Abstract
This entry gives an overview of classical and state-of-the-art nonparametric time and frequency-domain techniques. In opposition to parametric methods, these techniques require no detailed structural information to get insight into the dynamic behavior of complex systems. Therefore, nonparametric methods are used in system identification to get an initial idea of the model complexity and for model validation purposes (e.g., detection of unmodeled dynamics). Their drawback is the increased variability compared with the parametric estimates. Although the main focus of this entry is on the classical identification framework (estimation of dynamical systems operating in open loop from known input, noisy output observations), the reader will also learn more about (i) the connection between transient and leakage errors, (ii) the estimation of dynamical systems operating in closed loop, (iii) the estimation in the presence of input noise, and (iv) the influence of nonlinear distortions on the linear framework. All results are valid for discrete- and continuous-time systems. The entry concludes with some user choices and practical guidelines for setting up a system identification experiment and choosing an appropriate estimation method.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Antoni J, Schoukens J (2007) A comprehensive study of the bias and variance of frequency-response-function measurements: optimal window selection and overlapping strategies. Automatica 43(10):1723–1736
Bendat JS, Piersol AG (1980) Engineering applications of correlations and spectral analysis. Wiley, New York
Blackman RB, Tukey JW (1958) The measurement of power spectra from the point of view of communications engineering – Part II. Bell Syst Tech J 37(2):485–569
Brillinger DR (1981) Time series: data analysis and theory. McGraw-Hill, New York
Broersen PMT (2004) Mean square error of the empirical transfer function estimator for stochastic input signals. Automatica 40(1):95–100
Carter GC, Nuttall AH (1980) On the weighted overlapped segment averaging method for power spectral estimation. Proc IEEE 68(10):1352–1353
Chen T, Ohlsson H, Ljung L (2012) On the estimation of transfer functions, regularizations and Gaussian processes – revisited. Automatica 48(8):1525–1535
Enqvist M, Ljung L (2005) Linear approximations of nonlinear FIR systems for separable input processes. Automatica 41(3):459–473
Eykhoff P (1974) System identification. Wiley, New York
Godfrey K (1993) Perturbation signals for system identification. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Hägg P, Hjalmarsson H (2012) Non-parametric frequency response function estimation using transient impulse response modelling. Paper presented at the 16th IFAC symposium on system identification, Brussels, 11–13 July, pp 43–48
Heath WP (2007) Choice of weighting for averaged nonparametric transfer function estimates. IEEE Trans Autom Control 52(10):1914–1920
Ljung L (1999) System identification: theory for the user, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
McKelvey T, Guérin G (2012) Non-parametric frequency response estimation using a local rational model. Paper presented at the 16th IFAC symposium on system identification, Brussels, 11–13 July, pp 49–54
Pillonetto G, Chiuso A, De Nicolao G (2011) Prediction error identification of linear systems: a nonparametric Gaussian regression approach. Automatica 47(2):291–305
Pintelon R, Schoukens J (2012) System identification: a frequency domain approach, 2nd edn. IEEE, Piscataway/Wiley, Hoboken
Schoukens J, Rolain Y, Pintelon R (2006) Analysis of windowing/leakage effects in frequency response function measurements. Automatica 42(1):27–38
Stenman A, Gustafsson F, Rivera DE, Ljung L, McKelvey T (2000) On adaptive smoothing of empirical transfer function estimates. Control Eng Pract 8(11):1309–1315
Welch PD (1967) The use of the fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust 15(2):70–73
Wellstead PE (1981) Non-parametric methods of system identification. Automatica 17(1):55–69
Acknowledgements
This work is sponsored by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen), the Flemish Government (Methusalem Fund, METH1), the Belgian Federal Government (Interuniversity Attraction Poles programme IAP VII, DYSCO), and the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant SNLSID).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pintelon, R., Schoukens, J. (2020). Nonparametric Techniques in System Identification. In: Baillieul, J., Samad, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Systems and Control. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_109-5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_109-5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5102-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5102-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Nonparametric Techniques in System Identification- Published:
- 08 November 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_109-5
-
Nonparametric Techniques in System Identification
- Published:
- 29 August 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_109-4
-
Nonparametric Techniques in System Identification
- Published:
- 28 November 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_109-2
-
Original
Nonparametric Techniques in System Identification- Published:
- 17 March 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5102-9_109-1