Abstract
The study of the human ability to both detect the presence and estimate the amount of wetness on the skin has grown in scientific interest over the last century, due to the implication of wetness in comfort and skin health. In 1900, Bentley demonstrated that skin wetness is detected based on touch and temperature stimuli combining to produce sensations of liquidity, and that wetness perception increases with cold touch. It has since been demonstrated that, in the absence of a skin hygroreceptor (i.e., wetness receptor) in humans, the biophysical effects of moisture on the skin—conductive heat transfer and mechanical interaction—excite specific cutaneous mechanoreceptors and thermoreceptors. The resulting afferent signals are centrally integrated to generate our perception of skin wetness. As well as providing a theoretical foundation for understanding this aspect of somatosensation, these insights have helped develop a methodological framework for the study of human skin wetness sensing, which relies on assessing the independent and interactive effects of thermo-tactile stimulation of the skin in the presence of a liquid.
This chapter will provide an overview of the experimental framework and methods available to evaluate the biophysical and psychophysical responses to controlled dry and wet stimuli applied to skin, and the resulting wetness perception. We will use example scenarios of skin-moisture interactions (e.g., arising from contact with a wet surface or from sweat production), to critically evaluate the methods, noting their accuracy, reliability, and efficiency, and discuss their limitations and commonly encountered difficulties. It is hoped that these considerations will guide and further develop research of this relatively little-investigated, yet fundamental, aspect of somatosensation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vargas NT, Chapman CL, Johnson BD et al (2019) Exercise intensity independently modulates thermal behavior during exercise recovery but not during exercise. J Appl Physiol 126:1150–1159. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00992.2018
Gray M, Black JM, Baharestani MM et al (2011) Moisture-associated skin damage overview and pathophysiology. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs 38:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e318215f798
Filingeri D, Ackerley R (2017) The biology of skin wetness perception and its implications in manual function and for reproducing complex somatosensory signals in neuroprosthetics. J Neurophysiol 117:1761–1775. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00883.2016
Kim SM, Wang JW (2016) Hygrosensation: feeling wet and cold. Curr Biol 26:R408–R410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.040
Ackerley R, Kavounoudias A (2015) The role of tactile afference in shaping motor behaviour and implications for prosthetic innovation. Neuropsychologia 79:192–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.024
Ackerley R, Watkins RH (2018) Microneurography as a tool to study the function of individual C-fiber afferents in humans: responses from nociceptors, thermoreceptors, and mechanoreceptors. J Neurophysiol 120:2834–2846
Filingeri D, Havenith G (2017) Peripheral and central determinants of skin wetness sensing in humans. Temperature 2:86–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2015.1008878
Bentley I (1900) The synthetic experiment. Am J Phys 11:405–425. https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2001.23.2.29
Sullivan A (1923) The perceptions of liquidity, semi-liquidity and solidity. Am J Psychol 34:531–541
Zigler MJ (1923) An experimental study of the perception of stickiness. Am J Psychol 34:73–84. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.11.279
Zigler MJ (1923) An experimental study of the perception of clamminess. Am J Psychol 34:550–561
Cobbey LW, Sullivan AH (1922) An experimental study of the perception of oiliness. Am J Psychol 33:121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1413756
Demartine ML, Cussler EL (1975) Predicting subjective spreadability, viscosity, and stickiness. J Pharm Sci 64:976–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600640618
Gagge AP, Stolwijk JAJ, Hardy JD (1967) Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient temperatures. Environ Res 1:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-9351(67)90002-3
Sweeney MM, Branson DH (1990) Sensorial comfort: part I: a psychophysical method for assessing moisture sensation in clothing. Text Res J 60:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051759006000701
Sweeney MM, Branson DH (1990) Sensorial comfort part II: a magnitude estimation approach for assessing moisture sensation. Text Res J. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051759006000803
Merrick C, Rosati R, Filingeri D (2021) Skin wetness detection thresholds and wetness magnitude estimations of the human index fingerpad and their modulation by moisture temperature. J Neurophysiol 125:1987–1999. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00538.2020
Filingeri D, Fournet D, Hodder S, Havenith G (2014) Why wet feels wet? A neurophysiological model of human cutaneous wetness sensitivity. J Neurophysiol 112:1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00120.2014
Farage MA, Meyer S, Walter D (2004) Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products. Skin Res Technol 10:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00054.x
Humbert P, Ferial F, Agache P, Maibach HI (2017) Agache’s measuring the skin, 2nd edn. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham
Filingeri D, Fournet D, Hodder S, Havenith G (2014) Body mapping of cutaneous wetness perception across the human torso during thermo-neutral and warm environmental exposures. J Appl Physiol 117:887–897. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00535.2014
Vargas NT, Chapman CL, Johnson BD et al (2019) Thermal behavior alleviates thermal discomfort during steady-state exercise without affecting whole body heat loss. J Appl Physiol 127:984–994. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00379.2019
Ehrenstein W, Ehrenstein A (1999) Psychophysical methods. In: Windhorst U, Johansson H (eds) Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, Berlin, pp 128–157
Hatzfeld C, Kühner M, Söllner S et al (2017) Human perception measures for product design and development—a tutorial to measurement methods and analysis. Multimodal Technol Interact 1:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti1040028
Treutwein B (1995) Adaptive psychophysical procedures. Vis Res 35:2503–2522. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(95)00016-X
Breedlove SM, Rosenzweig MR, Watson NV (2007) Biological psychology : an introduction to behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience, 5th edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Peters A (2007) The effects of normal aging on nerve fibers and neuroglia in the central nervous system. In: Riddle D (ed) Brain aging: models, methods, and mechanisms. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Stevens JC, Choo KK (1996) Spatial acuity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 13:153–166
Stevens J, Choo K (1998) Temperature sensitivity of the body surface over the life span. Somatosens Mot Res 15:13–28
Ortiz A, Grando SA (2012) Smoking and the skin. Int J Dermatol 51:250–262
Yadav RL, Sharma D, Yadav PK et al (2016) Somatic neural alterations in non-diabetic obesity: a cross-sectional study. BMC Obes 3:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40608-016-0131-3
Schrieks I (2016) Influence of moderate alcohol consumption on emotional and physical well-being. Wageningen University
Valenza A, Bianco A, Filingeri D (2019) Thermosensory mapping of skin wetness sensitivity across the body of young males and females at rest and following maximal incremental running. J Physiol 597:3315–3332. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP277928
Filingeri D, Fournet D, Hodder S, Havenith G (2015) Tactile cues significantly modulate the perception of sweat-induced skin wetness independently of the level of physical skin wetness. J Neurophysiol 113:3462. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00141.2015
Green DM (1964) General prediction relating yes/no and forced/choice results. J Acoust Soc Am 36:1042–1042. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2143339
Schulman AJ, Mitchell RR (1966) Operating characteristics from yes/no and forced/choice procedures. J Acoust Soc Am 40:473–477. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1910098
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Merrick, C., Ackerley, R., Filingeri, D. (2023). Experimental Framework and Methods for the Assessment of Skin Wetness Sensing in Humans. In: Holmes, N.P. (eds) Somatosensory Research Methods. Neuromethods, vol 196. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3068-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3068-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3067-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3068-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols