Abstract
Structural variant detection by next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods have a higher molecular resolution than conventional cytogenetic techniques (Aypar et al., Eur J Haematol 102(1):87–96, 2019; Smadbeck et al., Blood Cancer J 9(12):103, 2019) and are particularly helpful in characterizing genomic rearrangements. Mate pair sequencing (MPseq) leverages a unique library preparation chemistry involving circularization of long DNA fragments, allowing for a unique application of paired-end sequencing of reads that are expected to map 2–5 kb apart in the genome. The unique orientation of the reads allows the user to estimate the location of breakpoints involved in a structural variant either within the sequenced reads or between the two reads. The precision of structural variant and copy number detection by this method allows for characterization of cryptic and complex rearrangements that may be otherwise undetectable by conventional cytogenetic methods (Singh et al., Leuk Lymphoma 60(5):1304–1307, 2019; Peterson et al., Blood Adv 3(8):1298–1302, 2019; Schultz et al., Leuk Lymphoma 61(4):975–978, 2020; Peterson et al., Mol Case Studies 5(2), 2019; Peterson et al., Mol Case Studies 5(3), 2019).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Watt JL, Page BM (1978) Reciprocal translocation and the Philadelphia chromosome. Hum Genet 42(2):163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00283636
Manolov G, Manolova Y, Klein G, Lenoir G, Levan A (1986) Alternative involvement of two cytogenetically distinguishable breakpoints on chromosome 8 in Burkitt’s lymphoma associated translocations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 20(1–2):95–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4608(86)90111-1
Zhang J, Meltzer P, Jenkins R, Guan XY, Trent J (1993) Application of chromosome microdissection probes for elucidation of BCR-ABL fusion and variant Philadelphia chromosome translocations in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 81(12):3365–3371
Aypar U, Smoley SA, Pitel BA, Pearce KE, Zenka RM, Vasmatzis G, Johnson SH, Smadbeck JB, Peterson JF, Geiersbach KB, Van Dyke DL, Thorland EC, Jenkins RB, Ketterling RP, Greipp PT, Kearney HM, Hoppman NL, Baughn LB (2019) Mate pair sequencing improves detection of genomic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia. Eur J Haematol 102(1):87–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13179
Smadbeck J, Peterson JF, Pearce KE, Pitel BA, Figueroa AL, Timm M, Jevremovic D, Shi M, Stewart AK, Braggio E, Riggs DL, Bergsagel PL, Vasmatzis G, Kearney HM, Hoppman NL, Ketterling RP, Kumar S, Rajkumar SV, Greipp PT, Baughn LB (2019) Mate pair sequencing outperforms fluorescence in situ hybridization in the genomic characterization of multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 9(12):103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-019-0255-z
Johnson SH, Smadbeck JB, Smoley SA, Gaitatzes A, Murphy SJ, Harris FR, Drucker TM, Zenka RM, Pitel BA, Rowsey RA, Hoppman NL, Aypar U, Sukov WR, Jenkins RB, Feldman AL, Kearney HM, Vasmatzis G (2018) SVAtools for junction detection of genome-wide chromosomal rearrangements by mate-pair sequencing (MPseq). Cancer Genet 221:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2017.11.009
Smadbeck JB, Johnson SH, Smoley SA, Gaitatzes A, Drucker TM, Zenka RM, Kosari F, Murphy SJ, Hoppman N, Aypar U, Sukov WR, Jenkins RB, Kearney HM, Feldman AL, Vasmatzis G (2018) Copy number variant analysis using genome-wide mate-pair sequencing. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 57(9):459–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.5
Drucker TM, Johnson SH, Murphy SJ, Cradic KW, Therneau TM, Vasmatzis G (2014) BIMA V3: an aligner customized for mate pair library sequencing. Bioinformatics 30(11):1627–1629. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu078
Singh ZN, Richards S, El Chaer F, Duong VH, Gudipati MA, Waters EO, Koon S, Webley M, Pitel B, Hoppman NL, Baer MR, Zou YS (2019) Cryptic ETV6–PDGFRB fusion in a highly complex rearrangement of chromosomes 1, 5, and 12 due to a chromothripsis-like event in a myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm. Leuk Lymphoma 60(5):1304–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2018.1480774
Peterson JF, Baughn LB, Ketterling RP, Pitel BA, Smoley SA, Vasmatzis G, Smadbeck JB, Greipp PT, Mangaonkar AA, Thompson CA, Parikh SA, Chen D, Viswanatha DS (2019) Characterization of a cryptic IGH/CCND1 rearrangement in a case of mantle cell lymphoma with negative CCND1 FISH studies. Blood Adv 3(8):1298–1302. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019031450
Schultz MJ, Blackburn PR, Cogbill CH, Pitel BA, Smadbeck JB, Johnson SH, Vasmatzis G, Rech KL, Sukov WR, Greipp PT, Hoppman NL, Baughn LB, Ketterling RP, Peterson JF (2020) Characterization of a cryptic PML-RARA fusion by mate-pair sequencing in a case of acute promyelocytic leukemia with a normal karyotype and negative RARA FISH studies. Leuk Lymphoma 61(4):975–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2019.1699081
Peterson JF, Pitel BA, Smoley SA, Smadbeck JB, Johnson SH, Vasmatzis G, Koon SJ, Webley MR, McGrath M, Bayerl MG, Baughn LB, Rowsey RA, Ketterling RP, Greipp PT, Hoppman NL (2019) Detection of a cryptic NUP214/ABL1 gene fusion by mate-pair sequencing (MPseq) in a newly diagnosed case of pediatric T-lymphoblastic leukemia. Mol Case Studies 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1101/mcs.a003533
Peterson JF, Pitel BA, Smoley SA, Vasmatzis G, Smadbeck JB, Greipp PT, Ketterling RP, Macon WR, Baughn LB (2019) Elucidating a false-negative MYC break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization probe study by next-generation sequencing in a patient with high-grade B-cell lymphoma with IGH/MYC and IGH/BCL2 rearrangements. Mol Case Studies 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1101/mcs.a004077
Petrackova A, Vasinek M, Sedlarikova L, Dyskova T, Schneiderova P, Novosad T, Papajik T, Kriegova E (2019) Standardization of sequencing coverage depth in NGS: recommendation for detection of clonal and subclonal mutations in cancer diagnostics. Front Oncol 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00851
Illumina (2019) HiSeq systems: denature and dilute libraries guide
Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754–1760. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
Hampton OA, English AC, Wang M, Salerno WJ, Liu Y, Muzny DM, Han Y, Wheeler DA, Worley KC, Lupski JR, Gibbs RA (2017) SVachra: a tool to identify genomic structural variation in mate pair sequencing data containing inward and outward facing reads. BMC Genomics 18(6):691. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4021-y
Paxton A (2019) Mate pair sequencing yields rich new data. CAP Today
Sexton CE, Han MV (2019) Paired-end mappability of transposable elements in the human genome. Mob DNA 10(1):29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-019-0172-5
Pitel BA, Sharma N, Zepeda-Mendoza C, Smadbeck JB, Pearce KE, Cook JM, Vasmatzis G, Sachs Z, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Viswanatha D, Xiao S, Jenkins RB, Xu X, Hoppman NL, Ketterling RP, Peterson JF, Greipp PT, Baughn LB (2021) Myeloid malignancies with 5q and 7q deletions are associated with extreme genomic complexity, biallelic TP53 variants, and very poor prognosis. Blood Cancer J 11(2):18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-021-00416-4
Van Nieuwerburgh F, Thompson RC, Ledesma J, Deforce D, Gaasterland T, Ordoukhanian P, Head SR (2011) Illumina mate-paired DNA sequencing-library preparation using Cre-Lox recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 40(3):e24–e24. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1000
Peng Z, Nath N, Zhao Z, Froula JL, Cheng JF, Chen F (2017) Preparing mate-paired Illumina libraries using cre recombinase. Methods Mol Biol 1642:247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7169-5_16
Zimmerman Zuckerman EOM, West B, Pitel B, Pearce K, Luoma I, Johnson S, Vasmatzis G, Baughn L, Hoppman N (2019) Liquid handling methods impact insert size and overall mate pair library quality. Association for Molecular Pathology Annual Meeting
Gudipati MA, Waters E, Greene C, Goel N, Hoppman NL, Pitel BA, Webley MR, Zou Y (2019) Stable transmission of complex chromosomal rearrangements involving chromosome 1q derived from constitutional chromoanagenesis. Mol Cytogenet 12(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-019-0455-z
Chan S, Lam E, Saghbini M, Bocklandt S, Hastie A, Cao H, Holmlin E, Borodkin M (2018) Structural variation detection and analysis using Bionano optical mapping. Methods Mol Biol 1833:193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8666-8_16
Merker JD, Wenger AM, Sneddon T, Grove M, Zappala Z, Fresard L, Waggott D, Utiramerur S, Hou Y, Smith KS, Montgomery SB, Wheeler M, Buchan JG, Lambert CC, Eng KS, Hickey L, Korlach J, Ford J, Ashley EA (2018) Long-read genome sequencing identifies causal structural variation in a Mendelian disease. Genet Med 20(1):159–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.86
Murphy SJ, Harris FR, Kosari F, Terra SBSP, Nasir A, Johnson SH, Serla V, Smadbeck JB, Halling GC, Karagouga G, Sukov WR, Leventakos K, Yang P, Peikert T, Mansfield AS, Wigle DA, Yi ES, Kipp BR, Vasmatzis G, Aubry MC (2019) Using genomics to differentiate multiple primaries from metastatic lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 14(9):1567–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2019.05.008
Bryce AH, Egan JB, Smadbeck JB, Johnson SH, Murphy SJ, Harris FR, Halling GC, Terra SBSP, Cheville J, Pagliaro L, Leibovich B, Costello BA, Vasmatzis G (2019) Shared and unique genomic structural variants of different histological components within testicular germ cell tumours identified with mate pair sequencing. Sci Rep 9(1):3586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39956-y
Murphy SJ, Aubry M-C, Harris FR, Halling GC, Johnson SH, Terra S, Drucker TM, Asiedu MK, Kipp BR, Yi ES, Peikert T, Yang P, Vasmatzis G, Wigle DA (2014) Identification of independent primary tumors and intrapulmonary metastases using DNA rearrangements in non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 32(36):4050–4058. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.56.7644
Kovtun IV, Cheville JC, Murphy SJ, Johnson SH, Zarei S, Kosari F, Sukov WR, Karnes RJ, Vasmatzis G (2013) Lineage relationship of Gleason patterns in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Cancer Res 73(11):3275–3284. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-12-2803
Duncavage EJ, Schroeder MC, O’Laughlin M, Wilson R, MacMillan S, Bohannon A, Kruchowski S, Garza J, Du F, Hughes AEO, Robinson J, Hughes E, Heath SE, Baty JD, Neidich J, Christopher MJ, Jacoby MA, Uy GL, Fulton RS, Miller CA, Payton JE, Link DC, Walter MJ, Westervelt P, DiPersio JF, Ley TJ, Spencer DH (2021) Genome sequencing as an alternative to cytogenetic analysis in myeloid cancers. N Engl J Med 384(10):924–935. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2024534
Chan EKF, Cameron DL, Petersen DC, Lyons RJ, Baldi BF, Papenfuss AT, Thomas DM, Hayes VM (2018) Optical mapping reveals a higher level of genomic architecture of chained fusions in cancer. Genome Res 28(5):726–738. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.227975.117
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Pitel, B.A., Zuckerman, E.Z., Baughn, L.B. (2023). Mate Pair Sequencing: Next-Generation Sequencing for Structural Variant Detection. In: Myers, M.B., Schandl, C.A. (eds) Clinical Applications of Nucleic Acid Amplification. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2621. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2950-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2950-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2949-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2950-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols