Abstract
Acute leukemia represents 31% of all cancers diagnosed in children and 80% of it is of Lymphoblastic type. Multiple genetic lesions in the hematopoietic progenitor cells prior to or during differentiation to B and T cell lead to development of leukemia. There are several subtypes of Acute Leukemia based on chromosome number changes, the presence of certain translocations and gene mutations, each of which has different clinical, biological and prognostic features. High throughput genomic technologies like array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays (SNP arrays), have given us insight through a very detailed look at the genetic changes of leukemia, specifically, ALL. Here, we discuss various genetic mutations identified in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. We also explore various genetic targets and currently available as well as upcoming targeted therapies for ALL.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Pediatric ALL
- B-cell
- Immunophenotype
- Fanconi anemia
- Down’s syndrome
- Bloom’s syndrome
- Ataxia telangiectasia
- Neurofibromatosis
- Leukemia
- ALL
- Array CGH
- SNP
- RUNX1
- MLL
- BCR-ABL
- IKZF1
- CRLF2
- E2A-PBX1
- E2A-HLF
- FLT3
- Ras
- Gamma sectretase
- TKI
- ETV6-RUNX1
- Dasatinib
- Ikaros
- TdT
- JAK mutation
- STAT
- PAX5
- NOTCH
- FBXW7
- PTEN
- PI3K
- Akt
- LMO1
- TAL1
- HOX11
- MYB
Introduction
Acute leukemia is the most common malignancy of childhood. It represents 31% of all cancers diagnosed in children [1]. About 3,250 cases of acute leukemia are diagnosed per year in United States. Approximately 80% of the childhood acute leukemia is lymphoblastic. 80% of Lymphoblastic leukemia in children between ages 2–10 years is of Pre B- cell immunophenotype and the rest are T cell lineage. Adolescents and young adults tend to have myeloid malignancies. There are several subtypes within these broad subgroups based on chromosome number changes, presence of certain translocations and gene mutations. Each of these subtypes have different clinical, biological and prognostic features.
Etiology and Pathogenesis
Exact etiology and pathogenesis of all types of childhood leukemia is still unknown. Only less than 5% cases are explained by inherited, predisposing genetic syndromes, such as Down’s syndrome, Neurofibromatosis, Fanconi anemia, Bloom’s syndrome, ataxia-telangiectasia, and Nijmegen breakage syndrome, or exposure to ionizing radiation or to specific chemotherapeutic drugs. There is evidence suggesting a prenatal origin for some types of childhood leukemia [2, 3]. Multiple genetic lesions in the hematopoietic progenitor cells prior to or during differentiation to B and T cell lead to development of leukemia. These mutations affect their ability of unlimited self renewal which leads to arrest at that specific developmental stage. Understanding the outcomes of frequently arising genetic lesions and their effects on cell survival, proliferation and differentiation will help researchers then to devise selectively targeted treatments against the altered gene products to which the leukemic clones have become addicted.
Current Treatment and Need for Targeted Therapy
About 60 years back, acute leukemia was universally fatal. Thanks to multicenter, national and international clinical trials, collaborations and basic science research, tremendous progress has been made in this field which has made childhood leukemia a success story of twentieth century. Cure rate for leukemia has increased from 10% to nearly 85% [4].
Current treatment of leukemia is based on intense multiagent chemotherapy and prophylaxis of central nervous system. Risk assessment and treatment allocation is made based on clinical features (age and white cell count at diagnosis), biological features (B or T cell immunophenotype) and response to initial treatment (morphological and minimal residual disease in bone marrow at the end of induction therapy) [5].
Despite high cure rate, nearly one quarter of children with leukemia of certain molecular subtypes, high risk clinical features and those who relapse, have poor outcome. Significant proportions of the children who fall into standard risk category (age 1–10 years and total white count at diagnosis <50,000 and Precursor B cell Immunophenotype) have treatment failure or relapse [6]. Outcome of these children is poor, despite intense chemotherapy and/or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Relapsed ALL is a leading cause of cancer related death. There is little room for intensification of already intense chemotherapy due to dose limiting toxicities and related morbidity and mortality. There is need for development of new targeted therapies which can improve outcome in this group of patients and have less side effects [7].
Molecular Genetics of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
It is very important to indentify genetic and epigenetic abrasions of prognostic importance in order to assign the patients to modern classification protocol and offer treatment [8, 9]. About 25% of the primary genetic lesions in ALL cannot be detected by standard genetic analysis. Currently, high throughput genomic technologies like array-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays (SNP arrays), have given us insight into very detailed look at the genetic changes of leukemia, specifically, ALL. Multiple novel submicroscopic genetic alterations in ALL samples which are not detectable by cytogenetic analysis have been identified [10]. Highly informative array-CGH using bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) typically use probes derived from large (up to 200 kb) fragments of human DNA cloned into BAC vectors [11]. Oligo nucleotide arrays use smaller probes (20–100 bp) for more detailed look at the genomic regions. Oligo CGH array is used for detection of copy number abnormality (CNA) and Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array is used to detect both CNA and copy neutral Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH).
Table 1 shows important genetic alterations seen in B-cell and Table 2 shows important genetic alterations indentified in T cell ALL. Figure 1 shows important intracellular pathways, targets and corresponding therapeutic agents that are under investigation. We will discuss below in detail about some of the most important genetic alterations.
ETV6-RUNX1
ETV6-RUNX1 formerly known as TEL-AML1, is translocation (12; 21) resulting in fusion of the ETV6 gene from chromosome band 12p13 to the RUNX1 gene from chromosome band 21q21. It is associated with recruitment of complexes containing histone deacetylases to AML1 target genes, causing aberrant transcriptional repression [11–15]. It is the most common chromosomal translocation seen in children with ‘Common Precursor B cell ALL’ (25%) but rarely observed in T cell ALL [12]. It is cryptic by conventional karyotyping but detected by FISH or molecular analysis. Translocation (12;21) [12, 16] was noted in a large number of archived neonatal blood samples suggesting prenatal origin but, only 1% actually developed T cell leukemia indicating that additional mutations later in life are necessary for leukemogenesis [2 3]. ETV6 -RUNX1 is known to be associated with favorable outcome [12].
BCR-ABL
The Philadelphia chromosome is characterized by the abnormal transposition of the q34 portion of chromosome 9 and the q11 portion of chromosome 22. A reciprocal translocation causes a head to-tail fusion of the breakpoint cluster region (BCR) gene on chromosome 22 with the cellular homolog of the Abelson (c-ABL) viral oncogene on chromosome 9, thereby placing the BCR-ABL oncogene under the control of the ubiquitously expressed BCR promoter. BCR-ABL encodes two main BCR-ABL fusion oncoproteins of distinct molecular weights, p190 and p210, that arise from different translocation breakpoints in the BCR gene. The p210 isoform is expressed in nearly one third of adult Ph+ B-ALL, with the other 2/3rd of adult Ph+ B-ALL expressing the p190 isoform. Approximately 90% of childhood Ph+ B-ALL cases express p190 [17]. BCR-ABL1 positive ALL is highly aggressive and has a poor prognosis [18, 19]. BCR-ABL is seen in 25–40% of adult CML and 3–5% of pediatric B cell -ALL.CML typically responds well to kinase inhibitors. BCR-ABL is a deregulated, constitutively active non receptor tyrosine kinase, and this kinase activity is required for cell transformation. BCR-ABL promotes leukemia mainly through two signal transduction pathways (RAS-MAPK and PI3K-AKT) that control cell proliferation, size, survival, and activation [20]. The constitutively active BCR-ABL1 cell impedes programmed cell death by keeping pro apoptotic protein in phosphorylated state and impeding it from localizing to mitochondria [21].
Targeted Therapy for BCR-ABL
Prior to use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, BCR-ABL positive ALL was one of the worst prognostic groups in pediatric ALL [16]. Imatinib Mesylate is a small orally available molecule which acts by binding to the ATP binding site of tyrosine kinase and stabilizing the inactive conformation. Imatinib showed remarkable a result in adults with CML. It is the best available first line therapy for CML in chronic phase [22]. Combination of Imatinib with chemotherapy in adults with Ph+ ALL showed encouraging results but the results were short lived when used as single agent. Children’s oncology group (COG) clinical trial COGALL0031 conducted between 2002 and 2006 used Imatinib in children with Ph+ ALL starting after induction chemotherapy. It showed 3 years EFS of 80% which is more than double the EFS of historic control group treated without tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in the past [23]. The outcome has remained stable in this patient cohort.
Dasatinib is a second generation TKI with potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor activity and active against most Imatinib resistant BCR-ABL-mutants (except T3135). Dasatinib also inhibits SRC kinase and is an attractive therapy in Ph+ ALL. Unlike CML, signaling through Src family kinases are required for development of leukemia. COG study AALL0622 is now testing addition of Dasatinib to same intense chemotherapy regimen.
MLL Rearrangement
The mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene encodes a large complex oncoprotein that regulates transcription.MLL methylates histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) and regulates gene expression (especially HOX family gene expression) to control early hematopoietic progenitor cell development. MLL gene rearrangements are seen in over 80% of Infant leukemia and 10% of childhood ALL cases [24, 25]. More than 40 different balanced chromosomal translocations have been identified as partners for MLL in ALL. The five most common MLL rearrangements, seen in MLL-translocated leukemia are,
-
t (4; 11)(q21;q23)-encoding MLL-AF4 (seen in 70% cases)
-
t (11; 19) (q23;p13.3)-encoding MLL-ENL (seen in 13% cases)
-
t (9; 11)(p22;q23)-encoding MLL-AF9
-
t (10; 11) (p12;q23)-encoding MLL-AF10
-
t (6;11)(q27;q23)-encoding MLL-AF6.
FLT3
FLT3 in-frame deletions and internal tandem duplications (ITDs) in the juxtamembrane region and point mutations in the activation loop of the kinase domain results in FLT3 protein over expression and constitutive activation of FLT3 signaling pathways through STAT5, MAP kinase, and AKT. FLT3-ITD mutations are found in approximately 2% of childhood ALL and are associated with poor prognosis. Lestaurtanib is a selective FLT3 inhibitor which has shown promising results in primary infant leukemia and ALL cells with high expression of constitutively activated FLT3. In COG phase three study AALL0631, Lestaurtanib followed by chemotherapy is being tested in infants with MLL rearranged leukemia.
IKZF1
Ikaros encodes a tumor suppressor zinc finger protein that is involved in heritable gene silencing. In hematopoietic cells, Ikaros localizes to pericentromeric heterochromatin (PC-HC) where it recruits its target genes, resulting in their activation or repression via chromatin remodeling [26–28]. The function of Ikaros is controlled by posttranslational modifications. Ikaros is shown to be phosphorylated by CK2 kinase at its C terminus, affecting cell cycle progression [29–31]. Reversible phosphorylation of Ikaros at specific amino acids controls its sub cellular localization as well as its ability to regulate TdT expression during thymocyte differentiation. PP1 regulates thymocyte differentiation by controlling Ikaros’ association with chromatin remodeling complexes and its ability to repress the transcription of developmentally regulated genes [32, 33].
Deletion or sequence mutation of the IKZF1 gene, is a hallmark of HR childhood ALL [34, 35]. Deletion of IKZF1 is present in over 80% of cases of BCR-ABL+ lymphoid leukemia, either de novo Ph+ ALL or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) at progression to lymphoid blast crisis. The deletions either involve entire IKZF1 locus, resulting in loss of function, or delete an internal subset of IKZF1 exons, resulting in the expression of dominant negative IKZF1 alleles. Expression of such dominant negative IKZF1 alleles in hematopoietic progenitors impairs lymphoid development, and loss of IKZF1 accelerates the onset of Ph+ ALL in a retroviral BM transplant and transgenic models of this disease [36]. BCR-ABL negative ALL cases with deletion or sequential mutation of IKZF1 have are shown to have higher chance of treatment failure [37, 38].
JAK Mutations
The Janus kinase (JAK) family of tyrosine kinases is activated by cytokine binding to a Type I cytokine receptor. Activation of JAK leads to phosphorylation of STAT, and subsequent activation of both the RAS/RAF and PI3K/AKT pathways, ultimately leading to cell proliferation. In ALL cell lines, members of this JAK family are abundantly expressed. JAK2 has been noted to be expressed more frequently than JAK1 or JAK [39, 40]. Constitutively active JAK/STAT results in uncontrolled proliferation of leukemia cells and has been associated with poor prognosis [41]. Activating mutations of JAK also correlate with other gene abnormalities, IKZF1 deletion or mutation and genomic rearrangement involving the Cytokine receptor-like factor 2 gene (CRLF2) which results in its over expression, both of which confer poor prognosis. JAK family of kinases, are mutated in Down syndrome-ALL and High risk non-DS ALL. Inhibitors targeting JAK pathways are currently being tested in clinical trials for adults. INCB018424 is a competitive ATP inhibitor that binds to the catalytic domain of JAK1/2. This agent is known to inhibit both wild-type and mutated JAK proteins. COG trial ADVL1011 is a single-agent phase I trial for children with relapsed/refractory solid tumors, leukemias, and myeloproliferative neoplasms.
CRLF2 is a subunit of the type I cytokine receptor, which forms a heterodimer with interleukin seven receptor (IL7R). Cytokine binds to the receptor and stimulates B-cell proliferation. Rearrangements involving CRLF2 have causes constitutive dimerization with IL7R, resulting in cytokine-independent activation of JAK2 and STAT5. This leads to subsequent B-cell proliferation, and possibly cell transformation, especially in the presence of a constitutively activated JAK mutation [41]. Targeting cells with activated JAK mutations may help to improve prognosis for patients with IKAROS mutations and CRLF-2 over expression because of the known high-frequency association of these abnormalities. 30% of childhood ‘BCR-ABL1-like’ ALL cases harbor rearrangements of the lymphoid cytokine receptor gene CRLF2, either alone or with concomitant mutation of the Janus kinase genes JAK1 and JAK2 [40–42].
PAX 5 Mutations
PAX5 encodes a gene required for B lymphoid lineage maturation. Recent SNP array and genomic DNA sequencing on B cell ALL samples have shown deletion and point mutation in 32% of cases [43]. Altered PAX5 may cause differentiation blockade in B cell development by targeting transcription factor genes known to be involved in B and T cell differentiation (IKAROS -IKZF1, and AIOLOS -IKZF3) [44–46].
E2A-PBX1
Translocation (1;19) is found in 3–5% of B-ALL cases. E2A encodes class I b Helix-loop -Helix (HLH) E47 and E12 E-box transcription factors that regulate the common lymphoid progenitor (CLP) to pre-pro-B cell transition in early B cell development. At (1; 19) (q23; p13) fuses the PBX1 class II divergent HOX gene to E2A which encodes a chimeric transcription factor that binds and sequesters normal PBX partners leading to repression of E2A target genes. This leads to uncontrolled cell-cycle progression [47]. This translocation is mostly seen in cytoplasmic Immunoglobulin positive (cIg+) Pre B ALL rather than cIg negative B -ALL and is associated with poor prognosis in those cases.
E2A-HLF
Translocation (17; 19) E2A variant translocation occurs in 1% of cases of childhood B-cell precursor ALL, which creates an E2A-HLF (hepatic leukemia factor) fusion gene. The novel chimeric transcription factor E2A-HLF promotes aggressive, treatment-resistant pro–B cell stage ALL that shows unique clinical associations including adolescent presentation, hypercalcemia, and disseminated intravascular coagulation [48].
TAL1/SCL
TAL1 (SCL) gene at Chromosome band 1p34 encodes a class II basic Helix loop helix (bHLH) transcription factor that is a master regulator of hematopoietic lineage commitment. SCL is a target for translocation or mutation in nearly 25–30% of childhood T-ALL cases. Translocation t(1;14)(p34;q11), and deletions aberrantly activating SCL during thymocyte maturation causes leukemia by promoting transformation.
Homeobox (HOX) Genes
Homeobox genes regulate axial patterning and cellular differentiation during embryonic development. HOX A cluster which belongs to Class I HOX is implicated in T cell leukemia.
HOX11 (also known as T cell leukemia, homeobox 1 and TLX1) is a class II orphan HOX gene that is normally required for survival of splenic precursors during organogenesis. Translocation t(10;14)(q24;q11) or t(7;10)(q34;q24), causes juxtaposition of HOX11 to TCR α/δ- or TCR β-loci regulatory elements leading to increased expression of HOX11. Over expression of HOX11 is found in about 5% of pediatric T cell-ALL. Loss of negative regulatory elements with cytogenetic rearrangements or by loss of silencing DNA methylation also causes aberrant HOX expression. HOX11-containing T-ALL has a better prognosis than other T-ALL subtypes [17, 49–51].
HOX11L2 (TLX3) is another well-studied class II orphan HOX gene that undergoes a t(5;14)(q35;q32), bringing it under the influence of TCRα-/δ-regulatory elements downstream of BCL11B (a gene expressed throughout T cell development) in ∼20% of children with T-ALL and these cases have less favorable prognosis compared to HOX11 positive T cell ALL [16–52].
NOTCH1
NOTCH is a transmembrane heterodimeric receptor. Sequentially cleavage of NOTCH by an ADAM metalloproteinase and then c-secretase, releases the intracellular domain Notch1 (ICN1). There it forms a transcription complex which functions as a transcription activator that regulates T-cell development in normal cells, and has been shown to activate transcription of genes such as MYC and NFKB1. Translocation t (7; 9) (q34; q34.3), fuses TCRB to the gene encoding the NOTCH1 and is extremely uncommon. It is found in less than 1% of T cell ALL. Gain-of-function intrageneic mutation in NOTCH1 were recently discovered in ∼55% of translocation negative T-ALL cases, which results in ligand-independent cleavage of Notch1 [53, 54]. This process still needs gamma secretase proteolysis to release active ICN1 which makes Gamma secretase Inhibitors (GSI) attractive therapy for NOTCH1 altered T cell ALL. GSIs are under development, and being tested in phase I trials [55–57].
PTEN
PTEN is a tumor suppressor with lipid and protein phosphatase activity that opposes the receptor tyrosine kinase–PI3K-induced activation of AKT. PTEN is mutated and is the most consistently down regulated gene in GSI-resistant T-ALL cell lines. Gain-of-function NOTCH1 mutations and mutational loss of PTEN are associated with resistance to GSIs in T-ALL. This is because the malignant clone transfers its oncogene addiction from constitutive NOTCH1 signaling to constitutive PI3K-AKT signaling.
FBXW7
FBW7 (F-box- and WD repeat domain–containing 7) is a protein substrate recognition subunit of the SCF-type E3 ubiquitin ligases. It is mutated in a wide range of human cancers, where it functions as a tumor suppressor. FBW7 mutation block FBW7- mediated ICN1 and possibly MYC degradation, leading to excessive NOTCH pathway signaling [58, 59]. FBW7 mutations make T-ALL cell lines and relapsed T-ALL insensitive to GSIs. Mechanism for drug resistance that is potentially related to stabilization of MYC expression. FBW7 mutations may also coexist with NOTCH1 heterodimerization–domain mutations to further augment NOTCH pathway signaling [59].
LYL1
LYL1 encodes another class II basic helix loop helix transcription factor that forms heterodimers with class I bHLH proteins, such as E2A (E47 and E12) and HEB. LYL1 was identified from a t(7;19)(q35;p13) in a T cell leukemia line and is aberrantly expressed in only a few T-ALL cases [17, 59, 60]. LYL1 has an unknown cellular function, but it has an overlapping expression pattern with TAL1.
MYB
MYB is the cellular homolog of the v-Myb oncogene which is essential for T cell development in mouse. Translocation and duplication involving MYB is detected in 8–15% of T cell ALL cases leading to MYB over expression and a blockade in T cell differentiation. Translocation t(6; 7)(q23;q34), juxtaposes the C-MYB gene at chromosome band 6q23 with the TCRB locus. Interestingly, translocation t(6; 7) is noted in younger children with T cell ALL. These cases also contain NOTCH1 mutations and CDNK2A p16 ARF deletions. This translocation is readily detectable by FISH but not by conventional karyotyping due to subtelomeric location of C-MYB and TCRB.
LMO1 and LMO2
LMO1 and LMO2 are oncogenic transcription factors, when fused to different TCR loci lead to unscheduled expression of the respective transcription protein. LMO1 (e.g., RBTN1, TTG1) and LMO2 (e.g., RBTN2, TTG2) genes encode cysteine-rich tandem LIM–only domain-containing proteins that interact with a variety of nuclear factors, including TAL1 in erythroid cells. LMO 2 translocations occur in 10–20% T cell ALL cases.
Conclusion
Detailed information about genetic alterations in Leukemia is being generated as a result of high throughput genomic analysis tools and many potential targets for therapy have been identified. Ideal ‘target’ is a protein or pathway which is specific to the tumor cell, not shared by normal cells, essential for tumor cell maintenance and/or proliferation and is easily accessible by therapeutic agent. Understanding these targets will help us identify and develop best targeted therapies for childhood leukemia.
References
Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 2008;371(9617):1030–43. Epub 2008/03/25.
O’Leary M, Krailo M, Anderson JR, Reaman GH, Children’s Oncology G. Progress in childhood cancer: 50 years of research collaboration, a report from the Children’s oncology group. Semin Oncol. 2008;35(5):484–93. Epub 2008/10/22.
Wiemels JL, Cazzaniga G, Daniotti M, Eden OB, Addison GM, Masera G, et al. Prenatal origin of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children. Lancet. 1999;354(9189):1499–503. Epub 1999/11/07.
Armstrong SA, Look AT. Molecular genetics of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(26):6306–15. Epub 2005/09/13.
Schultz KR, Pullen DJ, Sather HN, Shuster JJ, Devidas M, Borowitz MJ, et al. Risk- and response-based classification of childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a combined analysis of prognostic markers from the pediatric oncology group (POG) and Children’s cancer group (CCG). Blood. 2007;109(3):926–35. Epub 2006/09/28.
Borowitz MJ, Devidas M, Hunger SP, Bowman WP, Carroll AJ, Carroll WL, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and its relationship to other prognostic factors: a Children’s oncology group study. Blood. 2008;111(12):5477–85. Epub 2008/04/05.
Weinstein IB, Joe AK. Mechanisms of disease: oncogene addiction—a rationale for molecular targeting in cancer therapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006;3(8):448–57. Epub 2006/08/09.
Pui CH, Carroll WL, Meshinchi S, Arceci RJ. Biology, risk stratification, and therapy of pediatric acute leukemias: an update. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(5):551–65. Epub 2011/01/12.
Wiemels J. Perspectives on the causes of childhood leukemia. Chem Biol Interact. 2012;196(3):59–67. Epub 2012/02/14.
Mullighan CG. Genomic analysis of acute leukemia. Int J Lab Hematol. 2009;31(4):384–97. Epub 2009/06/03.
Mullighan CG, Downing JR. Genome-wide profiling of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: recent insights and future directions. Leukemia. 2009;23(7):1209–18. Epub 2009/02/27.
Zelent A, Greaves M, Enver T. Role of the TEL-AML1 fusion gene in the molecular pathogenesis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Oncogene. 2004;23(24):4275–83. Epub 2004/05/25.
Ford AM, Bennett CA, Price CM, Bruin MC, Van Wering ER, Greaves M. Fetal origins of the TEL-AML1 fusion gene in identical twins with leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(8):4584–8. Epub 1998/05/16.
Pine SR, Wiemels JL, Jayabose S, Sandoval C. TEL-AML1 fusion precedes differentiation to pre-B cells in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Res. 2003;27(2):155–64. Epub 2003/01/16.
Greaves MF, Wiemels J. Origins of chromosome translocations in childhood leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(9):639–49. Epub 2003/09/03.
Arico M, Schrappe M, Hunger SP, Carroll WL, Conter V, Galimberti S, et al. Clinical outcome of children with newly diagnosed philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated between 1995 and 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4755–61. Epub 2010/09/30.
Teitell MA, Pandolfi PP. Molecular genetics of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Annu Rev Pathol-Mech. 2009;4:175–98. Epub 2008/09/12.
Clark SS, McLaughlin J, Crist WM, Champlin R, Witte ON. Unique forms of the abl tyrosine kinase distinguish Ph1-positive CML from Ph1-positive ALL. Science. 1987;235(4784):85–8. Epub 1987/01/02.
Ribeiro RC, Abromowitch M, Raimondi SC, Murphy SB, Behm F, Williams DL. Clinical and biologic hallmarks of the philadelphia chromosome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1987;70(4):948–53. Epub 1987/10/01.
Kharas MG, Fruman DA. ABL oncogenes and phosphoinositide 3-kinase: mechanism of activation and downstream effectors. Cancer Res. 2005;65(6):2047–53. Epub 2005/03/23.
Salomoni P, Condorelli F, Sweeney SM, Calabretta B. Versatility of BCR/ABL-expressing leukemic cells in circumventing proapoptotic BAD effects. Blood. 2000;96(2):676–84. Epub 2000/07/11.
O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, Gathmann I, Baccarani M, Cervantes F, et al. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(11):994–1004. Epub 2003/03/15.
Arico M, Valsecchi MG, Camitta B, Schrappe M, Chessells J, Baruchel A, et al. Outcome of treatment in children with philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(14):998–1006. Epub 2000/04/06.
Armstrong SA, Staunton JE, Silverman LB, Pieters R, den Boer ML, Minden MD, et al. MLL translocations specify a distinct gene expression profile that distinguishes a unique leukemia. Nat Genet. 2002;30(1):41–7. Epub 2001/12/04.
Armstrong SA, Mabon ME, Silverman LB, Li A, Gribben JG, Fox EA, et al. FLT3 mutations in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2004;103(9):3544–6. Epub 2003/12/13.
Brown KE, Guest SS, Smale ST, Hahm K, Merkenschlager M, Fisher AG. Association of transcriptionally silent genes with ikaros complexes at centromeric heterochromatin. Cell. 1997;91(6):845–54. Epub 1997/12/31.
Dovat S, Payne KJ. Tumor suppression in T cell leukemia—the role of ikaros. Leuk Res. 2010;34(4):416–7. Epub 2009/11/07.
Payne KJ, Dovat S. Ikaros and tumor suppression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Crit Rev Oncog. 2011;16(1–2):3–12. Epub 2011/12/14.
Dovat S, Song C, Payne KJ, Li Z. Ikaros, CK2 kinase, and the road to leukemia. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;356(1–2):201–7. Epub 2011/07/14.
Song C, Li Z, Erbe AK, Savic A, Dovat S. Regulation of Ikaros function by casein kinase 2 and protein phosphatase 1. World J Biol Chem. 2011;2(6):126–31. Epub 2011/07/19.
Li Z, Song C, Ouyang H, Lai L, Payne KJ, Dovat S. Cell cycle-specific function of ikaros in human leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012;59(1):69–76.
Gurel Z, Ronni T, Ho S, Kuchar J, Payne KJ, Turk CW, et al. Recruitment of ikaros to pericentromeric heterochromatin is regulated by phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(13):8291–300. Epub 2008/01/29.
Popescu M, Gurel Z, Ronni T, Song C, Hung KY, Payne KJ, et al. Ikaros stability and pericentromeric localization are regulated by protein phosphatase 1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(20):13869–80. Epub 2009/03/14.
Mullighan CG, Miller CB, Radtke I, Phillips LA, Dalton J, Ma J, et al. BCR-ABL1 lymphoblastic leukaemia is characterized by the deletion of ikaros. Nature. 2008;453(7191):110–4. Epub 2008/04/15.
Mullighan CG, Su X, Zhang J, Radtke I, Phillips LA, Miller CB, et al. Deletion of IKZF1 and prognosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):470–80. Epub 2009/01/09.
Tonnelle C, Dijon M, Moreau T, Garulli C, Bardin F, Chabannon C. Stage specific over-expression of the dominant negative ikaros 6 reveals distinct role of ikaros throughout human B-cell differentiation. Mol Immunol. 2009;46(8–9):1736–43. Epub 2009/03/17.
Waanders E, van der Velden VH, van der Schoot CE, van Leeuwen FN, van Reijmersdal SV, de Haas V, et al. Integrated use of minimal residual disease classification and IKZF1 alteration status accurately predicts 79 % of relapses in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2011;25(2):254–8. Official Journal of the Leukemia Society of America, Leukemia Research Fund, UK. Epub 2010/11/26.
Den Boer ML, van Slegtenhorst M, De Menezes RX, Cheok MH, Buijs-Gladdines JG, Peters ST, et al. A subtype of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with poor treatment outcome: a genome-wide classification study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(2):125–34. Epub 2009/01/14.
Hunger SP, Raetz EA, Loh ML, Mullighan CG. Improving outcomes for high-risk ALL: translating new discoveries into clinical care. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(6):984–93. Epub 2011/03/04.
Mullighan CG, Collins-Underwood JR, Phillips LA, Loudin MG, Liu W, Zhang J, et al. Rearrangement of CRLF2 in B-progenitor- and down syndrome-associated acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2009;41(11):1243–6. Epub 2009/10/20.
Mullighan CG, Zhang J, Harvey RC, Collins-Underwood JR, Schulman BA, Phillips LA, et al. JAK mutations in high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(23):9414–8. Epub 2009/05/28.
Russell LJ, Capasso M, Vater I, Akasaka T, Bernard OA, Calasanz MJ, et al. Deregulated expression of cytokine receptor gene, CRLF2, is involved in lymphoid transformation in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2009;114(13):2688–98. Epub 2009/07/31.
Mullighan CG, Goorha S, Radtke I, Miller CB, Coustan-Smith E, Dalton JD, et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature. 2007;446(7137):758–64. Epub 2007/03/09.
Bousquet M, Broccardo C, Quelen C, Meggetto F, Kuhlein E, Delsol G, et al. A novel PAX5-ELN fusion protein identified in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia acts as a dominant negative on wild-type PAX5. Blood. 2007;109(8):3417–23. Epub 2006/12/21.
Cortes M, Wong E, Koipally J, Georgopoulos K. Control of lymphocyte development by the ikaros gene family. Curr Opin Immunol. 1999;11(2):167–71. Epub 1999/05/14.
Georgopoulos K. Haematopoietic cell-fate decisions, chromatin regulation and ikaros. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(3):162–74. Epub 2002/03/27.
Aspland SE, Bendall HH, Murre C. The role of E2A-PBX1 in leukemogenesis. Oncogene. 2001;20(40):5708–17. Epub 2001/10/19.
Hunger SP, Li S, Fall MZ, Naumovski L, Cleary ML. The proto-oncogene HLF and the related basic leucine zipper protein TEF display highly similar DNA-binding and transcriptional regulatory properties. Blood. 1996;87(11):4607–17. Epub 1996/06/01.
Dear TN, Colledge WH, Carlton MB, Lavenir I, Larson T, Smith AJ, et al. The Hox11 gene is essential for cell survival during spleen development. Development. 1995;121(9):2909–15. Epub 1995/09/01.
Roberts CW, Shutter JR, Korsmeyer SJ. Hox11 controls the genesis of the spleen. Nature. 1994;368(6473):747–9. Epub 1994/04/21.
Hatano M, Roberts CW, Minden M, Crist WM, Korsmeyer SJ. Deregulation of a homeobox gene, HOX11, by the t(10;14) in T cell leukemia. Science. 1991;253(5015):79–82. Epub 1991/07/05.
Su XY, Della-Valle V, Andre-Schmutz I, Lemercier C, Radford-Weiss I, Ballerini P, et al. HOX11L2/TLX3 Is transcriptionally activated through T-cell regulatory elements downstream of BCL11B as a result of the t(5;14)(q35;q32). Blood. 2006;108(13):4198–201. Epub 2006/08/24.
Weng AP, Ferrando AA, Lee W, Morris JP, Silverman LB, Sanchez-Irizarry C, et al. Activating mutations of NOTCH1 in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Science. 2004;306(5694):269–71. Epub 2004/10/09.
Palomero T, Lim WK, Odom DT, Sulis ML, Real PJ, Margolin A, et al. NOTCH1 directly regulates c-MYC and activates a feed-forward-loop transcriptional network promoting leukemic cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(48):18261–6. Epub 2006/11/23.
Milano J, McKay J, Dagenais C, Foster-Brown L, Pognan F, Gadient R, et al. Modulation of notch processing by gamma-secretase inhibitors causes intestinal goblet cell metaplasia and induction of genes known to specify gut secretory lineage differentiation. Toxicol Sci. 2004;82(1):341–58 An official Journal of the Society of Toxicology. Epub 2004/08/21.
Real PJ, Tosello V, Palomero T, Castillo M, Hernando E, de Stanchina E, et al. Gamma-secretase inhibitors reverse glucocorticoid resistance in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Med. 2009;15(1):50–8. Epub 2008/12/23.
Ciofani M, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Notch promotes survival of pre-T cells at the beta-selection checkpoint by regulating cellular metabolism. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(9):881–8. Epub 2005/08/02.
O’Neil J, Grim J, Strack P, Rao S, Tibbitts D, Winter C, et al. FBW7 mutations in leukemic cells mediate NOTCH pathway activation and resistance to gamma-secretase inhibitors. J Exp Med. 2007;204(8):1813–24. Epub 2007/07/25.
Thompson BJ, Buonamici S, Sulis ML, Palomero T, Vilimas T, Basso G, et al. The SCFFBW7 ubiquitin ligase complex as a tumor suppressor in T cell leukemia. J Exp Med. 2007;204(8):1825–35. Epub 2007/07/25.
Rubnitz JE, Pui CH. Recent advances in the treatment and understanding of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Cancer Treat Rev. 2003;29(1):31–44. Epub 2003/03/14.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported in part by an R01 HL095120 grant, The Four Diamonds Fund of the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, John Wawrynovic Leukemia Research Scholar Endowment (SD), St.Baldrick’s foundation grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gowda, C., Dovat, S. (2013). Genetic Targets in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. In: El-Deiry, W. (eds) Impact of Genetic Targets on Cancer Therapy. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 779. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6176-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6176-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6175-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6176-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)