crop.
References
Abd El-Moneim AM, van Dorrestein B, Baum M et al (2000) Improving the nutritional quality and yield potential of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Food Nut Bull 21:493–496
Abd El Moneim A, van Dorrestein B, Baum M et al (2001) Role of ICARDA in improving the nutritional quality and yield potential of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) for subsistence farmers in dry areas. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsl 2:55–58
Allkin R, Goyder DJ, Bisby FA et al (1986) Names and synonyms of species and subspecies in the Vicieae. Vicieae Database Project Issue 3. Southampton University, Southampton
Almeida NF, Leitão ST, Caminero C et al (2014a) Transferability of molecular markers from major legumes to Lathyrus spp. for their application in mapping and diversity studies. Mol Biol Rep 41:269–283
Almeida NF, Krezdorn N, Rotter B et al (2015) Lathyrus sativus transcriptome resistance response to Ascochyta lathyri investigated by deepSuperSAGE analysis. Front Plant Sci 6:178
Almeida NF, Leitão ST, Krezdorn N et al (2014b) Allelic diversity in the transcriptomes of contrasting rust-infected genotypes of Lathyrus sativus, a lasting resource for smart breeding. BMC Plant Biol (14:376)
Asmussen CB, Liston A (1998) Chloroplast DNA characters, phylogeny, and classification of Lathyrus (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 85:387–401
Barik DP, Mohapatra U, Chand PK (2005) Transgenic grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.): factors influencing agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration. Plant Cell Rep 24:523–531
Ben Brahim N, Combes D, Marrakchi M (2001) Autogamy and allogamy in genus Lathyrus. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsl 2:21–26
Biswas AK (2007) Induced mutation in grass pea. In: Ochatt SJ, Jain SM (eds) Breeding of neglected and under-utilised crops, spices and herbs. Science, Plymouth, pp 29–39
Campbell CG (1997) Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. Grass pea. Lathyrus sativus L., vol 18. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome
Campbell CG, Briggs CJ (1987) Registration of low neurotoxin content Lathyrus germplasm LS 8246. Crop Sci 27:821
Campbell CG, Mehra RB, Agrawal SK et al (1994) Current status and future strategy in breeding grasspea (Lathyrus sativus). Euphytica 73:167–175
Choi HK, Mun JH, Kim DJ et al (2004) Estimating genome conservation between crop and model legume species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(43):15289–15294
Chowdhury MA, Slinkard AE (1997) Natural outcrossing in grasspea. J Hered 88:154–156
Chowdhury MA, Slinkard AE (1999) Linkage of random amplified polymorphic DNA, isozyme and morphological markers in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus). J Agr Sci 133:389–395
Chowdhury MA, Slinkard AE (2000) Genetic diversity in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol 47:163–169
Cobb JN, DeClerck G, Greenberg A et al (2013) Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theor Appl Genet 126:867–887
Ellison NW, Liston A, Steiner JJ et al (2006) Molecular phylogenetics of the clover genus (Trifolium-Leguminosae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 39:688–705
Erskine W, Smartt J, Muehlbauer F (1994) Mimicry of lentil and the domestication of common vetch and grass pea. Econ Bot 48:326–332
Erskine W, Siddique K, Khan T et al (2001) Utilisation of grain legume diversity. In: Maxted N, Bennett S (eds) Plant genetic resources of legumes in the mediterranean. Current plant science and biotechnology in agriculture, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 311–326
FAO (2009) International treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
Fernández-Aparicio M, Flores F, Rubiales D (2012) Escape and true resistance to crenate broomrape (Orobanche crenata Forsk.) in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) germplasm. Field Crops Res 125:92–97
Fikre A, Korbu L, Kuo YH et al (2008) The contents of the neuro-excitatory amino acid beta-ODAP (beta-N-oxalyl-L-alpha, beta-diaminopropionic acid), and other free and protein amino acids in the seeds of different genotypes of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Food Chem 110:422–427
GCDT (2009) Strategy for the ex situ conservation of Lathyrus, with special reference to Lathyrus sativus, L. cicera, and L. ochrus. Global Crop Diversity Trust (GCDT), Rome
Gepts P (2006) Plant genetic resources conservation and utilization: the accomplishments and future of a societal insurance policy. Crop Sci 46:2278–2292
Girma D, Korbu L (2012) Genetic improvement of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) in Ethiopia: an unfulfilled promise. Plant Breed 131:231–236
Granati E, Bisignano V, Chiaretti D et al (2003) Characterization of Italian and exotic Lathyrus germplasm for quality traits. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:273–280
Grela E, Rybiński W, Matras J et al (2012) Variability of phenotypic and morphological characteristics of some Lathyrus sativus L. and Lathyrus cicera L. accessions and nutritional traits of their seeds. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:1687–1703
Gurung A, Pang EK (2011) Lathyrus. In: Kole C (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–126
Gurung AM, Pang ECK, Taylor PWJ (2002) Examination of Pisum and Lathyrus species as sources of ascochyta blight resistance for field pea (Pisum sativum). Australas Plant Pathol 31:41–45
Gutierrez MV, Vaz Patto MC, Huguet T et al (2005) Cross-species amplification of Medicago truncatula microsatellites across three major pulse crops. Theor Appl Genet 110:1210–1217
Hanbury CL, Siddique KHM (2000) Registration of ‘Chalus' Lathyrus cicera L. Crop Sci 40:1199
Hanbury CD, Sarker A, Siddique KHM et al (1995) Evaluation of Lathyrus germplasm in a Mediterranean type environment in south-western Australia. CLIMA Occasional Publication (Cooperative Research Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture) no 8, Perth, p 23
Hanbury CD, Siddique KHM, Galwey NW et al (1999) Genotype-environment interaction for seed yield and ODAP concentration of Lathyrus sativus L. and L. cicera L. in Mediterranean-type environments. Euphytica 110:45–60
Hanbury CD, White CL, Mullan BP et al (2000) A review of the potential of Lathyrus sativus L. and L. cicera L. grain for use as animal feed. Anim Feed Sci Technol 87:1–27
Heywood V, Casas A, Ford-Lloyd B et al (2007) Conservation and sustainable use of crop wild relatives. Agr Ecosyst Environ 121:245–255
Hillocks R, Maruthi M (2012) Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus): is there a case for further crop improvement? Euphytica 186:647–654
Hopf M (1986) Archaeological evidence of the spread and use of some members of the Leguminosae family. In: Barigozzi C (ed) The Origin and domestication of cultivated plants: symposium. Elsevier, Oxford, New York and Tokyo, UK, USA and Japan pp 35–60
ICAR (2009) Project Coordinator’s report of all India coordinated research project on mungbean, urdbean, lentil, lathyrus, rajmash and pea. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi
ICARDA (2006) ICARDA Annual report 2005. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. Aleppo, Syria, pp 54–55
ICARDA (2007) ICARDA Annual report 2006. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. Aleppo, Syria, pp 57–58
Jackson MT, Yunus AG (1984) Variation in the grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) and wild-species. Euphytica 33:549–559
Jørgensen IH (1992) Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley. Euphytica 63:141–152
Kenicer GJ, Kajita T, Pennington RT et al (2005) Systematics and biogeography of Lathyrus (Leguminosae) based on internal transcribed spacer and cpDNA sequence data. Am J Bot 92:1199–1209
Kenicer G, Nieto-Blásquez EM, Mikić A et al (2009) Lathyrus – diversity and phylogeny in the genus. Grain Legumes 54:16–18
Khazaei H, Street K, Bari A et al (2013) The FIGS (Focused Identification of Germplasm Strategy) approach identifies traits related to drought adaptation in Vicia faba genetic resources. PLoS ONE 8:e63107
Kislev ME (1989) Origins of the Cultivation of Lathyrus sativus and Lathyrus cicera (Fabaceae). Econ Bot 43:262–270
Kiyoshi Y, Toshiyuki F, Blumenreich ID (1985) Isozymic variation and interspecific crossability in annual species of genus Lathyrus L. In: Kaul AK, Combes D (eds) Lathyrus and Lathyrism. Pau, France, pp 118–129
Krause D, Krause I (2003) New green manuring Lathyrus sativus variety AC Greenfix available in USA. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsl 3:13–14
Kumar S, Bejiga G, Ahmed S et al (2011) Genetic improvement of grass pea for low neurotoxin (beta-ODAP) content. Food Chem Toxicol 49:589–600
Kumar S, Gupta P, Barpete S et al (2013) Grass pea. In: Singh M, Upadhyaya HD, Bisht IS (eds) Genetic and genomic resources of grain legume improvement. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 269–292
Kuo YH, Bau HM, Rozan P et al (2000) Reduction efficiency of the neurotoxin beta-ODAP in low-toxin varieties of Lathyrus sativus seeds by solid state fermentation with Aspergillus oryzae and Rhizopus microsporus var chinensis. J Sci Food Agr 80:2209–2215
Kupicha FK (1983) The infrageneric structure of Lathyrus. Notes Roy Bot Gard Edinburgh 41:209–244
Lal MS, Agrawal I, Chitale MW (1986) Genetic improvement of chickling vetch (Lathyrus sativus L.) in Madhya Pradesh, India. In: Kaul AK, Combes D (eds) Lathyrus and Lathyrism. Third World Medical Research Foundation, New York, pp 146–160
Lambein F, Ngudi DD, Kuo YH (2009) Progress in prevention of toxico-nutritional neurodegenerations. http://www.atdforumorg/journal/html/2009-34/8. Accessed July 2014
Lioi L, Sparvoli F, Sonnante G et al (2011) Characterization of Italian grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.) germplasm using agronomic traits, biochemical and molecular markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:425–437
Malek MA (1998) Genetic resources of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) in Bangladesh. In: Mathur PN, Rao VR (eds) Lathyrus Genetic Resources Network: Proc IPGRI-ICARDA-ICAR Regional Working Group Meeting. National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, IPGRI Office for South Asia, New Delhi, India, pp 1–6
Mera M (2010) Inheritance of seed weight in large-seed grass pea Lathyrus sativus L. Chil J Agr Res 70:357–364
Mera M, Tay J, France A et al (2003) Luanco-INIA, a large-seeded cultivar of Lathyrus sativus released in Chile. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsl 3:26
Morrell PL, Buckler ES, Ross-Ibarra J (2012) Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat Rev Genet 13:85–96
Nerkar YS (1972) Induced variation and response to selection for low neurotoxin content in Lathyrus sativus. Ind J Genet Plant Breed 32:175–180
Nerkar YS (1976) Mutation studies in Lathyrus sativus. Ind J Genet Plant Breed 36:223–229
Ochatt SJ, Muneaux E, Machado C et al (2002a) The hyperhydricity of in vitro regenerants of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) is linked with an abnormal DNA content. J Plant Physiol 159:1021–1028
Ochatt SJ, Sangwan RS, Marget P et al (2002b) New approaches towards the shortening of generation cycles for faster breeding of protein legumes. Plant Breed 121:436–440
Ochatt S, Pech C, Grewal R et al (2009) Abiotic stress enhances androgenesis from isolated microspores of some legume species (Fabaceae). J Plant Physiol 166:1314–1328
Ochatt SJ, Conreux C, Jacas L (2013) Flow cytometry distinction between species and between landraces within Lathyrus species and assessment of true-to-typeness of in vitro regenerants. Plant Syst Evol 299:75–85
Pandey RL, Chitale MW, Sharma RN et al (1996) Status of Lathyrus research in India. In: Arora RK, Mathur PN, Riley KW et al (eds) Lathyrus Genetic Resources in Asia: Proc Regional Workshop. Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, India. IPGRI Office for South Asia, New Delhi, India, pp 45–52
Peña-Chocarro L, Peña LZ (1999) History and traditional cultivation of Lathyrus sativus L. and Lathyrus cicera L. in the Iberian peninsula. Veget Hist Archaeobot 8:49–52
Piergiovanni AR, Damascelli A (2011) L-Homoarginine accumulation in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) dry seeds. A preliminary survey. Food Nut Sci 2:207–213
Piergiovanni AR, Lupo F, Zaccardelli M (2011) Environmental effect on yield, composition and technological seed traits of some Italian ecotypes of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). J Sci Food Agric 91:122–129
Rahman MM, Kumar J, Rahman MA et al (1995) Natural outcrossing in Lathyrus sativus L. Ind J Genet Plant Breed 55:204–207
Roy PK, All K, Gupta A et al (1993) β-N-Oxalyl-L-α, β-diaminopropionic acid in somaclones derived from internode explants of Lathyrus sativus. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 2:9–13
Rybinski W (2003) Mutagenesis as a tool for improvement of traits in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsl 3:30–34
Schaefer H, Hechenleitner P, Santos-Guerra A et al (2012) Systematics, biogeography, and character evolution of the legume tribe Fabeae with special focus on the middle-Atlantic island lineages. BMC Evol Biol 12:250
Shiferaw E, Pè M, Porceddu E et al (2011) Exploring the genetic diversity of Ethiopian grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) using EST-SSR markers. Mol Breed 30:789–797
Siddique KHM, Hanbury CL, Sarker A (2006) Registration of ‘Ceora’ grass pea registration by CSSA. Crop Sci 46:986–986
Skiba B, Ford R, Pang ECK (2004) Construction of a linkage map based on a Lathyrus sativus backcross population and preliminary investigation of QTLs associated with resistance to ascochyta blight. Theor Appl Genet 109:1726–1735
Skiba B, Ford R, Pang ECK (2005) Construction of a cDNA library of Lathyrus sativus inoculated with Mycosphaerella pinodes and the expression of potential defence-related expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 66:55–67
Smartt J (1984) Evolution of grain legumes.1. Mediterranean pulses. Exp Agric 20:275–296
Smýkal P, Kenicer G, Flavell AJ et al (2011) Phylogeny, phylogeography and genetic diversity of the Pisum genus. Plant Genet Resour 9:4–18
Tadesse W, Bekele E (2003) Phenotypic diversity of Ethiopian grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) in relation to geographical regions and altitudinal range. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:497–505
Talukdar D (2009a) Dwarf mutations in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.): origin, morphology, inheritance and linkage studies. J Genet 88:165–175
Talukdar D (2009b) Recent progress on genetic analysis of novel mutants and aneuploid research in grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Afr J Agr Res 4:1549–1559
Talukdar D (2011) Isolation and characterization of NaCl-tolerant mutations in two important legumes, Clitoria ternatea L. and Lathyrus sativus L.: induced mutagenesis and selection by salt stress. J Med Plant Res 5:3619–3628
Vaz Patto MC, Rubiales D (2009) Identification and characterization of partial resistance to rust in a germplasm collection of Lathyrus sativus L. Plant Breed 128:495–500
Vaz Patto MC, Rubiales D (2014) Lathyrus diversity: available resources with relevance to crop improvement – L. sativus and L. cicera as case studies. Ann Bot 113:895–908
Vaz Patto MC, Fernández-Aparicio M, Moral A et al (2006a) Characterization of resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) in a germplasm collection of Lathyrus sativus. Plant Breed 125:308–310
Vaz Patto MC, Skiba B, Pang ECK et al (2006b) Lathyrus improvement for resistance against biotic and abiotic stresses: from classical breeding to marker assisted selection. Euphytica 147:133–147
Vaz Patto MC, Hanbury CD, Moorhem MV et al (2011) Grass pea. In: Kole C (ed) Genetics, genomics and breeding of cool season grain legumes. Genetics, genomics and breeding of crop plants. Science, Enfield, pp 151–204
Vleeshouwers VG, Raffaele S, Vossen JH et al (2011) Understanding and exploiting late blight resistance in the age of effectors. Annu Rev Phytopathol 49:507–531
Wojciechowski MF, Lavin M, Sanderson MJ (2004) A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. Am J Bot 91:1846–1862
Yadav CR (1996) Genetic evaluation and varietal improvement of grasspea in Nepal. In: Arora RK, Mathur PN, Riley KW et al (eds) Lathyrus genetic resources in Asia: Proc Regional Workshop. Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur, India. IPGRI Office for South Asia, New Delhi, India, pp 21–28
Yang H-M, Zhang X-Y (2005) Considerations on the reintroduction of grass pea in China. Lathyrus Lathyrism Newsl 4:22–26
Yang T, Jiang J, Burlyaeva M et al (2014) Large-scale microsatellite development in grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.), an orphan legume of the arid areas. BMC Plant Biol 14:65
Yunus AG, Jackson MT (1991) The gene pools of the grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Plant Breed 106:319–328
Zambre M, Chowdhury B, Kuo YH et al (2002) Prolific regeneration of fertile plants from green nodular callus induced from meristematic tissues in Lathyrus sativus L. (grass pea). Plant Sci 163:1107–1112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Almeida, N., Rubiales, D., Vaz Patto, M. (2015). Grass Pea. In: De Ron, A. (eds) Grain Legumes. Handbook of Plant Breeding, vol 10. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2797-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2797-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2796-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2797-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)