Abstract
Bipolar active regions in both hemispheres tend to be tilted with respect to the East–West Equator of the Sun in accordance with Joy’s law, which describes the average tilt angle as a function of latitude. Mt. Wilson Observatory data from 1917 – 1985 are used to analyze the active-region tilt angle as a function of solar cycle, hemisphere, and longitude, in addition to the more common dependence on latitude. Our main results are as follows: i) We recommend a revision of Joy’s law towards a weaker dependence on latitude (slope of 0.13 – 0.26) and without forcing the tilt to zero at the Equator. ii) We determine that the hemispheric mean tilt value of active regions varies with each solar cycle, although the noise from a stochastic process dominates and does not allow for a determination of the slope of Joy’s law on an 11-year time scale. iii) The hemispheric difference in mean tilt angles, 1.1∘±0.27, over Cycles 16 to 21 was significant to a three-σ level, with average tilt angles in the Northern and Southern hemispheres of 4.7∘±0.26 and 3.6∘±0.27, respectively. iv) Area-weighted mean tilt angles normalized by latitude for Cycles 15 to 21 anticorrelate with cycle strength for the southern hemisphere and whole-Sun data, confirming previous results by Dasi-Espuig et al. (Astron. Astrophys. 518, A7, 2010). The Northern Hemispheric mean tilt angles do not show a dependence on cycle strength. v) Mean tilt angles do not show a dependence on longitude for any hemisphere or cycle. In addition, the standard deviation of the mean tilt is 29 – 31∘ for all cycles and hemispheres, indicating that the scatter is due to the same consistent process even if the mean tilt angles vary.
Solar Dynamics and Magnetism from the Interior to the Atmosphere
Guest Editors: R. Komm, A. Kosovichev, D. Longcope, and N. Mansour
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babcock, H.W.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 572.
Brunner, W.: 1930, Astron. Mitt. Zurich 124, 67.
Cally, P., Dikpati, M., Gilman, P.A.: 2003, Astrophys. J. 582, 1190.
Cameron, R.H., Schüssler, M.: 2012, Astron. Astrophys. 548, A57.
Charbonneau, P.: 2007, Adv. Space Res. 40, 899.
Chatterjee, P., Nandy, D., Choudhuri, A.R.: 2004, Astron. Astrophys. 427, 1019.
Dasi-Espuig, M., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Cameron, R.H., Penuela, T.: 2010, Astron. Astrophys. 518, A7.
De Toma, G., White, O.R., Harvey, K.L.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 529, 1101.
Dikpati, M., Gilman, P.A.: 2001, Astrophys. J. 559, 428.
D’Silva, S., Howard, R.F.: 1993, Solar Phys. 148, 1. doi:10.1007/BF00675531.
Durrant, C.J., Wilson, P.R.: 2002, Solar Phys. 214, 23. doi:10.1023/A:1024042918007.
Fisher, G.H., Fan, Y., Howard, R.F.: 1995, Astrophys. J. 438, 463.
Goel, A., Choudhuri, A.R.: 2009, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 9, 115.
Hale, G.E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., Joy, A.H.: 1919, Astrophys. J. 49, 153.
Howard, R.F.: 1991, Solar Phys. 136, 251. doi:10.1007/BF00146534.
Howard, R.F.: 1996, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34, 75.
Howard, R.F.: 2000, Astron. Astrophys. 21, 119.
Jiang, J., Isik, E., Cameron, R.H., Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M.: 2010, Astrophys. J. 717, 597.
Kosovichev, A.G., Stenflo, J.O.: 2008, Astrophys. J. Lett. 688, L115.
Leighton, R.B.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 1547.
Leighton, R.B.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 1.
McIntosh, S.W., Leamon, R.J., Gurman, J.R., Olive, J.P., Cirtain, J.W., Hathaway, D.H., Burkepile, J., Miesch, M., Markel, R.S., Sitongia, L.: 2013, Astrophys. J. 765, 146.
Norton, A.A., Gallagher, J.C.: 2010, Solar Phys. 261, 193. doi:10.1009/s11207-009-9479-6.
Norton, A.A., Gilman, P.A.: 2004, Astrophys. J. 603, 348.
Norton, A.A., Gilman, P.A.: 2005, Astrophys. J. 630, 1194.
Petrie, G.J.D.: 2012, Solar Phys. 281, 577. doi:10.1007/s11207-012-0117-3.
Schüssler, M., Caligari, P., Ferriz-Mas, A., Moreno-Insertis, F.: 1994, Astron. Astrophys. 281, L69.
Sivaraman, K.R., Gupta, S.S., Howard, R.F.: 1993, Solar Phys. 146, 27. doi:10.1007/BF00662168.
Sivaraman, K.R., Gupta, S.S., Howard, R.F.: 1999, Solar Phys. 189, 69. doi:10.1023/A:1005277515551.
Solanki, S.K., Schmidt, H.U.: 1993, Astron. Astrophys. 267, 287.
Stenflo, J.O., Kosovichev, A.G.: 2012, Astrophys. J. 745, 129.
Temmer, M., Rybák, J., Bendík, P., Veronig, A., Vogler, F., Otruba, W., Pötzi, W., Hanslmeier, A.: 2006, Astron. Astrophys. 447, 735.
Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N.R.: 1991, Astrophys. J. 375, 761.
Weber, M.A., Fan, Y., Miesch, M.S.: 2012, Solar Phys. doi:10.1007/s11207-012-0093-7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A. (2013). Recovering Joy’s Law as a Function of Solar Cycle, Hemisphere, and Longitude. In: Mansour, N.N., Kosovichev, A.G., Komm, R., Longcope, D. (eds) Solar Dynamics and Magnetism from the Interior to the Atmosphere. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8005-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8005-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-8004-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-8005-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)