Abstract
Chemotherapy, either used alone or with surgery and/or radiation, plays an important role in the treatment of patients with gynecologic cancer. Common chemotherapy agents used in this group of patients are classified into groups based on pharmacological mechanisms. While many of them share the similar toxicities such as myelosuppression, each agent has its own toxicity profiles. It is often challenging for new providers to understand how these agents are used in different chemotherapy regimens and how to monitor and manage associated toxicities.
This chapter is divided into three sections:
-
The first part discusses the mechanisms, toxicities, and clinical pearls of common chemotherapy agents used in gynecologic oncology. Authors also share clinical pearls of each agent including administration, drug interactions, dosing adjustment, and other tips.
-
The second part of this chapter lists evidence-based chemotherapy regimens to treat common gynecologic cancers including cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, uterine sarcoma, and ovarian cancer based on stage. All references for these regimens are included at the end of the chapter to help providers find the original literature/clinical trial.
-
The third part of this chapter discusses common chemotherapy associated toxicities across various agents. Topics cover chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting (CINV), chemotherapy-induced diarrhea, peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), febrile neutropenia (FN), extravasation, and hypersensitivity (HSRs). The authors summarize the background, diagnosis, and evidence-based management approaches for each toxicity.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Chemotherapy agents
- Chemotherapy regimen
- Chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting
- Chemotherapy-induced diarrhea
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Febrile neutropenia
- Extravasation
- Hypersensitivity
Chemotherapeutic Agents in Gynecologic Oncology
Introduction
The most commonly used agents in the treatment of gynecologic cancers are the platinums (carboplatin and cisplatin) and taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel). While these agents are used frequently, there are a number of other drugs employed in the recurrent setting and in the treatment of rare diseases.
Pharmacology and Clinical Pearls
Mechanism of action, common and severe toxicities, and clinical pearls of each agent used in the treatment of gynecologic malignancies are outlined in Table 6.1.
Treatment Regimens
Regimens used for the treatment of gynecologic cancers including the drugs, dosage, and frequency are detailed in Table 6.2.
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV)
Background [154–157]
Nausea /Vomiting (N/V) are two of the most feared adverse effects of chemotherapy. 70–90 % of patients will experience some form of N/V during their treatment. Since the advent of 5-Hydroxytryptamine-3 (5HT3) antagonists the incidence of vomiting has been decreased to 30 %. However, nausea still remains a significant adverse effect that can have a major impact on the treatment of gynecologic cancers.
Definitions [155, 158]
-
Nausea—a feeling of sickness in the stomach characterized by an urge to vomit.
-
Vomiting—an expulsion of gastrointestinal contents through the mouth.
-
Acute emesis—occurs in the first 24 h after chemotherapy.
-
Delayed emesis—takes place 24 h or more after chemotherapy administration.
-
Anticipatory emesis—result of a learned response to chemotherapy.
-
Breakthrough emesis occurs despite prophylactic antiemetics.
-
Refractory emesis failure to respond to prevention or intervention in the previous cycle.
Alternative Etiologies [159]
-
Medications (opioids, antimicrobials).
-
Surgery/radiation.
-
Electrolyte imbalances/dehydration.
-
Gastrointestinal: obstruction, gastroparesis, constipation.
-
Psychological (anxiety, anticipatory).
-
Brain metastasis.
Complications [157, 158]
-
Metabolic imbalances.
-
Decreased performance status.
-
Nutrient depletion/Anorexia.
-
Wound dehiscence.
-
Esophageal tears.
-
Noncompliance with treatment.
-
Aspiration.
-
Decreased quality of life.
Risk Factors [154, 157, 158, 160, 161]
Patient Related
-
Age—increased risk in younger patients.
-
Gender—increased risk for females.
-
History of alcohol use—decreased with prior use.
-
History of CINV.
-
History of vertigo/motion sickness.
-
Non-chemotherapy related etiologies.
-
History of nausea/vomiting with pregnancy.
Chemotherapy Related
-
>90 % = High risk.
-
31–90 % = Moderate risk.
-
10–30 % = Low risk.
-
<10 % = Minimal risk.
See Table 6.3 for CINV risk for agents used to treat gynecologic cancers.
Therapeutic Options [2, 160, 168]
High Therapeutic Index Agents
Used primarily for prevention first line breakthrough. Dosing outlined in Table 6.4.
-
5HT3 receptor antagonists:
Agents: Ondansetron, Palonosetron, Granisetron, Dolasetron.
Adverse effects: headache, constipation, QT prolongation.
-
Corticosteroids.
Agents: Dexamethasone, Prednisone, Methylprednisolone.
Adverse effects: hyperglycemia, insomnia, hypertension, immunosuppression.
-
Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists.
Agents: Aprepitant, Fosaprepitant.
Adverse effects: headache, hiccups, fatigue.
Moderate inhibitor and inducer of CYP3A4, weak inducer of CYP2C9.
Low Therapeutic Index Agents
Used primarily for breakthrough N/V. Dosing outlined in Table 6.5.
-
Phenothiazines.
Agents: Prochlorperazine, Promethazine.
Adverse effects: sedation, anticholinergic effects, extrapyramidal side effects.
-
Metoclopramide.
Adverse effects: sedation, extrapyramidal side effects, diarrhea.
-
Olanzapine.
Adverse effects: sedation, weight gain.
-
Benzodiazepines.
Drug of choice for anticipatory N/V.
Agents: Lorazepam, Alprazolam.
Adverse effects: sedation, amnesia.
-
Butyrophenones.
Agents: Haloperidol
Adverse effects: sedation, constipation, arrhythmias, extrapyramidal side effects.
-
Cannabinoids.
Agents: Dronabinol, Nabilone.
Adverse effects: sedation, abnormal thinking, palpitations, tachycardia, euphoria.
General Principles of Treatment [155, 160, 161, 165]
-
Primary goal is prevention of CINV.
-
Agents are chosen based upon chemotherapy regimen.
-
Consider toxicity of antiemetics used.
-
Always provide “rescue” medication for breakthrough CINV.
Treatment Recommendations [160, 161, 165, 169, 170]
High Risk Chemotherapy
-
Acute Emesis Prevention.
5HT3 antagonist + Dexamethasone + Neurokinin 1 antagonist +/− lorazepam +/− H2 blocker or proton pump inhibitor.
-
Delayed Emesis Prevention.
If fosaprepitant 150 mg: dexamethasone 8 mg PO day 2 then 8 mg PO BID days 3–4.
If aprepitant day 2–3: dexamethasone 8 mg PO days 2–4.
Moderate Risk Chemotherapy
-
Acute Emesis Prevention.
5HT3 antagonist + dexamethasone +/− Neurokinin 1 antagonist +/− lorazepam +/− H2 blocker or proton pump inhibitor.
-
Delayed Emesis Prevention.
5HT3 antagonist monotherapy for 2–3 days, OR.
Dexamethasone monotherapy for 2–3 days, OR.
Neurokinin 1 antagonist (if used day 1) + dexamethasone.
Low Risk
-
Prior to chemotherapy.
Dexamethasone PO/IV, OR.
Metoclopramide PO/IV, OR.
Prochlorperazine PO/IV, OR.
+/− Lorazepam and/or H2 blocker or proton pump inhibitor.
Minimal Risk
-
No prophylaxis recommended.
Multiday Chemotherapy Regimens
-
Consider emetogenic potential of each day.
-
5-HT3 antagonist should be administered daily for moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
-
Dexamethasone should be given daily prior for moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
-
Prevent delayed emesis with 2–3 days of prophylaxis following chemotherapy.
-
Palonosetron or transdermal granisetron may be used in lieu of daily 5HT3 dosing.
-
Dosing of Aprepitant beyond 3 days has been shown to be safe and effective in phase II trials.
-
Repeat doses of palonosetron have been studied and shown to reduce CINV.
Breakthrough Emesis
-
Add agent from different class.
-
PO administration often unfeasible due to emesis.
-
Routine administration of “rescue” medication should be considered.
-
Multiple concurrent agents in alternating schedules.
-
Reevaluate for alternative etiologies.
-
Change regimen for next cycle.
Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhea
Introduction [171–173]
Many chemotherapy agents can cause damage to the intestinal mucosa ultimately resulting in diarrhea. If not managed properly chemotherapy-induced diarrhea can result in treatment delays, dose reductions, and serious complications that may be fatal. Most agents for the primary treatment of gynecologic oncology do not commonly cause diarrhea but a number of agents used for recurrence or rare tumor types are known to cause diarrhea.
Pathogenesis [171–178]
-
Direct damage to intestinal mucosa (fluorouracil, capecitabine, Irinotecan late-onset, doxorubicin, gemcitabine, dacarbazine).
-
Cholinergic stimulation (Irinotecan acute-onset).
-
Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (pazopanib).
-
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency and thymidylate synthetase gene (TYMS) polymorphism can increase severity of diarrhea with fluorouracil and capecitabine.
-
Irinotecan is metabolized by the enzyme uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1).
-
Patients that are heterozygous or homozygous for UGT1A1*28 may be at increased risk for diarrhea.
Signs and Symptoms [171–173, 179]
-
Increase in number of stools or ostomy output.
-
Dehydration.
-
Renal insufficiency.
-
Electrolyte abnormalities (hypokalemia, metabolic acidosis, hyponatremia, or hypernatremia).
-
Fatigue.
-
Decreased quality of life.
-
Noncompliance with treatment.
Evaluation [171–173, 179]
-
Determine onset and duration.
-
Assess for alternative etiologies (infection, medication, radiation, diet, colitis, etc.).
-
Consider testing for DPD deficiency, TYMS variants, or UGT1A1 polymorphism.
-
Determine severity (Table 6.6).
-
Identify causative agent.
Therapeutic Options [2, 162–164, 167, 171–173, 179, 180]
General Principles
-
Treat any alternative/underlying etiologies.
-
Provide supportive care in the form of hydration and electrolyte repletion.
-
Severe cases may require delays or dose reduction of chemotherapy.
-
Scheduled doses of antidiarrheal are usually necessary to control symptoms.
-
Once controlled medications can be titrated to maintain control.
Nonpharmacologic Treatment
-
Avoid diarrhea inducing foods (dairy, spicy foods, alcohol, caffeine, high fiber).
-
Discontinue all laxative, stool softeners, or promotility agents.
-
Aggressive oral hydration (8–10 glasses per day).
-
Small frequent meals.
Pharmacologic Treatment
-
Loperamide.
-
Rapid onset of action.
Formulation
-
Tablet: 2 mg.
-
Capsule: 2 mg.
-
Solution: 1 mg/7.5 mL, 1 mg/5 mL.
-
Suspension: 1 mg/7.5 mL.
Dose
-
Standard dose: 4 mg PO after initial loose stool, 2 mg PO every 4 h or after subsequent loose stool.
-
High dose: 4 mg PO after initial loose stool, 2 mg PO every 2 h until diarrhea free for 12 h.
-
Maximum dose (16 mg/day) listed in drug references may be exceeded.
-
-
-
Diphenoxylate and atropine.
-
Rapid onset of action.
Formulation
-
Tablet: diphenoxylate 2.5 mg/atropine 0.025 mg.
-
Solution diphenoxylate 2.5 mg/atropine 0.025 mg per 5 mL.
Dose: 5 mg diphenoxylate every 6 h until diarrhea controlled.
-
-
-
Deodorized tincture of opium.
-
Contains 10 mg/mL of morphine.
-
Doses are expressed in milligrams of morphine.
-
Dose: 6 mg (0.6 mL) PO every 6 h.
-
Use with caution.
-
-
Paregoric.
-
Contains 0.4 mg/mL of morphine.
-
Dose: 5–10 mL PO every 6 h.
-
-
Octreotide.
-
Somatostatin analog.
-
Best used for complicated or refractory chemotherapy induced diarrhea.
Dose
-
100–150 mcg subQ three times daily; may increase dose up to 500 mcg three times daily.
-
25–50 mcg/h IV infusion.
-
Treatment Recommendations [172, 173, 180]
Uncomplicated Diarrhea
-
Grade 1–2 with no complicating signs or symptoms.
-
Nonpharmacologic therapy.
-
Hold chemotherapy for grade 2 until symptoms resolve.
-
Initiate standard dose loperamide and reevaluate in 12–24 h.
-
If symptoms resolve you may discontinue treatment after 12 h with no loose stool.
-
If symptoms persist increase to high dose loperamide, consider antibiotics, and reevaluate in 12–24 h.
-
If diarrhea persists discontinue loperamide, complete more comprehensive workup and begin octreotide or other second line agent.
-
If at any time the patients show worsening diarrhea or develop complication, they should be treated as such.
Complicated Diarrhea
-
Grade 3–4 or Grade 1–2 with cramping, nausea/vomiting, decrease performance status, fever, sepsis, neutropenia, bleeding, or dehydration.
-
Admit patient to hospital.
-
Give supportive care (IV hydration/electrolytes) and nonpharmacologic treatment.
-
Start octreotide and antibiotics as needed.
-
Hold all chemotherapy until symptoms resolve, restart at a reduced dose.
Peripheral Neuropathy
Introduction [181–183]
Peripheral neuropathy is an often overlooked but serious adverse effect that is common in patients with gynecologic cancers. Over 2/3 of gynecologic oncology patients my experience some form of peripheral neuropathy. Onset may result in the need for dose reductions or treatment delays potentially effecting treatment outcomes as well as patient’s quality-of-life.
Risk Factors [1–6, 15, 182–186]
-
Diabetes.
-
Preexisting neuropathy.
-
History of alcohol abuse.
-
Nutritional deficiencies.
-
Metabolic abnormalities.
-
Paraneoplastic disorders.
-
Tumor compression or infiltration.
-
Chemotherapy use (Table 6.7).
Definitions [179]
-
Peripheral neuropathy: a disorder characterized by inflammation or degeneration of the peripheral sensory nerves.
-
Paresthesia: abnormal cutaneous sensations of tingling, numbness, pressure, cold and warmth experienced in the absence of stimulus.
-
Instrumental activities of daily living (ADL): preparing meals, shopping, using the telephone, etc.
-
Self-care ADL: bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using toilet, taking medications, not bedridden.
Clinical Manifestations [181–184, 186, 187]
-
Sensory symptoms (paresthesia, numbness, pain) are most common.
-
Motor symptoms (weakness, loss of tendon reflexes) are uncommon.
-
Autonomic symptoms are rare (typically caused by vinca alkaloids).
-
Symmetrical “glove and stalking” distribution.
-
Starts distally in fingers and toes and moves proximally.
-
Symptoms may progress after discontinuation of offending agent.
-
Resolution usually occurs within 3 months but may persist.
Evaluation [179, 182, 183, 185]
-
Patients receiving neurotoxic agents should be questioned on the presence of peripheral neuropathy at each encounter.
-
Grade severity of symptoms and effect on functioning (Table 6.8).
-
Evaluate for the presence of pain.
-
Neurophysiologic testing is inconsistent and often unnecessary.
-
Need for interventions should be based upon severity of symptoms, and patient preference.
-
Referral to neurologist, physical/occupational therapy, or pain specialist may be needed.
Prevention [2, 182–190]
Chemotherapy Selection
-
For patients at high risk avoid chemotherapy regimens commonly associated with peripheral neuropathy.
-
Use docetaxel instead of paclitaxel.
-
Carboplatin use is preferred over cisplatin.
-
Avoid dose-dense paclitaxel.
-
Extend duration of paclitaxel infusion.
-
Avoid vinca alkaloids.
Pharmacologic Prevention
-
No treatment is proven to prevent the onset of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.
-
Use of prophylactic medications cannot be recommended for routine use.
-
Amifostine.
-
Multiple randomized trials and a meta-analysis failed to show benefit.
-
Not recommended due to lack of evidence and potential toxicity.
-
-
Glutathione.
-
Meta-analysis of five trials showed no benefit for cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.
-
Small trial of patient receiving oxaliplatin showed decreased grade II–IV neuropathy with glutathione use.
-
-
Vitamin E.
-
Patients having received 300 mg/m2 of cisplatin or more have shown decreased incidence and severity of peripheral neuropathy with vitamin E 400 international units daily during and 3 months following discontinuation of cisplatin.
-
Due to antioxidant effect there is theoretical concern about potential to decrease chemotherapy efficacy.
-
Further study evaluating efficacy and safety is needed.
-
-
Erythropoietin.
-
Animal studies suggest potential for prevention with cisplatin and docetaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy.
-
Study of patients receiving paclitaxel and erythropoietin for anemia suggests decreased peripheral neuropathy.
-
Risks of erythropoietin currently outweigh potential benefits for prophylaxis in patients being treated with curative intent or those without anemia.
-
-
IV calcium and magnesium.
-
Early trials in patient receiving infusion of calcium and magnesium with oxaliplatin showed potential benefit.
-
Randomized placebo controlled trial of 353 patients showed no difference in acute or cumulative neurotoxicity.
-
Expert consensus is to avoid use.
-
-
Glutamine and acetyl-l-carnitine.
-
Conflicting data from small trials with a variable design.
-
Further study needed to determine benefit.
-
-
Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.
-
Venlafaxine has been shown to decrease oxaliplatin-induced acute peripheral neuropathy.
-
No information regarding efficacy for chronic neuropathy.
-
Not recommended due to limited evidence.
-
Treatment
General Principles [2, 182, 183, 185, 187]
-
Treat any underlying neuropathy or metabolic abnormalities that may cause neuropathy.
-
Chemotherapy may be switched to an agent that causes less CIPN (i.e., paclitaxel to docetaxel) if clinically appropriate.
-
Dose reduction or discontinuation of offending agent may be necessary.
Pharmacologic Treatment
-
There are no approved medications for the treatment of CIPN.
-
Most medications available have been approved based upon their ability to treat pain in patients with diabetic neuropathy.
-
A variety of agents have been used (Table 6.9).
-
Motor weakness and loss of light touch and proprioception are not treatable with medication.
-
Start with low dose and titrate to doses that maximize symptom control while limiting side effects.
-
A trial of 2–8 weeks should be given to determine efficacy.
-
Addition of a second agent with a different mechanism of action may be necessary.
-
Dietary supplements such as acetyl-l-carnitine, glutamine, vitamin E, and glutathione have been studied but efficacy has not been established.
Nonpharmacologic Treatment
-
Acupuncture.
-
Neurostimulation.
-
Massage.
-
Meditation.
-
Occupational/physical therapy.
Febrile Neutropenia
Introduction [191, 192]
Febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the major dose-limiting toxicities of chemotherapy regimens used in patients with gynecologic oncology. It often requires hospitalization and broad spectrum antibiotics. Without prompt recognition and treatment, FN is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and cost. This section reviews some key points of management of FN and common drugs used in the clinical practice.
Definitions [193]
-
Neutropenia: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <0.5 × 109/L or ANC <1 × 109/L with predicted decrease to ≤0.5 × 109/L with the next 48 h.
-
Febrile neutropenia: ANC < 0.5 × 109/L and a single oral temperature of ≥38.3 °C (101 °F) or ≥38.0 °C (100.4 °F) for at least an hour.
Risk Factors [194]
-
Patient related.
-
Neutropenia.
-
Type of malignancy (hematologic malignancies have higher risk).
-
Asplenic.
-
Genetic factors.
-
-
Chemotherapy regimen related.
-
Immune system dysfunction.
-
Corticosteroids and other lymphotoxic agents.
-
Other defects in host defense.
Microbiology [193, 195]
-
Bacterial infection (80–85 %).
-
Most common bacterial pathogen for febrile neutropenia has changed over the past two decades from gram-negative to gram-positive organisms.
-
Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli and Klebsiella species are emerging.
-
Gram-negative organisms:
-
E. coli.
-
Klebsiella spp.
-
“SPICE” organisms: Serratia, Pseudomonas spp, indole-positive Proteus species, Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae.
-
-
Gram-positive organisms:
-
Staphylococcus species (most coagulase negative).
-
Streptococcus species.
-
Enterococci.
-
-
Polymicrobial.
-
Fungal infection.
-
Candida species.
-
Aspergillus species.
-
Others.
-
-
Other infections: viral.
Diagnosis and Workup [193, 195]
-
Diagnosis: Fever and ANC <0.5 × 109/L.
-
Workup:
-
History.
-
Complete physical exam (rectal exam not recommended due to a risk of transient bacteremia).
-
Two sets of blood cultures and any site-specific culture (i.e., port-a-cath, PICC line; results often negative).
-
Chest X-ray.
-
CBC with differential.
-
Chemistry including liver and renal function.
Initial Risk Assessment [193, 194, 196]
Low Risk
Outpatient status at time of development of fever.
-
No acute comorbidity.
-
Anticipated short duration of profound neutropenia.
-
Good performance status (PS 0–1).
-
No hepatic insufficiency.
-
No renal insufficiency
OR
-
MASCC Risk index score ≥21 (see Table 6.10).
High Risk
Inpatient status at time of development of fever.
-
Significant medical comorbidity or clinically unstable.
-
Anticipated prolonged profound neutropenia (ANC ≤0.1 × 109/L and ≥7 days).
-
Hepatic insufficiency (AST/ALT ≥5 × UNL).
-
Renal insufficiency (CrCL <30 ml/min).
-
Uncontrolled/progressive cancer.
-
Pneumonia or other complex complications.
-
Alemtuzumab.
-
Mucositis grade 3–4.
OR
-
MASCC Risk index score <21 (see Table 6.10).
Primary Prophylaxis [193, 194]
Low risk: Not recommended (included most solid tumor patients).
High Risk: Consider fluoroquinolones prophylaxis (levofloxacin is preferred).
Therapeutic Options [193, 194]
Common antibiotic and antifungal treatments are outline in Tables 6.11 and 6.12.
Low Risk Patients
-
Patients can be managed in home, ambulatory clinic, or hospital.
-
Both IV and/or oral antibiotics are reasonable.
-
Close monitoring before and after antibiotics administration, especially within the first 72 h, is required.
-
Anti-pseudomonas antibiotics should be used the first line.
-
If oral antibiotics are chosen, ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate are the first line therapy.
High Risk Patients
-
Patients should be managed in the hospital setting.
-
IV antibiotics is required.
-
Monotherapy with anti-pseudomonas antibiotics can be used as the first line for uncomplicated patients.
-
Details of drug dose and spectrum (see Tables 6.11 and 6.12).
-
Add site-specific evaluation and therapy when indicated.
Clinically Unstable Patients
-
Empiric treatment: broad spectrum β-lactam (meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin, pipercillin/tazobactam plus an aminoglycoside and vancomycin).
-
Strongly consider adding fluconazole and echinocandin antifungal if patient not on antifungal prophylaxis.
-
Consider additional stress dose of hydrocortisone, especially for patients with septic shock.
Indications for Antibiotics with Gram-Positive Coverage
-
Clinically apparent, serious, catheter-related infection.
-
Blood culture positive for gram-positive bacteria prior to final identification and susceptibility test.
-
Known colonization with penicillin/cephalosporin-resistant pneumococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococus.
-
Severe mucositis.
-
Hypotension or septic shock without identified pathogen (clinically unstable).
-
Soft tissue or skin infection.
Follow-Up [193]
-
Changes of empiric antibiotics should be based on clinical and microbiology data.
-
If infection is identified, then change antibiotics to appropriate coverage for the site and the drug susceptibility of the pathogen.
-
If vancomycin or other gram-positive coverage antibiotics are part of the initial empiric therapy, it can be discontinued after 2 days without evidence of infection.
-
After initial empiric standard regimen, antibiotics for hemodynamically unstable patients should be expanded to include coverage for persistent gram-negative, gram-positive, anaerobic bacteria and antifungals.
-
Empiric antifungals can be considered for patients with persistent fever over 4–7 days of broad spectrum antimicrobials and with no identified source of fever.
Treatment Duration [194]
-
For fever of unknown origin, initial antibiotic therapy should continue until ANC ≥0.5 × 109/L and increasing.
-
For documented infection, continue antibiotics at least to ANC ≥0.5 × 109/L; however, a full course of therapy can also be based on the infection site and pathogen. Can consult with institutional infectious disease specialist.
-
Skin/soft tissue: 7–14 days.
-
Bloodstream infection (uncomplicated).
-
Gram-positive: 7–14 days.
-
Gram-negative: 10–14 days.
-
S. aureus: at least 2 weeks after first negative blood culture, treatment course can be prolonged with the involvement of endovascular structure.
-
Yeast: at least 2 weeks after the first negative blood culture.
-
-
Sinusitis/bacterial pneumonia: 10–21 days.
-
Invasive fungal infection:
-
Candida: at least 2 weeks after the first negative blood culture.
-
Mold: (e.g., Aspergillus): at least 12 weeks.
-
-
Viral infection.
-
HSV/VZV: 7–10 days.
-
Influenza: at least 5 days, maybe prolonged until symptom resolution in immunocompromised patients.
-
Extravasation
Background [197]
Extravasation causes 0.5–6 % of adverse events associated with chemotherapy administration. Based on the characteristics and potential tissue damage, chemotherapy agents can be classified as irritant, vesicant and nonirritant, non-vesicant. However, it is often controversial regarding which drugs are vesicants or irritants. Because of limited clinical trial data, treatment for extravasation may vary from institution to institution.
Definitions [198]
-
Irritant: An agent which may cause a local inflammatory reaction, but without tissue necrosis.
-
Vesicant: An agent which may cause severe tissue necrosis.
Table 6.13 compares and contrasts irritants and vesicants.
Risk Factors [197]
-
Vein physiology—fragile, small, sclerotic veins, blood flow, and vessel size.
-
Pharmacologic—duration and amount of chemotherapy exposure, drug administration sequence (see Table 6.13).
-
Physiologic—superior vena cava syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, lymphedema, phlebitis.
-
Radiologic—previous local irradiation.
-
Mechanical—needle insertion technique, injection site, multiple venipuncture attempts.
Prevention [197–200]
-
Use of central venous catheter if possible.
-
Careful administration with frequent checking of blood return.
-
IV sites should be started from as distant from hand, dorsum of the foot, or any joints as possible.
-
Do not administer chemotherapy distal from a recent venipuncture site.
-
Consider using hot compress to dilate veins before administration.
-
Educate patients to report any pain, tingling, burning symptoms.
-
Monitor IV sites frequently during infusion.
Clinical Management [199, 200]
General Management Protocol (see Table 6.14)
-
Stop infusion.
-
Aspirate any drugs via intravenous cannula.
-
Do not flush the line.
-
Instill antidotes if available.
-
Remove the catheter.
-
Cold or warm packs as recommended.
-
Consider taking a picture of the site with extravasation and mark the border.
-
Monitor the site for 24 h, at 1 and 2 weeks and as necessary for redness, swelling, pain, ulceration and necrosis.
-
Early surgery for severe and large amount of extravasation when necessary.
Cold Protocol
-
Immediately after medical treatment is completed, apply ice pack to the affected area for 15–20 min at least 4 times per day for the first 24–48 h by any of the following means:
-
Cool wash cloth.
-
Instant cool/ice pack.
-
-
Elevate limb at all times and exercise at least every 4–6 h to reduce immobility.
Warm Protocol
-
Immediately after medical treatment is completed apply warmth to the affected area for 15–20 min at least 4 times per day for the first 24–48 h by any of the following means:
-
Heating pad (K pad) on moderate setting.
-
Instant warm pack.
-
-
Elevate and extend limb to promote circulation at all times and exercise at least every 4–6 h to reduce immobility.
Antidotes [197, 199–202]
-
Sodium Thiosulfate.
-
Mix 0.4 mL of 25 % sodium thiosulfate with 2.1 mL Sterile Water for Injection (resulting in 1/6 molar solution).
-
Inject 2 mL of the sodium thiosulfate solution subQ into the extravasation site using a 25-gauge or smaller needle.
-
Follow cold protocol.
-
-
Hyaluronidase.
-
Inject 1 mL (200 units) as five separate injections in a clockwise manner, each containing 0.2 mL of hyaluronidase, subQ around the extravasation site.
-
Change needle with each injection.
-
Hyaluronidase must not be given IV; death has resulted.
-
Follow warm protocol.
-
DO NOT APPLY ICE.
-
Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
-
For anthracycline extravasation management:
-
Consider for cases that may be difficult to delineate between a local infusion reaction (phlebitis, irritation) versus a small volume extravasation.
-
When opposite arm/extremity/area other than affected area is not available for IV access.
-
Begin DMSO immediately after the nurse has aspirated any residual extravasate and removed the IV device.
-
-
-
Conflicting literature exists as to the benefit of this adjuvant therapy.
-
Dimethylsulfoxide 99 %: Using cotton ball or small gauze pad, invert DMSO bottle to wet cotton ball or small gauze then apply topically every 6 h for 14 days or every 8 h for 7 days, leave uncovered.
-
-
Dexrazoxane (Totect™).
-
As an alternative treatment of anthracycline extravasations.
-
Consider systemic treatment when:
-
Centrally placed venous catheter extravasations may result in extensive underlying soft tissue involvement, Large volume extravasations (when ulceration and necrosis is likely to occur),
-
Significant amount of time (>1 h) has elapsed between discovery of the extravasation and initiation of extravasation management.
-
Therapy must be initiated within 6 h of extravasation.
-
-
-
Cold protocol should be held 15 min prior to infusion through 15 min after infusion.
-
Recommended dose:
-
Days 1 and 2: 1,000 mg/m2 (2,000 mg max dose) IV.
-
Day 3: 500 mg/m2 (1,000 mg max dose).
-
Reduce dose by 50 % for patients with a creatinine clearance less than 40 mL/min.
-
Dilute in 1,000 mL 0.9 % NaCl and infuse over 1–2 h in opposite extremity/area than the one affected by the extravasation.
-
On days 2 and 3, premedicate with prochlorperazine 10 mg PO or dexamethasone 12 mg PO.
-
Background [203]
Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are most commonly seen in gynecologic oncology patients receiving platinums (carboplatin, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin) and taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel); however, they were reported in other agents such as liposomal doxorubicin. HSRs are often unpredictable and symptoms vary dramatically. This article focuses on carboplatin/cisplatin and paclitaxel/docetaxel HSRs and their clinical management.
Incidence [1–5, 204]
-
Carboplatin: 1–6 % overall, however, incidence is up to 44 %.
-
Cisplatin: 5–20 %.
-
Paclitaxel and docetaxel: 10 % without premedication and 2 % with premedication.
Mechanism [203–205]
-
Platinums: true allergic reactions and most acute HSR if IgE mediated activation of basophils and mast cells. Types of HSRs are outlined in Table 6.15.
-
Taxanes: generally an infusion-related, but not Ig-E mediated. Often attributed to Cremophor (paclitaxel) and Tween 80 (docetaxel). It is the direct activation of basophils and mast cells.
Clinical Presentation and Grading [179, 203]
Severity grading of HSR is outlined in Table 6.16.
Platinum Hypersensitivity
-
Often occurs following re-exposure, after the completion of the initial treatment (>6 doses).
-
Symptoms can occur anytime during the infusion, or after completion of the infusion.
-
Commonly HSR symptoms are more severe.
-
Half of HSR are still mild but anaphylaxis can occur.
Taxane Hypersensitivity
-
Often occurs during the first and second cycle of paclitaxel/docetaxel.
-
Typically occurs with the first a few minutes.
-
Symptoms are often milder, but anaphylaxis can still occur.
Prevention [195, 203, 204]
-
Preparation for the possible HSR.
-
Obtain all necessary treatment/monitoring equipment including blood pressure monitor, IV antihistamines, IV emergent steroids (e.g., hydrocortisone), IV epinephrine, and oxygen.
-
-
Premedication 30 min before chemotherapy (most taxanes).
-
H1 antagonist (diphenhydramine 50 mg IV).
-
H2 antagonist (ranitidine 50 mg IV or famotidine 20 mg IV).
-
Steroid (dexamethasone 20 mg IV).
-
Desensitization [203, 206]
-
Gradual reintroduction of small amounts of drug antigen titrating to the full dose, on prolonged infusion and premedication.
-
Various desensitization protocols have been published.
-
No single protocol is preferred.
-
Desensitization typically takes a much longer time, but recent rapid desensitization protocols have been tested with success. Table 6.17 describes desensitization protocol from the largest study to date.
-
Consider substitute with a different platinum or taxane drug.
-
Cisplatin for patients with a history of severe carboplatin HSR.
-
Docetaxel or nanoalbumin paclitaxel for patients with a history of severe paclitaxel HSR.
-
Monitor patients closely for any signs/symptoms of breakthrough reactions during desensitization.
References
Taxol [Package Insert] Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Meyer Squibb Company; 2011.
Lexicomp Online. Wolters Kluwer Health. Hudson, OH; 2014. http://online.lexi.com. Accessed 11 Jan 2014.
Taxotere [Package Insert] Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis; 2013.
Platinol [Package Insert] Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Meyer Squibb Company; 2010.
Paraplatin [Package Insert] Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Meyer Squibb Company; 2010.
Eloxatin [Package Insert] Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis; 2013.
Camptosar [Package Insert] New York, NY: Pfizer; 2012.
Hycamtin [Package Insert] Research Triangle Park, NC: Glaxo Smith Kline; 2010.
Doxil [Package Insert] Horsham, PA: Janssen Products; 2013.
Doxorubicin [Package Insert] Bedford, OH: Bedford Laboratories; 2012.
Ellence [Package Insert] New York, NY: Pfizer Inc.; 2013.
Gemzar [Package Insert] Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2013.
Navelbine [Package Insert] Parsippany, NJ: Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2007.
Vinblastine [Package Insert] Bedford, OH: Bedford Laboratories; 2012.
Vincristine [Package Insert] Lake Forest, IL: Hospira, Inc.; 2013.
Methotrexate Injection [Package Insert] Lake Forest, IL: Hospira, Inc.; 2011.
Cosmogen [Package Insert] Deerfield, IL: Ovation Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2008.
Cytoxan [Package Insert] Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2005.
Hexalen [Package Insert] Woodcliff Lake, NJ: Eisai Inc.; 2009.
Xeloda [Package Insert] South San Francisco, CA: Genentech, Inc.; 2013.
Fluorouracil [Package Insert] Irvine, CA: Gensia Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 1999.
Ifex [Package Insert] Princeton, NJ: Bristol Myers Squibb Company; 2007.
Alkeran Injection [Package Insert] Rockville, MD: ApoPharma USA Inc.; 2011.
Alimta [Package Insert] Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2013.
Dacarbazine [Package Insert] Bedford, OH: Bedford Laboratories; 2007.
Temodar [Package Insert] Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc.; 2013.
Votrient [Package Insert] Research Triangle Park, NC: GlaxoSmithKline; 2013.
Etoposide Injection [Package Insert] Bedford, OH: Bedford Laboratories; 2012.
Etoposide Capsule [Package Insert] Morgantown, WV: Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2013.
Bleomycin [Package Insert] Lake Forest, IL: Hospira, Inc.; 2012.
Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1144–53.
Rose PG, Ali S, Watkins E, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Clarke-Pearson DL, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing concurrent single agent cisplatin, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, or hydroxyurea during pelvic irradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(19):2804–10.
Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB, Muderspach LI, Chafe WE, Suggs 3rd CL, et al. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1154–61.
Lanciano R, Calkins A, Bundy BN, Parham G, Lucci 3rd JA, Moore DH, et al. Randomized comparison of weekly cisplatin or protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil in combination with pelvic radiation in advanced cervix cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(33):8289–95.
Peters 3rd WA, Liu PY, Barrett 2nd RJ, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1606–13.
Moore DH, Blessing JA, McQuellon RP, Thaler HT, Cella D, Benda J, et al. Phase III study of cisplatin with or without paclitaxel in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(15):3113–9.
Monk BJ, Sill MW, McMeekin DS, Cohn DE, Ramondetta LM, Boardman CH, et al. Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(28):4649–55.
Kitagawa R, Katsumata N, Shibata T. A randomized, phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin (TP) in stage IVb, persistent or recurrent cervical cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG0505). J Clin Oncol. 2012;30.
Long 3rd HJ, Bundy BN, Grendys Jr EC, Benda JA, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J, et al. Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(21):4626–33.
Tewari KSS, Long M, Ramondetta HJ, Landrum LM, Oaknin A, Reid TJ, Leitao MM, Michael HE, Monk BJ. Incorporation of bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer: a phase III randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31 Suppl 18:3. Abstract.
Weiss GR, Green S, Hannigan EV, Boutselis JG, Surwit EA, Wallace DL, et al. A phase II trial of carboplatin for recurrent or metastatic squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1990;39(3):332–6.
Kudelka AP, Winn R, Edwards CL, Downey G, Greenberg H, Dakhil SR, et al. An update of a phase II study of paclitaxel in advanced or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the cervix. Anticancer Drugs. 1997;8(7):657–61.
Monk BJ, Sill MW, Burger RA, Gray HJ, Buekers TE, Roman LD. Phase II trial of bevacizumab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(7):1069–74.
Garcia AA, Blessing JA, Vaccarello L, Roman LD. Phase II clinical trial of docetaxel in refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2007;30(4):428–31.
Look KY, Blessing JA, Gallup DG, Lentz SS. A phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin in patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Clin Oncol. 1996;19(5):439–41.
Schilder RJ, Blessing J, Cohn DE. Evaluation of gemcitabine in previously treated patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96(1):103–7.
Coleman RE, Harper PG, Gallagher C, Osborne R, Rankin EM, Silverstone AC, et al. A phase II study of ifosfamide in advanced and relapsed carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1986;18(3):280–3.
Sutton GP, Blessing JA, McGuire WP, Patton T, Look KY. Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous carcinoma of the cervix who had never received chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168(3 Pt 1):805–7.
Verschraegen CF, Levy T, Kudelka AP, Llerena E, Ende K, Freedman RS, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan in prior chemotherapy-treated squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(2):625–31.
Wagenaar HC, Pecorelli S, Mangioni C, van der Burg ME, Rotmensz N, Anastasopoulou A, et al. Phase II study of mitomycin-C and cisplatin in disseminated, squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gynecological Cancer Group study. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(13):1624–8.
Muderspach LI, Blessing JA, Levenback C, Moore Jr JL. A phase II study of topotecan in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;81(2):213–5.
Bookman MA, Blessing JA, Hanjani P, Herzog TJ, Andersen WA. Topotecan in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77(3):446–9.
Thigpen JT, Brady MF, Alvarez RD, Adelson MD, Homesley HD, Manetta A, et al. Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose-response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(6):1736–44.
Thigpen T, Brady MF, Homesley HD, Soper JT, Bell J. Tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(2):364–7.
Pinelli DM, Fiorica JV, Roberts WS, Hoffman MS, Nicosia SV, Cavanagh D. Chemotherapy plus sequential hormonal therapy for advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a phase II study. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;60(3):462–7.
Lentz SS, Brady MF, Major FJ, Reid GC, Soper JT. High-dose megestrol acetate in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(2):357–61.
Fiorica JV, Brunetto VL, Hanjani P, Lentz SS, Mannel R, Andersen W. Phase II trial of alternating courses of megestrol acetate and tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92(1):10–4.
Ma BB, Oza A, Eisenhauer E, Stanimir G, Carey M, Chapman W, et al. The activity of letrozole in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and correlation with biological markers – a study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14(4):650–8.
Rose PG, Brunetto VL, VanLe L, Bell J, Walker JL, Lee RB. A phase II trial of anastrozole in advanced recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78(2):212–6.
Randall ME, Filiaci VL, Muss H, Spirtos NM, Mannel RS, Fowler J, et al. Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(1):36–44.
Thigpen JT, Brady MF, Homesley HD, Malfetano J, DuBeshter B, Burger RA, et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin with or without cisplatin in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(19):3902–8.
Homesley HD, Filiaci V, Gibbons SK, Long HJ, Cella D, Spirtos NM, et al. A randomized phase III trial in advanced endometrial carcinoma of surgery and volume directed radiation followed by cisplatin and doxorubicin with or without paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(3):543–52.
Sorbe B, Andersson H, Boman K, Rosenberg P, Kalling M. Treatment of primary advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma with a combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel-long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18(4):803–8.
Pectasides D, Xiros N, Papaxoinis G, Pectasides E, Sykiotis C, Koumarianou A, et al. Carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(2):250–4.
Nomura H, Aoki D, Takahashi F, Katsumata N, Watanabe Y, Konishi I, et al. Randomized phase II study comparing docetaxel plus cisplatin, docetaxel plus carboplatin, and paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG2041). Ann Oncol. 2011;22(3):636–42.
Secord AA, Havrilesky LJ, Carney ME, Soper JT, Clarke-Pearson DL, Rodriguez GC, et al. Weekly low-dose paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical and endometrial cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2007;12(1):31–6.
Scribner Jr DR, Puls LE, Gold MA. A phase II evaluation of docetaxel and carboplatin followed by tumor volume directed pelvic plus or minus paraaortic irradiation for stage III endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(2):388–93.
Geller MA, Ivy JJ, Ghebre R, Downs Jr LS, Judson PL, Carson LF, et al. A phase II trial of carboplatin and docetaxel followed by radiotherapy given in a “Sandwich” method for stage III, IV, and recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(1):112–7.
Deppe G, Cohen CJ, Bruckner HW. Treatment of advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma with cis-dichlorodiammine platinum (II) after intensive prior therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 1980;10(1):51–4.
Seski JC, Edwards CL, Herson J, Rutledge FN. Cisplatin chemotherapy for disseminated endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59(2):225–8.
Burke TW, Munkarah A, Kavanagh JJ, Morris M, Levenback C, Tornos C, et al. Treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma with single-agent carboplatin. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51(3):397–400.
Green 3rd JB, Green S, Alberts DS, O’Toole R, Surwit EA, Noltimier JW. Carboplatin therapy in advanced endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75(4):696–700.
Thigpen JT, Buchsbaum HJ, Mangan C, Blessing JA. Phase II trial of adriamycin in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer Treat Rep. 1979;63(1):21–7.
Muggia FM, Blessing JA, Sorosky J, Reid GC. Phase II trial of the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in previously treated metastatic endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(9):2360–4.
Ball HG, Blessing JA, Lentz SS, Mutch DG. A phase II trial of paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;62(2):278–81.
Lincoln S, Blessing JA, Lee RB, Rocereto TF. Activity of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88(3):277–81.
Garcia AA, Blessing JA, Nolte S, Mannel RS. A phase II evaluation of weekly docetaxel in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(1):22–6.
Aghajanian C, Sill MW, Darcy KM, Greer B, McMeekin DS, Rose PG, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2259–65.
Sutton G, Brunetto VL, Kilgore L, Soper JT, McGehee R, Olt G, et al. A phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without cisplatin in carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79(2):147–53.
Sutton G, Kauderer J, Carson LF, Lentz SS, Whitney CW, Gallion H. Adjuvant ifosfamide and cisplatin in patients with completely resected stage I or II carcinosarcomas (mixed mesodermal tumors) of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96(3):630–4.
Homesley HD, Filiaci V, Markman M, Bitterman P, Eaton L, Kilgore LC, et al. Phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):526–31.
Pink D, Lindner T, Mrozek A, Kretzschmar A, Thuss-Patience PC, Dorken B, et al. Harm or benefit of hormonal treatment in metastatic low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: single center experience with 10 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101(3):464–9.
Chu MC, Mor G, Lim C, Zheng W, Parkash V, Schwartz PE. Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: hormonal aspects. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90(1):170–6.
Cheng X, Yang G, Schmeler KM, Coleman RL, Tu X, Liu J, et al. Recurrence patterns and prognosis of endometrial stromal sarcoma and the potential of tyrosine kinase-inhibiting therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(2):323–7.
O'Cearbhaill R, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, Soslow RA, Leitao MM, Aghajanian C, et al. Treatment of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma with aromatase inhibitors. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116(3):424–9.
Hensley ML, Maki R, Venkatraman E, Geller G, Lovegren M, Aghajanian C, et al. Gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with unresectable leiomyosarcoma: results of a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(12):2824–31.
Hensley ML, Blessing JA, Degeest K, Abulafia O, Rose PG, Homesley HD. Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as second-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II study. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(3):323–8.
Hensley ML, Blessing JA, Mannel R, Rose PG. Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(3):329–34.
Hensley ML, Ishill N, Soslow R, Larkin J, Abu-Rustum N, Sabbatini P, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine plus docetaxel for completely resected stages I-IV high grade uterine leiomyosarcoma: results of a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(3):563–7.
Sutton G, Blessing JA, Malfetano JH. Ifosfamide and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;62(2):226–9.
Le Cesne A, Judson I, Crowther D, Rodenhuis S, Keizer HJ, Van Hoesel Q, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing conventional-dose doxorubicin plus ifosfamide versus high-dose doxorubicin plus ifosfamide plus recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(14):2676–84.
Omura GA, Major FJ, Blessing JA, Sedlacek TV, Thigpen JT, Creasman WT, et al. A randomized study of adriamycin with and without dimethyl triazenoimidazole carboxamide in advanced uterine sarcomas. Cancer. 1983;52(4):626–32.
Losa R, Fra J, Lopez-Pousa A, Sierra M, Goitia A, Una E, et al. Phase II study with the combination of gemcitabine and DTIC in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007;59(2):251–9.
Garcia-Del-Muro X, Lopez-Pousa A, Maurel J, Martin J, Martinez-Trufero J, Casado A, et al. Randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone in patients with previously treated soft tissue sarcoma: a Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(18):2528–33.
Dileo P, Morgan JA, Zahrieh D, Desai J, Salesi JM, Harmon DC, et al. Gemcitabine and vinorelbine combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: results of a phase II trial. Cancer. 2007;109(9):1863–9.
Petrioli R, Coratti A, Correale P, D’Aniello C, Grimaldi L, Tanzini G, et al. Adjuvant epirubicin with or without Ifosfamide for adult soft-tissue sarcoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25(5):468–73.
Look KY, Sandler A, Blessing JA, Lucci 3rd JA, Rose PG. Phase II trial of gemcitabine as second-line chemotherapy of uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92(2):644–7.
Sutton GP, Blessing JA, Barrett RJ, McGehee R. Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(2):556–9.
Sutton G, Blessing J, Hanjani P, Kramer P. Phase II evaluation of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in recurrent or advanced leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96(3):749–52.
Sutton G, Blessing JA, Ball H. Phase II trial of paclitaxel in leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;74(3):346–9.
Gallup DG, Blessing JA, Andersen W, Morgan MA. Evaluation of paclitaxel in previously treated leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;89(1):48–51.
Anderson S, Aghajanian C. Temozolomide in uterine leiomyosarcomas. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;98(1):99–103.
Nasti G, Errante D, Talamini R, Rizzardini G, Fasan M, Landonio G, et al. Vinorelbine is an effective and safe drug for AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma: results of a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(7):1550–7.
van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, Kim DW, Bui-Nguyen B, Casali PG, et al. Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1879–86.
Ozols RF, Bundy BN, Greer BE, Fowler JM, Clarke-Pearson D, Burger RA, et al. Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(17):3194–200.
Vasey PA, Atkinson R, Coleman R, Crawford M, Cruickshank M, Eggleton P, et al. Docetaxel-carboplatin as first line chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2001;84(2):170–8.
McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, Kucera PR, Partridge EE, Look KY, et al. Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(1):1–6.
Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(1):34–43.
Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Takahashi F, Isonishi S, Jobo T, Aoki D, et al. Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1331–8.
Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, Fleming GF, Monk BJ, Huang H, et al. Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(26):2473–83.
Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, Ledermann JA, Pujade-Lauraine E, Kristensen G, et al. A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(26):2484–96.
Parmar MK, Ledermann JA, Colombo N, du Bois A, Delaloye JF, Kristensen GB, et al. Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9375):2099–106.
Gronlund B, Hogdall C, Hansen HH, Engelholm SA. Results of reinduction therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83(1):128–34.
Pfisterer J, Plante M, Vergote I, du Bois A, Hirte H, Lacave AJ, et al. Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(29):4699–707.
Aghajanian C, Blank SV, Goff BA, Judson PL, Teneriello MG, Husain A, et al. OCEANS: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(17):2039–45.
Nagourney RA, Brewer CA, Radecki S, Kidder WA, Sommers BL, Evans SS, et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin repeating doublet therapy in previously treated, relapsed ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88(1):35–9.
Rose PG, Mossbruger K, Fusco N, Smrekar M, Eaton S, Rodriguez M. Gemcitabine reverses cisplatin resistance: demonstration of activity in platinum- and multidrug-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88(1):17–21.
Strauss HG, Henze A, Teichmann A, Karbe I, Baumgart A, Thomssen C, et al. Phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104(3):612–6.
Kushner DM, Connor JP, Sanchez F, Volk M, Schink JC, Bailey HH, et al. Weekly docetaxel and carboplatin for recurrent ovarian and peritoneal cancer: a phase II trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105(2):358–64.
Wagner U, Marth C, Largillier R, Kaern J, Brown C, Heywood M, et al. Final overall survival results of phase III GCIG CALYPSO trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin vs paclitaxel and carboplatin in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(4):588–91.
Alberts DS, Liu PY, Wilczynski SP, Clouser MC, Lopez AM, Michelin DP, et al. Randomized trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus carboplatin versus carboplatin in platinum-sensitive (PS) patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma after failure of initial platinum-based chemotherapy (Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S0200). Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108(1):90–4.
Burger RA, Sill MW, Monk BJ, Greer BE, Sorosky JI. Phase II trial of bevacizumab in persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5165–71.
Kaye SB, Piccart M, Aapro M, Francis P, Kavanagh J. Phase II trials of docetaxel (Taxotere) in advanced ovarian cancer – an updated overview. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33(13):2167–70.
Rose PG, Blessing JA, Ball HG, Hoffman J, Warshal D, DeGeest K, et al. A phase II study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88(2):130–5.
Markman M, Blessing J, Rubin SC, Connor J, Hanjani P, Waggoner S. Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) in platinum and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101(3):436–40.
Markman M, Webster K, Zanotti K, Kulp B, Peterson G, Belinson J. Phase 2 trial of single-agent gemcitabine in platinum-paclitaxel refractory ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;90(3):593–6.
D'Agostino G, Amant F, Berteloot P, Scambia G, Vergote I. Phase II study of gemcitabine in recurrent platinum-and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88(3):266–9.
Mutch DG, Orlando M, Goss T, Teneriello MG, Gordon AN, McMeekin SD, et al. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(19):2811–8.
Rose PG, Blessing JA, Mayer AR, Homesley HD. Prolonged oral etoposide as second-line therapy for platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(2):405–10.
Vergote I, Himmelmann A, Frankendal B, Scheistroen M, Vlachos K, Trope C. Hexamethylmelamine as second-line therapy in platin-resistant ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;47(3):282–6.
Monk BJ, Choi DC, Pugmire G, Burger RA. Activity of bevacizumab (rhuMAB VEGF) in advanced refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;96(3):902–5.
Cannistra SA, Matulonis UA, Penson RT, Hambleton J, Dupont J, Mackey H, et al. Phase II study of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or peritoneal serous cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5180–6.
Teneriello MG, Tseng PC, Crozier M, Encarnacion C, Hancock K, Messing MJ, et al. Phase II evaluation of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in platinum-sensitive patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(9):1426–31.
Fracasso PM, Blessing JA, Morgan MA, Sood AK, Hoffman JS. Phase II study of oxaliplatin in platinum-resistant and refractory ovarian cancer: a gynecologic group study. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(15):2856–9.
Gordon AN, Fleagle JT, Guthrie D, Parkin DE, Gore ME, Lacave AJ. Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(14):3312–22.
Muggia FM, Hainsworth JD, Jeffers S, Miller P, Groshen S, Tan M, et al. Phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in refractory ovarian cancer: antitumor activity and toxicity modification by liposomal encapsulation. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(3):987–93.
Ferrandina G, Ludovisi M, Lorusso D, Pignata S, Breda E, Savarese A, et al. Phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(6):890–6.
ten Bokkel Huinink W, Gore M, Carmichael J, Gordon A, Malfetano J, Hudson I, et al. Topotecan versus paclitaxel for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(6):2183–93.
McGuire WP, Blessing JA, Bookman MA, Lentz SS, Dunton CJ. Topotecan has substantial antitumor activity as first-line salvage therapy in platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(5):1062–7.
Sehouli J, Stengel D, Harter P, Kurzeder C, Belau A, Bogenrieder T, et al. Topotecan weekly versus conventional 5-day schedule in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a randomized multicenter phase II trial of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(2):242–8.
Burger RA, DiSaia PJ, Roberts JA, O’Rourke M, Gershenson DM, Homesley HD, et al. Phase II trial of vinorelbine in recurrent and progressive epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;72(2):148–53.
Miller DS, Blessing JA, Krasner CN, Mannel RS, Hanjani P, Pearl ML, et al. Phase II evaluation of pemetrexed in the treatment of recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(16):2686–91.
Markman M, Hakes T, Reichman B, Lewis Jr JL, Rubin S, Jones W, et al. Ifosfamide and mesna in previously treated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: activity in platinum-resistant disease. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(2):243–8.
Wolf JK, Bodurka DC, Verschraegen C, Sun CC, Branham D, Jenkins AD, et al. A phase II trial of oral capecitabine in patients with platinum – and taxane – refractory ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102(3):468–74.
Bodurka DC, Levenback C, Wolf JK, Gano J, Wharton JT, Kavanagh JJ, et al. Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer or peritoneal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(2):291–7.
Markman M, Iseminger KA, Hatch KD, Creasman WT, Barnes W, Dubeshter B. Tamoxifen in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Ancillary Report. Gynecol Oncol. 1996;62(1):4–6.
del Carmen MG, Fuller AF, Matulonis U, Horick NK, Goodman A, Duska LR, et al. Phase II trial of anastrozole in women with asymptomatic mullerian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91(3):596–602.
Papadimitriou CA, Markaki S, Siapkaras J, Vlachos G, Efstathiou E, Grimani I, et al. Hormonal therapy with letrozole for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. Long-term results of a phase II study. Oncology. 2004;66(2):112–7.
Bowman A, Gabra H, Langdon SP, Lessells A, Stewart M, Young A, et al. CA125 response is associated with estrogen receptor expression in a phase II trial of letrozole in ovarian cancer: identification of an endocrine-sensitive subgroup. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(7):2233–9.
Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Milam MR, Slomovitz BM, Smith JA, Kavanagh JJ, et al. Efficacy of letrozole in the treatment of recurrent platinum- and taxane-resistant high-grade cancer of the ovary or peritoneum. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110(1):56–9.
Marinaccio M, D'Addario V, Serrati A, Pinto V, Cagnazzo G. Leuprolide acetate as a salvage-therapy in relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1996;17(4):286–8.
Veenhof CH, van der Burg ME, Nooy M, Aalders JG, Pecorelli S, Oliveira CF, et al. Phase II study of high-dose megestrol acetate in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(5):697–8.
Wilailak S, Linasmita V, Srisupundit S. Phase II study of high-dose megestrol acetate in platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2001;12(9):719–24.
Hesketh PJ. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(23):2482–94. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0706547.
Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ, Warr DG, Roila F, de Wit R, et al. The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist Aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(22):4112–9.
Wiser W, Berger A. Practical management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oncology (Williston Park). 2005;19(5):637–45.
Hawkins R, Grunberg S. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: challenges and opportunities for improved patient outcomes. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2009;13(1):54–64. doi:10.1188/09.CJON.54-64.
Wilhelm SM, Dehoorne-Smith ML, Kale-Pradhan PB. Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41(1):68–78.
Richardson JL, Marks G, Levine A. The influence of symptoms of disease and side effects of treatment on compliance with cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6(11):1746–52.
Roila F, Herrstedt J, Aapro M, Gralla RJ, Einhorn LH, Ballatori E, et al. Guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results of the Perugia consensus conference. Ann Oncol. 2010;21 suppl 5:v232–43. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq194.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Antiemesis. Version 1.2014. Accessed 11 Jan 2014. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/antiemesis.pdf.
Marty M, Pouillart P, Scholl S, Droz JP, Azab M, Brion N, et al. Comparison of 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (serotonin) antagonist ondansetron (GR 38032F) with high-dose metoclopramide in the control of cisplatin-induced emesis. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(12):816–21. doi:10.1056/NEJM199003223221205.
Boccia RV, Gordan LN, Clark G, Howell JD, Grunberg SM, Sancuso Study Group. Efficacy and tolerability of transdermal granisetron for the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately and highly emetogenic multi-day chemotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase III study. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(10):1609–17.
Zofran [Package Insert]. Research Triangle Park, NC: GlaxoSmithKline; 2011.
Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Feyer PC, Somerfield MR, et al. Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(31):4189–98. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4614.
Anzamet [Package Insert]. Bridgewater, NJ: Sanofi-Aventis; 2011.
Emend [Package Insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp; 2010.
Navari RM, Gray SE, Kerr AC. Olanzapine versus Aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized phase III trial. J Support Oncol. 2011;9(5):188–95. doi:10.1016/j.suponc.2011.05.002.
Jordan K, Kinitz I, Voigt W, Behlendrof T, Wolf HH, Schmoll HJ. Safety and efficacy of a triple antiemetic combination with the NK-1 antagonist Aprepitant in highly and moderately emetogenic multiple-day chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(7):1184–7.
Einhorn LH, Brames MJ, Dreicer R, Nichols CR, Cullen Jr MT, Bubalo J. Palonosetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple-day cisplatin chemotherapy for germ cell cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15(11):1293–300.
Shaw C, Taylor L. Treatment-related diarrhea in patients with cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16(4):413–7. doi:10.1188/12.CJON.413-417.
Wadler S, Benson AB, Engelking C, Catalano R, Field M, Kornblau SM, et al. Recommended guidelines for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:3169.
Benson AB, Ajani JA, Catalano RB, Engelking C, Kornblau SM, Martenson JA, et al. Recommended guidelines for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(14):2918–26. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.04.132.
Gupta E, Lestingi TM, Mick R, Ramirez J, Vokes EE, Ratain MJ. Metabolic fate of Irinotecan in humans: correlation of glucuronidation with diarrhea. Cancer Res. 1994;54(14):3723–5.
Diasio RB, Beavers TL, Carpenter JT. Familial deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. Biochemical basis for familial pyrimidinemia and severe 5-fluorouracil-induced toxicity. J Clin Invest. 1988;81(1):47–51.
Harris BE, Carpenter JT, Diasio RB. Severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity secondary to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. A potentially more common pharmacogenetic syndrome. Cancer. 1991;68(3):499–501.
Pullarkat ST, Stoehlmacher J, Ghader V, Xiong YP, Ingles SA, Sherrod A, et al. Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism determines response and toxicity of 5-FU chemotherapy. Pharmacogenomics J. 2001;1(1):65.
Xu JM, Wang Y, Ge FJ, Lin L, Liu ZY, Sharma MR. Severe irinotecan-induced toxicity in a patient with UGT1A1 28 and UGT1A1 6 polymorphisms. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(24):2899–903. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3899.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03. http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010–06–14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2014.
Abigerges D, Armand JP, Chabot GG, Da Costa L, Fadel E, Cote C, et al. Irinotecan (CPT-11) high-dose escalation using intensive high-dose loperamide to control diarrhea. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86(6):446. doi:10.1093/jnci/86.6.446.
Stavraka C, Ford A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Crook T, Agarwal R, Gabra H, et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(1):59–64. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.12.421.
Argyriou AA, Bruna J, Marmiroli P, Cavaletti G. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN): an update. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012;82(1):51–77.
Stubblefield MD, Burstein HJ, Burton AW, Custodio CM, Deng GE, Ho M, et al. NCCN task force report: management of neuropathy in cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7:S-1–26.
Beijers AJ, Jongen JL, Vreugdenhil G. Chemotherapy-induced neurotoxocity: the value of neuroprotective strategies. Neth J Med. 2012;70(1):18–25.
Grisold W, Cavaletti G, Windebank AJ. Peripheral neuropathies from chemotherapeutics and targeted agents: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14 Suppl 4:iv45–54. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nos203.
Chamberlain MC. Neurotoxicity of cancer treatment. Curr Oncol Rep. 2010;16:60–7. doi:10.1007/s11912-009-0072-9.
Piccolo J, Kolesar JM. Prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2014;71(1):19–25. doi:10.2146/ajhp130126.
Weber B, Largillier R, Ray-Coquard I, Yazbek G, Meunier J, Alexandre J, et al. A potentially neuroprotective role for erythropoietin with paclitaxel treatment in ovarian cancer patients: a prospective phase II GINECO trial. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(7):1947–54.
Loprinzi CL, Qin R, Dakhill SR, Fehrenbacher L, Flynn KA, Atherton P, et al. Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of intravenous calcium and magnesium to prevent oxaliplatin-induced sensory neurotoxicity (N08CB/Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2013. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.52.0536.
Hensley ML, Hagerty KL, Kewalramani T, Green DM, Meropol NJ, Wasserman TH, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2008 clinical practice guideline update: use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy protectants. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(1):127–45. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2627.
Dale DC, McCarter GC, Crawford J, Lyman GH. Myelotoxicity and dose intensity of chemotherapy: reporting practices from randomized clinical trials. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2003;1(3):440–54.
Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH. Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer. 2006;106(10):2258–66.
Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):427–31.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prevention and treatment of cancer-related infection. Version 1.2013. Accessed 25 Dec 2013. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/infections.pdf.
Green MR. Symptom management. In: ASHP and ACCP Inc. 2013 Oncology Pharmacy Preparatory Review Course, 2013 ed. Lenex, KS: American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 2013:1072–1079.
Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB, Boyer M, Elting L, Feld R, et al. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: a multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(16):3038–51.
Goolsby TV, Lombardo FA. Extravasation of chemotherapeutic agents: prevention and treatment. Semin Oncol. 2006;33(1):139–43.
Chu E, DeVita Jr VT, Copur MS, et al., editors. Physician’s cancer chemotherapy drug manual. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett; 2008.
Perry MC. The chemotherapy source book. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
Schulmeister L. Extravasation management: clinical update. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011;27(1):82–90.
Bertelli G, Gozza A, Forno GB, Vidili MG, Silvestro S, Venturini M, et al. Topical dimethylsulfoxide for the prevention of soft tissue injury after extravasation of vesicant cytotoxic drugs: a prospective clinical study. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(11):2851–5.
Mouridsen HT, Langer SW, Buter J, Eidtmann H, Rosti G, de Wit M, et al. Treatment of anthracycline extravasation with Savene (dexrazoxane): results from two prospective clinical multicentre studies. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(3):546–50.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Epithelial ovarian cancer. Version 2.2013. Accessed 20 July 2013. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/ovarian.pdf.
Makrilia N, Syrigou E, Kaklamanos I, Manolopoulos L, Saif MW. Hypersensitivity reactions associated with platinum antineoplastic agents: a systematic review. Met Based Drugs. 2010;2010. pii:207084.
Castells M, Sancho-Serra Mdel C, Simarro M. Hypersensitivity to antineoplastic agents: mechanisms and treatment with rapid desensitization. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61(9):1575–84.
Castells MC, Tennant NM, Sloane DE, Hsu FI, Barrett NA, Hong DI, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: outcomes and safety of rapid desensitization in 413 cases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(3):574–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, Q., Watkins, J.L. (2015). Chemotherapy for Gynecologic Cancer. In: Eskander, R., Bristow, R. (eds) Gynecologic Oncology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1976-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1976-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1975-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1976-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)