Skip to main content

Coase Theorem (Empirical Tests)

Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

This entry examines three classic tests of the Coase theorem: two empirical studies on the most famous examples of externalities – Coase’s ranchers and farmers (Ellickson, Stanford Law Rev. 38(3):623–687, 1986) and Meade’s bees (Cheung, J Law Econ 16(1):11–33, 1973) – as well as the seminal laboratory experiments of Hoffman and Spitzer (J Law Econ 25(1):73–98, 1982). I will insist on the difficulty of testing the theorem without measuring transaction costs, and on another obstacle to negotiation over and above these costs: a moral or social prohibition on exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aivazian VA, Callen JL, McCracken S (2009) Experimental tests of core theory and the Coase theorem: inefficiency and cycling. J Law Econ 52(4):745–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand E (2011) What do cattle and bees tell us about the Coase theorem? Eur J Law Econ 31(1):39–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand E (2014) Autorisation à l’échange sur des externalités. De l’interdiction à l’obligation. Revue Economique 65(2):439–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry TL, Shogren JF (2005) Costly Coasean bargaining and property right security. Environ Resour Econ 31(3):349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung SNS (1969) The theory of share tenancy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung SNS (1973) The fable of the bees: an economic investigation. J Law Econ 16(1):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coursey DL, Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1987) Fear and loathing in the Coase theorem: experimental tests involving physical discomfort. J Leg Stud 16(1):217–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cymrot DJ, Dunlevy JA, Even WE (2001) “Who’s on first”: an empirical test of the Coase theorem in baseball. Appl Econ 33(5):593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue JJ III (1989) Diverting the Coasean river: incentive schemes to reduce unemployment spells. Yale Law J 99(3):549–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson RC (1986) Of Coase and cattle: dispute resolution among neighbors in Shasta county. Stanford Law Rev 38(3):623–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth W (1999) Do parties to nuisance cases bargain after judgment? A glimpse inside the cathedral. Univ Chicago Law Rev 66(2):373–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanter M (1983) Reading the landscape of disputes: what we know and don’t know (and think we don’t know) about our allegedly contentious and litigious society. UCLA Law Rev 31:4–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Sumner C (1995) Bargaining over common property resources: applying the Coase theorem to red deer in the Scottish Highlands. J Environ Manag 43(1):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW, McKee M (1985) Experimental evaluation of the Coase theorem. J Law Econ 28(3):653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW, Hoffman E, Rutström EE, Spitzer ML (1987) Coasian solutions to the externality problem in experimental markets. Econ J 97(386):388–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1982) The Coase theorem: some experimental tests. J Law Econ 25(1):73–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1985a) Entitlements, rights, and fairness: an experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice. J Leg Stud 14(2):259–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1985b) Experimental law and economics: an introduction. Columbia Law Rev 85(5):991–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1986) Experimental tests of the Coase theorem with large bargaining groups. J Leg Stud 15(1):149–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hylan TR, Lage MJ, Treglia M (1996) The Coase theorem, free agency, and major league baseball: a panel study of pitcher mobility from 1961 to 1992. South Econ J 62(4):1029–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DB (1973) Meade, bees, and externalities. J Law Econ 16(1):35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J Polit Econ 98(6):1325–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman M (1985) Comment on Hoffman and Spitzer’s “Experimental law and economics”. Columbia Law Rev 85(5):1037–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey RD, Page T (2000) An experimental study of the effect of private information in the Coase theorem. Exp Econ 3:187–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade JE (1952) External economies and diseconomies in a competitive situation. Econ J 62:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema SG (1997) The trial of homo economicus: what law and economics tells us about the development of economic imperialism? In: Davis JB (ed) New economics and its history, suppl. 29. Duke university Press, Durham, pp 122–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema SG, Zerbe RO Jr (2000) The Coase theorem. In: Bouckaert B, De Geest G (eds) Encyclopedia of law and economics, vol 1. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 836–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters HE (1986) Marriage and divorce: informational constraints and private contracting. Am Econ Rev 76(3):437–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott CR (1983) Externalities and corrective policies in experimental markets. Econ J 93(369):106–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prudencio YC (1982) The voluntary approach to externality problems: an experimental test. J Environ Econ Manag 9(3):213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads TA, Shogren JF (1999) On Coasean bargaining with transaction costs. Appl Econ Lett 6(12):779–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab S (1988) A Coasean experiment on contract presumptions. J Leg Stud 17(2):237–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren JF (1992) An experiment on Coasian bargaining over ex ante lotteries and ex post rewards. J Econ Behav Organ 17(1):153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren JF, Moffett R, Margolis M (2002) Coasean bargaining with nonconvexities. Appl Econ Lett 9(15):971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler GJ (1966) The theory of price, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski S (2007) The champions league and the Coase theorem. Scott J Polit Econ 54(3):355–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel KR (1987) The Coase theorem and California animal trespass law. J Leg Stud 16(1):149–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elodie Bertrand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bertrand, E. (2017). Coase Theorem (Empirical Tests). In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_628-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_628-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Coase Theorem (Empirical Tests)
    Published:
    04 December 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_628-2

  2. Original

    Coase Theorem (Empirical Tests)
    Published:
    07 July 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_628-1