Abstract
The identification of suitable protein structures that can serve as scaffolds for the introduction of catalytic residues is crucial for the design of new enzymes. Here we describe how the automated and rapid scaffold search program ScaffoldSelection can be used to find the best starting points, namely protein structures that are most likely to tolerate the introduction and promote the proper formation of a specific catalytic motif.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pinto AL, Hellinga HW, Caradonna JP (1997) Construction of a catalytically active iron superoxide dismutase by rational protein design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:5562–5567
Jiang L, Althoff EA, Clemente FR, Doyle L, Röthlisberger D, Zanghellini A et al (2008) De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319:1387–1391
Röthlisberger D, Khersonsky O, Wollacott AM, Jiang L, DeChancie J, Betker J et al (2008) Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453: 190–195
Zanghellini A, Jiang L, Wollacott AM, Cheng G, Meiler J, Althoff EA et al (2006) New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci 15:2785–2794
Malisi C, Kohlbacher O, Höcker B (2009) Automated scaffold selection for enzyme design. Proteins 77:74–83
Hellinga HW, Richards FM (1991) Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. I. Computer-aided modeling of sites with pre-defined geometry. J Mol Biol 222:763–785
Hearst DP, Cohen FE (1994) GRAFTER: a computational aid for the design of novel proteins. Protein Eng 7:1411–1421
Hornischer K, Blocker H (1996) Grafting of discontinuous sites: a protein modeling strategy. Protein Eng 9:931–939
Lei Y, Luo W, Zhu Y (2011) A matching algorithm for catalytic residue site selection in computational enzyme design. Protein Sci 20:1566–1575
Zhang C, Lai L (2012) AutoMatch: target-binding protein design and enzyme design by automatic pinpointing potential active sites in available protein scaffolds. Proteins 80: 1078–1094
Friedland GD, Linares AJ, Smith CA, Kortemme T (2008) A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability. J Mol Biol 380:757–774
Tantillo DJ, Chen J, Houk KN (1998) Theozymes and compuzymes: theoretical models for biological catalysis. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2:743–750
Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22:2577–2637
Huang B, Schroeder M (2006) LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation. BMC Struct Biol 6:19
Kohlbacher O, Lenhof HP (2000) BALL—rapid software prototyping in computational molecular biology. Biochemicals Algorithms Library. Bioinformatics 16:815–824
Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383:66–93
Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM et al (2011) ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487:545–574
Malisi C, Schumann M, Toussaint NC et al (2012) Binding pocket optimization by computational protein design. PLoS One 7(12): e52505
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Stiel, A.C., Feldmeier, K., Höcker, B. (2014). Identification of Protein Scaffolds for Enzyme Design Using Scaffold Selection. In: Köhler, V. (eds) Protein Design. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1216. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1486-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1486-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1485-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1486-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols