Abstract
Electrophysiological studies are commonly used to evaluate nerve regeneration following repair or to simply determine the functional integrity of peripheral nerve and central neural structures in large animal models. Most often used large animals for nerve repair studies include cats, dogs, primates, gouts, and sheep. The vast majority of authors use electrophysiological methods to assess nerve regeneration including maximal nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEPs), both spinal and cortical recorded. This chapter outlines a method to measure NCV and cortical SEPs in a sheep following median nerve stimulation. In addition, special anesthetic considerations, animal preparation, and common pitfalls that may be encounter during measurements are described.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
Evoked potentials is a useful technique to evaluate nerve regeneration following repair or to simply determine the functional integrity of peripheral nerve and central neural structures in large animal models. Most often used large animals for nerve repair studies include cats, dogs, primates, gouts, and sheep [1–15]. The vast majority of authors use electrophysiological methods to assess nerve regeneration including maximal nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEPs), both spinal and cortical recorded. In this chapter we describe a method to measure NCV and cortical SEPs in a sheep following median nerve stimulation.
Anesthetic Considerations for Intraoperative Measurements
Intraoperative SEPs can be significantly affected by different anesthetic regimens. Although cortical data is the most sensitive, all recordings may be affected in an anesthetized animal.
Drugs
In our model we use ketamine and xylazine for the induction, and isoflurane for the maintenance of anesthesia. Perioperative pain control is provided with either buprenorphine or fentanyl.
Halogenated anesthetics such as isoflurane are the most potent inhibitors of the SEPs. When these agents are use, it is often necessary to limit the dose to minimum to allow successful recordings. Typically, reducing the dose by half allows obtaining a reliable data.
Narcotics have lesser impact on the recording of evoked potentials and suppression of cortical data is not as severe. In the balanced anesthesia typically they are given with conjunction with other anesthetics, which allows using lower doses of other agents such as isoflurane. Some narcotics, i.e., ketamine, have even neuroexcitatory properties that can enhance signal recordings and facilitate data collection. These agents should be included to the anesthetic regimen whenever possible.
Finally, muscle relaxants are a routine part of the large animal anesthetic protocol. They do not adversely interfere with the SEPs measurements. Moreover, these agents are very useful in data collection since they eliminate potential movement of the animal during nerve stimulation. Limb jerking during repetitive nerve stimulation not only makes the procedure more difficult, but also may contaminate recorded data with artifacts.
Skin and Core Temperature
Peripheral nerve conduction velocities are affected by changes in limb temperature. Marked decrease in body temperature significantly decreases the absolute and interpeak latencies of all cortical potentials. Core temperature below 34 °C typically results in decrease of cortical data. All SEPs typically disappear at temperatures ranging from 20 to 25 °C.
Technique
In our model, we create a 6 cm median nerve defect and repair it with different conduits and techniques. 6 months following the repair we surgically expose the nerve and complete the maximal NCV measurements and cortical SEPs. After the neuroevaluation is completed, the nerve is harvested and the animal is euthanized.
Placing Stimulating Electrodes
The procedure is performed sequentially on both forelegs of the animal. With the sheep in lateral position, a forelimb and axilla are shaved and prepared with povidone iodine solution and then draped in the usual manner. Ten centimeter skin incision is made on the anteromedial aspect of the limb extending from the lateral chest wall proximally to the groove formed between the flexor carpi radialis muscle and radius distally. The fascia is incised and underlying fat tissue is dissected. The flexor carpi radialis muscle is identified and then detached from its point of insertion to improve the access to the median nerve. The nerve dissection needs to be done carefully with attention paid to the median artery, which runs close to the nerve.
Following the isolation of the 6 cm segment of the repaired median nerve, the dissection is continued 3 cm proximally and 3 cm distally. This is done to expose a naive nerve that can be further stimulated to measure NCV. Bipolar hook electrodes are placed proximally and distally to the nerve conduit (Fig. 52.1).
Placing Recording Electrodes
SEPs are recorded from the sensory cortex following stimulation of the peripheral nerve. After direct electrical stimulus to the median nerve, SEPs can be registered from the surface of the contralateral scalp, with the greatest signal obtained over the postcentral brain region. Based on our experience, however, the greater amplitude and more accurate measurements can be obtained transcranially with small point electrodes placed directly over the brain sensory cortex Kwiecien et al. [16].
With the sheep in lateral position, a scalp area is shaved and prepared with povidone iodine solution and then draped in the usual manner. A 6–8 cm skin incision over the midline of the scalp is made, widely exposing the skull bilaterally. Sagittal and coronal sutures should be easily visible. Next, an array of several burr holes is created in the parietotemporal location using a small 3 mm surgical drill. First two holes are drilled on the line connecting center points of each horn, 2 and 4 cm from the midline. Then, another sets of two holes are burred 1 and 2 cm anteriorly and posteriorly to the line (Fig. 52.2). Since the SEPs from both median nerves will be recorded, it may be preferable to drill the holes on the other side of the skull at the same time. Special attention needs to be paid not to penetrate the dura, which may result in injury to the brain and inability to record reliable data. Appearance of the clear, yellowish fluid at the burr side indicates injury to the dura and cerebrospinal fluid leakage.
The recording teflon-insulated monopolar needle electrodes are placed over the subdural space of sensory cortex.
Placing a Ground Electrode
The right position of the ground electrode is crucial for recording SEPs because of the electrical artifacts produced by the stimulation. To minimize these artifacts, the ground electrode should be placed on the stimulated limb proximally to the stimulating electrodes. A flexible metal band covered with saline soaked gauze wrapped around the limb serves well as a ground electrode. In case of isolated direct nerve stimulation, the ground electrode may be also placed subdermally on the head, which adequately eliminates artifacts related to the electrical interference (Fig. 52.2).
SEPs Measurements
After connecting the stimulating electrodes with the stimulus box and plugging the cortical and ground electrodes into the recording unit, the system is ready for SEPs measurements.
Most commercially available SEPs systems allow to choose between stimulation with either constant voltage or constant current. For the direct median nerve stimulation we prefer to use a constant current in the range from 1 to 4 mA. For each measurement, 100 stimuli are delivered at a rate of 1–10 Hz. These rates are considered optimal in most textbooks. However, it is worth to mention that lower rates are recommended for SEPs peaking more than 25 ms after stimulation, which is the case in sheep median nerve evaluation. In our laboratory, we use a rate of 4.5 Hz. It is important not to choose frequency of stimulation a multiple of 60 Hz. This can result in AC current interference from electrical devices in the operating room. Duration of stimulus should be in range 0.2–0.5 ms.
Each examination consists of three sequential measurements. After completing the data collection, average latency and amplitude values are calculated.
Maximal Nerve Conduction Velocity Measurements
Bipolar hook stimulating and recording electrodes are placed 1 cm proximally and 1 cm distally to the repair sites and the exact distance between electrodes is measured to calculate the conduction velocity (Fig. 52.1). After placing and connecting the electrodes, the system is ready for measurements. The position of the stimulating electrodes can be confirmed by turning on the stimulation and observing hoof twitching as a result of flexor carpi radialis activity. Stimulus intensity is adjusted to obtain the lowest threshold for the muscle contraction.
Following stimulation, the signal latency and amplitude are recorded from the distal electrodes. The examination is repeated three times and average values are used to calculate maximal NCV using the following formula:
Where:
-
maxNCV = maximal nerve conduction velocity
-
Es = proximal stimulating electrode
-
Er = proximal recording electrode
-
L = average latency between stimulus and recorded action potential
References
Cao P, Zheng Y, Zheng T, Sun C, Lu J, Rickett T, Shi R. A model of acute compressive spinal cord injury with a minimally invasive balloon in goats. J Neurol Sci. 2014;337(1–2):97–103.
Cozzi P, Poncelet L, Michaux C, Balligand M. Effect of stimulus intensity on spine recorded somatosensory evoked potential in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1998;59(2):217–20.
Forden J, Xu QG, Khu KJ, Midha R. A long peripheral nerve autograft model in the sheep forelimb. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(5):1354–62.
Jeans L, Healy D, Gilchrist T. An evaluation using techniques to assess muscle and nerve regeneration of a flexible glass wrap in the repair of peripheral nerves. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;100:25–8.
Jeans LA, Gilchrist T, Healy D. Peripheral nerve repair by means of a flexible biodegradable glass fibre wrap: a comparison with microsurgical epineurial repair. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(12):1302–8.
Kawakami Y, Suzuki H, Dong WK. Assessment of peripheral nerve crush injury with cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in the cat. Exp Neurol. 1989;103(2):146–53.
Kettle SJ, Starritt NE, Glasby MA, Hems TE. End-to-side nerve repair in a large animal model: how does it compare with conventional methods of nerve repair? J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013;38(2):192–202.
Nakamura T, Inada Y, Fukuda S, Yoshitani M, Nakada A, Itoi S, et al. Experimental study on the regeneration of peripheral nerve gaps through a polyglycolic acid-collagen (PGA-collagen) tube. Brain Res. 2004;1027(1–2):18–29.
Radtke C, Allmeling C, Waldmann KH, Reimers K, Thies K, Schenk HC, et al. Spider silk constructs enhance axonal regeneration and remyelination in long nerve defects in sheep. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16990.
Strasberg SR, Mackinnon SE, Genden EM, Bain JR, Purcell CM, Hunter DA, et al. Long-segment nerve allograft regeneration in the sheep model: experimental study and review of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996;12(8):529–37.
Suzuki Y, Tanihara M, Ohnishi K, Suzuki K, Endo K, Nishimura Y. Cat peripheral nerve regeneration across 50 mm gap repaired with a novel nerve guide composed of freeze-dried alginate gel. Neurosci Lett. 1999;259(2):75–8.
Toba T, Nakamura T, Lynn AK, Matsumoto K, Fukuda S, Yoshitani M, et al. Evaluation of peripheral nerve regeneration across an 80-mm gap using a polyglycolic acid (PGA)–collagen nerve conduit filled with laminin-soaked collagen sponge in dogs. Int J Artif Organs. 2002;25(3):230–7.
Uzuka Y, Saitoh M, Hiramatsu I, Nagata T. Studies on the factors affecting the recording of somatosensory evoked potentials induced by tibial nerve stimulation in dogs. J Vet Med Sci. 1995;57(5):871–6.
Vialle R, Loureiro MC, Ilharreborde B, Liu S, Lozeron P, Tadié M. The feasibility of detecting motor and sensory potentials in a sheep model. Lab Anim. 2006;40(4):469–73.
Vanderzant CW, Schott RJ, Natale JE, Pondo CA, D’Alecy LG. Somatosensory evoked potentials of the dog: recording techniques and normal values. J Neurosci Methods. 1989;27(3):253–63.
Kwiecien G, Ozturk C, Uygur S, Szopinski J, Bobkiewicz A, Madajka M, et al. Neurologic evaluation of long segment nerve repair with Epineural Sheath Conduit in sheep – a preliminary report. 56th annual meeting of the Ohio Valley Society of Plastic Surgeons, Indianapolis; 2013 May 17–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kwiecien, G.J., Siemionow, W. (2015). Somatosensory Evoked Potential Model for Assessment of Nerve Regeneration. In: Siemionow, M. (eds) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6335-0_52
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6335-0_52
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-6334-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-6335-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)