Abstract
In this chapter, I explore what makes a social science of law, suggesting that the ‘socio’ in socio-legal refers to the social scientific study of law.1 As a set of interdependent human transactions (i.e. social actions), however, socio-legal studies involves a doubling of the social, both the subject and the method of inquiry. First, socio-legal scholarship investigates the human constitution of law, how human action produces law and legality.2 The second social in socio-legal recognizes this inquiry as a scientific enterprise. As a collective, interdependent, participatory and consensual process, a social science of law is a political and democratic project challenging legal authority to serve similar commitments. Many academics who identify as socio-legal scholars but not as social scientists may challenge my account. Such contestation and debate is welcome and well within the paradigm I am outlining. The first section begins with a general address to the quotidian life and meaning of science, about transparency and consensus in knowledge-making; subsequent sections discuss interpretive methods and theory-building, discussing parallels and differences between socio-legal scholarship and science studies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arendt, H (1972) Crisis of the Republic (New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich)
Collins, H M and T Pinch (1993) The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Crane, D (2010) ‘Cultural Sociology and Other Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity in the Cultural Sciences’ 4/3 Sociology Compass 169–79
Emirbayer, M (1997) ‘Manifesto for a Relational Sociology’ 103(2) American Journal of Sociology 281–317
Ewick, P and S S Silbey (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press)
Ewick, P and S S Silbey (2002) ‘The Structure of Legality: The Cultural Contradictions of Social Institutions’ in R A Kagan, M Krygier and Kenneth Winston (eds), Legality and Community: On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick (Berkeley CA: University of California Press), pp. 149–65
Ewick, P and S S Silbey (2003) ‘Narrating Social Structure: Stories of Resistance to Legal Authority’ 109(1) American Journal of Sociology 1328–72
Feyerabend, P (1975) Against Method (New York: Verso)
Giddens, A (1990) The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press)
Gieryn, T F (1995) ‘Boundaries of Sciences’ in S Jasanoff, G E Markle, J C Peterson and T Pinch (eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Thousand Oaks CA: Sage), pp. 393–443
Goodwin, A and J Wolff (1997) ‘Conserving Cultural Studies’ in E Long (ed.), From Sociology to Cultural Studies: New Perspectives (Malden MA: Blackwell), pp. 123–54
Harvey, D (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity (Cambridge: Basil Blackwell)
Heller, M and R Eisenberg (1998) ‘Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti-commons in Biomedical Research’ 280 Science 698–701
Helmreich, S (2009) Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in a Microbial Sea (Berkeley CA: University of California Press)
Jacobs, J (1992) The Death and Life of Great American Cities (New York: Vintage Books)
Jacobs, M (2008) ‘Cultural Sociology and Cultural Studies’ 23(1) Culture (newsletter of the Sociology of Culture section of the American Sociological Association) 1
Jacobs, M (2009) ‘Commentary on: Cultural Sociology and Other Disciplines: Interdisciplinarity in the Cultural Sciences’, presented at Compass Interdisciplinary Virtual Conference, 19–30 October 2009 http://compassconference.wordpress.com
Jacobs, M and N Hanrahan (eds) (2005) The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Culture (Oxford: Blackwell)
Landes, M and E Posner (2003) The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press)
Maurer, B (2004) ‘The Cultural Power of Law? Conjunctive Readings’ 38(4) Law and Society Review 843–9
Merton, R K (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press)
Overbye, D (2009) ‘Elevating Science, Elevating Democracy’, New York Times, 26 January 2009
Restivo, S (2005) Science, Technology and Society: An Encyclopedia (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Sarat, A (1990) ‘“… The Law is All Over”: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor’ 2 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 343–79
Schwab, J (1969) College Curriculum and Student Protest (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press)
Seron, C and S S Silbey (2004) ‘Profession, Science and Culture: An Emergent Canon of Law and Society Research’ in A Sarat (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Law and Society (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 30–60
Silbey, S S (1997) ‘“Let them Eat Cake: Globalization, Postmodern Colonialism, and the Possibilities of Justice”, 1996 Presidential Address’ 31(2) Law and Society Review 207–35
Silbey, S S (2011) ‘Editor’s Introduction: The Sociological Citizen: Pragmatic and Relational Regulation in Law and Organizations’ 5 Regulation and Governance 1–13
Silbey, S S and E Bittner (1982) ‘The Availability of Law’ 4(4) Law and Policy 399–434
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Susan S Silbey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silbey, S.S. (2013). What Makes a Social Science of Law? Doubling the Social in Socio-Legal Studies. In: Feenan, D. (eds) Exploring the ‘Socio’ of Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-31463-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-31463-5_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-88427-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-31463-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)