Abstract
Thinking about responding to climate change and its associated risks is an enormous challenge. The climate system is complex. Economic systems are complex. Social and political systems are complex. And they all converge to make it impossible to consider any response without a thought template that can organize a plethora of plans, policies, and programs into a coherent and consistent toolkit. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change authored such a template in 2007: “Responding to climate change involves an iterative risk management process that includes both mitigation and adaptation and takes into account climate change damages, co-benefits, sustainability, equity, and attitudes toward risk” – 30 words that make the concept of risk the essential lens through which to assess the past and prepare for the future. This chapter takes most of the nouns as signposts for conducting rigorous and comparable analyses climate action at multiple spatial and temporal scales – from local to state to nation to planet; from community to institution to government to society; and from days to months to years to decades to centuries. Tens of thousands of researchers, decision-makers, and opinion-makers as well as billions of people all need the risk management lens and the various signposts to put their work into context and promote conversation across scale and perspective. The point of this chapter is to offer some expansion of the IPCC declaration that will hopefully be helpful in making their collective efforts more valuable than the sum of their individual efforts taking one at a time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen MR, Frame DJ, Huntingford C et al (2009) Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth ton. Nature 458(7242):1163–1166. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08019
Auffhammer M (2018) Quantifying economic damages from climate change. J Econ Perspect 31(4):33–52
Bosworth R, Hunter A, Kibria A (2017) The value of a statistical life: economics and politics. Dig Strata. https://strata.org/pdf/2017/vsl-full-report.pdf
Burkett VR, Suarez AG, Bindi M et al (2014) Point of departure. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, pp 169–194
Cal Fire (2020) 2020 incident archive, Dig. https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2020/
Clapper J (2015) Intelligence community directive number 203, Dig Office of the Director of National Intelligence, https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICD/ICD%20203%20Analytic%20Standards.pdf
Cramer W, Yohe G, Auffhammer M et al (2014) Detection and attribution of observed impacts. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, pp 979–1037
Duffin E (2020) Annual U.S. chained inflation rate 2000–2019. Dig Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/191119/chained-inflation-rate-in-the-us-since-2001/
Ebi K, Yohe G (2013) Adaptation in first and second best worlds. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. https://www.academia.edu/28437889/Adaptation_in_first_and_second_best_worlds?auto=download&email_work_card=download-paper
Eeckhoudt L, Fiori A, Gianin E (2018) Risk aversion, loss aversion, and the demand for insurance. Dig MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/6/2/60/pdf
Fawcett A, Iyer G, Clarke L et al (2015) Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? Science 350:1168–1169. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5761
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED) (2020) Personal consumption expenditures per capita. https://www.fred.stlouis.org
Findlaw (2018) How the emergency national flood program works. Dig Findlaw.com. https://corporate.findlaw.com/law-library/how-the-emergency-national-flood-insurance-program-works.html?DCMP=google:ppc:K-FLPortal:10313486553:103002902536&HBX_PK=&sid=1014715&source=google~ppc
Flyvbjerg B (2020) The law of regression to the tail: how to mitigate COVID-19, Climate change, and other catastrophic risks. Dig Acad. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3600070
Heikkinen N (2017) EPA revises social cost of a potent greenhouse gas. Scientific American, Dig ClimateWire, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/epa-revises-the-social-cost-of-a-potent-greenhouse-gas/
Hotelling H (1931) The economics of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 39(2):137–175. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1822328
Hsiang S, Kopp R, Jina A et al (2017) Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science 356:1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4369
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2000) TAR climate change 2000: synthesis report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar3/syr/
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007a) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/wg2/
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007b) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva, p 104. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/syr/
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, p 582. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/managing-the-risks-of-extreme-events-and-disasters-to-advance-climate-change-adaptation/
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014a) AR5 climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014b) AR5 climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018) Synthesis report: special report on global warming of 1.5oC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/
Kaufman N, Barron AR, Krawczyk W et al (2020) A near-term to net zero alternative to the social cost of carbon for setting carbon prices. Nat Clim Chang. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0880-3
Los Angeles Times (2020) Destructive bay area fires fueled by rare mix of intense dry lightening and extreme heat, Dig. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-19/destructive-bay-area-fires-fueled-by-rare-mix-of-intense-dry-lightning-and-extreme-heat
Mastrandrea M, Field C, Stocker T et al (2010) Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC fifth assessment report on consistent treatment of uncertainties. IPCC, Geneva. 5 p. https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/supporting-material/uncertainty-guidance-note.pdf
Matthews H, Gillett N, Stott P et al (2009) The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature 459(7248):829–U823. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08047
MIT Econ (2020) Relative risk aversion – demand for insurance. Dig MIT Econ. http://economics.mit.edu/files/15026
Moss R, Edmonds J, Hibbard K et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08823
National Research Council (NRC) (2010a) Adapting to the impacts of climate change. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/12783
National Research Council (NRC) (2010b) Climate stabilization targets – emissions, concentrations, and impacts over decades to millennia. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/12877
National Research Council (NRC) (2011) America’s climate choices. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/12781
National Research Council (NRC) (2017) Valuing climate damages: updating estimation of the social cost of carbon dioxide, Washington, DC, NAS Press, p 280. https://doi.org/10.17226/24651
New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC) (2010) Climate change adaptation in New York City: building a risk management response. In: Rosenzweig C, Solecki W (eds) Prepared for use by the New York City climate change adaptation task force. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol 1196, pp 1–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05415.x
Nordhaus W (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258(5086):1315–1319. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.258.5086.1315
Nordhaus W (2018) Climate change: the ultimate challenge for economics. William D. Nordhaus – Prize Lecture. NobelPrize.org. Nobel Media AB 2020. Fri. 28 Aug 2020
O’Neill BC, Oppenheimer M, Warren R et al (2017) IPCC Reasons for concern regarding climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang 7:38–37. https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate3179
Pew (2020) How U.S. unemployment during COVID-19 compares with the great depression. Dig Pew Research. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/11/unemployment-rose-higher-in-three-months-of-covid-19-than-it-did-in-two-years-of-the-great-recession
Rampell C (2020) Forget the Trump tweets this is the Trump action that might actually kill us. Dig Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/forget-the-trump-tweets-this-is-the-trump-action-that-might-actually-kill-us/2020/08/17/e912c0ae-e0b8-11ea-b69b-64f7b0477ed4_story.html
Ramsey FP (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38(4):543–559
Richels R, Jacoby H, Yohe G et al (2020) The Trump administration cooks the climate change numbers once again. Dig The Hill. https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/507929-the-trump-administration-cooks-the-climate-change-numbers-once#bottom-story-socials and https://apple.news/A19pGk94PSbiGqdPdul4HlA
Schneider S (2003) OECD workshop on the benefits of climate policy: improving information for policy makers. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). https://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/M00037347.pdf
Smith A (2020) 2010–2019: a landmark decade of U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Washington, Dig Nal Cen for Environ Info. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/beyond-data/2010-2019-landmark-decade-us-billion-dollar-weather-and-climate
Stern N et al (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434
Stone D, Auffhammer M, Carey M et al (2013) The challenge to detect and attribute effects of climate change on human and natural systems. Clim Chang 121(2):381–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0873-6
Tol R, Yohe G (2007) The weakest link hypothesis for adaptive capacity: an empirical test. Glob Environ Chang 17(2):218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.08.001
United Nations (UN) (1992) Dig United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2016) EPA fact sheet – social cost of carbon. Washington, p. 8. https://archive.epa.gov/epa/production/files/2016-07/documents/social-cost-carbon.pdf
United States General Accounting Office (GAO) (2020) Social cost of carbon: identifying a federal entity to address the National Academies’ recommendations could strengthen regulatory analysis. Dig GAO-20-254, https://www.gao.gov/mobile/products/GAO-20-254
United States Global Climate Research Program (USGCRP) (2014) Third national climate assessment. https://www.globalchange.nca2014.gov
UN-SDG (2020) Dig United Nations sustainable development goals (SDG’s) https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
USGCRP (2018) Fourth national climate assessment. https://www.globalchange.nca2018.gov
White House (2020) Guidelines opening up America again, Dig. https://www.whitehouse.gov/openingamerica/
Willows R, Connell R (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty, and decision making, UKCIP technical report. UK Climate Impacts Program, Oxford, UK, p 2003
Yohe G (2001) Mitigative capacity – the mirror image of adaptive capacity on the emissions side. Clim Chang 49:247–262. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010677916703
Yohe G (2017) Characterizing transient temperature trajectories for assessing the value of achieving alternative temperature targets. Clim Chang 145:469–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2100-3
Yohe G (2021) On the value of modeling exercises in support of sustainable development: lessons from epidemiology and climate science. Environ Chang Sustain, Dig. www.Intechopen.com
Yohe G, Tol R (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity – moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 12(1):25–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00026-7
Yohe G, Willwerth J, Neumann J et al (2020) What the future might hold: regional transient sectoral damages for the United States – estimates and maps in an exhibition. Clim Chang Econ. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007820400023
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Yohe, G. (2021). How to Think About Climate Change Responses: On Organizing One’s Thoughts. In: Lackner, M., Sajjadi, B., Chen, WY. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_102-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_102-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6431-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6431-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Chemistry and Mat. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics