Abstract
The study of variations has challenged long-standing theories that the utilization of medical services is primarily determined by the incidence of illness, the constraints of medical science, or patient preferences. This chapter traces the development of empirical research in small area variation in the United States, England, and other countries and the concurrent evolution of explanatory theories. Variations in health services are marked across every level of care – small areas, tertiary regions, and health care providers. The majority of this variation is not explained by patient differences. We categorize different sources of variation into (1) effective care, where benefits far exceed harm, (2) preference-sensitive care, where there are a variety of options for patients, each with benefits and trade-offs, and (3) supply-sensitive care, where varying supplies of health care resources lead to differences in the frequency of care, with scant evidence that more services benefit patients. Each of these explanatory categories is linked to specific clinical and policy remedies that, if implemented, would significantly improve health care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appleby J, Raleigh V, Frosini F, et al. Variations in health care. The good, the bad and the inexplicable. London: King’s Fund; 2011.
Bunker JP. Surgical manpower: a comparison of operations and surgeons in the United States and in England and Wales. N Engl J Med. 1970;282:135–44.
Burton M. Tonsillectomy – then and now. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:23–5.
Department of Health. The NHS atlas of variation in healthcare. 2010. http://www.rightcare.nhs.uk
Dyck FJ, Murphy FA, Murphy JK, et al. Effect of surveillance on the number of hysterectomies in the province of Saskatchewan. N Engl J Med. 1977;2:1326–8.
Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending: part 2. Health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:288–98.
Glover JA. The incidence of tonsillectomy in school children. Proc R Soc Med. 1938;31:1219–36. Reprinted in the Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:9–19.
Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. 50th anniversary. Ian Hacking (intro.). 4th ed. University of Chicago Press; 2012. p. 264. ISBN 978-0-226-45811-3. LCCN 2011042476.
Lembcke PA. Measuring the quality of medical care through vital statistics based on hospital service areas: 1. comparative study of appendectomy rates. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1952;42(3):276–86. doi:10.2105/AJPH.42.3.276.
Lewis CE. Variations in the incidence of surgery. N Engl J Med. 1969;281:880–4.
Lichner EA, Pflanz M. Appendectomy in the Federal Republic of Germany: epidemiology and medical care patterns. Med Care. 1971;9:311–8.
McPherson K. International differences in medical care practices. In: International comparison of health care financing and delivery: data and perspectives. Health Care Financing Administration; Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, Dec. 1989, (Annual Supplement) pp. 9–20.
McPherson K, Bunker JP. Costs, risks and benefits of surgery: a milestone in the development of health services research. J R Soc Med. 2007;100:387–90.
McPherson K, Wennberg JE, Hovind OB, Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1310–4.
McPherson K, Downing A, Buirski D. Systematic variation in surgical procedures and hospital admission rates, PHP publication no 23. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 1996.
McPherson K, Gon G, Scott M. International variations in a selected number of surgical procedures. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 61, OECD Publishing; 2013. doi:10.1787/5k49h4p5g9mw-en.
OECD Report. Geographic variations in health care: what do we know and what can be done to improve health system performance? OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing; 2014. doi:10.1787/9789264216594-en.
Scott M, McPherson K, McKenzie I, et al. International variations in rates of a range of surgical procedures. Report to the Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making. University of Oxford; 2008.
Song Y, Skinner J, Bynum J, et al. Regional variations in diagnostic practices. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:45–53.
Vayda E. A comparison of surgical rates in Canada and in England and Wales. N Engl J Med. 1973;289:1224–9.
Welch HG, Sharp SM, Gottlieb DJ, et al. Geographic variation in diagnosis frequency and risk of death among Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2011;305(11):1113–8.
Wennberg JE. Tracking medicine: a researcher’s quest to understand health care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. Chapters 6 and 7.
Wennberg Anthology. 2015. http://www.wennberganthology.org/the-prostate-papers-outcomes-research-and-the-pathway-to-shared-decision-making/.
Wennberg Anthology. 2015. http://www.wennberganthology.org.
Wennberg JE, Cooper MM, editors. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care 1998. Chicago: American Hospital Publishing; 1998.
Wennberg J, Fowler FJ. A test of consumer contributions to small area variations in health care delivery. J Maine Med Assoc. 1977;68:275–9.
Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A. Small area variations in health care delivery: a population-based health information system can guide planning and regulatory decision-making. Science. 1973;182:1102–8.
Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A. Health care delivery in Maine I: patterns of use of common surgical procedures. J Maine Med Assoc. 1975;66:123–30, 149.
Wennberg J, Gittelsohn A. Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am. 1982;246(4):120–34.
Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Skinner JS. Geography and the debate over Medicare reform. 2002. Web-Exclusive on Health Affairs. http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.w2.96v1/DC1
Wennberg J, Blowers L, Parker R, Gittelsohn AM. Changes in tonsillectomy rates associated with feedback and review. Pediatrics. 1977;59:821–6.
Wennberg JE, Bunker J, Barnes B. The need for assessing the outcomes of common medical practices. Annu Rev Public Health. 1980;1:277–95.
Wennberg JE, McPherson K, Caper P. Will payment based upon diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs? N Engl J Med. 1984;311:295–300.
Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Culp WJ. Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilized in Boston? Lancet. 1987;1(8543):1185–8.
Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Baker L, Sharp SM, Bronner KK. Evaluating the efficiency of California providers in caring for patients with chronic illness. Web-Exclusive on Health Affairs. 2005. http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.w5.526/DC1
Wennberg JE, Staiger DO, Sharp SM, et al. Observational intensity bias associated with illness adjustment: cross sectional analysis of insurance claims. BMJ. 2013;346:f549.
Wennberg DE, Sharp SM, Bevan G, et al. A population health approach to reducing observational intensity bias in health risk adjustment: cross sectional analysis of insurance claims. BMJ. 2014;348:g2392.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic supplementary material
Video 1
WINDOWS ON HEALTHCARE
MOV file: 3030384 kb
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wennberg, J., McPherson, K., Goodman, D. (2015). Small Area Analysis and the Challenge of Practice Variation. In: Johnson, A., Stukel, T. (eds) Medical Practice Variations. Health Services Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7573-7_65-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7573-7_65-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7573-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine