Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) lack well-defined secondary or tertiary structures in solution but are found to be involved in a wide range of critical cellular processes that highlight their functional importance. IDPs usually undergo folding upon binding to their targets. Such binding coupled to folding behavior has widened our perspective on the protein structure–dynamics–function paradigm in molecular biology. However, characterizing the folding upon binding mechanism of IDPs experimentally remains quite challenging. Molecular simulations emerge as a potentially powerful tool that offers information complementary to experiments. Here we present a general computational framework for the molecular simulations of IDP folding upon binding processes that combines all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) and coarse-grained simulations. The classical all-atom molecular dynamics approach using GPU acceleration allows the researcher to explore the properties of the IDP conformational ensemble, whereas coarse-grained structure-based models implemented with parameters carefully calibrated to available experimental measurements can be used to simulate the entire folding upon binding process. We also discuss a set of tools for the analysis of MD trajectories and describe the details of the computational protocol to follow so that it can be adapted by the user to study any IDP in isolation and in complex with partners.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wright PE, Dyson HJ (1999) Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol 293(2):321–331
Dunker AK, Lawson JD, Brown CJ, Williams RM, Romero P, Oh JS, Oldfield CJ, Campen AM, Ratliff CM, Hipps KW, Ausio J, Nissen MS, Reeves R, Kang C, Kissinger CR, Bailey RW, Griswold MD, Chiu W, Garner EC, Obradovic Z (2001) Intrinsically disordered protein. J Mol Graph Model 19(1):26–59
Tompa P (2002) Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 27(10):527–533
Papoian GA (2008) Proteins with weakly funneled energy landscapes challenge the classical structure–function paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(38):14237–14238
Obradovic Z, Peng K, Vucetic S, Radivojac P, Brown CJ, Dunker AK (2003) Predicting intrinsic disorder from amino acid sequence. Proteins 53(S6):566–572
Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffin LJ, Buxton BF, Jones DT (2004) Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 337(3):635–645
Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Iakoucheva LM, Obradovic Z (2002) Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 41(21):6573–6582
Shammas SL (2017) Mechanistic roles of protein disorder within transcription. Curr Opin Struct Biol 42:155–161
Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2005) Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6(3):197–208
DeForte S, Uversky VN (2016) Intrinsically disordered proteins in PubMed: what can the tip of the iceberg tell us about what lies below? RSC Adv 6(14):11513–11521
Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS (2009) Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 324(5924):203–207
Zhou H-X (2012) Intrinsic disorder: signaling via highly specific but short-lived association. Trends Biochem Sci 37(2):43–48
Teilum K, Olsen JG, Kragelund BB (2009) Functional aspects of protein flexibility. Cell Mol Life Sci 66(14):2231
Dunker AK, Garner E, Guilliot S, Romero P, Albrecht K, Hart J, Obradovic Z, Kissinger C, Villafranca JE (1998) Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations. Pac Symp Biocomput:473–484
Chu X, Wang J (2014) Specificity and affinity quantification of flexible recognition from underlying energy landscape topography. PLoS Comput Biol 10(8):e1003782
Shoemaker BA, Portman JJ, Wolynes PG (2000) Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the fly-casting mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(16):8868–8873
Huang Y, Liu Z (2009) Kinetic advantage of intrinsically disordered proteins in coupled folding–binding process: a critical assessment of the “fly-casting” mechanism. J Mol Biol 393(5):1143–1159
Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK (2005) Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling. J Mol Recognit 18(5):343–384
Pontius BW (1993) Close encounters: why unstructured, polymeric domains can increase rates of specific macromolecular association. Trends Biochem Sci 18(5):181–186
Umezawa K, Ohnuki J, Higo J, Takano M (2016) Intrinsic disorder accelerates dissociation rather than association. Proteins 84(8):1124–1133
Xie H, Vucetic S, Iakoucheva LM, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK, Obradovic Z, Uversky VN (2007) Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 3. Ligands, post-translational modifications, and diseases associated with intrinsically disordered proteins. J Proteome Res 6(5):1917–1932
Csizmok V, Follis AV, Kriwacki RW, Forman-Kay JD (2016) Dynamic protein interaction networks and new structural paradigms in signaling. Chem Rev 116(11):6424–6462
Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2002) Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12(1):54–60
Wright PE, Dyson HJ (2009) Linking folding and binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19(1):31–38
Koshland DE (1958) Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 44(2):98–104
Tsai C-J, Ma B, Nussinov R (1999) Folding and binding cascades: shifts in energy landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(18):9970–9972
Bosshard HR (2001) Molecular recognition by induced fit: how fit is the concept? Physiology 16(4):171–173
Csermely P, Palotai R, Nussinov R (2010) Induced fit, conformational selection and independent dynamic segments: an extended view of binding events. Trends Biochem Sci 35(10):539–546
Kiefhaber T, Bachmann A, Jensen KS (2012) Dynamics and mechanisms of coupled protein folding and binding reactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22(1):21–29
Okazaki K-I, Takada S (2008) Dynamic energy landscape view of coupled binding and protein conformational change: induced-fit versus population-shift mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(32):11182–11187
Zhou H-X (2010) From induced fit to conformational selection: a continuum of binding mechanism controlled by the timescale of conformational transitions. Biophys J 98(6):L15–L17
Hammes GG, Chang Y-C, Oas TG (2009) Conformational selection or induced fit: a flux description of reaction mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(33):13737–13741
Dyson HJ, Wright PE (1998) Equilibrium NMR studies of unfolded and partially folded proteins. Nat Struct Biol 5:499–503
Mukhopadhyay S, Krishnan R, Lemke EA, Lindquist S, Deniz AA (2007) A natively unfolded yeast prion monomer adopts an ensemble of collapsed and rapidly fluctuating structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(8):2649–2654
Eliezer D (2009) Biophysical characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19(1):23–30
Zhu F, Kapitan J, Tranter GE, Pudney PD, Isaacs NW, Hecht L, Barron LD (2008) Residual structure in disordered peptides and unfolded proteins from multivariate analysis and ab initio simulation of Raman optical activity data. Proteins 70(3):823–833
Fuxreiter M, Simon I, Friedrich P, Tompa P (2004) Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 338(5):1015–1026
Knott M, Best RB (2012) A preformed binding interface in the unbound ensemble of an intrinsically disordered protein: evidence from molecular simulations. PLoS Comput Biol 8(7):e1002605
Arai M, Sugase K, Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2015) Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins influence the mechanism of binding and folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(31):9614–9619
Chu X, Wang Y, Gan L, Bai Y, Han W, Wang E, Wang J (2012) Importance of electrostatic interactions in the association of intrinsically disordered histone chaperone Chz1 and histone H2A. Z-H2B. PLoS Comput Biol 8(7):e1002608
Iešmantavičius V, Dogan J, Jemth P, Teilum K, Kjaergaard M (2014) Helical propensity in an intrinsically disordered protein accelerates ligand binding. Angew Chem Int Ed 53(6):1548–1551
Rauscher S, Gapsys V, Gajda MJ, Zweckstetter M, de Groot BL, Grubmüller H (2015) Structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins depend strongly on force field: a comparison to experiment. J Chem Theory Comput 11(11):5513–5524
Best RB, Zheng W, Mittal J (2014) Balanced protein–water interactions improve properties of disordered proteins and non-specific protein association. J Chem Theory Comput 10(11):5113–5124
Huang J, Rauscher S, Nawrocki G, Ran T, Feig M, de Groot BL, Grubmüller H, MacKerell A (2017) CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat Methods 14(1):71–73
Best RB, Zhu X, Shim J, Lopes PE, Mittal J, Feig M, MacKerell AD Jr (2012) Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone ϕ, ψ and side-chain χ1 and χ2 dihedral angles. J Chem Theory Comput 8(9):3257–3273
Piana S, Lindorff-Larsen K, Shaw DE (2011) How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization? Biophys J 100(9):L47–L49
Piana S, Donchev AG, Robustelli P, Shaw DE (2015) Water dispersion interactions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states. J Phys Chem B 119(16):5113–5123
Shaw DE, Deneroff MM, Dror RO, Kuskin JS, Larson RH, Salmon JK, Young C, Batson B, Bowers KJ, Chao JC (2008) Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation. Commun ACM 51(7):91–97
Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE (2011) How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 334(6055):517–520
Lindorff-Larsen K, Trbovic N, Maragakis P, Piana S, Shaw DE (2012) Structure and dynamics of an unfolded protein examined by molecular dynamics simulation. J Am Chem Soc 134(8):3787–3791
Sugita Y, Okamoto Y (1999) Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett 314(1):141–151
Torrie GM, Valleau JP (1977) Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: umbrella sampling. J Comput Phys 23(2):187–199
Laio A, Parrinello M (2002) Escaping free-energy minima. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(20):12562–12566
Stanley N, Esteban-Martín S, De Fabritiis G (2014) Kinetic modulation of a disordered protein domain by phosphorylation. Nat Commun 5:ncomms6272
Bryngelson JD, Onuchic JN, Socci ND, Wolynes PG (1995) Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins 21(3):167–195
Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN (2000) Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and “en-route” intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol 298(5):937–953
Levy Y, Cho SS, Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG (2005) A survey of flexible protein binding mechanisms and their transition states using native topology based energy landscapes. J Mol Biol 346(4):1121–1145
Levy Y, Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG (2007) Fly-casting in protein-DNA binding: frustration between protein folding and electrostatics facilitates target recognition. J Am Chem Soc 129(4):738–739
Levy Y, Wolynes PG, Onuchic JN (2004) Protein topology determines binding mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(2):511–516
Chu X, Gan L, Wang E, Wang J (2013) Quantifying the topography of the intrinsic energy landscape of flexible biomolecular recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(26):E2342–E2351
De Sancho D, Best RB (2012) Modulation of an IDP binding mechanism and rates by helix propensity and non-native interactions: association of HIF1α with CBP. Mol BioSyst 8(1):256–267
Ganguly D, Chen J (2011) Topology-based modeling of intrinsically disordered proteins: balancing intrinsic folding and intermolecular interactions. Proteins 79(4):1251–1266
Turjanski AG, Gutkind JS, Best RB, Hummer G (2008) Binding-induced folding of a natively unstructured transcription factor. PLoS Comput Biol 4(4):e1000060
Wang J, Wang Y, Chu X, Hagen SJ, Han W, Wang E (2011) Multi-scaled explorations of binding-induced folding of intrinsically disordered protein inhibitor IA3 to its target enzyme. PLoS Comput Biol 7(4):e1001118
Van Der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJ (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 26(16):1701–1718
Tribello GA, Bonomi M, Branduardi D, Camilloni C, Bussi G (2014) PLUMED 2: new feathers for an old bird. Comput Phys Commun 185(2):604–613
Schrodinger, LLC (2015) The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8
Noel JK, Whitford PC, Sanbonmatsu KY, Onuchic JN (2010) SMOG@ ctbp: simplified deployment of structure-based models in GROMACS. Nucleic Acids Res 38(suppl 2):W657–W661
Radhakrishnan I, Pérez-Alvarado GC, Dyson HJ, Wright PE (1998) Conformational preferences in the Ser133-phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms of the kinase inducible transactivation domain of CREB. FEBS Lett 430(3):317–322
Radhakrishnan I, Pérez-Alvarado GC, Parker D, Dyson HJ, Montminy MR, Wright PE (1997) Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of CREB: a model for activator: coactivator interactions. Cell 91(6):741–752
Zor T, De Guzman RN, Dyson HJ, Wright PE (2004) Solution structure of the KIX domain of CBP bound to the transactivation domain of c-Myb. J Mol Biol 337(3):521–534
Zor T, Mayr BM, Dyson HJ, Montminy MR, Wright PE (2002) Roles of phosphorylation and helix propensity in the binding of the KIX domain of CREB-binding protein by constitutive (c-Myb) and inducible (CREB) activators. J Biol Chem 277(44):42241–42248
Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJ, Fraaije JG (1997) LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 18(12):1463–1472
Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M (2007) Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys 126(1):014101
Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 103(19):8577–8593
Parrinello M, Rahman A (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 52(12):7182–7190
Sobolev V, Sorokine A, Prilusky J, Abola EE, Edelman M (1999) Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics 15(4):327–332
Azia A, Levy Y (2009) Nonnative electrostatic interactions can modulate protein folding: molecular dynamics with a grain of salt. J Mol Biol 393(2):527–542
Givaty O, Levy Y (2009) Protein sliding along DNA: dynamics and structural characterization. J Mol Biol 385(4):1087–1097
Morrone A, Giri R, Brunori M, Gianni S (2012) Reassessing the folding of the KIX domain: evidence for a two-state mechanism. Protein Sci 21(11):1775–1779
Horng J-C, Tracz SM, Lumb KJ, Raleigh DP (2005) Slow folding of a three-helix protein via a compact intermediate. Biochemistry 44(2):627–634
Tollinger M, Kloiber K, Ágoston B, Dorigoni C, Lichtenecker R, Schmid W, Konrat R (2006) An isolated helix persists in a sparsely populated form of KIX under native conditions. Biochemistry 45(29):8885–8893
Wei Y, Horng J-C, Vendel AC, Raleigh DP, Lumb KJ (2003) Contribution to stability and folding of a buried polar residue at the CARM1 methylation site of the KIX domain of CBP. Biochemistry 42(23):7044–7049
Lifson S, Roig A (1961) On the theory of helix—coil transition in polypeptides. J Chem Res 34(6):1963–1974
Socci N, Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG (1996) Diffusive dynamics of the reaction coordinate for protein folding funnels. J Chem Res 104(15):5860–5868
Cho SS, Levy Y, Wolynes PG (2006) P versus Q: structural reaction coordinates capture protein folding on smooth landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(3):586–591
Oliveira RJ, Whitford PC, Chahine J, Wang J, Onuchic JN, Leite VB (2010) The origin of nonmonotonic complex behavior and the effects of nonnative interactions on the diffusive properties of protein folding. Biophys J 99(2):600–608
Šali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234(3):779–815
Chwastyk M, Bernaola AP, Cieplak M (2015) Statistical radii associated with amino acids to determine the contact map: fixing the structure of a type I cohesin domain in the clostridium thermocellum cellulosome. Phys Biol 12(4):046002
Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22(12):2577–2637
Veitshans T, Klimov D, Thirumalai D (1997) Protein folding kinetics: timescales, pathways and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties. Fold Des 2(1):1–22
Kouza M, Li MS, O'Brien EP, Hu C-K, Thirumalai D (2006) Effect of finite size on cooperativity and rates of protein folding. J Phys Chem A 110(2):671–676
Kumar S, Rosenberg JM, Bouzida D, Swendsen RH, Kollman PA (1992) The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method. J Comput Chem 13(8):1011–1021
Barducci A, Bussi G, Parrinello M (2008) Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method. Phys Rev Lett 100(2):020603
Sharma R, De Sancho D, Muñoz V (2017) Interplay between the folding mechanism and binding modes in folding coupled to binding processes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19(42):28512–28516
Huang Y, Liu Z (2010) Smoothing molecular interactions: the “kinetic buffer” effect of intrinsically disordered proteins. Proteins 78(16):3251–3259
Law SM, Gagnon JK, Mapp AK, Brooks CL (2014) Prepaying the entropic cost for allosteric regulation in KIX. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(33):12067–12072
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by Advanced Grant ERC-2012-ADG-323059 from the European Research Council to V. M. V. M. also acknowledges support from the Keck foundation, the CREST Center for Cellular and Biomolecular Machines (NSF-CREST-1547848) and the NSF (NSF-MCB-1616759).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Chu, X., Nagpal, S., Muñoz, V. (2022). Molecular Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Their Binding Mechanisms. In: Muñoz, V. (eds) Protein Folding. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2376. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1716-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1716-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1715-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1716-8
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols